This section presents a professionally wirtten variation of your essay and highlights the differences.
It is claimed that there is a decline in the population of countryside as a result of rural immigration to cities in several countries. Whilst I believe rural people have right to enjoy higher standards of living, I presume that this trend may give rise to some urban sprawling and air pollution.
It is claimed that there is a decline in the population of rural areas due to the migration of people from the countryside to cities in several countries. While I believe that rural residents have the right to enjoy higher standards of living, I contend that this trend may lead to urban sprawl and increased air pollution.
On the one hand, people living in the countryside usually are deprived from numerous facilities such as, higher educational systems and better healthcare systems. If they move to big cities, for example, they can enjoy attending more facilitated universities and hospitals. In addition, getting graduated from a top ranked university, may enable them to find a decent and rewarding job which contributes to higher standards of living.
On the one hand, people living in rural areas are often deprived of numerous facilities, such as advanced educational systems and better healthcare services. By moving to larger cities, for example, they can access more well-equipped universities and hospitals. Additionally, graduating from a top-ranked university may enable them to secure decent and rewarding jobs, which contribute to an improved quality of life.
On the other hand, immigration to cities, albeit useful for rustic people, require a efficient infrastructure. This is to say that, immigration to cities may not only lead to overpopulation but also air pollution. Due to the fact that, urban sprawl is often the result of unplanned city development and a large number of residence who are seeking for a dwelling. Moreover, public transportation might not be able to assist people in meeting their transport needs and the increase in the usage of private cars can lead to air pollution.
On the other hand, migration to cities, although beneficial for rural individuals, requires efficient infrastructure. This means that urban migration can lead not only to overpopulation but also to air pollution. Urban sprawl is often the result of unplanned city development and a large influx of residents seeking housing. Furthermore, public transportation systems may struggle to meet the increased demand, leading to a rise in the use of private vehicles, which in turn exacerbates air pollution.
In conclusion, I affirm, despite the fact that living in a city provides many useful opportunities, the city should be well-infrastructure to be the host of migrants as this action can cause many systemic and environmental problems.
In conclusion, I assert that while living in a city offers many valuable opportunities, it is essential for urban areas to have well-developed infrastructure to accommodate migrants. Without proper planning, this influx can result in significant systemic and environmental challenges.