IELTS Writing Samples

Response: Nowadays, everyone is surrounded by advertising which leads them to be more and more consumer. As a result, it is very difficult for the young people to save their income. While, saving money is a difficult task, it has numerus benefits for people’s lives. This essay completely agrees with the idea that individuals should save their money. This matter will be further elaborated on by scrutinizing following topics: saving money for long-term and short-term purposes in the future. On the one hand, some believe that every one, especially young people have to save their money for their retirement periods. Although, in some countries, governments support old people, in this period, individuals need to be in safe financial conditions, due to their saving. For example, some health problems are not supported by the insurance, so people have to pay their money for the treatments. In addition, in this age, people are struggling with some mental issues due to lack of outdoor activities and entertainment, so they can invest their saving to boost their mental health, including, going on a trip and participating in entertainment groups. Moreover, not only does saving money have certain advantages for the retirement, but it also has some benefits during the youth period. For instance, young people can save their money to invest it on improving both their personality skills and life conditions, such as learning new skills, buying a new house and having new experiences, then the quality of their lives can be increased during the time. It can be mentioned that young people should be taught to learn how they can manage their income. In conclusion, this essay has elaborated on why saving money has significant roles in old and young people’s lives. It has explained it that old people life depends on their saving for solving both the mental and physical health and young people can use their saving to develop their current conditions.

Response: In the contemporary era, the phenomenon of migration of professionals has witnessed an unprecedented surge. There are varying views on that professionals should not be free to work wherever they want, and many believe they should be in the service of the location that train them. I argue that the negative consequences of forcing professionals to stay in the country where they have studied, particularly in terms of personal choices and social impacts, far outweigh benefits, making it a detrimental approach. On the one hand, many proponents of mandatory work place claim that a vast amount of money should be spent until professionals become expert, and this money often provide by individuals tax. Therefore, professionals have a huge responsibility to work for people that make them unable to study. Furthermore, they assert that professionals usually opt for developed countries provided that they have right to choose the country owing to better work condition. As a result, poor countries that prepare experts cannot use the knowledge of them, and they cannot progress. On the other hand, numerous proponents contend that imposing such requirements infringes on the professionals' autonomy to make independent choices. They advocate instead for an approach that presents both sides of the debate, empowering professionals to make a informed and voluntary decisions rather than obligating them to choose one side. A poignant example can be found in a survey conducted in Iran, which revealed that obligating experts who studied a lot and have a strong credentials to stay in country is an overly simplistic approach that can be effective. Moreover, a growing number of research has shown, as professionals not be free to choose freely, they cannot work properly, resulting in decreasing useful hours of work. In conclusion, while many declare that professionals such as doctors and engineers, should be work in the country where they learn to be expert, many opine they should be free to make decision where they want to work. I firmly believe that they should be free to choose.

Response: There is an ongoing debate about the effectiveness of advertisements. While some argue that nowadays these commercials no longer have their impact on individuals, others advocate for the significant effects of advertisement. In my view, advertising still has its effective strategies to influence people. On the one hand, it is undeniably true that people easily purchase goods based on the advertisement they watched. The expertise of those who create them is a major reason for power of advertising. Most of them are industrial psychologists who study human behavior and the techniques of persuading people. In this way, they know the exact colours and words to attract customers, and even their needs are obvious to them. Additionally, in the wake of technological advancements, individuals have access to many online platforms, such as Instagram, YouTube and TikTok, which make it easy for advertising agencies to draw different group of customers. On the other hand, despite the above arguments, another group argues that because of public awareness of these commercials’ facts, they are not being affected by them. First of all, people notice that advertisements do not always show the truth of the products; they use special effects. For example, in fast-food restaurants, the advertised images of their food are not often quite the same as reality. Moreover, as individuals face too many commercial breaks on different platforms, these advertisements have become far too normal for viewers, so they prefer to skip them or purchase the premium version to avoid advertising. In conclusion, people hold different views on whether advertising has still its power to attract customers or not. Although some believe that people aware that advertisements sometimes hide the truth, therefore they will not be affected, others argue that the methods used in advertising meet market demands. I assert that commercial advertising has the most vital impact on humans.

Response: There is an ongoing debate about whether it is better to take care of ourselves when we are sick and use from housemade treatments, or we have to see doctors and ask for their counsoalts. In today's digital era, everybody has an easy access to sheer number of information through internet and social platforms . Besides that, people awarenesses have been increased over the passed decades. The more people recieve higher education degrees, the more knowledgable they are about different categories including medical treatments and medicines. Moreover, people learn from their expriances, for instance, every individual gets cold several times a year, and based on the previous expriences, they are aware that medical doctors usually offer the same medicines for some sort of colds, so they prefer to use their own treatments. Opposed that, other believe that, firstly, alternative medicines and treatments are not an intellectual way to treat ourselfs. They refer to developing countries which because of uncontroled usage of antibiotics, the resistance against antibiotic has been increased in their bodies and it is a terrible implication of their wrong behaviours. Secondly, alternative medicines may be effective in some cases, but they could have medical interferences with other kinds of drug, and consequently, it could lead to undeniable hurts. From my perspective, every person is responsible for the health of the community which is consisted of us, and the way we act has a direct and indirect impacts on the further generations. We have to visit doctors whenever it is needed and use doctors' updated knowledge to recieve the best medication.

Response: There is a global trend in which dwellers migrate from country side to cities. As a result, the proportion of people living in rural areas decreases. I think it's a negative development due to several factors. On one hand, there are many elements that encourage people to move to metropolises. As there might not be enough facilities, many people prefer to leave. For instance, educational facilities are not advance in small villages. Consequently, when you try to have self development, moving to cities makes it possible. More over, living in a city allows you to benefit from convenient public transportation, which country side might be deprived of. So if you don't own a vehicle, commuting in rural areas may be impossible. But it doesn't seem reasonable if we only care about individuals and not the problems that it may cause. On the other hand, when rural people leave their home town, this action leads to significant problems. Firstly, agriculture is going to be consigned to oblivion as there are no farmers in towns. The lack of agriculture may be felt by both rural and urban people. As fields and farms may be left, the soil may be eroded. Moreover, cities have capacities. Thus, when many people migrates to cities, it causes problems. Take Tehran as an example. Huge number of migrants made this city crowded. Citizens suffer from high volume of traffic and congested roads. It also put dwellers in a competition to own accommodation, which increases the house prices. In conclusion, although rural people think migrating is beneficial for them, it is indeed problematic. I firmly believe that huge migration number may cause problems that seems hard to be addressed.

Response: There is a global trend in which dwellers migrate from country side to cities. As a result, the proportion of people living in rural areas decreases. I think it's a negative development due to several factors. On one hand, there are many elements that encourage people to move to metropolises. As there might not be enough facilities, many people prefer to leave. For instance, educational facilities are not advance in small villages. Consequently, when you try to have self development, moving to cities makes it possible. More over, living in a city allows you to benefit from convenient public transportation, which country side might be deprived of. So if you don't own a vehicle, commuting in rural areas may be impossible. But it doesn't seem reasonable if we only care about individuals and not the problems that it may cause. On the other hand, when rural people leave their home town, this action leads to significant problems. Firstly, agriculture is gonna be consigned to oblivion as there are no farmers in towns. The lack of agriculture may be felt by both rural and urban people. As fields and farms may be left, the soil may be eroded. Moreover, cities have capacities. Thus, when many people migrates to cities, it causes problems. Take Tehran as an example. Huge number of migrants made this city crowded. Citizens suffer from high volume of traffic and congested roads. It also put dwellers in a competition to own accommodation, which increases the house prices. In conclusion, although rural people think migrating is beneficial for them, it is indeed problematic. I firmly believe that huge migration number may cause problems that seems hard to be addressed.

Response: There have been competing views on whether advertisement persuades people successfully or whether it is so common to attract people. In my opinion, advertisements are not as provocative as before in grabbing customers' attention. Some people argue that cutting-edge technology has increased brand awareness. For example, ordinary people can advertise their products via Instagram but this possibility was not available a few years ago and they had to pay for an advertisement. Additionally, celebrity endorsements influence people's decisions to purchase even shampoo. For instance, a shampoo called Clear was advertised by Cristiano Ronaldo and an increasing number of people are still using this brand. So, celebrity endorsement has been an effective form of persuasion recently. Those on the other side of the argument believe that an increasing number of advertisements have bombarded individuals in recent years. People are bored with repetitive advertising on YouTube and believe that advertisement spoils the flow while they are watching a video. When people are engrossed in a video clip then a pop-up pauses it and they will skip the advertisement with no thought to watch the rest of the program. So, publicizing hasn't found a successful way to attract customers. Furthermore, many companies don’t apply creativity to publicize a product, so people are less inclined to watch an advertisement that just introduces the features of a product. To conclude, considering both views on whether advertising is still convincing or not, I reckon that advertising is not only unattractive but also frustrating, because companies opt for passive ways to convince people to purchase.

Response: Some students tend to learn more about other subjects apart from their major subjects, while other learners argue that dedicating their full time and attention to studying one main study is more essential. Personally, I completely agree with former perspective and will discuss both sides in more detail. To begin with, those who advocate to learning various subjects have their own reasons. Firstly, they believe that school curriculum should consists of diverse activities including art classes, physical education and musical instrument classes. These programs provide an opportunity for students to foster their abilities and learning multitasking. Secondly, communication skills and cooperative attitude are taught in these kinds of classes by professional tutors. For example, by attending in football classes, both genders could enhance their functional abilities significantly. Finally, if students learn to do more activity simultansouly, their brain will develop effectively. On the other hand, those who believe in one major subjects have their own perspective. Students could focus and concentrate effectively on one major study which offers students a better environment for improving. In other words, learners would study their lessons without any distractions and could also save their time significantly. The more time students spend on one topic, the better outcomes they will probably have in exams. Research has indicated that the quality of learning one major subject will affect children’s future career. Moreover, if students engage one main subject, they are likely to become successful in that position. In conclusion, although concentrating on one major study could benefit students positively and impact on their future, I firmly believe that learning other studies such as arts, music, and sports is more beneficial than learning one subject.

Response: Taking risky decisions is a matter which is usually advised to grow in both personal life and professional career. While such decision could yield some negative results, I strongly believe the merits coming along often outweigh the potential drawbacks. On the one hand, some possible disadvantages might discourage people from taking risks as coming out of the comfort zone usually is a hard decision and needs a lot of thinking. Take migration to another country as an obvious example of risky decisions; loneliness and homesick are likely the first personal issues coming into mind whenever we want to talk about living abroad. Migrants have to leave their families and friends behind, relocating to a place where they do not know anyone. In such situation, language barriers often aggravate the circumstance to make new friends. From a professional perspective, leaving the financial stability in your own country and starting a new career path elsewhere is not an easy task and there is the risk of going bankrupt. in spite of all the arguments above, I deeply believe risk taking is necessary to improve and the brighter future that can come along risky decisions should not be overlooked. When we read about or talk with successful individuals, the majority of them point to a time they put aside their fear, changing their lives by an important decision. For instance, Cristiano Ronaldo, widely regarded as the greatest footballer of all time, at his 18, an age that many of his peers scared even to live alone, decided to relocate to the UK from his own country to play in a greater football club. From then on, his well-known career began, with achieving all the possible trophies. By that risky decision, not only did he leave a legacy in football, but he also have provided a luxurious life style for himself and his family in their personal lives. To sum up, although it is accepted that coming out from one’s comfort zone is a hard and could be along with some problems, the positive outcomes of such decisions are so worthwhile that people should try their chance.

Response: There is an ongoing debate about the effectiveness of advertisements. While some argue that nowadays these commercials no longer have their impact on individuals, others advocate for the significant effects of advertisement. In my view, advertising still has its effective strategies to influence people. On the one hand, it is undeniably true that people easily purchase goods based on the advertisement that they watched. The science of experts who create them is a major reason for the power of advertising. Most of them are industrial psychologists who studied human behaviours and the techniques of persuading people. In this way, they know the exact colors and words to attract customers, and even their needs are obvious to them. Additionally, in the wake of technological advancements, individuals have access to many online platforms, such as Instagram, YouTube, and TikTok, which make it easy to advertising agency to draw different groups of customers. On the other hand, despite the above arguments, other group argue that because of the public awareness of these commercial's facts, they are not being affected by them. First of all, people notice that advertisements are not always show the truth of the products, they are actually some special effects, for example, the fast-food restaurants, their food advertised images are not often quiet the same as the reality. Moreover, as individuals face too many commercial breaks on different platforms, these advertisements have become far normal for viewers, so they prefer to skip instead of watching them or purchasing the premium version to avoid advertising. In conclusion, people hold different views on whether advertising still has its power to attract customers or not. Although some believe that people are aware that advertisements sometimes hide the truth, therefore they will not be affected, others argue that the methods are used on advertising meet the market demands. lassert that commercial advertising has the most vital impact on the humans.