IELTS Writing Samples

Response: One of the important arguments among environmentalism is worring for lossing of particular species of plants and animals this time. Althogh, it is one of the greatest aspects of environmental problems, in my opinion some other issuse are as main as lossing especial especies. From an overall perspective, the growth of number of people, causes the over usage of environmental sourses, hunting and cultivating some kinds of species increased drastically recently. Indeed, environment not to be able to foster again rapidlly. Ultimatelly the balance between consuming and applying is damaged. Additionaly, some unique kind of animals were hunted, it is because collectors pay extra money for them. For instance, Hindian tigger hase been extincted, resulting in hunting for years and enhanced local people incomes. However, it is a popular idea these day, in my opinion over polluted is simultaneously realy dangerious for plants and animals this time. Litter are expanded in the suburbs and forest, smog of factories and cars is emissioned due to burn coal in developing countries. Not only we use the vast amounts of vegetables and meet of animals but also desrtoyed their habitats. Furthermore, People should be much more concern about side-effect of their treats. For example, after rised air pollution in tehran 80 % of local birds are migrated and never returnd . In conclusion, my firm belif is, while the loss of particular species of plants and animals is an important topic this time, overpllution and over consumption is as important as other topics and aslo intense lossing the diverce of species in the world.

Response: When encounering to a difficulty, people are divided in two categories. One group surrenders and the other one strives to defeat the issue. I strongly believe man is capable of almost everything and giving up must be the last choice. Indeed, it is possible for each person to come across to a heinous condition and acknowledging it might seem the best choice compared to struggling with it. In other words, a certain challenge, which is impossible to solve, might happen to someone, and after several endeavours the person may not manage to solve it, the result which causes frustration and depression. Therefore, accepting them at the first stage might be an optimal option for one, similarly it can help them to concentrate on the other important matters rather than wasting their time on trying impractical solutions. For example, one might be unconvinced ith their job, which were the only option for them to get employed in, and they spend the half of their day with hatred of the situation that they cannot change, thus they must accept the circumstances. However, I totally disagree with the previous beliefe, and I believe with deligence nothing is impossible for human. Infact, if we yield at the beginning without showing any effort, we would not find out whether we were capable of resolving the problem. On the other hand, each person needs to increase their problem solving skills, because getting over the challenges is vital to learn from them and progress. To illustrate, Michael Jordan was a terrible player when he was in high school. He even was not admitted to attend in the school team. But he did not give up and he tried harder. Eventually, he became the best Basketball player of all time. In conclusion, difficulties might seem

Response: The given charts show an assessment in five cities in Australia that examines people's preferences in purchasing coffee or tea. Overall, it is evident that all categories have fluctuant patterns with the proportion of a habit visiting a cafe having the largest average compared to others. The number of populations that purchase coffee or tea from a cafe is generally higher with more than 60% both in Melbourne and Hobart, which holds the greatest percentage in all categories. However, Adelaide is slightly less than 50%, indicating a moderate difference in that particular category and positioning it as the least preferably habit. Additionally, the second place is Sydney with marginally above 60%, which only creates a subtle gap. Furthermore, residents who consumed instant coffee in the last 4 weeks are mainly in Hobart, which is nearly 55%, while Sydney is the lowest population with only around 45%. In contrast, people who bought fresh coffee largely come from Sydney with approximately 40%, even though it is the highest percentage among all categories, it is still smaller rather than other aspects.

Response: Being able to benefit from good situations is a basic human right. Although some feel that it is better to accept a bad situation, I completely agree with those who believe that trying to make a positive change in such situations is far more beneficial. On the one hand, it could be argued that sustaining an unsatisfactory job or poverty is preferable. Supporters of this view say that trying to improve bad situations can be totally risky. Individuals might be obligated to defend their improvements at the expense of their meaningful relationships with their colleagues especially their managers. Additionally, it is said that some people are not aware of the damaging effects of bad situations on their physical and mental well-being. For instance, the poor may have no concept of how restricted their facilities are as they are obligated to work hard all the time, limiting their free time to dedicate to raising their awareness. On the other hand, I strongly believe that people would be able to achieve more accomplishments in better situations. Being surrounded by a challenging circumstance can decrease individuals' motivation, preventing them from performing better. However, the more people are able to make constructive changes in their circumstances, the more they manage to achieve groundbreaking accomplishments. Moreover, individuals can stay far healthier by avoiding conflicts and toxic atmosphere, either mentally or physically. Take an unpleasant workplace atmosphere as an example; when people have to argue with their co-workers or chairmen, it deprives them of focusing on their personal growth. To sum up, despite the fact that making changes can be risky to some extent, I believe that accepting bad situations such as poverty is far worse. So, trying to improve unpleasant situations is worth the risk.

Response: Being able to benefit from good situations is a basic human right. Although some feel that it is better to accept a bad situation, I completely agree with those who believe that trying to make a positive change in such situations is far more beneficial. On the one hand, it could be argued that sustaining an unsatisfactory job or poverty is preferable. Supporters to this view say that trying to improve bad situations can be totally risky. Individuals might be obligated to defence their improvements at the expense of their meaningful relationships with their colleagues especially their managers. Additionally, it is said to some people are not aware of the damaging effects of bad situations on their physical and mental well-being. For instance, the poor may have no concept about how restricted their facilities are as they are obligated to work hard all the time, limiting their free time to dedicate to raise their awareness. On the other hand, I strongly believe that people would be able to achieve more accomplishments in better situations. Being surrounded by a challenging circumstance can decrease individuals' motivation, refusing to perform better. However, the more people are able to make constructive changes in their circumstances, the more they do manage to achieve groundbreaking achievements. Moreover, individuals can stay far healthier by avoiding conflicts and toxic atmosphere either mentally or physically. Take an unpleasant work place atmosphere as an example; when people have to argue with their co-workers or chairmen, depriving them from focusing on their personal growth. To sum up, despite the fact that making change can be risky to some extent, I view that accepting bad situations such as poverty are far worse. So, trying to improve unpleasant situations is worth risking.

Response: It is argued among some people that nowadays, the most important of enviromental problems is the loss of particular species of plants and animals. Others believe that there more important environmental issues. While I accept that the extinction of animals and plants is one the most important problems, I believe that there are more important environmental problems which I will argue them below. On the one hand, it is believed by some people that the loss of particular species of plants and animals would be the most important environmental problem. They believe this, for two main reasons: Firstly, the continuing of humans' lives isn't possible without the existance of many speceis of animals. For instance, the existance of a particular type of insects is essential for agricultural activities. Secondly, by extinction of many types of plants, condition will be highly difficult for producing food products, for almost the production all types of food products depends on plants. for example, the grean-tea production can not be continued without the existence of a special type of plant. On the other hand, there are many types of environmental problems that are more essential than the loss of particular species of plants and animals. I believe that air polution that produced by factories or muchines traffic, is the most important of our environmental issues. air polution causes many types of disease for humans. Many types of heart, breathing, skin and eyes diseases are created beacause of air polution. For instance, the city of tehran is one of the most pulluted city all around the world, therefore most people are bothering from a wide rage of diseases; by contrast, cities without a lot of pullotion have the lowest number of sick people. Water pollution is the other dangerous problem. The pollution of water can easily influence on the health condition of humans. For instance, people who live in villages have less diseases related to stomache like stomachace. In conclusion, I believe that nowadays, we have more important environmental problems than the loss of particular species of plants and animals; however, extiction of plants and animal is highly important.

Response: Most businesses in their advertising usually concentrate that their products are new in some way. This subject can be associated with several reasons and I just mention a few of them. Additionally, from my perspective, this is a positive improvement. The first reason for promoting their products with their new features is creating a significant increase in their sales. If companies advertise their goods and focus on new developments, people will encourage more to purchase that product. This advertise is a double edge sword. One the one hand, it is the condition that there is no development and the only purpose is manipulating people. In this case the only reason that companies think about it is their own benefit and abuse from people to take their money. On the other hand, there is a case that businesses really make an advancement and in order to inform people about these features, they mentioned it in the advertisement. This is the condition that both people and businesses can benefit from each other and people are able to use new products in order to more convenient life. I personally believe that the positive aspects outweigh its negative side due to the fact that people can make better choices. With the precise advertisements which mentioned the functionality of a product in details, people are able to compare different brands and make up their mind. Another main reason is an improvement in the recruitment rate. As detailed advertisements need skillful workforce, they have to employ more people for each purpose. For example, they need a good scenario writer and a skillful graphic designer to make advertisements which not only attract people better but also introduce the products in its best way. In conclusion, there are reasons such as witnesses a growth in sale or provide people with better products in emphasizing on new features and this is a totally positive development due to people are able to make better choices and increase employment rate

Response: It is argue that there are two main attitudes toward bad situations: they can be tolerated or we can try and improve the condition. I personaly believe that we have to resist against bad situations and we have to try to improve them as much as possible. On the one hand, I don't agree the idea that it's best to accept bad situations. The acceptance of bad conditions happen in our lives, leads to this reality that, we must tolerate this unpleasant situation like the shortage of money and we must do nothing to improve our lives. Furthermore, if we don't try to tackle our problems, the amount of problems will be more difficult in the near future; therefore, it's better to resolve our issues and prevent from the greatest problems in the future. On the other hand, I believe that the best solution to our problems is try to imporve them. the improvement of our bad situations can be done in some ways. Firstly, if we do not have job satisfaction, it's better to change our job or our employer; therefore, we solve our job unsatisfactory problem as easy as we can. Secondly, it's better to us to improve our bad conditions. For instance, if we are in a shortage of money, it's better to work overtime as much as possible instead of staying at home and sit back on a chair. Finally, in spite of all problems, we should invest on small steps, for it is proved by the scientists that small forward steps can have large influences in our lives in a long period for example one year. In conclusion, I believe that the best way to dominate our problems is nothing except try and improve them. It would be well if we learnt that problems easily could be solved by chronic try.

Response: It is argued that whether advertising is beneficial or people are just ignoring them. Although, advertizment is a key to entice customers, it is turning to a cliché that people overlook it. However, I believe the influence of promotion is undeniable, and with some modifications it could become more persuasive. First of all, businesses aim to make their product or service known among population by advertisement. Indeed, people need to know something before buying it. But most important, sellers advertise to outperform they rivals in the market and attract more customers. To elaborate, the more advertising you do the more sale you have. A great example that springs to mind is Coca Cola that is the most sold product among baverages in the world. Thanks to the massive investment of company on the promotion. Nonetheless, preponderance of individuals ignore commercials, due to their redundancy. Potentially, this arises from utilizing same and similar infrastructures in all the advertisments. For instance, all of us have seen an advertisment of a certain cleaning powder , that there is white muddy white shirt and becomes clean after using the powder. On the other hand commercials could be bothersome, such as whatcing a video on Youtube, when unexpected advertisings are really interfering and almost everyone want them to finish and continue whatcing their content. In my opinion, without advertising, companies will not have a chance to prosper and they would end up with fail. However, the advertisings must alter in order to become more persuasive and convincing. That is, avoiding traditional methods and structures and adding some innovation. In conclusion, although advertisments have become common and ineffective in some cases, they are the main key of attracting customers. With some beneficial modification in the addverting manners, they would be more eficient.

Response: In many countries, people prefer to buy a house instead of renting an accommodation. In my opinion, in these countries, houses are very important property, and also, they are a symbol of wealth. I am also convinced that owning a house has many positive effects on the household expenditures. It is my view that, in the majority of countries that have a high rate of inflation, people are more likely to invest in accommodation sections. For example, the rate of inflation in Iran is 45%, and people benefit from their investment in houses. Meanwhile, in the other countries where their governments can control the inflation, investors have a negative attitude toward investment in the houses. Also, governments should offer better investment opportunities than accommodation. I further believe that having a house is highly beneficial for family. There are many benefits which need to be taken into consideration; firstly, parents who owned a home will not worry about their children's future; secondly, they can save more money compared with families that they compel to pay money for rent. so they can provide their family with a wide range of amenities. Thirdly, one of the most negative of renting houses is that people usually find it difficult to move to another house because they have to pack their stuff and can cause irreparable damage to something. In conclusion, in many countries, having a house plays a vital role in families' expenditure stability, so a sizeable number of people are willing to buy a house. From my perspective, owning a house has some advantages in the long run. For instance, parents ensure that their children will not face a problem about accommodation.