This section presents a professionally wirtten variation of your essay and highlights the differences.
It is considered by many individuals that skilled people should remain in locations where they improved their talents, in contrast, others argue that they shoud make decision about where they desire for living. I believe that they must choose their favorite place for living.
On the one hand, there are some reasons why many individuals oblige professional workers have to mantain in nations they learned crafts, also it is seen as fundamental help for organizations which gave services to improve these skilled people. Firstly, those nations where are donating various scholarships to students, have some expections that students must remain in their areas and return these investments on organizations, even these countries are not developed. Secondly, everyone should play a significant role in developing regions where they grow and received facilities, and people believe it is their responsibilities, Finally, skillful individuals are capable of enhancing other people's welfare situations, for example, engineers can sell their ideas cheaper to that regions they grew to reduce poverty rather than expensive to others.
On the other hand, few factors mentioned to support the first opinion that said professional experts have to maintain in their initial place where they received services, but I agree they can select everwhere they prefer to go. For example, they are not forced to waste their lives where they can not grow faster. Moreover, several governments do not pay enough attention to skilled people and the best strategy is migrating to other advanced nations.
In conclusion, different opinions are regarding to the future of professional experts, I am convinced that they should make decisions according to their resolutions, if they want they can spend their time on countries they got skilled or other countries where they prefered.
Here is the corrected version:
Many people believe skilled individuals should remain in the countries where they developed their talents, while others argue they should be free to choose where to live. I believe professionals should have the freedom to select their preferred location.
On one hand, there are valid reasons why some argue professionals should stay where they were trained. Countries that invest in education through scholarships often expect graduates to contribute locally, repaying this investment. This is particularly important in developing nations where skilled workers are scarce. Additionally, professionals have a moral obligation to support communities that nurtured their growth. For example, engineers could implement affordable solutions in their home regions to alleviate poverty rather than offering expensive services elsewhere.
On the other hand, I support the view that professionals should choose their place of residence freely. They should not be forced to remain in environments that limit their growth potential. Furthermore, when governments fail to properly value skilled workers, migration to more developed nations may be the most practical solution.
In conclusion, while opinions differ regarding where professionals should work, I firmly believe they should have the freedom to decide based on personal circumstances. They may choose to contribute to their home country or pursue opportunities elsewhere according to their preferences.