IELTS Writing Samples

Response: It is claimed that some vehicles like trucks, buses and cars will be automated driving which contributes to eliminate the drivers from these vehicles and people only can use them as a passenger in the future. This essay will clarify both sides of the coin, and demonstrate my view that the drawback outweigh the benefits. One the one hand, automatization is one of the consequences of modernity. The more humans are being replacing by Robots or other developed programming programs in many aspects while driving is not an exception. In addition, some people might assume that it can be considered as a great development for both individuals and disabled people. For example, if it reaches mass produced and distribute with affordable prices, it may fulfill paralyzed people dream of driving. However, they are still passengers, this revolution enables them to travel independently specially by car. Another merit of driverless vehicles would be less number of accidents which usually happen by human carelessness due to programming programs' precision as they are perfectly programmed. One the other hand, driverless vehicles can bring about numerous problem, albeit can be considered as a development. One of the drawbacks of these smart machines would be their potential mistakes in navigation. Due to the fact that they work by electricity or other written programs, any error or bug can contribute to irreversible consequences. Thus, this development not only endanger the passengers inside, but also people outside. For instance, even an unknown virus can ruin the program's function while preventing work efficiently and an accident by other cars or pedestrians as a result. In conclusion, despite automated vehicles provide many benefits, they can turn into a disaster if they operation face errors. Eventually, they should be considered as a threat that a bless.

Response: It is claimed that saving money for the future is crucial for individuals while the young persons are not an exeption. I strongly agree that everyone should be responsioble for their future unpredictable expenses, however some people may believe that this is the governments responsibility to provide some financial assistance. In this essay I will argue that why people should save money for the following years of their life even the youth. First and foremost, government supportive schemes, albeit useful, is not adequate due to the fact that national budget should be allocated to different aspects efficiently. Thus. People should not be dependent on others help in order to lack of responsibility for earn and save money may prevents them from enhancing their financial knowledge. Moreover, if a person does not have adequate knowledge about finance, means of investment or unpredictable expenditure, they are more likely to spent their money like water. However, governments can provide some incentive programs such as, some finance courses for all ages which contribute to rising public awareness about how invest properly or what kinds of investments are much more suitable for their age group and income. Eventually this is people who should determine their future by their wise decisions. Furthermore, this action provide a sense of self-confidence whenever they invest and make profits. Thus, learning to save money promote not only numerous benefits for future but also personal development. In conclusion, I affirm that it is a vital skill which should be learned no matter in what age you are due to its importance role in the present and future life for everybody.

Response: It is claimed that there is a decline in the population of countryside as a result of rural immigration to cities in several countries. Whilst I believe rural people have right to enjoy higher standards of living, I presume that this trend may give rise to some urban sprawling and air pollution. On the one hand, people living in the countryside usually are deprived from numerous facilities such as, higher educational systems and better healthcare systems. If they move to big cities, for example, they can enjoy attending more facilitated universities and hospitals. In addition, getting graduated from a top ranked university, may enable them to find a decent and rewarding job which contributes to higher standards of living. On the other hand, immigration to cities, albeit useful for rustic people, require a efficient infrastructure. This is to say that, immigration to cities may not only lead to overpopulation but also air pollution. Due to the fact that, urban sprawl is often the result of unplanned city development and a large number of residence who are seeking for a dwelling. Moreover, public transportation might not be able to assist people in meeting their transport needs and the increase in the usage of private cars can lead to air pollution. In conclusion, I affirm, despite the fact that living in a city provides many useful opportunities, the city should be well-infrastructure to be the host of migrants as this action can cause many systemic and environmental problems.

Response: There is a belief among people, which says, in the near future there will be no more human driver and all the travelling vehicle will be driverless. I assume this as a negative phenomena. On the one hand, there are plenty of reasons: first of all, many people job is driving. in my country specially recent years, many colloge studants or their dad are doing drivering for university cost, so if we just take their jobs and give it to AI we are actually destroing a popular job, andthat would be bring poverty and consequently, crime to the scociety. Secondly, I reckon, most of the people are not completely trustful to AI, and i think they are right as this really a sireios chang for the scociety and has an impact for all the citizens. On the other hand, it may have some benefits. Like time saiving which is somthing that does matter for most of us, if we consider that driverless cars areusing AI for founding the track so they will do the travel by the best way and that is how they help for time saiving. Another benefit that comes frome this progression in technology usage, is multi tasking for example, a student can do his or her homework on the way. in general while they do not need to drive the car they can do anyother activities. In conclusion, this future planing has its own positive and negative point but i believe it will heart people more than benefite them, as it turn many jobs useless.

Response: It is widely debated in some cultures that children should be given this massage that with hard attempt they would achieve whatever they want. One of the most significant disadvantages of children can achieve something if they try hard is, everything will not be achieve just with effort. creating this attitude may harm children because for becoming successful, various items are required and attempt is just one of them. young people may feel lose more than they should be if they could not achieve their goals, consequently they will lose their self-steem and confidence. Unfortunately, in the flip side, social media are trying to create some fake and unreal belief in children with bragging about success, something that awareness can prevent its possible hurts. On the contrary, there are some advantages, for instance this attitude raise children's confidence and create a good sense of perseverance. Also they will follow their dreams enthusiastically. Although these are merit factors for everyone but are not enough, and may caused young people think with each failure in their career life or educational life, they are not good enough and everything was their fault. In conclusion, I believe, encouraging children to put %100 of their ability and effort to achieve is not a good idea, unless remind them regularly that sometimes in real life, people become failed and it is common. As a result creating this belief due to the reasons I have mentioned above has more disadvantages.

Response: In the present days, there is a controversy among university students. Some of them believe that they should only focus on their own filed of study, and other group claim that it is better to learn about other subjects in addition to their main subjects. I totally agree with second view. Those who claim the student should only pass courses related to their subject, believe that in the present era the branches of science have become extremely specialized and it seems to be logical each person learn relative courses deeply to have a better performance. For example, medical science students don not need to learn about civil engineering or mechanical engineering because, these skills are not useful in their major so it is better for students to become profound in their subject of study. On the other hand, other group of people including my self, claim that some new skills such as artifiicial inteligence and data analysis are essential tools for each university student and all the students should learn about these new topics because they are so practical in every branches of science. For instance, all the researches in every fields of science need analyzing data and these tasks are done using computer programing as a consequence, all the experts should be familiar with these skills and beter for them to learn these skills at university. Moreover, nowadays different types of science are relevant so it is logical that students know about some majores related to their main subject. For instance, knowing about architecture can be helpful for civil engineering students because their works are very dependent on each other. In summary, from what has been discussed it can be concluded that it seems to be rational, the students should learn about other subjects in addition to their main subject because it can be helpful in their future and for conducting their research.

Response: Some students have demanded the addition of other subjects to their main courses, while others contend that they have to prioritize their major-related subjects. Although I acknowledge the benefits of the former approach, I have an inclination toward the latter group. Adding extracurricular subjects offers creativity and life balance. Firstly, studying other materials can open one's horizons and unlock doors into uncharted territories where individuals would be able to foster their innovation and creativity. These invaluable abilities can help individuals to stand apart from their peers and surpass them in professional settings. Take Steve Jobs, for instance; his insatiable curiosity encouraged him to attend calligraphy classes. This unrelated skill later became the primary motive for the distinguishable design of iPhone's apps. Additionally, it is argued that doing artistic and sportive activities replenishes individuals' energy sources and lowers their heightened stress level caused by the rigorous syllabus. These activities help individuals get away from the daily grind and focus on something less stressful for a while, ultimately encouraging a more balanced lifestyle. However, the lack of time and little value these unrelated subjects offer have constrained their addition to the university's curricula. Students' schedules are already condensed, and adding extra materials would only bring about negative impacts on their health and later economic achievement. Students have to manage studying and researching, along with attending lectures during their university years. Therefore, adding other subjects only demands extra work, ultimately necessitating students to lessen their sleeping hours and force them to abandon their leisure time activities. This unbalanced approach can cause anxiety and depression in the long run. Moreover, by shortening lecture times in order to make way for other subjects, professors are obliged to omit a significant portion of information. As a result, students will not get an adequate education and will not be equipped with the essential skills demanded in professional settings. Hence, without the required skills, they will be forced to opt for jobs with lower incomes. In conclusion, the potential drawbacks of adding extra subjects outweigh its benefits. Therefore, I am of the opinion that students should focus on their studies related to their qualifications.

Response: It is claimed that there should be a decrease in the number of workload hours per week and workforces should enjoy more days off. I agree with this statement in order to this can contribute to higher productivity and workers mental health First and foremost, there might be a belief that heavy weekly work lead to higher productivity. While due to the fact that workers usually do not have adequate rest, they are more likely to make both minor and serious mistake in their job. For instance, if employees do not have sufficient leisure time to recharge themselves for a new working week, the overall productivity may sacrifice to fatigue. Thus, the more working days do not necessarily lead to fulfilling the aims of participants. As there is often a strong connection and cooperation between colleagues, lack of energy in even one employee can affect other's development. Moreover, allocating longer weekends to workers not only increase development but also deteriorate conflicts. When a person is tired, there is more chance to lose their temper easily. Therefore, enjoying enough rest can prevent from aggression in the work environment as a result of fatigue. This enables employees to cooperate well with each other, while increasing their cognitive abilities. In addition, people show more sympathy when they are in a good mood they can feel their surrounding environment better than when they are frustrated. A boosted energy would lift the others spirit either and make a friendlier atmosphere which is filled with positive energy and joy. In conclusion, from my point of view, despite the fact that many working hours provide productivity, it can cause many problem for both workers and work places.

Response: It is claimed that saving money for the future is crucial for individuals while the young persons are not an exeption. I strongly agree that everyone should be responsioble for their future unpredictable expenses, however some people may believe that this is the governments responsibility to provide some financial assistance. In this essay I will argue that why people should save money for the following years of their life even the youth. First and foremost, government supportive schemes, albeit useful, is not adequate due to the fact that national budget should be allocated to different aspects efficiently. Thus. People should not be dependent on others help in order to lack of responsibility for earn and save money may prevents them from enhancing their financial knowledge. Moreover, if a person does not have adequate knowledge about finance, means of investment or unpredictable expenditure, they are more likely to spent their money like water. However, governments can provide some incentive programs such as, some finance courses for all ages which contribute to rising public awareness about how invest properly or what kinds of investments are much more suitable for their age group and income. Eventually this is people who should determine their future by their wise decisions. Furthermore, this action provide a sense of self-confidence whenever they invest and make profits. Thus, learning to save money promote not only numerous benefits for future but also personal development. In conclusion, I affirm that it is a vital skill which should be learned no matter in what age you are due to its importance role in the present and future life for everybody.

Response: It is argued that applying an increase in the price of sugary snacks may contribute to the lower consumption of sugar, due to the fact that the high amount of sugar in produced drinkable and eatable products is associated with many health-related problem. I agree with this statement and some preventive measures should be taken to decrease the usage of sugary products, while encouraging people to enjoy more wholesome meals. First and foremost, when people do not pay attention to their intakes adequately, it would be the government responsibility to take some effective actions in order to reduce health problems for its citizens. One of those measurements can be allocating tax burdens on some specific products, especially sugary ones or make them more expensive due to the fact that they are a serious harm for physical well-being. These actions benefit not only humans but also the overall health of society. For example, if people be obese, they are more likely to stay at home passively and lack of activity can bring about fewer workforce and lead to inadequate financial productivity. Making the products with sugary flavors, albeit useful, is not enough. Some incentive programs can be done to rise people awareness of the adverse impact of unhealthy food on mental and physical health. For instance, providing some deteriorating advertisements due to encourage people to consume less sugary products. Moreover, introducing some shining examples of problems which are the result of consuming these products such as obesity and diabetes, may change the people's shopping habits. Another efficient action would be providing fresh fruits and vegetables in every walk of the city. In conclusion, government play an important role in shaping the people's daily consumption. In addition, some measures should be undertaken in order to reduce the consumption of unhealthy snacks.