IELTS Writing Samples

Response: There is an ongoing debate about how effectiveness of advertisement. While some argue that nowadays these commercials are no longer have their impacts on individuals, others advocate for the significant effects of advertisement. In my view, advertising still has its effective strategies to influence people. On the one hand, it is undeniable true that people easily purchase goods based on the advertisement that they watched. The science of experts who create them is a major reason for power of advertising. Most of them are industrial psychologists who studied human behaviours and the techniques of persuading people. In this way, they know the exact colors and words to attract customers, and even their needs are obvious to them. Additionally, in the wake of technological advancements, individuals have access to many online platforms, such as Instagram, YouTube and TikTok, which make it easy to advertising agency to draw different group of customers. On the other hand , despite above arguments, other group argue that because of the public awareness of On the other hand, despite above arguments, other group argue that because of the public awareness of these commercial's facts, they are not being affected by them. First of all, people notice that advertisements are not always show the truth of the products, they are actually some special effects, for example, the fast-food restaurants, their food advertised images are not often quiet the same as the reality. Moreover, as individuals face too many commercial breaks on different platforms, theses advertisements have become far normal for viewers, 5o they prefer to skip instead of watching them or purchase the premium version to avoid advertising. In conclusion, people hold different views on whether advertising has still its power to attract customers or not. Although some believe that people aware that advertisements are sometimes hide the truth, therefore they will not be affected, others argue that the methods are used on advertising meet the market demands. lassert that commercial advertising has the most vital impact on the humans.

Response: These days, the majority of people with healthy issues prefer to use alternative medicines and treatments rather than meeting their usual doctors. I firmly believe that it will have detrimental effects on peoples’ health and it is not a positive development due to several reasons that I will mention in this essay. To begin with, one reason why using alternative treatments instead of visiting doctors a negative development is that it will have detriment effects on people’s health. When people are struggling with health issues, they will require to be examined, and doctors diagnose their main problems. If they try alternative medicines, they will be more likely to pose a difficulty in doctor’s diagnosis. For example, people struggling with high blood pressure, a dangerous disease, for example; if they not been treated by doctors can lead to serious problems such as stroke, heart disease as some alternative medicines may not be experimented by scientist and have serious side effects for people who suffer from high blood pressures. Moreover, another reason that if illnesses try to use alternative medicines instead of meeting their doctors is not a positive development is that it can undermine medical professionals. When illnesses use unknown medicines, they may get good results in some situations without knowing about their side effects, leading to destroying trust among people and doctors as they think their health issues get over completely. Take some herbal medicines such as ginger which are useful for health issues sometimes, for example; it can give people a sense of healing temporary, making people think their problem have been ameliorate and it is not essential to meet doctor. In conclusion, I firmly believe that using alternative medicines and treatments can be a negative development due to its potential to pose a threaten on people’s health as an abundant of them have not been experimented and it can adversely affect medical professionals and people may not trust in doctors easily.

Response: There is an ongoing debate about whether professionals should stay in the place where they have learned their qualifications, or they should be free to change their locations and choose anywhere they prefer to work. Some people have always been passionate about helping their peers and they believe that everybody has to serve people from their homtown and their country. Governments provide facilities to invest on different majors, and people who have the opportunity to increase their skills, should make it up in the future by using their abillities in order to support country. For instance, when studentst study medicine at the university, they participate in the classes to increase their knowledge, Moreover, there are free accesses to laboaotories and equipments which help them to foster their talents. The point is that lots of these thins are provided by taxes, and ordinary people pay these taxe. So when they graduate as medical doctors, they owe to the society to support them with health and care services On the other hand, others mention that human is created free and they have the authority to do whatever they want and to live whenever they like. They say that is not fair to obligate them to live in a certain place jut because they have been trained there. For example, consider a baby which was born in remote place in the world, he tried hard to make progresses in his career, now he is able to travel to the developed countries and enjoy his achivements in new location. It is something that should not be judged. From my perspective, every individual is responsible for their lives. There must not be any obligation about these kind of decisions. it is crucial to respect each idea and give the autorithy to everyone to determine their routes in life.

Response: An increasing number of people are using e-books and podcasts rather than printed books. It is argued that printed books and newspapers will disappear in the future. I believe that the convenience and affordability of online reading may result in the deletion of printed ones. To begin with, there is no limitation to reading by technology. People can easily search in a variety of online libraries and start to read their favorite books, so cutting-edge technology has provided convenient reading. When individuals can read various books without carrying them, they will be more inclined to use technology. For example, students can have all of the school books on a phone, while they are traveling or there is no access to the original books. Although these portable books may lead to staring at screens for a long time, I reckon that using technology in an appropriate way prevents diseases. Furthermore, expensive books in libraries could be freely purchased. Online reading reduces the necessity of paying too much money. Therefore, there is access to any book which was impossible for some people to buy. When students can read various books, they will be more informed about subjects and consequently, more capable in school. Moreover, online books have provided opportunities for people at work. For instance, reading books on a break at work not only brings a sense of productivity but also improves the per capita reading in countries. To conclude, I strongly agree that accessible and affordable books may result in the disappearance of printed newspapers and printed books; however, these online books may bring some problems such as blurred vision.

Response: It is an imperative for mankind to save money for future, and I align myself with this statement. These days, saving money seems unimportant and hard. People work to live better lives but the amount of their salaries might not be as much as they need. Sometimes incomes are not sufficient for living conveniently. Consequently, people don't have enough money to save for future. More over, young people that has just started to work, don't get paid enough to save extra money. Take university students as an example. They need to pay for their education and if they receive extra money, it won't be helpful due to high amount of purchase they have. But what if an unpredictable thing happens to them? On the other hand, people should always separate a part of their salary for future. Firstly, if you force yourself not to buy unnecessary stuff or not to go on unnecessary trips, you can save some money. When you are not prepared for an unpredictable event, this money would save you. Secondly, without saving money, you would not have the ability to buy expensive things. For instance when you decide to buy a house you need to save money for years in order to be prepared. Finally, saving money may allows you to change your job whenever you want. Indeed when you have some money saved, it allows you to be unemployement for a while, until you find the best career without rush. In conclusion, although it might seem hard or sometimes impossible to save money, it is beneficial and sometimes crucial.

Response: In the contemporary era, the technology has witnessed an unprecedented surge, reflecting a significant shift in people’s habits. Nowadays, smartphones have changed the face of world and we see children spend a vast amount of time on smartphones. I argue that the negative consequences of using digital devises, particularly in term of social and personal life, far outweigh the benefits, making it a largely detrimental breakthrough. Many researchers believe that the paramount importance of spending many hours in smartphones is related to social media because they allow them to establish cross-cultural friendships and also deep connections. So, they can get familiar with different individuals and it give them a sense of joy. Moreover, as technology develops nothing remains unchanged and the way children attend class is no exception. Many proponents argue that one of the main reasons of spending a lot of time on these cold-hard digital devises is due to the growth of online class. A debate has emerged about whether smart phones are detrimental or not. Many supporters opine it can be beneficial in some aspects such as online education, and provide opportunities for those children that do not assess in quality training. While many proponents think a number of deficiencies are associated with using smart phones. For instance, it can be significantly perilous for children health, affecting not only mental health but also physical. They say loudly setting for a long hours while children using their smart gadgets can lead to dire consequences such as obesity, poor eyesight and spinal-related problems. Furthermore, in terms of mental issues a large number of scientists believe it may result in isolation. In conclusion, times have changed and the ways of living have as well. These days, many children spend many time on smart phones and online education and social media are two crucial factors that contributes in this phenomenon. While many assert that it can be worthwhile, I firmly believe that the multitude of drawbacks derived from using a lot from digital devises do not represent a viable approach.

Response: In certain nations, owning a home instead of renting is deemed a matter of significant importance for individuals. Were I to express my opinion, I would say the same is true in my country, mainly because of the drop in the value of our currency. Moreover, in my opinion, the need to allocate time for paying rent and the stress caused by monthly rental payment can be overwhelming, whereas homeowners do not face such issues. To begin with, I must say in countries like mine, Islamic republic of Iran, the value of currency decreases every day, making it impossible to purchase high-priced assets like houses. As a result, if someone has a fixed amount of money, they might be able to purchase home with it this year; next year, however, they may not even be able to afford a car with the same amount. Thus, renting home is just a temporary cure, and after some years, paying rent will surely be impossible. Furthermore, renting a house requires a monthly considerable amount of funds, which can sometimes be a quite high. Not only do you need to make sure that you pay it on time, but you also face the constant stress wondering whether you will make it or not. My mother, for instance, is a homeowner and she is used to save money monthly, and purchase gold to keep her savings value, and by the end of the year, convert the gold into a property. As a result, she has no stress about her wealth; my aunt, on the other hand, lives in a renting home, and always has anxiety thinking about the next month rental payment, and I cannot remember her being relaxed at all. Therefore, it can be concluded that in certain countries, which the currency’s value lessen daily, renting home does not seem reasonable, and will merely add to existing concerns of life.

Response: Some students prefer to learn new lessons apart from their main subjects, while others believe that it is more essential to allocate all their time to studying for a qualification. Although learning new skills can be beneficial, I believe that focusing on main subjects can be more significant for students’ career prospects. On the one hand, the most compelling reason why students tend to learn new subjects is that it will lead them to personal development. If students gainnew skills, they will be more talented in various fields, leading to improvement in their confidence. For example, some students often try to learn a new language such as English, an international language, which is crucial for maintaining international interactions. Improving communication skills not only can boost their confidence but also makes them acquire more competence in every aspect of their lives. On the other hand, the reason supporting this notion that students should focus on their main subjects and allocate all their time to it is that it can provide more job opportunities for them. The more students allot their time to studying an ability, the more proffesional they will be at it. As they are more unlikely to be distracted by other subjects, they can improve their efficiency and productivity. Take students studying medicine, an important job for maintaining public health, for example; if they want to engage in learning a new subject such as art, they might not be successful in medicine; in contrast, focusing on their main subjects makes them more highly skilled, which is an important factor in offering more job opportunities. In conclusion, while learning new subjects helps students improve their interpersonal skills, it is more beneficial for them to allot all their attention to studying their main subjects as it can make them more professional and provide them with more job opportunities.

Response: Some students prefer to learn new lessons apart from their main subjects, while others believe that it is more essential to allocate all their time to studying for a qualification. Although learning new skills can be beneficial, l believe that focusing on main subjects can be more significant for students’ career prospects. On one hand, the most compelling reason why students tend to learn new subjects is that it will lead them to personal developments. If students gain new skills, they will be more talented in various fields. Leading to improvement in their confidence. For example, some students often try to learn new language such as English, an international language, which is crucial for maintaining international interactions. Improving communication skills not only can boost their confidence but it also makes them acquire more competence in every aspects of their lives. On the other hand, the reason supporting this notion that students should focus on their main subjects and allocate all their time to it is that it can provide more job opportunities for them. The more students allot their time to studying an ability, the more they will be professional at it. As they can be more unlikely to be distracted by other subjects, they can improve their efficiency and productivity. Take students studying medicine, an important job for maintaining public health, for example; if they want to engage in learning new subject such as art, they could not be successful in medicine; in contrast, focusing on their main subjects makes them more highly-skilled, which is an important factor in offering more job opportunities. In conclusion, while learning new subjects help students improve their interpersonal skills, it is more beneficial for them to allot all their attention to studying for main subjects as it can make them more professional and provide them with more job opportunities.

Response: It is an imperative for mankind to save money for future, and I align my self with this statement. These day saving money seems unimportant and hard. People work to live better lives but the amount of their salaries might not be as much as they need. Some times incomes are not sufficient for living conveniently. Consequently, people don't have enough money to save for future. More over, young people that has just started to work, don't get paid enough to save extra money. Take university students as an example. They need to pay for their education and if they receive extra money, it won't be helpful due to high amount of purchase they have. But what if an unpredictable thing happens to them? On the other hand, people should always separate a part of their salary for future. Firstly, if you force yourself not to buy unnecessary stuff or not to go on unnecessary trips, you can save some money. When you are not prepared for an unpredictable event, this money would save you. Secondly, without saving money, you would not have the ability to buy expensive things. For instance when you decide to buy a house you need to save money for years in order to be prepared. Finally, saving money may allows you to change your job whenever you want. Indeed when you have some money saved, it allows you to be unemployement for a while, until you find the best career without rush. In conclusion, although it might seem hard or sometimes impossible to save money, it is beneficial and sometimes crucial.