IELTS Writing Samples

Response: It is widely debated in some cultures that children should be given this massage that with hard attempt they would achieve whatever they want. One of the most significant disadvantages of children can achieve something if they try hard is, everything will not be achieve just with effort. creating this attitude may harm children because for becoming successful, various items are required and attempt is just one of them. young people may feel lose more than they should be if they could not achieve their goals, consequently they will lose their self-steem and confidence. Unfortunately, in the flip side, social media are trying to create some fake and unreal belief in children with bragging about success, something that awareness can prevent its possible hurts. On the contrary, there are some advantages, for instance this attitude raise children's confidence and create a good sense of perseverance. Also they will follow their dreams enthusiastically. Although these are merit factors for everyone but are not enough, and may caused young people think with each failure in their career life or educational life, they are not good enough and everything was their fault. In conclusion, I believe, encouraging children to put %100 of their ability and effort to achieve is not a good idea, unless remind them regularly that sometimes in real life, people become failed and it is common. As a result creating this belief due to the reasons I have mentioned above has more disadvantages.

Response: In the present days, there is a controversy among university students. Some of them believe that they should only focus on their own filed of study, and other group claim that it is better to learn about other subjects in addition to their main subjects. I totally agree with second view. Those who claim the student should only pass courses related to their subject, believe that in the present era the branches of science have become extremely specialized and it seems to be logical each person learn relative courses deeply to have a better performance. For example, medical science students don not need to learn about civil engineering or mechanical engineering because, these skills are not useful in their major so it is better for students to become profound in their subject of study. On the other hand, other group of people including my self, claim that some new skills such as artifiicial inteligence and data analysis are essential tools for each university student and all the students should learn about these new topics because they are so practical in every branches of science. For instance, all the researches in every fields of science need analyzing data and these tasks are done using computer programing as a consequence, all the experts should be familiar with these skills and beter for them to learn these skills at university. Moreover, nowadays different types of science are relevant so it is logical that students know about some majores related to their main subject. For instance, knowing about architecture can be helpful for civil engineering students because their works are very dependent on each other. In summary, from what has been discussed it can be concluded that it seems to be rational, the students should learn about other subjects in addition to their main subject because it can be helpful in their future and for conducting their research.

Response: Some students have demanded the addition of other subjects to their main courses, while others contend that they have to prioritize their major-related subjects. Although I acknowledge the benefits of the former approach, I have an inclination toward the latter group. Adding extracurricular subjects offers creativity and life balance. Firstly, studying other materials can open one's horizons and unlock doors into uncharted territories where individuals would be able to foster their innovation and creativity. These invaluable abilities can help individuals to stand apart from their peers and surpass them in professional settings. Take Steve Jobs, for instance; his insatiable curiosity encouraged him to attend calligraphy classes. This unrelated skill later became the primary motive for the distinguishable design of iPhone's apps. Additionally, it is argued that doing artistic and sportive activities replenishes individuals' energy sources and lowers their heightened stress level caused by the rigorous syllabus. These activities help individuals get away from the daily grind and focus on something less stressful for a while, ultimately encouraging a more balanced lifestyle. However, the lack of time and little value these unrelated subjects offer have constrained their addition to the university's curricula. Students' schedules are already condensed, and adding extra materials would only bring about negative impacts on their health and later economic achievement. Students have to manage studying and researching, along with attending lectures during their university years. Therefore, adding other subjects only demands extra work, ultimately necessitating students to lessen their sleeping hours and force them to abandon their leisure time activities. This unbalanced approach can cause anxiety and depression in the long run. Moreover, by shortening lecture times in order to make way for other subjects, professors are obliged to omit a significant portion of information. As a result, students will not get an adequate education and will not be equipped with the essential skills demanded in professional settings. Hence, without the required skills, they will be forced to opt for jobs with lower incomes. In conclusion, the potential drawbacks of adding extra subjects outweigh its benefits. Therefore, I am of the opinion that students should focus on their studies related to their qualifications.

Response: It is claimed that there should be a decrease in the number of workload hours per week and workforces should enjoy more days off. I agree with this statement in order to this can contribute to higher productivity and workers mental health First and foremost, there might be a belief that heavy weekly work lead to higher productivity. While due to the fact that workers usually do not have adequate rest, they are more likely to make both minor and serious mistake in their job. For instance, if employees do not have sufficient leisure time to recharge themselves for a new working week, the overall productivity may sacrifice to fatigue. Thus, the more working days do not necessarily lead to fulfilling the aims of participants. As there is often a strong connection and cooperation between colleagues, lack of energy in even one employee can affect other's development. Moreover, allocating longer weekends to workers not only increase development but also deteriorate conflicts. When a person is tired, there is more chance to lose their temper easily. Therefore, enjoying enough rest can prevent from aggression in the work environment as a result of fatigue. This enables employees to cooperate well with each other, while increasing their cognitive abilities. In addition, people show more sympathy when they are in a good mood they can feel their surrounding environment better than when they are frustrated. A boosted energy would lift the others spirit either and make a friendlier atmosphere which is filled with positive energy and joy. In conclusion, from my point of view, despite the fact that many working hours provide productivity, it can cause many problem for both workers and work places.

Response: It is claimed that saving money for the future is crucial for individuals while the young persons are not an exeption. I strongly agree that everyone should be responsioble for their future unpredictable expenses, however some people may believe that this is the governments responsibility to provide some financial assistance. In this essay I will argue that why people should save money for the following years of their life even the youth. First and foremost, government supportive schemes, albeit useful, is not adequate due to the fact that national budget should be allocated to different aspects efficiently. Thus. People should not be dependent on others help in order to lack of responsibility for earn and save money may prevents them from enhancing their financial knowledge. Moreover, if a person does not have adequate knowledge about finance, means of investment or unpredictable expenditure, they are more likely to spent their money like water. However, governments can provide some incentive programs such as, some finance courses for all ages which contribute to rising public awareness about how invest properly or what kinds of investments are much more suitable for their age group and income. Eventually this is people who should determine their future by their wise decisions. Furthermore, this action provide a sense of self-confidence whenever they invest and make profits. Thus, learning to save money promote not only numerous benefits for future but also personal development. In conclusion, I affirm that it is a vital skill which should be learned no matter in what age you are due to its importance role in the present and future life for everybody.

Response: It is argued that applying an increase in the price of sugary snacks may contribute to the lower consumption of sugar, due to the fact that the high amount of sugar in produced drinkable and eatable products is associated with many health-related problem. I agree with this statement and some preventive measures should be taken to decrease the usage of sugary products, while encouraging people to enjoy more wholesome meals. First and foremost, when people do not pay attention to their intakes adequately, it would be the government responsibility to take some effective actions in order to reduce health problems for its citizens. One of those measurements can be allocating tax burdens on some specific products, especially sugary ones or make them more expensive due to the fact that they are a serious harm for physical well-being. These actions benefit not only humans but also the overall health of society. For example, if people be obese, they are more likely to stay at home passively and lack of activity can bring about fewer workforce and lead to inadequate financial productivity. Making the products with sugary flavors, albeit useful, is not enough. Some incentive programs can be done to rise people awareness of the adverse impact of unhealthy food on mental and physical health. For instance, providing some deteriorating advertisements due to encourage people to consume less sugary products. Moreover, introducing some shining examples of problems which are the result of consuming these products such as obesity and diabetes, may change the people's shopping habits. Another efficient action would be providing fresh fruits and vegetables in every walk of the city. In conclusion, government play an important role in shaping the people's daily consumption. In addition, some measures should be undertaken in order to reduce the consumption of unhealthy snacks.

Response: In the new millinneum , thanks to technology many people dealing with social media, and their not tend to perchase printed newspaper or books. I agree this idea that individuals tend to more read everything online. In the first place, there are plenty of reason for reading online and provide platform suitable for everybody. For example, digital convenience, the rise of the internet has made access to information incredibly easy. With smartphones, tablets, and computers, users can access a vast array of content anytime and anywhere with one click, which is more convenient that carrying physical books or newspaper. Moreover, users can awareness of environmental issues grows, and get information around the world. Some individuals may prefer digital formats to reduce paper consumption and waste. Secondly, cost of Digital content is one of the benefits online. Many online platforms offer free news and articles , making it appealing for consumers to find information without the need to pay for subscriptions or printed materials. Furthermore, people can stay at home and read a lot of books without any pay and without their stuck the traffic jam. Additionally, every body can have a lot of e-books on their phone and everytime their want to can read. Reading articles and books in online platform not only is conviente but we can save a lot of time. Which is priceless. To sum up,while digital media will continue to dominate and influence hoe people consume information. in my opinion, in the future many people turn to online books, because is suitable platform for everybody.

Response: It is often argued that the price of some unhealthy products must increase due to they cause diseases especially those which is made of lots of sugar. I partially agree with this view and obviously they are harmful for human’s health, however the price is not the only problem and people would purchase them even if is not cheap. On the one hand, it is clear that increasing price of junk foods encourage individuals to buy less and it is not affordable for everyone. In this case the consumption of sugar will decrease among the society and people would not experience some chronic disease such as high blood pressure. So, the healthier individuals are, the lower the patient load of hospitals will be. Moreover, the healthcare staff would have more time to treat other patients who have serious diseases. In addition, if the products were costly, less advertising companies will invest due to it is not affordable for majority of people and low profit they will make. Therefore, the manufacturers may produce some type of food and drinks that are healthier and contain less sugar. On the other hand, not also being expensive might not result in lower purchase, but also individuals may think they are worthy to taste due to its high quality ingredients. For instance, if a sugary drink was not cheap, customers will believe it contains something special and makes it a luxury item in the market, which is worth to pay. Another result is the negative competition among the producers of the food industry when a fake rise for an unhealthy product price happens. This will often lead to increased healthy products to make a higher profit and devastate the market totally. To conclude, costly junk foods may encourage some people to pay for the notorious ones but there is no guarantee the advantages outweigh the disadvantages.

Response: Some nations believe that children are given advice all their dreams will fulfil if they work hard as much as needed. This attitude will mostly lead to the individual successful; while, in some cases it will cause children to have mental consequences. This essay will discuss both merits and demerits of this approach. On the one hand, there are some significant benefits to emphasize to children that they will achieve all their goals through being industrious. This is true for everyone that the more they try, with any levels of ability, the more they success. Effort, repetition and continuity in any path increase experience and learning more, and facilitate to make progress. Besides, when young people are sure of the result, they accomplish their tasks optimistically and without stress, so his performance will be rise. Hence, rarely do they fail. On the other hand, this statement can have some dramatically drawbacks. If a child tries his best but not be successful, he will find himself guilty. It can damage their self-esteem and make them more hesitant to take risks in the future. Thus, not only will he be disillusioned, but he also will not follow his other goals. In addition, this message can make this wrong belief that only effort can make success, despite the fact that there are several factors to be prosperous such as talent, interest, luck and life circumstance. Having all this factors altogether, someone can always fortunate. In conclusion, although telling children everything you want will be done if you do your best can make them more effective, it can have negative effects on their minds. Schools should adopt a policy to learn student both sides of winning and losing.

Response: In today's world, we should pay more attention to our diet. With regard to this fact, companies that produce products with high amounts of sugar should be banned or at least rise thir price to encourage people to consume less sugar. I think that is not a reasonable soulotion. First of all, I disagree with this point of view because raising prices effect so many people on society and bring poverty with it self, and the biggest damage in this example is for workers on realevent factories because as the time manager dosent feel good profite with his or her manufactures, he or she will reduce the workers salary. Instead of this, government should do some positive activities like: free confrences, advertising a healthy diet with usage of radio, tv, podcasts, bilbords... The second biggest help, I reckon come from sience. Individuals use sugar in many different activities for example: making cake or coffee or event for switing the tea. Consequently, people are not able to just eradicate sugar from their lives. so sientists should help both factories and people to continue their activities with just a little difference, and that is replacing sugar with another natural thing which has not bad effects on human body. In conclusion, a healthy diet is completely necessary and it is good to reduce our daily useage of sugar, but finding the true way is a little difficult. While some people may offere to sell sugary products with higher prices, I assume that is not the answer, the right way happens with the help of both government and science.