IELTS Writing Samples

Response: The number of people travelling from countrysides toward capitals and big cities around the world is on the rise. This trend is causing problems for rural areas as well as bringing drawbacks to cities which of both require careful consideration. However, the negative aspects of this migrating pattern deserve careful attention which I will elaborate on in the following essay. On the one hand, as village settlers move to mega cities, the population of manpower in those remote areas will drop significantly, which have negative effects on both industries and local residents. First and foremost, in terms of industrial aspect, the companies in such places encounter a lack of a sufficient workforce because the skilled workers have travelled to big cities in search of better job prospects and higher income. In this context, employers are obliged to pay higher wages to adept worker for commuting long distances from other adjacent towns which has a direct detrimental influence on the domestic economy. Additionaly, this trend not only poses a threat to organisations, but also forces locals to face the consequences of this situation. For example, if a person wants to repair impaired equipment in their house in those remote regions, they will have to bring in an expert from another cities within the country which is undoubtedly costly and daunting. On the flip side, as a result of the growing population rate in destination cities, concerns including poorer air quality, a polluted environment, and a lack of decent jobs for city dwellers are inevitable. As an illustration, the more citizens work, the more fossil fuel is needed to operate private and public transport vehicles which considerably contributes to pollution in the weather and environment due to emitting a high amount of carbon dioxide and exhaust emissions. Furthermore, as demands for jobs escalate in overcrowded capital cities,the unemployment rate will assuredly surge, necessitating immediate measures to address the issue; otherwise, negative outcomes become impossible to mend. In conclusion, as indicated above, the migration of people from rural areas to urban ones is considered an undesirable process that has multifaceted drawbacks for both environments, such as increasing the unemployment rate in metropolises along with decreasing the workforce in remote regions. I firmly believe this pattern is the last thing every nation wants.

Response: The variety of university subjects has significantly increased over the past few decades. Despite the arguments of some people that all of the time and attention of the students must be allocated to their own major, in this essay I intend to discuss about why the opposite of this belief is true. The reasons for this are twofold. First, it is vitally important that we appreciate the importance of some courses. On one hand, some people might believe it is not worthwhile for students to learn about general courses which do not belong to their main major. On the other hand, some teachers and parents encourage children to learn about different subjects. With regard to both views, it is my personal belief that all university students in the world must know a negligible amount of knowledge in different criteria. Some university's courses such as art, personal growth or psychology are essential and despite the fields of study, it is crucial for all members of society to know about it. For instance if biology students do not know anything about how to develop a well-balanced character or how to incorporate personal boundaries, they might be face difficulties in their personal lives and finding an appropriate partner. Furthermore, if art students do not know any tips related to business, it is hard for them to found a startup in the future. Moreover, in my opinion, it is the university's responsibility to provide different extracurricular activities and classes. One of the best ways to do this is to provide different facilities such as a sports club, and music club along with art and psychology classes aimed at encouraging students to participate in those activities in their leisure time. By way of conclusion, I once again reaffirm my view that it is essential for students to learn about other subjects in addition to their main subject.

Response: The variety of univeristy subjects has significantly increased over the past few decades. Despite the arguments of some people that all of the time and attention of the students most allocate to their own major, in this essay i intend to discuss about why the opposite of this belief is true. The reasons for this are twofold. First, it is vitally important that we appreciate the importance of some courses. On one hand some people might believe it is not worthwhile for students to learn about general courses which are not belong to their main major. On the other hand, some teachers and parents encourage children to learn about different subjects. Regard to both views, it is my personal belief that all of the university students in the world must know a negligible amount of knowledge in different criteria. Some university's courses such as art, personal growth or psychology are essential and despite the fields of study, it is crucial for all of the members of the society to know about it. For instance if biology students do not know anything about how to develop a well-balanced character or how to incorporate personal bounderis, they might be face difficulties in their perosnal lives and finding an appropiate partner. Furthermore, If art students do not know any tips related to business, it is hard for them to found a startup in the future. Moreover, in my opinion, it is the univeristy's responsibilty to provide different extracurricular activities and classes. One of the best ways to do this is to provide different facilities such as sport club, and music club along with art and psychology classes aimed at encouraging students to participate in those activities in their lesisure time. By way of conclusion, I once again reaffirm my view that it is essential for students to learn about other subjects in addition to their main subject.

Response: The number of people travelling from countrysides toward capitals and big cities around the world is on the rise. This trend is causing problems to rural areas as well as bringing out drawbacks for cities which both require careful considerations. However. the negative aspects of this migrating pattern deserve careful attentions which I will elaborate on this issue in the following essay. On the one hand, as village settlers move to mega cities, the population of manpower in those remote areas will drop significantly, which have negative effects on both industries and local residents. The first and foremost, in terms of industrial facet, the companies in such places encounter lack of sufficient workforce because the prominent workers have travelled to big cities for better job prospect and achieving higher income. In this context, employers are obliged to pay higher wages to adept worker for commuting long distances from other adjacent towns which has a direct detrimental influence on the domestic economy. Additionaly, not only would this trend pose threat to organisations, but also locals have to face the consequences of this menace. For example, if a person wants to repair an impared equipment in his or her house in those remote regions, he or she will have to bring in an expert from another cities within a country which is costly and a daunting job, undoubtedly. On the flip side, as a result of growing population rate in destination cities, consequences including poorer air-quality, polluted environment, and lack of decent jobs for city dwellers are inevitable. As an illustration, the more citizens are working, the more fossil fuel is needed to operate both private and public transport vehicles which considerably contributes to polluting weather and environments as well, because of emiting a high amount of Carbon-dioxide and exhaust fumes. On top of that, as long as demands for jobs are escalating in overcrowded capital cities, unemployement rate will surge assuredly that requires immediate measurements in order to stop the rot, otherwise negative outcomes become impossible to mend. In conclusion, as indicated above, travelling people from rural areas to urban ones is considered an undesired process which has multi-faceted demerits for both environments, like increasing unemployment figure in megalopolis coupled with decreasing the number of workforce in remote regions. I firmly believe this pattern is the last thing every nation wants.

Response: It is sometimes argued that in the far future newspapers and books will disappear. Due to advancements in technology, news and books will be published online and with no need for payment, so they will be more accessible to people. While I agree that books and newspapers would be significantly affected in the future, I believe that there are individuals who will continue to buy paper books or newspapers, and even pay for them. On the one hand, the effects of technological developments are undeniable, particularly on books and newspapers. First of all, with a considerable range of platforms in the world, there is competition between local and national press to attract their customers, so the newest news will be published quickly and will be available and free on many platforms, even on social media, like Instagram. In addition, as more people become aware of the detrimental effect of printing paper, which causes deforestation, they are less willing to buy these and prefer more e-books or read news online. Therefore, these traditional ways will lose their attraction. On the other hand, despite the above arguments, I believe that some people are going to use paper-based news or books in the future. By increasing the speed of publishing news, there are potential disadvantages. Firstly, the quality of news will decrease; and secondly, the yellow press might publish false news to increase their income. As a result, individuals will buy news to ensure that the publisher does not make any mistakes for its profit. Moreover, there are a number of people who struggle with the physical conditions, medical problems or not being familiar with technology, so they will buy paper books or news. For example, the older generation or disabled people who are not being able to go out will have to buy books, or people who have eye problems would continue to use traditional methods. In conclusion, in the wake of technology, paper books and newspaper may be forgotten, because in the future everything will be free and available. Although I agree that technology has a vital impact on books and newspapers, in my opinion in the future some people, such as the elderly, will still buy news or prefer to read paper books.

Response: It is sometimes argued that in the far-future newspapers and books would be disappeared. Due to the advancements in technology, news and books will be published online and even no need for payment, so they will be more accessible for people. While I agree that books and newspapers would be affected significant in the future, however I believe that there are individuals who will continue to buy paper books or newspapers, and even pay for them. On the one hand, the effects of the developments of technology are undeniable, particularly on books and newspapers. First of all, by having a considerable range of platforms in the world, there is a competition between local and national press to attract their customers, so the newest news will be published fast and will be available and free on so many platforms, even on the social media, like Instagram. In addition, as more people be aware about a detrimental effect of printing paper which cause deforestation, they are not more willing to buy these and prefer more e-books or read news online. Therefore, these traditional ways will lose their attraction. On the other hand, despite of above arguments, I believe that people are going to use paper-based news or books in future. By increasing the speed of publishing news, there are potential disadvantages. Firstly, the quality of news will be decrease; and secondly, the yellow press might publish false news to increase their outcome. As result, individuals will buy news to make sure that the publisher do not any mistakes for its profit. Moreover, there are a number of people that struggle with the physical condition, medical problems or not being familiar with technology, so they will buy paper books or news. For example, the older generation or disable people who are not being able to go out will have to buy books, or people who having eyes problem would continue to use the traditional methods. In conclusion, In the wake of technology, paper books and newspaper maybe be forgotten, because in the future everything will be free and available. Although I agree that technology has a vital impact on books and newspaper, in my opinion in the future some people, such as the elderly, still buy news or prefer to read paper book.

Response: There are opposing views on whether competition in various environments, including school and work is beneficial. Many argue that it can help us, while others believe cooperating can be more effective. This essay will examine both perspectives and explain why I agree with the former viewpoint. To begin with, a number of individuals hold the belief that cooprationg in better than competition, as it does not put coworkers and pupils against each other. They think rivalry can result not only in hostility but also in the separation of friends in severe cases, while collaborating builds bonds and reinforces team spirit in people. Furthermore, when people work in a team and try to assist each other, more ideas will be created. For example, in many elite companies, in order to address an issue, colleagues tend to brainstorm, as they believe it is the best approach to problem-solving. However, a vast majority of people believe competition in certain areas is essential. First and foremost, being competitive is a part of an individual's nature, and humans inherently tend to be the best in all competitions. If there had not been competition between actors at the Oscar ceremony, no one would have bothered themselves and done their best to win an award. Thereforem, competitive spirit plays a significant role in the progress and enthusiasm of people to develop themselves. In conclusion, although teaming up with others is a good approach as it prevents enmity, I think having competition in different fields is vital, as it helps us to try to get better and achieve resounding accomplishments.

Response: Nowadays, many individuals living in villages are migrating to large towns, resulting in a decline in the population of rural areas. This phenomenon can offer certain advantages to those who move, but it often leads to significant consequences for society as a whole. On one hand, young people who leave their small towns for larger cities find a wealth of opportunities. They have access to a diverse range of activities, including modern clubs, leisure facilities, and various career options. Consequently, by relocating to urban areas, they are likely to experience a more fulfilling life. As they secure employment more easily and earn higher incomes, they can spend their earnings on things that interest them. On the other hand, if an increasing number of people continue to leave rural regions, there will be a shortage of individuals to fulfill essential responsibilities. Professions such as agriculture, farming, and animal husbandry may face extinction if there are not enough people to carry out these vital tasks. The most critical consequence of this trend would be food shortages. If there is insufficient food for the population, it becomes irrelevant where people live or what resources are available to them; everyone will suffer equally. Therefore, it is not a wise decision to deplete small towns of their populations. In conclusion, while the prospect of finding better job opportunities and earning higher salaries is appealing to many, it does not justify the severe repercussions that can arise for society as a whole. Thus, the disadvantages of increased migration from villages to metropolises outweigh the benefits.

Response: Music has been a great representative of cultures for decades. It is argued that music can bring a sense of togetherness to people of different ages and cultures. In my opinion, music couldn’t be only words but also a universal sentiment. Music transmits a wide range of feelings such as sadness, love, grief, and loneliness. As a matter of fact, some people may not understand the exact meaning of the lyrics but can feel empathy with the singer. For example, Taylor Swift is a popular singer who holds universal tours annually for people who may barely know the English language, nonetheless thousands of people attend her tours and enjoy the performance. What's more, some audience members in an interview admitted they didn't know English but could feel the songs. As a result, people of different languages come together to hear the songs of a singer whom they don't know her language. So, I believe that music conveys meaning through words, but some people get the meaning through sentiment. Music mostly doesn’t involve age or location. People have access to a variety of songs from the cutting-edge internet. They can download high-stream music and be connected to worldwide trends. Instagram not only introduces a person but also introduces trendy music to the world. As a result, people from any country aged 60 can hear a song by Taylor Swift in a post on Instagram and consequently decide to attend her tour for the next. However, individuals' tastes in music may be far different, and when they are not interested in a song, they will never be inclined to download it. To conclude, although p may have various tastes in music, I agree that music can result in togetherness that unites people of different languages, cultures, ages, and locations.

Response: In today 's world, the importance of science has sparked cosiderable debate among various groups. Personally, I strongly agree with this statement because science can impact on most part of the part our lives and contribute to other parts. There are several reasons why might argue that science offer significant benefits. First and foremost, science not only affects personal life, but also helps social life. Increasing skills and knowledge can provide great opportunities in socities that lead to recognize our social level. For example, The specialty individuals who live wherever in the world, able to get job such as work in academic position or in fame copmanies and use their science in it. Furthermore, attempt to progress in science can foster your character and make confident that can helps to encourage others to pursue higher education to enhance their lives. On the negative site, some might argue that improving lives is not the most importance of science. Seldom do governments consider the aim of science as a curical part of life, With this in mind, lack of addressing the educational systems in schools and universities can resulted in majority of people don't consider the importance of science. Should government enforce some regulations, they would promote the role of science in improving lives. However, despite these concerns, I belive that science is vital way to improve our lives. In conclusion, while both above perspective have their merits, I compeletly agree improving in lives needs to science and neglecting the aim of science can lead to not improving.