Balang
  • Home
  • Speaking
  • Blog
lemon logo
Balang is committed to revolutionizing language learning, empowering individuals worldwide to achieve their aspirations through innovative technology and personalized education.
Terms of ServicePrivacy PolicyRefund Policy
Contact
Email
telegram logo
Telegram

Question: Some people believe that professionals, such as doctors and engineers, should be required ...

Click on red question marks (?) to see an explanation for each change. Some changes are only suggestions and don't mean the original is necessarily wrong.
While some people believe experts should not be allowed to work in a country other than the one they trained in, otherothers, myself included, argue every individual should have the right to decide about where they want to work. I will try to delve into both perspectiveperspectives in the following. On the one hand, a group of people advocate the idea of restricting professionals offrom working abroad. They might argue their government has invested a considerable amount of money and time to educate these experts. So, they should stay and serve their people, compensating for all the expenditures. inIn addition, it would be difficult to replace the work forces workforce trained and considered as the would-be experts to fill vacancies if they leave the country, leading to numerous problems in the government’s planning. In spite of all the arguments above, I firmly believe every individual should have the basic right to decide about where they want to live and work in. Furthermore, in many cases these experts can provide a better life and well-being for themselves and their families as they can get better opportunities in other countries. Take nurses who work in middle eastthe Middle East as an obvious example; they are usually underpaid, causing theythem to lack of motivation to work. While they have the chance to apply for countries like the UK and the USA, where nurses can get their desired recognition. In addition, this migration trend can force their government to provide a better situation. To sum up, although migratingthe migration of professionals to work abroad could have its drawbacks on the country of originsorigin, they should be given this fundamental right, and they have the right to be worriedconcerned about their future.
This section presents vocabulary suggestions. Highlighted words are either too simple or are repeated more than 3 times . Please note that some suggested alternatives might require changes to other parts of the sentence.
This section presents a professionally wirtten variation of your essay and highlights the differences.
While some people believe experts should not be allowed to work in a country other than the one they trained in, other, myself included, argue every individual should have the right to decide about where they want to work. I will try to delve into both perspective in the following.
While some people believe experts should not be allowed to work in countries other than where they trained, others, including myself, argue that every individual should have the right to choose their place of work. This essay will examine both perspectives.
On the one hand, a group of people advocate the idea of restricting professionals of working abroad. They might argue their government has invested a considerable amount of money and time to educate these experts. So, they should stay and serve their people, compensating all the expenditures. in addition, it would be difficult to replace the work forces trained and considered as the would-be experts to fill vacancies if they leave the country, leading to numerous problems in the government’s planning.
On the one hand, some advocate restricting professionals from working abroad. They argue that governments invest significant resources in educating these experts, who should therefore remain to serve their home country and justify this investment. Additionally, replacing skilled professionals who leave can be challenging, potentially disrupting national planning and development.
In spite of all the arguments above, I firmly believe every individual should have the basic right to decide about where they want to live and work in. Furthermore, in many cases these experts can provide a better life and well-being for themselves and their families as they can get better opportunities in other countries. Take nurses who work in middle east as an obvious example; they are usually underpaid, causing they lack of motivation to work. While they have the chance to apply for countries like the UK and the USA, where nurses can get their desired recognition. In addition, this migration trend can force their government to provide a better situation.
However, I firmly believe individuals should have the fundamental right to decide where they live and work. Many professionals seek better opportunities abroad, improving their quality of life and that of their families. For instance, nurses in some countries face low wages and poor working conditions, whereas in nations like the UK or the US, they receive fair compensation and recognition. Moreover, such migration can pressure governments to improve domestic conditions to retain talent.
To sum up, although migrating of professionals to work abroad could have its drawbacks on the country of origins, they should be given this fundamental right, and they have the right to be worried about their future.
In conclusion, while the emigration of skilled workers may pose challenges for their home countries, individuals should retain the right to pursue better opportunities abroad, as this freedom is essential for personal and professional fulfillment.
See more samples for this topic
Check your essay for this topic
Overall Band Score
7
Overview
Vocabulary Range
average
Linking Words
average
Spelling
weak
Grammar Accuracy
average
Grammar Range
average
Cohesion
average
Paragraph Structure
average
Task Response
strong
Word Count
sufficient
While we are confident in our score estimation, you are not guaranteed to receive the same score in an official test.

Feedback on the Essay

Task Achievement

  • The essay addresses both sides of the argument and presents a clear opinion, fulfilling the task requirements.
  • The introduction could be more concise—it repeats the prompt without adding much new information. A stronger hook or clearer thesis statement would improve engagement.
  • The arguments are relevant, but some points lack depth. For example, the claim that professionals "should stay and serve their people" could be expanded with specific examples of how this benefits society.
  • The conclusion restates the opinion but could summarize the key points more effectively.

Coherence and Cohesion

  • The essay is logically structured, with clear paragraphs for each viewpoint and the writer’s opinion.
  • Some transitions between ideas could be smoother. For example, "In spite of all the arguments above" is a bit abrupt—phrases like "However" or "On the other hand" might work better.
  • The phrase "leading to numerous problems in the government’s planning" is vague—specifying what these problems are would strengthen coherence.
  • Minor grammatical errors (e.g., "causing they lack of motivation" should be "causing them to lack motivation") slightly disrupt flow.

Lexical Resource

  • The vocabulary is generally appropriate, but some word choices could be more precise (e.g., "would-be experts" is unclear—perhaps "future professionals" or "trainees").
  • Some phrasing is awkward ("delving into both perspective" should be "perspectives").
  • The phrase "migrating of professionals" should be "the migration of professionals."
  • The use of "middle east" and "the UK and the USA" should be capitalized ("Middle East," "the UK, and the USA").

Grammatical Range and Accuracy

  • There are several grammatical errors:
    • "causing they lack of motivation" → "causing them to lack motivation"
    • "considered as the would-be experts" → "considered as future experts"
    • "migrating of professionals" → "the migration of professionals"
  • Some sentences are overly long and could be split for clarity (e.g., the second sentence in the second paragraph).
  • Subject-verb agreement issues ("a group of people advocate" should be "advocates").

Suggestions for Improvement

  • Clarity & Precision: Avoid vague statements (e.g., "numerous problems in the government’s planning")—be specific.
  • Grammar & Syntax: Proofread for subject-verb agreement, article usage ("the" before "Middle East"), and awkward phrasing.
  • Stronger Examples: The nurse example is good but could be developed further—how does underpayment affect the healthcare system?
  • Conclusion: Instead of just restating the opinion, briefly summarize the strongest points from both sides.

Overall, the essay presents a balanced discussion with a clear stance but would benefit from more precise language, stronger examples, and improved grammatical accuracy.