IELTS Writing Samples

Response: In the new millinneum , thanks to technology many people dealing with social media, and their not tend to perchase printed newspaper or books. I agree this idea that individuals tend to more read everything online. In the first place, there are plenty of reason for reading online and provide platform suitable for everybody. For example, digital convenience, the rise of the internet has made access to information incredibly easy. With smartphones, tablets, and computers, users can access a vast array of content anytime and anywhere with one click, which is more convenient that carrying physical books or newspaper. Moreover, users can awareness of environmental issues grows, and get information around the world. Some individuals may prefer digital formats to reduce paper consumption and waste. Secondly, cost of Digital content is one of the benefits online. Many online platforms offer free news and articles , making it appealing for consumers to find information without the need to pay for subscriptions or printed materials. Furthermore, people can stay at home and read a lot of books without any pay and without their stuck the traffic jam. Additionally, every body can have a lot of e-books on their phone and everytime their want to can read. Reading articles and books in online platform not only is conviente but we can save a lot of time. Which is priceless. To sum up,while digital media will continue to dominate and influence hoe people consume information. in my opinion, in the future many people turn to online books, because is suitable platform for everybody.

Response: It is often argued that the price of some unhealthy products must increase due to they cause diseases especially those which is made of lots of sugar. I partially agree with this view and obviously they are harmful for human’s health, however the price is not the only problem and people would purchase them even if is not cheap. On the one hand, it is clear that increasing price of junk foods encourage individuals to buy less and it is not affordable for everyone. In this case the consumption of sugar will decrease among the society and people would not experience some chronic disease such as high blood pressure. So, the healthier individuals are, the lower the patient load of hospitals will be. Moreover, the healthcare staff would have more time to treat other patients who have serious diseases. In addition, if the products were costly, less advertising companies will invest due to it is not affordable for majority of people and low profit they will make. Therefore, the manufacturers may produce some type of food and drinks that are healthier and contain less sugar. On the other hand, not also being expensive might not result in lower purchase, but also individuals may think they are worthy to taste due to its high quality ingredients. For instance, if a sugary drink was not cheap, customers will believe it contains something special and makes it a luxury item in the market, which is worth to pay. Another result is the negative competition among the producers of the food industry when a fake rise for an unhealthy product price happens. This will often lead to increased healthy products to make a higher profit and devastate the market totally. To conclude, costly junk foods may encourage some people to pay for the notorious ones but there is no guarantee the advantages outweigh the disadvantages.

Response: Some nations believe that children are given advice all their dreams will fulfil if they work hard as much as needed. This attitude will mostly lead to the individual successful; while, in some cases it will cause children to have mental consequences. This essay will discuss both merits and demerits of this approach. On the one hand, there are some significant benefits to emphasize to children that they will achieve all their goals through being industrious. This is true for everyone that the more they try, with any levels of ability, the more they success. Effort, repetition and continuity in any path increase experience and learning more, and facilitate to make progress. Besides, when young people are sure of the result, they accomplish their tasks optimistically and without stress, so his performance will be rise. Hence, rarely do they fail. On the other hand, this statement can have some dramatically drawbacks. If a child tries his best but not be successful, he will find himself guilty. It can damage their self-esteem and make them more hesitant to take risks in the future. Thus, not only will he be disillusioned, but he also will not follow his other goals. In addition, this message can make this wrong belief that only effort can make success, despite the fact that there are several factors to be prosperous such as talent, interest, luck and life circumstance. Having all this factors altogether, someone can always fortunate. In conclusion, although telling children everything you want will be done if you do your best can make them more effective, it can have negative effects on their minds. Schools should adopt a policy to learn student both sides of winning and losing.

Response: In today's world, we should pay more attention to our diet. With regard to this fact, companies that produce products with high amounts of sugar should be banned or at least rise thir price to encourage people to consume less sugar. I think that is not a reasonable soulotion. First of all, I disagree with this point of view because raising prices effect so many people on society and bring poverty with it self, and the biggest damage in this example is for workers on realevent factories because as the time manager dosent feel good profite with his or her manufactures, he or she will reduce the workers salary. Instead of this, government should do some positive activities like: free confrences, advertising a healthy diet with usage of radio, tv, podcasts, bilbords... The second biggest help, I reckon come from sience. Individuals use sugar in many different activities for example: making cake or coffee or event for switing the tea. Consequently, people are not able to just eradicate sugar from their lives. so sientists should help both factories and people to continue their activities with just a little difference, and that is replacing sugar with another natural thing which has not bad effects on human body. In conclusion, a healthy diet is completely necessary and it is good to reduce our daily useage of sugar, but finding the true way is a little difficult. While some people may offere to sell sugary products with higher prices, I assume that is not the answer, the right way happens with the help of both government and science.

Response: There is an ongoing debate about whether individuals should take risks in their personal lives and career path. I personally believe that there are significant benefits to taking risks in both professional and personal life with only a few minor drawbacks. In this essay, I will discuss these advantages and disadvantages. On the one hand, taking risks can lead individuals to major success and progress, particularly in their professional lives because this this approach can provide them with notable opportunities, helping them climb their career ladder quicker than others. For instance, those who have jobs related to the economy can take advantage of taking risks in their career. Moreover, taking risk can significantly enhance bravery and courage in people's personalities, as they must be brave enough to make some vital decisions. This can also help them gain valuable skills, such as problem-solving and decision-making because they more risks they take, the more likely it is for them to face with different challenges; therefore, they can learn how to resolve their problems effectively. On the other hand, in my opinion, being a risk-taker person can result in some minor disadvantages. Firstly, in some circumstances, this attitude can lead people to failure and inadequate results, such as bankruptcy which affect their lives negatively and create an unstable financial situation. Additionally, conservative people often make reasonable decisions, while those who take risks may have less consideration in their choices, which can result in more and more failure in life. Consequently, it can have a negative impact on their mental health, leading them to feelings of hopeless and despair. In conclusion, it seems to me that the possible benefits of being a risk-taker in life, including improving valuable skills and providing major opportunities, are more considerable than its potential dangers.

Response: In several countries in recent years, individuals are able to go to a supermarket and purchase foreigner food products from different parts of the world. It has its own pros and cons. This essay discusses both sides of this issue. In general, I believe it is a positive development since it can be used to make a progress in the economy and boost the level of satisfaction of people. It is widely accepted that having opportunity to buy products from different countries increases competition in a country. In this circumstance, domestic producers ought to produce items with higher quality to compete with foreigner peers. As a result, people are able to choose the better product. For instance, chocolate like Nutella and Jif are really delicious and yummy. Companies in my country would produce chocolate according to the global standards, if they want to stay in the market. In this way, interior companies will create chocolate with high quality. On the other hand, it has several drawbacks. A group of people tend to buy only branded products and foods from other countries. They claim that domestic products do not have acceptable quality. As a result, if companies do not level up their food, they would deal with breakdowns. In addition, a large group of members in society will lose their job. It means that society will counter with economic and social issues. In conclusion, I argue that it is critical to make a balance between using interior and exterior products. Domestic companies should to take advantages of the competitional market. Not only does it help them to produce foods with convenient quality, but it also helps them to earn more money by selling more foods.

Response: There is a belief in several traditions that telling children to try hard adequately, provides them with the possibility of achieving everything. This essay will suggest that taking incentives programs to activate motivation can be the primary benefit for the children, while some mental disorders because of stress may be the main drawback. First and foremost, encouraging the children by positive energy and motivating words can lead to boosting their ambitious to gain more and more. If parents or other authorities tell a child that they have the power to make their lives by hardworking, it will instill a sense of self-confidence in them. For example, the children who have supportive parents are more likely to escape the fear and take action in order to fulfill their dreams. In this case, they are not only motivated but also strong enough to tackle any obstacle. On the other hand, keep telling children to work hard, albeit useful, can contribute to various psychological problems such as chronic stress and ant-social behaviors. Moreover, it can foster the sense of superiority to achieve everything at any cost. On contrary, some children may have to deal with inferiority about their failure due to peer pressures. As continuous stress may prevents them to show their best performance. In conclusion, however children can be encouraged by others' enlightening quotes to take measure, there is still the chance to put a great deal of pressure and burden on them unconsciously as the result of meeting all their needs.

Response: In recent years, many businesses have been focusing on promoting their products, because they have been upgraded and are considerd innovative. In my opinion this trend have many reasons, and while it might seem beneficial, it can have some downsides as well. To begin with, the underlying reason for the great pressure on an innovative product by producers has various explanations. Firstly, these days, indivisuals have more desire due to the rapid-paced quality of the modern world. They not only are faced to many challenges like E-learning on pandemic, but also are called for more advanced items to respond these problems adequately. For example, these items can be a new interactive platform or a better quality laptop designed for a rigorous study. As a result, companies see these gaps and try to fill them with their newly introduced products. Secondly, they can also exploit the psychological effects of the new products and use it for raising their sales. They are completely aware of the fact that their designed item might have a hanful new features, but they use this fact and encourage people to buy them. For instance, new vesion of iphone is only bear an other camera lense, which made it a little more high-tech than its previous one. However, this feature has made it very popular and drawn sheer interests twards it especially on social media. With regard to its overall effects, I believe it has both positive and negative implications. In many cases people are truely desperate for a product in order to overcome their new challenges. Thus, this circumastance call entreprenures for alerting them and help them for reaching their desirable results. This can be a positive side of this trend. Although, In many cases, companies prioritize their economic status and intrigue their consumers for purchasing their sellings, and collect their adequate budget. Consequently, this is only a disruption for people which deplete their savings. In this case, advertising new products is assumed profoundly negative as it abuses people's resources. In conclusion, In my view, introducing new merchandises is reasonable, although some firms tend to use this method for only financial matters.

Response: In recent years, many people have been curious to find out about the history of the houses they reside in. This trend have different reasons, and people might find relavent information by asking questions from differnt sources. To begin with, understanding about the history of places we live in might have some benfits in terms of finance and family heritage. Firstly, if the houses were for well-known persons who once resided in such places, then it would have historical values. As a result, people can exploit this oppurtunity by making these houses accessible for public and make money by in this way. Secondly, while these houses have historical value, they might also sell them with high prices to differnt organizations and gain more money for buying a modern house. Finally, while many people research for financial benefits, many try to develop insight about their ancestors. For example, my grandfather has done some investigations and understood that our family line is related to one of the princes in Ghajar dinesty who had the responsibility for organizing this region. However, obtaining these information are not straightforward, but there are some ways to tackling this problem. The first way is to refer to the local libraries for reading the related books about the history of the neighbourhoods and the recordings of their owners. Similarly, asking the elderlies in our neighbourhood might be a practical solution as well. In additon, individuals can refer to the relevant authorities to investigate the past recordings of the town and their land lords, if the recordings are available. In conclusion, these days, people are eager to get more information about their huosing as it not only contributes to leverage their potential, but also gain knowledge about their bloodlines. These information can be found throgh local resources or according authorities.

Response: In recent years, employing machinery equipment in industries has become more prevalent compared to the past. While there are some drawbacks to using machines in the job market like decreasing job opportunities for people, the perks of this improvement such as being both less time-consuming and cost-effective are far more significant. Firstly, one of the primary downsides of this advancement is robot employment in practical jobs reduces the number of career openings for the human workforce. In other words, the more machines perform hands-on tasks in workplaces, the less employers hire human workers for their job vacancies. Furthermore, machinery is limited to completing tasks needing human abilities including decision-making skills, managing customer responses, and comprehension of urgent situations. For instance, the projects associated with autonomous vehicles failed due to a lack of decision-making abilities in particular conditions like the possibility of accidents needing human involvement. However, there are some merits associated with this technological improvement, one of the prominent ones is time-effectiveness. To put it another way, today, many companies employ machines for their labor-intensive jobs to work more and faster than human laborers for 24 hours nonstop. In addition, embedding technological equipment in handy jobs is economically efficient for industries, as they need no salaries, insurance, or retirement. Moreover, this development creates new employment prospects for individuals in programming, Artificial Intelligence, and IT. In conclusion, although there are some disadvantages to applying robots to functional careers like increasing the unemployment rate among traditional physical workers and the limitation of robot performance in some specific conditions due to the lack of emotions, there are some potential benefits in this improvement such as being both time-saving and cost-efficient. Finally, a cooperative approach that combines humans and robots to work together is the best way to achieve the best outputs.