IELTS Writing Samples

Response: There is a belief in several traditions that telling children to try hard adequately, provides them with the possibility of achieving everything. This essay will suggest that taking incentives programs to activate motivation can be the primary benefit for the children, while some mental disorders because of stress may be the main drawback. First and foremost, encouraging the children by positive energy and motivating words can lead to boosting their ambitious to gain more and more. If parents or other authorities tell a child that they have the power to make their lives by hardworking, it will instill a sense of self-confidence in them. For example, the children who have supportive parents are more likely to escape the fear and take action in order to fulfill their dreams. In this case, they are not only motivated but also strong enough to tackle any obstacle. On the other hand, keep telling children to work hard, albeit useful, can contribute to various psychological problems such as chronic stress and ant-social behaviors. Moreover, it can foster the sense of superiority to achieve everything at any cost. On contrary, some children may have to deal with inferiority about their failure due to peer pressures. As continuous stress may prevents them to show their best performance. In conclusion, however children can be encouraged by others' enlightening quotes to take measure, there is still the chance to put a great deal of pressure and burden on them unconsciously as the result of meeting all their needs.

Response: In recent years, many businesses have been focusing on promoting their products, because they have been upgraded and are considerd innovative. In my opinion this trend have many reasons, and while it might seem beneficial, it can have some downsides as well. To begin with, the underlying reason for the great pressure on an innovative product by producers has various explanations. Firstly, these days, indivisuals have more desire due to the rapid-paced quality of the modern world. They not only are faced to many challenges like E-learning on pandemic, but also are called for more advanced items to respond these problems adequately. For example, these items can be a new interactive platform or a better quality laptop designed for a rigorous study. As a result, companies see these gaps and try to fill them with their newly introduced products. Secondly, they can also exploit the psychological effects of the new products and use it for raising their sales. They are completely aware of the fact that their designed item might have a hanful new features, but they use this fact and encourage people to buy them. For instance, new vesion of iphone is only bear an other camera lense, which made it a little more high-tech than its previous one. However, this feature has made it very popular and drawn sheer interests twards it especially on social media. With regard to its overall effects, I believe it has both positive and negative implications. In many cases people are truely desperate for a product in order to overcome their new challenges. Thus, this circumastance call entreprenures for alerting them and help them for reaching their desirable results. This can be a positive side of this trend. Although, In many cases, companies prioritize their economic status and intrigue their consumers for purchasing their sellings, and collect their adequate budget. Consequently, this is only a disruption for people which deplete their savings. In this case, advertising new products is assumed profoundly negative as it abuses people's resources. In conclusion, In my view, introducing new merchandises is reasonable, although some firms tend to use this method for only financial matters.

Response: In recent years, many people have been curious to find out about the history of the houses they reside in. This trend have different reasons, and people might find relavent information by asking questions from differnt sources. To begin with, understanding about the history of places we live in might have some benfits in terms of finance and family heritage. Firstly, if the houses were for well-known persons who once resided in such places, then it would have historical values. As a result, people can exploit this oppurtunity by making these houses accessible for public and make money by in this way. Secondly, while these houses have historical value, they might also sell them with high prices to differnt organizations and gain more money for buying a modern house. Finally, while many people research for financial benefits, many try to develop insight about their ancestors. For example, my grandfather has done some investigations and understood that our family line is related to one of the princes in Ghajar dinesty who had the responsibility for organizing this region. However, obtaining these information are not straightforward, but there are some ways to tackling this problem. The first way is to refer to the local libraries for reading the related books about the history of the neighbourhoods and the recordings of their owners. Similarly, asking the elderlies in our neighbourhood might be a practical solution as well. In additon, individuals can refer to the relevant authorities to investigate the past recordings of the town and their land lords, if the recordings are available. In conclusion, these days, people are eager to get more information about their huosing as it not only contributes to leverage their potential, but also gain knowledge about their bloodlines. These information can be found throgh local resources or according authorities.

Response: In recent years, employing machinery equipment in industries has become more prevalent compared to the past. While there are some drawbacks to using machines in the job market like decreasing job opportunities for people, the perks of this improvement such as being both less time-consuming and cost-effective are far more significant. Firstly, one of the primary downsides of this advancement is robot employment in practical jobs reduces the number of career openings for the human workforce. In other words, the more machines perform hands-on tasks in workplaces, the less employers hire human workers for their job vacancies. Furthermore, machinery is limited to completing tasks needing human abilities including decision-making skills, managing customer responses, and comprehension of urgent situations. For instance, the projects associated with autonomous vehicles failed due to a lack of decision-making abilities in particular conditions like the possibility of accidents needing human involvement. However, there are some merits associated with this technological improvement, one of the prominent ones is time-effectiveness. To put it another way, today, many companies employ machines for their labor-intensive jobs to work more and faster than human laborers for 24 hours nonstop. In addition, embedding technological equipment in handy jobs is economically efficient for industries, as they need no salaries, insurance, or retirement. Moreover, this development creates new employment prospects for individuals in programming, Artificial Intelligence, and IT. In conclusion, although there are some disadvantages to applying robots to functional careers like increasing the unemployment rate among traditional physical workers and the limitation of robot performance in some specific conditions due to the lack of emotions, there are some potential benefits in this improvement such as being both time-saving and cost-efficient. Finally, a cooperative approach that combines humans and robots to work together is the best way to achieve the best outputs.

Response: In recent years, people have lost their trust to their usual medical practitioners and substituted professional helps with other sources for medicines as well as treatments. I strongly think, this is a negative trend, and should not be considered in any case due to its harmful implications. To begin with, these days, many people criticise the failure of modern medicine for addressing many health conditions effectively. While this argument can be true in some exceptions, it should be noted that relying on people who are not qualified with the proper medical degree would result in misdiagnoses. This not only delay the process of healing, but also may lead to various side effects as the treatment would not be sufficient for the condition. Consequently, people who prescribed these priscrptions for themeselves or others did this for them, may suffer from other health problems in future, which can have some adverse effects on their overal health. For example, at first glance, taking herbal drinks might sound safe for a common cold, but in some cases it would deteriorate the health of the lungs if it was consumed in a large amount. On the other hand, it has become common that many anonymous sources advertise their pharmaceutical products in social media. Desperate people are often manipulated by these advertisements and purchace their products for alleviating their pain. However, it has been proven that desspite positive feedbaks from these drugs, many contain high amount of addictive substances that only have effects in curbing the pain and not curing the illness itself. Although these can make the patients healthy in the short-term, it would make them addicted in the long-term and face them with its related concequenses. In conclusion, while many people consider using non-prescribed medicines useful for overcoming their sicknesses, in my opinion it has many deletrious outcomes and should be prevented by policymakers.

Response: Some health problems can be caused by consuming too much high-in-sugar foods and beverages. I totally disagree with the statement of considering higher prices in sweet goods because this can increase the costs of other goods and result in monetary extreme situations. Additionally, sugary goods are not always detrimental to people’s health, so people should be aware of correct intake of these foods in order to adapt their sugar consumption to their diets. It is generally believed that increasing the cost of foods leads to increment of other goods. The price of different items are correlated because people are always trading with each other, so if the cost of a product increases, the price of other items will see upward trends, as well. As a result, when people who want to buy sugary foods face an increment in the cost of sugary products, they have no choice but to increase the price of their own products in order to combat the lack required money for buying sugary products. Consequently, when the prices of many items increase, hard economic situations appear, so all the citizens and even the governments face some challenges, such as recession, inflation to name but a few. Therefore, increasing the price of sweetened goods is not an efficient way for restricting people from buying these foods and drinks. Admittedly, foods and drinks which are high in sugar can bring diseases, however, they contain some minerals which are crucial for humans’ bodies. For example, if governments limit consumption of sweet foods in a strict way, people face some diseases, namely low blood pressure, because people need necessary minerals in order to continue their livings in an healthy way. Nevertheless, consuming too much sugar results in some diseases, such as diabetes and high blood pressure. However, people cannot strike a balance for their sugar consumption by monetary aspects because their behavior should receive more attention, not their pockets. Instead, In order to make a compromise between these two issues, people should be aware of the exact amount of sugar consumption for each age, which can be done by food scientists via mass media and social media. Thus, consumption of sweet foods and drinks should not be controlled by increasing the price of these goods, while making aware people of the right consumption of them is more effective. In conclusion, many goods which contain a great deal of sugar can bring illnesses for people. One probable solution is considering an increment in the price of foods and goods, while I claim that his is a negative development because when the price of these foods increase, costs of other items will increase, too. Moreover, people’s knowledge of using sweeteners should be increased by skilled doctors and there should not be any restriction in sugar consumption.

Response: Some health problems can be causes by consuming too much high-in-sugar food and beverage. I totally disagree with the statement of considering higher prices on sweet goods because this can increase the costs of other goods and resulting monetary extreme situations. Additionally, sugary goods are not always detrimental to people’s health, and people should be aware of correct intake of these foods in order to adapt their sugar consumption to their diets. It is generally believed that increasing the cost of specific foods leads to increment of other goods. The price of different items are correlated because people are always trading with each other, and if cost of a thing increases, the price of other things will see an upward trend. As a result, when people who want to buy sugary foods face increment in the costs of sugary products, they tend to increase the price of their own products in order to combat lack of money for buying sugary products. Consequently, when the prices of many items increase hard economic situations are brought for all the citizens and even the governments, recession, inflation, to name but a few. Therefore, increasing the price of sweetened goods is not an efficient way for avoiding people from buying these foods and drinks. Admittedly, foods and drinks which are high in sugar can bring diseases, however, they contain some minerals which are crucial for humans’ bodies. For example, if governments restrict consumption of sweet foods in a strict way, people face some diseases, namely low blood pressure, because they need necessary minerals in order to perform in an optimum way. Nevertheless, consuming too much sugar results in some diseases, such as diabetes and high blood pressure. However, people cannot strike a balance for their sugar consumption by monetary aspects. Instead, In order to make a compromise between these two issues, people should be aware of the exact amount of sugar consumption for each age, which can be done by food scientists via mass media and social media. Thus, consumption of sweet foods and drinks should not be controlled by increasing the price of these goods, while making aware people of the right consumption of them is more effective. In conclusion, many goods which contain a great deal of sugar can bring illnesses for people. One probable solution is considering an increment in the price of foods and goods, while I claim by increasing the price of these foods, costs of other items will increases, too. Moreover, people’s knowledge of using sweeteners should be increased by skilled doctors and there should not be any restriction in sugar consumption.

Response: Nowadays, businesses use advertisements to tell people that they have a new product that is different from others. I reckon whenever a company emphasizes something, there is a problem there, so on this occasion too I think it is a negative thing. First of all, I believe this occasion is due to competition and consumerism within society. In a society with consumerism, many companies will produce the exact same product, but at different prices so if anyone asks them why they are selling at a higher price while another company sells it at a lower price, they will answer because our product is different and we produced it with high-quality materials, while in fact they didn't. another side of competition is between individuals, everybody looks for something unique and special product which no one else has it, they want to be spectacular so if a company advertises that they have manufactured something new which is differ from others, so many people will go and buy that. In the last paragraph, I said in a consumerist society this kind of behaviorism is so common, but now I'm going to discuss about the effect of this kind of advertisement on individuals. I suppose companies regard advertisements as manipulating people and using cognitive psychological tricks. so when they tell people they have new products which have nothing incommone with others, people will think maybe I should look different. for example, a teenage girl who saw this advertisement on tv, want to hang out with freinds but she feels like she is suppose to be in different close than last time they saw each other so she will go aand buy new things, while she didnt need them at all. I believe this sort of advertisement has a big bad effect on society and makes people unsatisfied with their belongings, consequently, people will buy those new product so the company will do that advertise againe and again.

Response: It is widely accepted that individuals, especially young people, ought to save their money for using in future. This essay explains the reasons why people have to save money. I strongly agree that every person should have a deposit for future. To begin with, it is an essential skill that people have to learn from their childhood. Parents should teach this concept to them to save money for their elderly years. For example, if young people use to save money, it would be possible to explore different places in the world when they get old, and spend their leisure times by creating unforgettable memories and visiting new places. It is definitely convenient for them. In addition, young people ought to consider instability and uncertainty in the economy situation, and they always have to be ready if they lose their job. Having enough saving helps them to live without salary at least for a short period, and they are able to look for a decent job without any concerns. Finally, when a young person decides to marry, having saving is a good support for him/ her. For instance, it is obvious that the person needs huge amount of money to have a wedding party, and saving is really helpful in this circumstance. In conclusion, I believe that it is crucial for people to save money, in order to have welfare in unpredictable moments, or having fun in future. Although it does not mean that people have to be stingy. I claim that not only it helps them to manage their budget, but it also helps them to live comfortably in future.

Response: Some contend that scientists should prioritize improving people's quality of life. I completely agree with this statement. Scientists might have different approaches toward science, ranging from conservation programms to power seizing. One of the most important factors for one's overall well-being is having access to enough food sources. This mentality urges people to seek resources among flourished vegetation and well-developed animals. Some environmentalists, however, believe that animal rights hold equal importance in comparison to human needs; therefore, certain constraints are set in order to compel humankind to live in favour of other creatures, regardless of their own interests. Moreover, during challenging times, science can be enslaved to privilege a nation over others. For instance, in war, governments oblige scientists to develop biological and nuclear weapons to bend components to their will. This approach not only hinders other communities' quality of life but also imposes unbearable pressure on scientists. Nevertheless, it is believed that science should aim for the most rational solution rather than considering humanity and people's preferences. Although scientists have numerous ambitions, it is crucial to prioritize people's pursuits to benefit both society and individuals. Taxpayers allocate a large proportion of scientific funds, entitling them to benefit from its results. Taxes should be used to provide adequate healthcare services and develop technologies that bring about convenience for humankind. This approach can motivate individuals to engage in the collaborative act of taxpaying. Additionally, research has proved that prioritizing other's needs and succeeding in meeting them offers optimal happiness. Helping other individuals can bring about a sense of unparalleled fulfillment that can not be compared to any other accomplishment in life. This feeling can foster one's mental well-being. In conclusion, science has various responsibilities, among which upgrading individuals' lives is the most important motive.