IELTS Writing Samples

Response: Most businesses in their advertising usually concentrate that their products are new in some way. This subject can be associated with several reasons and I just mention a few of them. Additionally, from my perspective, this is a positive improvement. The first reason for promoting their products with their new features is creating a significant increase in their sales. If companies advertise their goods and focus on new developments, people will encourage more to purchase that product. This advertise is a double edge sword. One the one hand, it is the condition that there is no development and the only purpose is manipulating people. In this case the only reason that companies think about it is their own benefit and abuse from people to take their money. On the other hand, there is a case that businesses really make an advancement and in order to inform people about these features, they mentioned it in the advertisement. This is the condition that both people and businesses can benefit from each other and people are able to use new products in order to more convenient life. I personally believe that the positive aspects outweigh its negative side due to the fact that people can make better choices. With the precise advertisements which mentioned the functionality of a product in details, people are able to compare different brands and make up their mind. Another main reason is an improvement in the recruitment rate. As detailed advertisements need skillful workforce, they have to employ more people for each purpose. For example, they need a good scenario writer and a skillful graphic designer to make advertisements which not only attract people better but also introduce the products in its best way. In conclusion, there are reasons such as witnesses a growth in sale or provide people with better products in emphasizing on new features and this is a totally positive development due to people are able to make better choices and increase employment rate

Response: It is argue that there are two main attitudes toward bad situations: they can be tolerated or we can try and improve the condition. I personaly believe that we have to resist against bad situations and we have to try to improve them as much as possible. On the one hand, I don't agree the idea that it's best to accept bad situations. The acceptance of bad conditions happen in our lives, leads to this reality that, we must tolerate this unpleasant situation like the shortage of money and we must do nothing to improve our lives. Furthermore, if we don't try to tackle our problems, the amount of problems will be more difficult in the near future; therefore, it's better to resolve our issues and prevent from the greatest problems in the future. On the other hand, I believe that the best solution to our problems is try to imporve them. the improvement of our bad situations can be done in some ways. Firstly, if we do not have job satisfaction, it's better to change our job or our employer; therefore, we solve our job unsatisfactory problem as easy as we can. Secondly, it's better to us to improve our bad conditions. For instance, if we are in a shortage of money, it's better to work overtime as much as possible instead of staying at home and sit back on a chair. Finally, in spite of all problems, we should invest on small steps, for it is proved by the scientists that small forward steps can have large influences in our lives in a long period for example one year. In conclusion, I believe that the best way to dominate our problems is nothing except try and improve them. It would be well if we learnt that problems easily could be solved by chronic try.

Response: It is argued that whether advertising is beneficial or people are just ignoring them. Although, advertizment is a key to entice customers, it is turning to a cliché that people overlook it. However, I believe the influence of promotion is undeniable, and with some modifications it could become more persuasive. First of all, businesses aim to make their product or service known among population by advertisement. Indeed, people need to know something before buying it. But most important, sellers advertise to outperform they rivals in the market and attract more customers. To elaborate, the more advertising you do the more sale you have. A great example that springs to mind is Coca Cola that is the most sold product among baverages in the world. Thanks to the massive investment of company on the promotion. Nonetheless, preponderance of individuals ignore commercials, due to their redundancy. Potentially, this arises from utilizing same and similar infrastructures in all the advertisments. For instance, all of us have seen an advertisment of a certain cleaning powder , that there is white muddy white shirt and becomes clean after using the powder. On the other hand commercials could be bothersome, such as whatcing a video on Youtube, when unexpected advertisings are really interfering and almost everyone want them to finish and continue whatcing their content. In my opinion, without advertising, companies will not have a chance to prosper and they would end up with fail. However, the advertisings must alter in order to become more persuasive and convincing. That is, avoiding traditional methods and structures and adding some innovation. In conclusion, although advertisments have become common and ineffective in some cases, they are the main key of attracting customers. With some beneficial modification in the addverting manners, they would be more eficient.

Response: In many countries, people prefer to buy a house instead of renting an accommodation. In my opinion, in these countries, houses are very important property, and also, they are a symbol of wealth. I am also convinced that owning a house has many positive effects on the household expenditures. It is my view that, in the majority of countries that have a high rate of inflation, people are more likely to invest in accommodation sections. For example, the rate of inflation in Iran is 45%, and people benefit from their investment in houses. Meanwhile, in the other countries where their governments can control the inflation, investors have a negative attitude toward investment in the houses. Also, governments should offer better investment opportunities than accommodation. I further believe that having a house is highly beneficial for family. There are many benefits which need to be taken into consideration; firstly, parents who owned a home will not worry about their children's future; secondly, they can save more money compared with families that they compel to pay money for rent. so they can provide their family with a wide range of amenities. Thirdly, one of the most negative of renting houses is that people usually find it difficult to move to another house because they have to pack their stuff and can cause irreparable damage to something. In conclusion, in many countries, having a house plays a vital role in families' expenditure stability, so a sizeable number of people are willing to buy a house. From my perspective, owning a house has some advantages in the long run. For instance, parents ensure that their children will not face a problem about accommodation.

Response: It is crucial for some people possessing your own home instead of renting. This essay reveals the mian reasons behind this phenomenon such as a way of investment and avoiding regualr relocation. I believe that the this is a positive trend. One key reason for the importance of owning home is that individuals can consider as an investment. For instance, if a person purchase by its budget a flat or apartment, this falt become not only a place for living but also a saving for its future. Therefor, the value of their house do not change over time. This is becasue almost always the price of housing has fluctuation during time. Additionally, the are not compell to relocate from time to time, in other words they can benefit from a secure accomidation. The reason why i think it is a positive situation is that they are not worry about scllating of properties. This is becuase the housing cost gradually increase, specially in some countries that the value of their money is directly depends on the global curency. Consequently, they have a stable accomidation for living. As a result, they are less likely to suffer from stress, which may lose their house in the lung run. Furthermore, when people buy property and overally have their own possesions, they become landowner. So, they can rent their properties to others, and it became a additional income. As a consequence, they can afford they cost of living more effortlessly. In conclusion, investing in property and avoiding of the challenges of relocating are the main reasons for this trend. In my view, having your own home is more substancial rather than renting a house because of having a stable accommodatin and useing as an way of earnign money.

Response: it is believed that the most crucial environmental problem in today's world is the extinction of important species. others believe there much more important obstacles to tend to. the second group are emphasizing on general treats to the planet. in contrast, the first group believe that preserving each specie is a small gesture with great benefits. although both points of views seem eligible, my opinion align more with seconds view. on the one hand, it is believed that our planet is suffering from major issues that require immediate actions and lives of individual creatures might be unimportant compare to them. human destructive behavior damaged environment noticeably and it will bring us to a point that makes us unable to repair it. for instance, cutting down trees of tropical jungles in a large scale and significant increase in carbon dioxide emissions had resulted in global warming and climate changes. on the other hand, some people think that to preserve nature small steps should be taken and saving a few particular endangered animal or planet is a much easier and more intellectual move. there are some key creatures in any habitat that losing them will hurt its foundation. all species are living in food chains and loss of a low member will disturb others. moreover, some animals and plants are providing a suitable atmosphere to live in by their actions and have domino effects on others' lives. for example, one of them are beavers that by making dams on rivers, slow the water flew and let other animal drink the water much easier and make their nests and homes around the water. in conclusion, necessary measures must be taken in matter of large global problems and it isn't wise to just attend to save pre-extinction species. however, I believe some animals are extremely important and should considered as key members of the planet. therefore, we shouldn't lose focus on them to just look at the big picture.

Response: In today's world, overconsumption of sugary food and beverages is causing multiple health issues all over the world. While some feel that making these products more costly should be considered to reduce people's consumption, I completely disagree with this suggestion due to three main areas. Firstly, offering products in a higher price can lead to inflation. The more expensive products are on the market, the more people's purchasing power would decrease, leading to financial recession in societies. As a result, inflation might be worsened, inflicting damage to all residents' lives in terms of their ability to meet basic needs. Quality of life is another area of concern. If sugary products were offered in higher prices, individuals may feel deprived, leading to a lower level of satisfaction. Even worse, they may search for some harmful alternatives offered in more reasonable costs, threatening their physical well-being. Consequantly, people's quality of life may be affected in a negative way by more expensive products available. The final area that making sugary foods can have a negative impact on is companies. To elaborate, factories should spend too much money on replacing their current machines with more advanced ones, enabling them to monitor the amount of sugar used in their products. When these products offered in unaffordable prices, customers are no longer able to buy them, leading to less profit for producers. So, there would not be a reliable income for companies, taking them to bankrupt. To sum up, as costly products can have negative influence on finance, quality of life, and companies, it is no longer a good solution to reduce people's consumption of sugary products.

Response: Some individuals tell children that they can do anything if they put enought effort on that, i believe sending such messages may be risky because they can make younger ones both motivated and dillusional about their goals. On one hand, all human kind needs motivation and sometimes stimulation to achieve their essential preposes in their life and children are not excepted. Some experiments on different groups of people show that giving positive comments on ones efforts may boost their mood and energy to finish that job. Additionaly some experts say emphisising "hard work" instead of intelligence is more effective in encouraging children to improve their operation. So it it good to focus on the hard work and trying ones best. On the other hand, giving too much hope and illustrating unrealistic results can cause dissapointment and hopplessness for children. In many common situations trying hard may also results failure due to several factors and varies circumstance like abilities or tallents. If we keep sending a message in which hard work always brings victory, as this is not a realistic expectation, after some unpleasant results children may face disapointment, anger and losing appetite for trying again. so this approach can be toxic according to difference of skills. In conclusion, i believe telling children that hard work always pays off may give them enough motivation to start and finish a task but it can also make them face so much disapointment and rage after every failure and give away their passion for start the process all over agan.

Response: In some notions, individuals prefer to buy a property instead of renting it. This tendency can be due to inflation and aging population, and although some feel that this trend is a negative alteration, I firmly believe that it is a positive trend. There are some fundamental reasons why people in some particular countries have a tendency to own a home rather than being a renter. The first reason is an increasing inflation, leading to decreasing purchasing power among population. The more financial crisis exist in communities, the more people may experience difficulties in affording their basic needs and demands. As a result, people prefer to buy a home, enabling them to be more financially secure in the future. Another reason is aging population, finding moving from one house to another one too challenging. The old are usually interested in living in one home for a long run, giving them the opportunity to avoid transferring their heavy possessions on a regular basis. Consequently, some countries with an aging population have more demands for buying accommodations apart from renting them. I would argue that purchasing a home is a positive situation as provides individuals with the chance to have more satisfaction, leading to better quality of life. As people no longer are obligated to move regularly, they would experince more tranquility, resulting in having more time to allocate to their leisure activities and being far happier. What is more, people would be able to save more money when they are not under an obligation to rent a house. Since renters should spend some of their income on renting a home, owning a property allows them to save these expenditures in order to tackle any probable financial issues. To sum up, inhabitants in some countries are keen to be a home owner rather than renting one to secure their financial lives and avoid constant moving. I strongly believe that this trend is beneficial because of boosting individual's quality of life and saving money.

Response: Diverse perspectives regarding advertising are prevalent among individuals. While some argue that advertisments are significantly successful to persuade us for purchasing various products, others think that they have become very prevalent, that people do not attention any more. Personally, I believe that they are still persuasisve for people. This essay will initially examines both facets of the argument and then culminate and judicious conclusion. On the one hand, some support the idea that advertising are highly successful to covineing individuals to buy pruducts. The reason for this is companies and businesses use innovative and creative strategies to drawing attention of their target audience. For instance, they use celebrity endorsement for promoting and introducing their products to customers. Consequently, customers can trust more to the brand, and find them reliable. Similarly, they use some methods such as time-limited offer. In this way they creating a sense of urgency and rush, which presuade people to buy goods that really do not need. On the other hand, some think that nowadays advertisments do not succeed no longer due to commonly. They say that advertising become extremely typical which usually considrate annoying. Some websites and applications constantly display advertisments when people watching an impostant educational course or readig an important article, for instance. Additionally, The widspread of advertising, can creat a sense of confusion. When someone have numerous options form various brands, they become unable to select one of them. Therefore, this ubiquility can lead to people prefer to buy their products baised on past experiences or word of mouth, which customers have limited choise. As a result, they do not confused with a wide range of brands. In conclusion, although advertisments may become annoying and creat confusion, I firmly believe that they are highly practical to tempting customer to buy them due to creativity and using innovative strategies.