This section presents a professionally wirtten variation of your essay and highlights the differences.
There is an ongoing debate about whether professionals should stay in the place where they have learned their qualifications, or they should be free to change their locations and choose anywhere they prefer to work.
There is an ongoing debate about whether professionals should remain in the country where they obtained their qualifications or be free to relocate and work wherever they prefer.
Some people have always been passionate about helping their peers and they believe that everybody has to serve people from their homtown and their country. Governments provide facilities to invest on different majors, and people who have the opportunity to increase their skills, should make it up in the future by using their abillities in order to support country. For instance, when studentst study medicine at the university, they participate in the classes to increase their knowledge, Moreover, there are free accesses to laboaotories and equipments which help them to foster their talents. The point is that lots of these thins are provided by taxes, and ordinary people pay these taxe. So when they graduate as medical doctors, they owe to the society to support them with health and care services
Some argue that individuals have a duty to serve their communities and countries, particularly when their education has been subsidized by public resources. Governments invest in various fields of study, and those who benefit from such opportunities should contribute their skills to society in return. For instance, medical students gain knowledge through university programs and utilize laboratories and equipment funded by taxpayers. Upon graduation, they have a moral obligation to provide healthcare services to the society that supported their education.
On the other hand, others mention that human is created free and they have the authority to do whatever they want and to live whenever they like. They say that is not fair to obligate them to live in a certain place jut because they have been trained there. For example, consider a baby which was born in remote place in the world, he tried hard to make progresses in his career, now he is able to travel to the developed countries and enjoy his achivements in new location. It is something that should not be judged.
Conversely, others believe that individuals have the fundamental right to choose where they live and work. They argue that it is unjust to restrict professionals to a specific location simply because they were trained there. For example, someone born in a remote area may strive to advance their career and eventually move to a more developed country to enjoy the fruits of their labor. Such choices should not be subject to criticism.
From my perspective, every individual is responsible for their lives. There must not be any obligation about these kind of decisions. it is crucial to respect each idea and give the autorithy to everyone to determine their routes in life.
In my view, every individual has the right to determine their own path. There should be no compulsory restrictions on such personal decisions. It is essential to respect differing perspectives and allow people the freedom to shape their own futures.