IELTS Writing Samples

Response: This is an unquestionable fact that music has a universal impulse on individual whole of the world. Music evoke emotions and transport listeners to different world or both various culture and any ages. I firmly believe that music have a profound influence on our lives. First of all, one of the most captivating types of art is music undoubtedly. Music not only is an artistic method of expressing emotions but also cultivate talents. Moreover, this could create atmosphere for immersing people to a varied realm. Connect person through share information and experience result from engaging in music. In addition, people have inspired with music in various circumstance. Furthermore, some kind of music such as rap has encouraged people to combat to misgovern by authorities. For instance, when people should not criticize directly, music have been used in order to benefit familiar language between society even throughout of the world. Secondly, although all of people are faced with a monotonous rhythm of life, they can also escape from tedious situation into a mesmerizing shape of lifetime certainly. What is more, music would be a blend of reality and imagination, leading to spark of an imagination in order to nurture the creativity. When it comes to peace and tranquility, music enrich our lives through mitigate the effect of challenges in our perceptions so that result in being rest and giving up dismal sense. In conclusion, music would be an impressive factors in daily life. By using this, individuals are able to release an intense sense of pressure and obtain a strong sense of tranquility while they struggle with an abysmal condition. Additionally, music showcase all of imagination and emotion as well. Also music is used bring people together regardless of culture, region, religion or may be political bias.

Response: While some individuals contend that accepting tough conditions is the optimal approach, others argue that improvement in the conditions should be preferable. This essay will discuss both perspectives before presenting my point of view. On one hand, some individuals are opposed to the changes. They believe that what people experience is part of their lives so that they should acknowledge challenges and difficulties, which leads to a stability in their lives. For instance, working in a position which provides insufficient satisfaction is more convenient than acquiring new skills and roles for another occupation. Moreover, adapting with difficulties can help people to acknowledge what they have and avoid consumerism because they strive to put up with financial instability. For example, insufficient budgets can oblige individuals to do less impulsive shopping, contributing to enhanced tolerance of the condition. On the other hand, proponents of development believe that by making enough efforts people can have better lives. They argue that the acceptance of challenging conditions can leave behind people from progress and success, which can deteriorate situations. Once people accept financial problems should be accepted, they may lose what they have and become homeless because they try to acknowledge the condition instead of making money to alleviate it. Furthermore, people may suffer from emotional diseases like depression and isolation when they are not satisfied with what they do, leading to less productivity in the workplace. To conclude, while some individuals argue that the adaptation of adverse conditions can enhance stability and tolerance in their lives, I believe that people should strive to convert the conditions because accepting the problems can not only worsen the condition but also make people depressed and less productive.

Response: Ownership of a house has always been a considerable issue in some countries. Mostly, people prefer to buy a house rather than rent one, however provision of an adequate amount of money to purchase a house necessitate some measures. In my opinion, thriving to be an owner brings more stability and welfare. To begin with, people who are renting houses for years, won't be sure of next year situation. They cannot firmly decide where their children should be enrolled in a school. For example, my professor at university who has not a house, he has never assured us whether next will come to our university or no, because he has to choose if can rent a flat around the university or no. On the other side people who possess a place to live in, they are able of making firm decisions about enrolment of their children or job situation most of the time. Family members' peace of mind and less level of stress are consequences of housing stability that leads to mindfulness in career. When people are less stressful, they will perform effectively in their job Furthermore, individuals who are in a stable home, have more opportunity of saving money. Not only they are not pressurized to pay rent or get a mortgage to live in a place but also there is a possibility of finance improvement. As a result, people can save their money for subsequent purposes. For example, in many countries people open an account and pile up their money to get a considerable mortgage to facilitate their goal achievement. To conclude, stable housing should be viewed as a positive situation. Career efficacy and other goals achievement are effective results of house ownership, however buying a private house is not that much approachable.

Response: It is true that in some parts of the world, people can easily purchase food which is produced globally. While I believe this attitude could be negative, it has more advantages. There are various positives regardless of this progress. Firstly, individuals could access simultaneously to all kind of products which are generated by factories. Secondly, people would consume different sort of food which is produced in other countries. For example, Chinese noodle and sushi, which is extremely well-known, are found in many countries and people could enjoy having them and knowing Chinese food culture. Finally, individuals could have various choices in order to purchasing food. For instance, vegetarian people who do not eat meat or egg, could find different kind of sources that is suitable for them. On the other hand, there are some drawbacks for this development. If people tend to buy different kind of products, this progress would increase consumerism. This process could contribute to rise the waste of products which is generated by people. For example, by consuming different food, the amount of waste which is produced all over the world, will soar. Not only does it increase consumerism, but also it would rise the amount of disposal waste. Research has shown that by the end of the 2050, the amount of food packing will have increased up to 43%. In conclusion, although it could affect consumerism badly, I think that it could benefit individuals.

Response: In contemporary society, in some countries, rural people are moving to urban areas which can decrease the population of rural areas. Although immigrating to cities can offer more opportunities for people, l think it can have a negative impact on peope and society for several reasons that I will mention in this essay. To begin with, one reason that reducing the population of the rural areas due to their immigration to big cities is a negative development is that it will increase environmental issues. The more population of the countryside drops, The more population of cities grows, leading to a rise in consumption and traffic, contributing factors to both air and noise pollutions. For example, if people want to live in the cities, they will need to meet accomodation needs by working, which can lead to growth in cars due to commuting, and a rise in green house gases, which can exacerbate environmental problems. Moreover, another reason that decreasing the population of rural areas is a negative development is that it can undermine the local economy. If the majority of people move to big cities, there will be no labour force for rural jobs such as farming, station industries. For instance, people working as stockbreeders provide governements with diary products such as cheese, milk, and even meat that if their workforce decreases, it will has the potential to adversely affect on food production, which is important in the export market due to improving the local economy. In conclusion, l believe that when rural people move to cities and reduce their populaton in the countryside can bring several drawbacks due to its potential to impact on people's population in big cities, hinder exporting food production, and underminer the local economy.

Response: In some nations increasing significantly people are motive to know about the history of the building they live. In my opinion the principal reason for this can be that individuals are keen to understande the structure of builings they live in. Another significant issue is they want to the originality of builings، date of construction and people who have lived there before .For achieving this goal its better to question local autharities or neighbors. Construction rules and builing materials vary in different part of world over the time . According to the region، culture and availiable materials، builings differ from eachother. For instance the buildings have constructed 100 years ago were simply built by stone ،wood and other natural materials،while in recent years، houses are built by concrete ،metal and other modernized materials. Throughout years the buildins need maintances . In the process of renovation the exterior face of buildings remaines the same whereas the interior parts experience impressive changes. Additionaly geting acquainted with the previous residents and what kind of people have lived there is vital to find the house which is convienent for us. People could get informed of the history of houses by asking lacal authorities.In this case they will refer to the district municipality and ask them to see the basic plans .Moreover they ask the name of the architects and other constructors ، however it is the best manner to become aware of buildings its a challengible way. For getting informed of history of buildinds in some cases we can ask of neighbors who have been living there for a long time. Overall individuals are interested in the history of the buildings they live in according to different aspects like kowing structure and previous residents.To get this aim they could ask lacal authorities or neighbors.

Response: In some nations more and more individuals are keen to discover about the history and background of the building they live in. In my point of view the principal reason of this attitude is to be aware of the stuructute of building and other cause is knowing about previous habitants . The manner individuals can get information of these isuses is to question of neighbors. In trems of the construction the building materials for constructing vary around the world ، building rules differ as well. For instance buildings are habitable in most part of the countries whereas it is esssential to have renovations، therefore the face of the builings remains almost constant over years or maybe it needs some minor chanegs، while the interior parts have significantly modified. Moreover get information about previous habitants and how they maintaince the houses are effective. When it comes to know about history of buildings we can mention the neighbors، especially the ones who have been living for long time in that regon .Although we can get informed about history of residential building trough local autharities ، in my opinion the information of the neighbors is more reliable for they are always in presence. In conclusion the interest of individuals to know about their buildings is not only admitted ،it is also a necessity. By getting informed of the structure and building materials and the way of renovation poeple could be more confident of their choice of dwelling.The convienent way to reach this data is to ask neighbors.

Response: Students attend university to improve their prospects and find suitable employment after graduation. For this reason, some feel that they should focus all their energy on their main subjects to gain a relevant qualification. Others want a more well-rounded education, so they try to learn about additional subjects. It is perfectly reasonable for students to enter university with a strong sense of curiosity and a desire to learn as much as possible. Unfortunately, we tend to put subjects into artificial boxes, suggesting that business, art and science are not connected. If students become too focused on a single area, it may stifle their initial curiosity, limiting their potential. They could also graduate with a very narrow skill set that doesn't translate well to the current job market, which often favours those who have taken a multidisciplinary approach to their studies. Despite this, caution is certainly needed. The more we learn about a subject, the more complex it becomes. Gaining an in-depth, specialist knowledge of a subject requires a certain level of focus and dedication over a long period. If we try to learn about too many things at once, our Knowledge may lack the depth required to obtain a qualification. If they are not careful, young people could begin to lose interest in their main subjects, which would be detrimental to their studies. While learning about other subjects is not necessarily a bad thing, I believe university students should ensure that their main subjects remain the priority so that they do not lose sight of their objective: gaining a qualification. Then they can calculate how much time, energy and headspace they have left for learning about other topics.

Response: Students attend university to improve their prospects and find suitable employment after graduation. For this reason, some feel that they should focus all their energy on their main subjects to gain a relevant qualification. Others want a more well-rounded education, so they try to learn about additional subjects. It is perfectly reasonable for students to enter university with a strong sense of curiosity and a desire to learn as much as possible. Unfortunately, we tend to put subjects into artificial boxes, suggesting that business, art and science are not connected. If students become too focused on a single area, it may stifle their initial curiosity, limiting their potential. They could also graduate with a very narrow skill set that doesn't translate well to the current job market, which often favours those who have taken a multidisciplinary approach to their studies. Despite this, caution is certainly needed. The more we learn about a subject, the more complex it becomes. Gaining an in-depth, specialist knowledge of a subject requires a certain level of focus and dedication over a long period. If we try to learn about too many things at once, our Knowledge may lack the depth required to obtain a qualification. If they are not careful, young people could begin to lose interest in their main subjects, which would be detrimental to their studies. While learning about other subjects is not necessarily a bad thing, I believe university students should ensure that their main subjects remain the priority so that they do not lose sight of their objective: gaining a qualification. Then they can calculate how much time, energy and headspace they have left for learning about other topics.

Response: The number of people travelling from countrysides toward capitals and big cities around the world is on the rise. This trend is causing problems for rural areas as well as bringing drawbacks to cities which of both require careful consideration. However, the negative aspects of this migrating pattern deserve careful attention which I will elaborate on in the following essay. On the one hand, as village settlers move to mega cities, the population of manpower in those remote areas will drop significantly, which have negative effects on both industries and local residents. First and foremost, in terms of industrial aspect, the companies in such places encounter a lack of a sufficient workforce because the skilled workers have travelled to big cities in search of better job prospects and higher income. In this context, employers are obliged to pay higher wages to adept worker for commuting long distances from other adjacent towns which has a direct detrimental influence on the domestic economy. Additionaly, this trend not only poses a threat to organisations, but also forces locals to face the consequences of this situation. For example, if a person wants to repair impaired equipment in their house in those remote regions, they will have to bring in an expert from another cities within the country which is undoubtedly costly and daunting. On the flip side, as a result of the growing population rate in destination cities, concerns including poorer air quality, a polluted environment, and a lack of decent jobs for city dwellers are inevitable. As an illustration, the more citizens work, the more fossil fuel is needed to operate private and public transport vehicles which considerably contributes to pollution in the weather and environment due to emitting a high amount of carbon dioxide and exhaust emissions. Furthermore, as demands for jobs escalate in overcrowded capital cities,the unemployment rate will assuredly surge, necessitating immediate measures to address the issue; otherwise, negative outcomes become impossible to mend. In conclusion, as indicated above, the migration of people from rural areas to urban ones is considered an undesirable process that has multifaceted drawbacks for both environments, such as increasing the unemployment rate in metropolises along with decreasing the workforce in remote regions. I firmly believe this pattern is the last thing every nation wants.