IELTS Writing Samples

Response: Some people believe that the optimal goal of scientific works should be to enhance the quality of people's lives. While scientists should try to develope their knowledge in scientific subjects, I agree with the idea that it is most crucial to make improvments in our lives. On the one hand, it is vital for scientist to aquire more information about their area of specialization. One of their purposes can be expanding the knowledge they already have by doing more research and experiment. Finding new discoveries will change the perivious false information and contribute to gain a better understanding of the world, humans, and many other various unknown issues. For example, the information about the space has changed throughout human existance, and now we have more knowledge about planets, stars, and their characteristics. However, I believe enhancing people's lives is an essencial aim for scientist. One of the main aspects that should be improved is health problems. Scientific experiments should be done on viruses or other causes of illnesses in order to discover more effective medicine, so rapid recovery can be possible for patients. Additionaly, creating new machines for assisting doctors, operating in the safest way is crucial. For example, recently doctors are provided with the assisstance of robots for doing delicate operations. By doing these measures, risks to human's health will be reduced. Furthuremore, preserving the environment is important for us and even for the next generations. Scientific experiments can be done on fossil fuels for making them less harmful for humans. They also can find better ways of utilizing renewable sources of energy like solar, wind, and water power. This leades to a healthier air and cleaner water in our environment, which can maintain our health condition and plant for many years from now to future. In conclusion, scientists should work on obtaining new information about the science itselfe, while keeping the improvement of people's lives their most important aim.

Response: It is widely believed that employees’ weekends should be prolonged. I strongly agree with this notion, on the one condition that there is enough observance of how working hours are spent and how efficient the workforce is. On the one hand, based on recent research people’s job efficiency is totally affected by their mental status and as a result, the whole outcome of a typical company or on a larger scale, the country is influenced by an individual’s spirit. Being given a longer time to rest, staff feel a sense of being appreciated and consequently put more effort into doing tasks in a much flourishing way. They don’t resist working longer hours when needed if they are certain that their families receive the required attention and care for them and that their occupation does not disturb their family ties. On the other hand, decreasing working hours should not be interpreted as insignificance of the job. It needs to be cleared by the employers that being rewarded for leisure time means higher expectations of them regarding the hours spent by the staff at the office. If needed, the ones meeting the expectations should be given promotions and the other group ought to be punished either financially or by being obliged to spend more time at the workplace to do their assigned duties. In conclusion, it is a fabulous opinion to support working individuals by giving them time to do their favourite activities and have fun with their loved ones; however, strong observing measures need to be taken to have the best possible result.

Response: Nowadays, people argue about that the main environmental problem of today’s world could be the loss of special types of plants and animals or other important issues.This essay will explain that the most important environmental problem could be global warmth, while explaining the other point of view and provides relevant examples. Recent decate principle environmental issue is death of particular plants and animals. Lack of variety of different type of plants can lead to decrease of food supplements for animals that use vegetables as the main source of energy. Consecuensly , these animals became vulnerable and die which leads to more decrease on energy source for other animals. that finally, the food chain will move to different pathway and some species rapidly increase in number and some totally extinc. Increase the temperature of earth, could be the most important environment problem. Melted icebergs lead to rising the level of sea and ocean, while, directly affect the weather. This change can harmed the landscapes and living critures on it. For instance, earthquick and tsunamis rapidly increased in recent years due to the climate change that destroyed islands and costal cities which are unrepairable and cost a lot on human being. In my opinion, the earth warming is the most important environmental issue that has direct effect of the disappearing of some types of plants and animals that influence human life.For example, climate change in amazon jungle leads to the loss of kind of trees and animals that meant to the sudden increase of other kinds and interrupt the natural cycle so, governments, by the help of scientists, need to put special efford on some species to prevent further global disasters. To conclute, while it is true to say that the loss of some kind of plants and animals is one of the most important environment issues that needs to pay attention but in my point of view, other environmental problems like global warming is the main problem that seek to more attention from individuals.

Response: These days, due to changes in humankind’s way of life, the Earth is facing some serious environmental problems. While some believe that the main environmental problem is the loss of particular species of plants and animals, I agree with those who feel that there are more important environmental problems. On the one hand, the loss of particular species of plants and animals is said to be the main environmental problem of our time. Firstly, it could be argued that this may affect ecosystems. For example, the water purification process directly connected to some marine creatures would be disturbed. Similarly, our climate regulation that follows from a specific plant may be affected. Moreover, some people believe that medical resources might be affected by the loss of these species, and agricultural diversity would be decreased to a limited number. In other words, a specific type of plant that used to be used in producing a medicine will not be available. On the other hand, I firmly believe that there are more important environmental problems. Firstly, I would argue that one important issue is resource depletion; overuse of water and soil degradation are two examples. How do these problems threaten sustainability and human survival? The next problem is pollution. Personally, I believe that plastic and water pollution are some of the far-reaching problems that humans face. Water pollution makes marine creatures poisoned, and this may affect the food chain. Consequently, this process causes damage to our health. Finally, and most importantly, is climate change. It directly affects all aspects of life and the Earth. For example, crop shortages, extreme weather, and rising sea levels are the most significant impacts of climate change. All of this being said, although the loss of particular plants and animals may affect ecosystems, there are many more important problems that should be considered. Therefore, on balance, I believe that climate change is the issue we should focus on.

Response: People live in different situations ranging from very rich to very poor, and they have different attitudes about their lives. However, while some believe that it is best to accept a bad situation, I agree with those who feel that trying to improve such situations is always a better idea. On the one hand, it could be argued that accepting bad situations may have some benefits. Firstly, this may reduce unnecessary stress. Take money as an example, when people struggle to earn more money they may suffer some stress, but when they accept that they are poor, they will live according to that amount, and they may naturally experience less stress. Second, being in an unpleasant situation generally cultivates patience and resilience individually. Moreover, accepting a bad situation usually focusing on gratitude for what they have. Similarly, they may feel satisfaction during life. On the other hand, in my opinion, it is always better to try and improve a bad situation. Personally, I feel that striving for change may lead to personal growth and development. In other words, when individuals try to make their lives better, this process usually leads to personal development. Moreover, seeking alternatives for bad situations often accompanies other opportunities. For instance, consider a person who is dissatisfied with his job, if he wants to change his job, he may find very good working conditions. The most important factor is fulfilment. In other words, the more achievements you gain, the more fulfilment you experience. The sense of accomplishment after reaching what you want is highly regarded. All of this being said, although accepting bad situations may reduce stress, it may also bring more achievements. Therefore, on balance, I believe that trying to improve a bad situation is always better than accepting it.

Response: Nowadays, people do have access to means of transportation and can transfer easily from time to time. While some believe that professionals, such as doctors and engineers should be free to work in other countries, I, however, firmly believe that experts need to work in the country where they did their training. Some people believe that professionals should be free to work in other countries. It could be argued that experts who work in another country can bring their expertise to bear on global issues. For example, a doctor can concentrate on infectious diseases on a global scale. Some believe that when someone works in a different community, they can learn from other cultures. Consequently, this process of working abroad may broaden their knowledge and might be effective in some ways. On the other hand, I completely believe that professionals should work in an environment where they are trained. First, they acquired their skills according to their country’s standards. For example, the rules of construction vary from country to country, and it is good for engineers to work in their own country. Second, experts are more familiar with their own country’s environment. Similarly, they may be more comfortable with their colleagues. For example, not only are lawyers trained in their own country’s rules, but they also can interact easily with their countrymen. The third and most important factor is that they should repay the country that invested in their education. In other words, they have had free education and now it is time for them to repay the government for the cost of their education by working in the country where they studied. All of this being said, although working in another country may lead experts to focus on global issues, it is good for professionals to stay in their own country to pay off government investment in training. Therefore, on balance, I wholeheartedly believe that professionals should stay in their own country, and work in their own community.

Response: Nowadays, people do have access to transportation means and can transfer easily from time to time. While some believe that professionals, such as doctors and engineers should be free to work in other countries, I, however, firmly believe that experts need to work in the country they did their training. Some people believe that professionals should be free to work in other countries. It could be argued that experts who work in another country can bring expertise to bear on global issues. For example, a doctor can concentrate on infectious diseases in the scale of the world. Some believe that when someone works in a different community, they can learn from other cultures. Consequently, this process of working abroad may broaden their knowledge and might be effective in some ways. On the other hand, I completely believe that professionals should work in the environment that they had trained. First, they acquired their skills according to their country’s standards. For example, the rules of construction vary from country to country, and it is good for engineers to work in their own country. Second, experts are more familiar with their own country’s environment. Similarly, they may be more convenient with their colleague. For example, not only are lawyers trained with their own country’s rules, but they also can interact easily with their countrymen. The third and most important factor is that they should repay the country that invested in their education. In other words, they have had free education and now it is time for them to repay the government for the cost of their education by working in the country where they studied. All of this being said, although working in another country may lead experts to focus on global issues, it is good for professionals to stay in their own country to pay off government investment in training. Therefore, on balance, I wholeheartedly believe that professionals should stay in their own country, and work in their own community.

Response: There a view that an effective method to gather people from various cultures and age groups together is by using music. I firmly agree with this statement and in this essay I will discuss the reasons for it. To begin with, it is important to acknowledge that music can be utilized in different ways to promote unity among people from different traditions. For example, in musical festivals, not only many fans of various artists from different countries have an opportunity to attend in their favorite musicians’ concerts but also they can enjoy a shared musical experience with others. To illustrate, Selena Gomez is a famous singer who annually arrange massive tour shows in many countries, and thousands of people from different nations and cultures usually participate to her concerts, thus to share a common interest and bond with other people who also support the same artist. As for different age groups, the vast majority of young generation are increasingly becoming interested in old songs. This is because while the internet and social media play a crucial role on teenagers’ music tastes, a lot of old music have gained so much popularity on TikTok and Instagram these days. For instance, rock music from 1960s are trending today’s, leading teenagers connect with that era, and learn more about the previous generations. This could result in a stronger bond between the youth and their elders, as they can now enjoy the same songs and have more subjects of conversation. In conclusion, I completely agree that music is a great approach which can build a strong connection between younger generations and the older ones, and also gather many people from all around the world together, therefore breaking down the barriers between different cultures.

Response: Nowadays, due to consumption of excessive amounts of sugar which are found in packaged food and drink products, a significant proportion of people suffer from health disorders. It is said that if sugary products cost increases, it motivates individuals to cut down on sugar consumption. While this notion can be sometimes beneficial, I completely disagree with that. To begin with, experts argue that the only group who benefits from increasing the price is brands and manufacturers because they usually produce a low-quality product which not contain high levels of nutrients. The only thing that they focus on is enhancing the packaging and taste to finally increase their sells and profits. Unfortunately customers who are addicted to sugary food strive to spend a significant part of their salary to purchase them at all cost without considering how much money they are wasting. Second, raising the price can have detrimental effects on economy. Since many of these products are made overseas, governments have to spend a large number of their annual budgets to import these kinds of goods or the primary ingredients which are used to manufacture these products. It not only cause a great deal of budget are wasted on unnecessary items, but also it will cause many health disorders such as obesity and diabetes. In conclusion, increasing the price cannot be a deterrent against the consumption of sugary food due to encouraging companies and brands to produce a rubbish which only attract addicted consumers. Moreover, with increasing the price, governments will lose a huge amount of money to import unnecessary materials which are hazardous for the well-being of society.

Response: Some individuals argue that advertising is highly effective at convincing us to make purchase. In contrast, others believe that advertising has become so pervasive that we have grown indifferent to it. Although advertising has become prevalent, l believe that it still can grabs our attentions and is very successful at enticing us to buy products. On the one hand, the proponents of advertising believe that it is greatly efficient at encouraging us to buy things. The most compelling reason justifying this assertion is that advertising can influence on people’s emotion by using some useful strategies, making it a significant tool for brands. For example, if companies want to reach more customers, they can use celebrity endorsement, an important contributor at giving products an exaggerated account, leading to turning us into impulsive buyers. In other words, advertising can use as a method of promotion which is very beneficial for us, helping us to distinguish inferior products from quality ones, resulting in spurring us to buy the goods. On the other hands, others assert that advertising is so prevalent so it is no longer important for us. This is because nowadays advertisement is seen everywhere such as billboards, televisions, and social media. That is to say, due to the susceptible to a wide range of advertising, we will try to stay alert to the influence of advertising. For instance, if we want to watch a movie, we will encounter an array of advertisement during movie which is often annoying and distracting, leading to choosing sites, not including them. Therefore, we will be less receptive to attention-grabbing advertising messages. In conclusion, while advertising exists everywhere and it is so widespread, l firmly believe that advertising not only can tempts us to buy the product but it also grabs our attention due to using persuasive methods, such as celebrity endorsement, and targeting customer’s emotions.