IELTS Writing Samples

Response: It is said that risk-taking plays a significant role not only in people’s career paths but also in their personal lives. Making progress in life and enhancing certain skills are two of the main advantages of taking risks that clearly outweigh losing some benefits temporarily as the major drawback. Making risky decisions can lead to advancement. This derives from the fact that a risk taker is subjected to new situations, requiring new knowledge and skills. Achieving success in such situations drives people to learn required knowledge or skills. For example, an individual resigns from a dead-end job to find a well-paid job. This person needs to develop their knowledge or acquire new skills to become employable for a well-paid job. As a result, he/she earns more money in the new job, leading to a higher quality of life, which is the epitome of progress in professional life. Furthermore, doing risky actions can boost the quality of people’s personal life. This happens because risk takers improve specific skills through risky undertakings, which are thoroughly helpful in their personal lives. Extreme sports exemplify it. In such sports, such as mountain climbing, people are struggling with challenges. To overcome these difficulties, they try to create new solutions. Doing so has direct effects on their problem-solving skill which is vital for life. These people are more likely to tackle their difficulties in daily affairs, including their relationships, more easily. On the other hand, taking a chance may cause some benefits for a period. In risky actions, individuals may have to leave out their status quo to reach a goal. For example, in the case of changing a job, people may lose their livelihood for the short-term until they are hired in a new job. This issue may make them stressed out; however, it is temporary and finally the risk pays off. In conclusion, risky decisions can lead to a lack of benefits for a certain period, which can be detrimental. However, making progress and learning new skills are two of the most important pros that overshadow the mentioned cons.

Response: It is widely believed that in the future all vehicles such as cars, buses and trucks will become automated and driverless. Travellers in these vehicles will be only passengers. While driverless vehicles can bring some drawbacks, l believe that they can be more beneficial for several reasons that I will mention in this essay. To begin with, as the majority of collisions happen due to human error, driverless vehicles can provide people with safer journeys, leading to an improvement in quality of life. So, people will travel more, particularly attemting long journeys without becoming exhausted, and they can allocate their time to other things rather than driving, leading to enjoyment during their traveling. In addition, these vehicles will give an opportunity to travel independently for certain people who are physically disabled or are not allowed to obtain a licence, such as adolescets, helping their parents to spend their time on other tasks. For example, if their schools are far from home, they do not need to go to pick them up. On the other hand, there are several drawbacks to traveling with driverless vehicles. Firstly, it can lead to unemployment for drivers. Many individuals working as drivers of buses, trucks, and taxis, if they lose their jobs can adversely affect their families. For instance, for some drivers, it may take a long time to find a new job due to a lack of talent in other skills, making their families suffer from poor economic conditions. Furthermore, driverless vehicles can be dangerous as they are without drivere; they may be hacked easily and create problems for passengers. For example, if their systems become disrupted, passengers will lose their destinations. In conclusion, while traveling without a driver can bring some negative impacts on drivers and passengers, l firmly believe that its benefits outweigh its drawbacks due to its potential to bring safety and a sense of satisfaction.

Response: It is widely believed that in the future all vehicles such as cars, buses and trucks become automative without driver. And travellers of vehicles will be only passengers. While driverless vehicles can bring some drawbacks, l believe that they can be more beneficials for several that I will mention in this essay To begin with, as the majority of collisions happen due to human errors, driverless vehicles can provide people with safety journey, leading to improvement in quality of life. So, people will travel more, particularly try to go to long journey without being exhausted, and they can allocate their time on other things rather than driving, leading to enjoyment during their traveling. In addition, these vehicles will give an opportunity to travel independently for certain people who are physically disable or are not allowed to take licence certificate such as adolescence, helping their parents to spend their time on other tasks. For example, if their school are far away home, they do not need to go to back them. On the other hand, there are several drawbacks of traveling with driverless vehicles. Firstly, it can lead to unemployment of drivers. Many of individuals, working as drivers of buses, trucks, and taxi, that if they lose their jobs can adversely affect on their families. For instance, for some drivers, it may take a long time to find a new job due to lack of talent in other skills, making their families suffer from poor economy. Furthermore, driverless vehicles can be dangerous as they are without drivers, they may be hacked easily and create problems for passengers, for example, if their systems become disruptive, passengers will lose their destinations. In conclusion, while traveling without driver cab bring some negative impact on drivers and passengers, l firmly believe that its benefits outweigh its drawbacks due to its potential to bring safety, and a sense of satisfaction.

Response: In some special regions, a common belief is told to children that they are capable of doing anything by trying hard. There are some benefits to this message which lead them to have a meaningful life; however, the disappointed child without a plan is one of the most crucial drawbacks. On the one hand, in some society, most parents, teachers, and principals strive to engrave a slogan or message in children’s minds, so they will always remember that anything is achievable for them if they push themselves enough. In fact, there are various advantages, with having motivation being the greatest merit. In this way, children have strong passions to continue to do rough tasks and they feel their work and duties are valuable. Moreover, they understand planning makes a significant contribution to this belief, and through this, they also learn other essential lessons, such as decision making, which are the keys to being successful in their life. On the other hand, this trend could cause serious problems, too. The most important one will happen in their adolescence, when they cannot accept any failure because, in their childhood, they were told they can achieve anything if they endeavor. This also has a detrimental effect on their mental health, like causing depression. Secondly, if children do not achieve their goals by trying hard, the feeling of inadequacy and unworthiness will arise in them; thus, as adults, they never experience satisfaction in their life, or even in their workplace, and their well-being will undergo major influences. Finally, these children might target something completely imaginary or unreal. For example, being a superhero with magical powers. In conclusion, while in some communities children are encouraged to try harder in order to achieve their aims, this trend has both special privileges, like learning to plan, and being highly ambitious to continue their tasks, and destructive drawbacks on their mental health and well-being, such as feelings of depression and unworthiness. In my view, these disadvantages outweigh the advantages; therefore, children should not encounter this situation by their parents.

Response: In some special regions, a common belief is told to children that they are capable of doing anything by trying hard. There are some benefits in this message which lead them to have a meaningful life, however the disappointed child without no plan is one of the most crucial drawbacks. On the one hand, in some society, most parents, teachers, and principals strive to engrave a slogan or message in children’s mind, so the they will always remember that anything is achievable for them if they push themselves enough. In fact, there are various advantages, which having a motivation is the greatest merit. In this way, children have strong passions to continue to do rough tasks and they feel their works and duties are valuable. Moreover, they understand planning make a significant contribution in this belief, and through this, they also learn other essential lessens, such as decision making, which are the keys to be successful in their life. On the other hand, this trend would cause serious problems, too. The most important one will happen in their adolescences, when they could not accept any failure because, in their childhood, they were told they can achieve anything that if they endeavor. This also has a detrimental effect on their mental health, like causing depression. Secondly, if children do not achieve their goals by trying hard, the feeling of inadequacy and unworthiness will arise in them; thus, as adults, they never experience satisfaction in their life, or even in their work place, and their well-being will undergo major influences. Finally, these children might target something completely imaginary or unreal. For example, being a superhero with magical power. In conclusion, while in some community children are encourage to try harder in order to achieve their aims, this trend has both special privileges, like learning to plan, and being highly ambitious to continue their tasks, and destructive drawbacks on their mental health and well-being, such as feeling of depression and unworthiness. In my view, these disadvantages drawback the advantages, therefore children should not encounter this situation by their parents.

Response: It is becoming increasingly common for people worldwide to look for the historical background of the building where they reside. In my point of view, this phenomenon can be largely explained by stereotypical beliefs and curiosity about previous residents which the most promising solutions involve questioning prior inhabitants and neighbours about of the house. With regards to some historical stereotypes such as ghosts, the first reason why individuals are bound to discover the history of living residences could be relatively obvious. To clarify, in some geographical areas, the USA for instance, people believe that believing supernatural creatures have been becoming a prevalent belief particularly in old established buildings surrounded by farmland. “The Conjuring” was a well-known American movie, in which a practiced couple conjured evil ghosts of particular houses and also arrested them saving new owners, has obviously illustrated the high importance of research about preceding events of some residential areas in America. Dealing with this challenge, persons folks should seek for a number of verified data about the selected house through either residents living previously, priests or supernatural researchers, in some occasions of the film. In addition to common myths in relation to unknown existences leading to research about the history of the place for another might be a great extent of curiosity about former inhabitants because of either pleasure or caution. In other words, if newcomers resided in succession with some well-liked persons, artists( authors, actors, singers, painters, and etc.) they would provide with a sense of pride, enjoyment as well as more awareness. On the other hand, they would find it impossible to live in that area where a criminal inhabited in advance, since potential detrimental behaviour from others. To combat this crucial issue, people have versatile methods to consider about the history of a house such as browsing through neighbours, on the internet, and accurate interviews with real-estate consultants, as well. In conclusion, this essay argued some reasons that cause to be browsed about the historical information of residencies. Additionally, some measures have been highlighted to tackle these problems.

Response: Some children spend hours every day on their smartphones. Why is this the case? Do you think this is a positive or a negative development? It is true that, nowadays children spend a significant amount of their daily time on digital gadgets like smartphones. I believe this trend have a negative impact on their children and In this essay, I will explore the cause of that. To begin with causes, one of the major reasons is that smartphones often offer a wider range of options to them as entertainment such as: online video games, cartoons, animations and storybooks. These program because of their innovative designs are interesting and appealing for them. For instance, a child can easy has an easy access to various games just via click on the bottom or simply search it. which in reality may not have many options for playing game. Additionally, parent these days due to their demanding and tight schedules do not have sufficient time to spending time with thier children. Consequently, they preffer to keep bust them through smartphones. In my view this approch has numrous harmful effects on children both physically and mentally. This is because when they looking at screen frequently and for long time, thier eyes can become week or even headack. What's more it can impact on their social skills in the long term. to illustrate, when a kid allocate a majority of their time, they lose their interest to engaging in group games or spending time with their friends in reality. this is because online games provide them more intresting activity. finally spending time too much on online applications in digital devices limit their activity by just sitting down and clicking and scorlling on screen, which can leads to obesity due to lack of movements and physical activities. In conclusion, various reasons can contribute to engaging children many time on their smartphones such as captivating apps and being convenience. In my view, while it have potential effects, their detrimental impacta are more significant.

Response: In the contemporary era, the phenomenon of health has witnessed an unprecedented surge, reflecting a significant shift in people habits. A debate has emerged among individuals about whether using new medicines and treatments can be effective or not rather than going to doctor. I argue that the adverse repercussions of alternative curative methods, particularly in terms of health problems and dangerous risks, far outweigh the benefits, making it a largely harmful breakthrough. On the one hand, many proponents claim that these methods are much affordable than its traditional ones, resulting in saving a vast amount of money for other essential needs of life. Moreover, it is argued that they can meet the results faster as opposed the time they go to the physicians. On the other hand, numerous opponents contend that using medicines and treatments without the opinion of experts leads to dire consequences, affecting not only physical health but also mental health of consumers. They believe that if citizens are able to treat one problems, as a result of trying this approach, they will be faced with other hardships, which is why they warn individuals to do not use options like this. A poignant example of this can be found in a survey conducted in Japan, which revealed that cardiovascular disease and renal failure problems on those people that decided to try new solutions rather than opt for visiting doctors. In conclusion, although utilizing alternative medicines and treatments is thought by some to be one of the most effectives means of to solve well-being difficulties, a large number of researchers declare that it is an overly simplistic resolution. They concern that this way of facing health issues may lead to other health problems while the initial hurdle is exist. I firmly believe that the multitude of drawbacks derived from this approach that make it detrimental instead of beneficial.

Response: While some people believe experts should not be allowed to work in a country other than the one they trained in, other, myself included, argue every individual should have the right to decide about where they want to work. I will try to delve into both perspective in the following. On the one hand, a group of people advocate the idea of restricting professionals of working abroad. They might argue their government has invested a considerable amount of money and time to educate these experts. So, they should stay and serve their people, compensating all the expenditures. in addition, it would be difficult to replace the work forces trained and considered as the would-be experts to fill vacancies if they leave the country, leading to numerous problems in the government’s planning. In spite of all the arguments above, I firmly believe every individual should have the basic right to decide about where they want to live and work in. Furthermore, in many cases these experts can provide a better life and well-being for themselves and their families as they can get better opportunities in other countries. Take nurses who work in middle east as an obvious example; they are usually underpaid, causing they lack of motivation to work. While they have the chance to apply for countries like the UK and the USA, where nurses can get their desired recognition. In addition, this migration trend can force their government to provide a better situation. To sum up, although migrating of professionals to work abroad could have its drawbacks on the country of origins, they should be given this fundamental right, and they have the right to be worried about their future.

Response: It is argue between people, some of them suppose that experts like doctors or engineers, should get a job in the country that they trained, while others thinks that they should be free to work in different region if they want. I believe, it is very important for each person to have freedom to select where to work so we should leave them free and do some steps to prevent leaving after course. Firstly, It is true that some countries may need more professionals, so it is better to keep students in country after finishing university or taining course, but I disagree by forcing them. Secondly, I think government should encourage them and make a suitable facilities. It is more effective and keeps experts to provide excellent services for people. On the one hand, it is relation between doing a job in a correct way and experts mood. If they do not feel comfortable, maybe they could not be useful, so it is better to allow them to choose their work destination. On the other hand, they should improve theit knowledge and in some countries, there are not enough education facilities, for this reason sometimes, experts need to change their country. In conclusion, I agree by being free to make decision about where to work . As some reasonable factores are to require professionals to work in the country that they are