IELTS Writing Samples

Response: In some special regions, a common belief is told to children that they are capable of doing anything by trying hard. There are some benefits in this message which lead them to have a meaningful life, however the disappointed child without no plan is one of the most crucial drawbacks. On the one hand, in some society, most parents, teachers, and principals strive to engrave a slogan or message in children’s mind, so the they will always remember that anything is achievable for them if they push themselves enough. In fact, there are various advantages, which having a motivation is the greatest merit. In this way, children have strong passions to continue to do rough tasks and they feel their works and duties are valuable. Moreover, they understand planning make a significant contribution in this belief, and through this, they also learn other essential lessens, such as decision making, which are the keys to be successful in their life. On the other hand, this trend would cause serious problems, too. The most important one will happen in their adolescences, when they could not accept any failure because, in their childhood, they were told they can achieve anything that if they endeavor. This also has a detrimental effect on their mental health, like causing depression. Secondly, if children do not achieve their goals by trying hard, the feeling of inadequacy and unworthiness will arise in them; thus, as adults, they never experience satisfaction in their life, or even in their work place, and their well-being will undergo major influences. Finally, these children might target something completely imaginary or unreal. For example, being a superhero with magical power. In conclusion, while in some community children are encourage to try harder in order to achieve their aims, this trend has both special privileges, like learning to plan, and being highly ambitious to continue their tasks, and destructive drawbacks on their mental health and well-being, such as feeling of depression and unworthiness. In my view, these disadvantages drawback the advantages, therefore children should not encounter this situation by their parents.

Response: It is becoming increasingly common for people worldwide to look for the historical background of the building where they reside. In my point of view, this phenomenon can be largely explained by stereotypical beliefs and curiosity about previous residents which the most promising solutions involve questioning prior inhabitants and neighbours about of the house. With regards to some historical stereotypes such as ghosts, the first reason why individuals are bound to discover the history of living residences could be relatively obvious. To clarify, in some geographical areas, the USA for instance, people believe that believing supernatural creatures have been becoming a prevalent belief particularly in old established buildings surrounded by farmland. “The Conjuring” was a well-known American movie, in which a practiced couple conjured evil ghosts of particular houses and also arrested them saving new owners, has obviously illustrated the high importance of research about preceding events of some residential areas in America. Dealing with this challenge, persons folks should seek for a number of verified data about the selected house through either residents living previously, priests or supernatural researchers, in some occasions of the film. In addition to common myths in relation to unknown existences leading to research about the history of the place for another might be a great extent of curiosity about former inhabitants because of either pleasure or caution. In other words, if newcomers resided in succession with some well-liked persons, artists( authors, actors, singers, painters, and etc.) they would provide with a sense of pride, enjoyment as well as more awareness. On the other hand, they would find it impossible to live in that area where a criminal inhabited in advance, since potential detrimental behaviour from others. To combat this crucial issue, people have versatile methods to consider about the history of a house such as browsing through neighbours, on the internet, and accurate interviews with real-estate consultants, as well. In conclusion, this essay argued some reasons that cause to be browsed about the historical information of residencies. Additionally, some measures have been highlighted to tackle these problems.

Response: Some children spend hours every day on their smartphones. Why is this the case? Do you think this is a positive or a negative development? It is true that, nowadays children spend a significant amount of their daily time on digital gadgets like smartphones. I believe this trend have a negative impact on their children and In this essay, I will explore the cause of that. To begin with causes, one of the major reasons is that smartphones often offer a wider range of options to them as entertainment such as: online video games, cartoons, animations and storybooks. These program because of their innovative designs are interesting and appealing for them. For instance, a child can easy has an easy access to various games just via click on the bottom or simply search it. which in reality may not have many options for playing game. Additionally, parent these days due to their demanding and tight schedules do not have sufficient time to spending time with thier children. Consequently, they preffer to keep bust them through smartphones. In my view this approch has numrous harmful effects on children both physically and mentally. This is because when they looking at screen frequently and for long time, thier eyes can become week or even headack. What's more it can impact on their social skills in the long term. to illustrate, when a kid allocate a majority of their time, they lose their interest to engaging in group games or spending time with their friends in reality. this is because online games provide them more intresting activity. finally spending time too much on online applications in digital devices limit their activity by just sitting down and clicking and scorlling on screen, which can leads to obesity due to lack of movements and physical activities. In conclusion, various reasons can contribute to engaging children many time on their smartphones such as captivating apps and being convenience. In my view, while it have potential effects, their detrimental impacta are more significant.

Response: In the contemporary era, the phenomenon of health has witnessed an unprecedented surge, reflecting a significant shift in people habits. A debate has emerged among individuals about whether using new medicines and treatments can be effective or not rather than going to doctor. I argue that the adverse repercussions of alternative curative methods, particularly in terms of health problems and dangerous risks, far outweigh the benefits, making it a largely harmful breakthrough. On the one hand, many proponents claim that these methods are much affordable than its traditional ones, resulting in saving a vast amount of money for other essential needs of life. Moreover, it is argued that they can meet the results faster as opposed the time they go to the physicians. On the other hand, numerous opponents contend that using medicines and treatments without the opinion of experts leads to dire consequences, affecting not only physical health but also mental health of consumers. They believe that if citizens are able to treat one problems, as a result of trying this approach, they will be faced with other hardships, which is why they warn individuals to do not use options like this. A poignant example of this can be found in a survey conducted in Japan, which revealed that cardiovascular disease and renal failure problems on those people that decided to try new solutions rather than opt for visiting doctors. In conclusion, although utilizing alternative medicines and treatments is thought by some to be one of the most effectives means of to solve well-being difficulties, a large number of researchers declare that it is an overly simplistic resolution. They concern that this way of facing health issues may lead to other health problems while the initial hurdle is exist. I firmly believe that the multitude of drawbacks derived from this approach that make it detrimental instead of beneficial.

Response: While some people believe experts should not be allowed to work in a country other than the one they trained in, other, myself included, argue every individual should have the right to decide about where they want to work. I will try to delve into both perspective in the following. On the one hand, a group of people advocate the idea of restricting professionals of working abroad. They might argue their government has invested a considerable amount of money and time to educate these experts. So, they should stay and serve their people, compensating all the expenditures. in addition, it would be difficult to replace the work forces trained and considered as the would-be experts to fill vacancies if they leave the country, leading to numerous problems in the government’s planning. In spite of all the arguments above, I firmly believe every individual should have the basic right to decide about where they want to live and work in. Furthermore, in many cases these experts can provide a better life and well-being for themselves and their families as they can get better opportunities in other countries. Take nurses who work in middle east as an obvious example; they are usually underpaid, causing they lack of motivation to work. While they have the chance to apply for countries like the UK and the USA, where nurses can get their desired recognition. In addition, this migration trend can force their government to provide a better situation. To sum up, although migrating of professionals to work abroad could have its drawbacks on the country of origins, they should be given this fundamental right, and they have the right to be worried about their future.

Response: It is argue between people, some of them suppose that experts like doctors or engineers, should get a job in the country that they trained, while others thinks that they should be free to work in different region if they want. I believe, it is very important for each person to have freedom to select where to work so we should leave them free and do some steps to prevent leaving after course. Firstly, It is true that some countries may need more professionals, so it is better to keep students in country after finishing university or taining course, but I disagree by forcing them. Secondly, I think government should encourage them and make a suitable facilities. It is more effective and keeps experts to provide excellent services for people. On the one hand, it is relation between doing a job in a correct way and experts mood. If they do not feel comfortable, maybe they could not be useful, so it is better to allow them to choose their work destination. On the other hand, they should improve theit knowledge and in some countries, there are not enough education facilities, for this reason sometimes, experts need to change their country. In conclusion, I agree by being free to make decision about where to work . As some reasonable factores are to require professionals to work in the country that they are

Response: Some people believe that competing with others in studying, working, and generally in our every aspects of our lives is a positive act, while others argue that people should work together and collaborate instead. In my opinion, although competitions can be beneficial to a certain extent, cooperation can be more effective and more advantageous. On the one hand, competitions can motivate individuals to thrive in their studies or professions. Motivation contributes to enhanced performances and surpassing other people in the field. This happens because individuals compare themselves to others and analise other's actions to do better than them. Competition can also happen while people compare their past self to the person they have become at the present, therefore they can see how much they grew and work on their weaknesses. Therefore, productivity would improve as people try to achieve higher positions and attainments, and personal and public growth would happen along together. Cooperation, on the other hand, is more beneficial because people tend to help and assist eachother in hardships and difficalties. Individuals can ask for guidence about their problems, and they will be sure that there is always someone to support them and give advice. In addition, when people work in a team, they divide the necessary tasks and responsibilities, so in this way projects may complete in a faster pace while being more reliable, considering the fact that several people had worked on them before and removed almost all the mistakes. All these reasons lead to a safer environment for everyone to thrive peacefully with other people's collaboration and assistence. I believe that competiton can be less productive than cooperation. The reason is that, when people compete with their colleagues or classmates, they compare their abilities and actions to people who have completely different abilities and backgrounds, and this leads to increasing anxiety, self doubt, and serious mental issues. As a result productivity and efficiency would considerably decline. So I think cooperation is a better choice. In conclusion, While competing with our classmates and other people can benefit us, I believe that cooperation is more effective and creates a safer environment to grow.

Response: Some people believe that when some professionals, such as doctors and engineers complete their studies should work where they had been trained, while others believe that they should be free to make a decision about their future. Despite the former opinion, I think that freedom is important, and professionals should have the right to choose where they want to work or live. On the one hand, some people believe that as governments allocate an array of budgets and facilities for studying such professionals, it is reasonable to expect them stay and serve for the training country. Particularly if they study at their own country, they will be responsible for development of their country. In other words, when professionals do not immigrate to abroad, the government would not be required to take new labour forces, leading to improvement in the economy, as foreign workers may require new trainings. For example, in many developing countries, there is a shortage of healthcare professionals. Requiring doctors to stay because not only can they alleviate this issue but they also can help governments not fund for training of new employees. On the other hand, some individuals think that people should be free to decide about their future because they have tried to achieve their goals, and it is the result of their perseverance and determinations. So they should have the right to choose where they wish to live. Allowing professionals to go to other countries, can lead to personal growth because they will face with more job opportunities, experience new skills, making them to be a great expertise which can be useful for all of the world. Take Prof Samii, one of the most renowned neurosurgeons in the world, for example; although he graduated from Iran, he went to Germany for receiving more training and finally became prof Samii. In conclusion, while serving for training country or own country can be good and give a sense of satisfaction, l firmly believe that as some countries might be poor and may not able to support professionals to receive higher positions, so it is acceptable to immigrate to other nations as they may pursue their aims, leading them to personal growth.

Response: There have always been an ongonig debate about this topic that whether it is good to encourage people to compete with each other in different social places such as workplace or schools, or cooperating is more important than competition. Some people believe that life is a long game full of opportunities, which you win or you loose. So,they persuade childrens from an early ages to compete with their peers. It gives them the opportunity to grow and achieve whatever they want. For example, when they start working in a company as a junior employee, they need to foster their talents and abillities, and in order to be promoted, they are compared with other colleagues so they must know how to compete, otherwise they will face problems. On the other hand, other believe that individuals have to try to achieve their goals, but competiting leads to jelaousy and makes people to behave unfair in some special situations. For instance, in workplace, all the workeforced have to support each other. They have to learn that they should be happy for their colleagues' promotions. Because life isn't a competition and every body could make their wishes come true if they work hard enough. Therefore, when we teach students to try to have self growth, and not to compare themselves with other scholars. They should help them in the time of difficulty and give a hand to each other when it is needed. From my perspective, cooperation have always been more valuable that competing. And when all the people try to help each other and see themselves as a community, then the route for growth is even brighter and human values will be respected. We as older people owe this to the further generation to increase the awareness about human values and breed our children with moral educations.

Response: It is important to consider how managing money can help people. There is a view that it is crucial for all people especially younger ones to save money for their future. I firmly agree with this statement and in this essay I will discuss the reasons for it. One the one hand, many young individuals prefer to focus on their current moments instead of worrying about their future. This is because it helps them to make the most of their youth by spending their money on their interests and things that makes them really happy, instead of depriving themselves from doing them. For example, a person who is in 20s may decide not go to a travel that they have always dreamed of it and instead save its money for their retirement age. Consequently, they not only scarify their precious young age but also this might effect on their life satisfaction even when they will get older. On the other hand, in my view, people should make a balance between considering their future financial security and their current time. for example, they can allocate some part of their salary for spending on their favorite activities, while saving other portions for the later unexpected situations. In doing so, they can not only take full advantage of their younger years but also enjoy the financial independency they will have. In contrast, if they solely focus on the current period, they might run out of money and be rely on others in the future. In conclusion, although people should not ruin their present moment by constantly thinking about the future, it is vital to make a balance between them and also allocate part of their income for their retirement period.