IELTS Writing Samples

Response: In the present climate, trying to accomplish achievements in life has immensely sparked a heated debate. Kids, in some nations, are frequently told that they are able to achieve anything they desire if they try hard. This claim potentially have benefits and drawbacks. I, for one, believe that the advantages outweigh the disadvantages. If parents tell their offspring that they can be successful if they just try, this can lead to several problems. Firstly, it may not be reasonable that just perseverance is considered if a child wants to be prosperous. A considerable number of jobs and tasks require special factors and trying hard is not enough. By way of illustration, an individual who intends to become a painter should consider whether they are talented or have particular abilities, such as being creative. As axiomatic as it may sound, without the mentioned qualities, a child is not able to become a professional in a career. This, in turn, might result in many negative consequences. For example, children may feel frustrated or depressed after trying hard and not reaching their goals. On the other hand, provided that the young are told that they are able to accomplish anything by determination and perseverance, this can be beneficial in several respects. It cannot be overlooked that a significant number of accomplishments can be achieved if a person try really hard. For instance, a student who desires to gain admission into a favorable institute of higher education may reach their goal through studying hard. This might be true of one who seeks a rewarding job with a decent salary. Consequently, this message can serve as a motivator for children and they are able to ensure that they may satisfy their dreams by trying hard. In conclusion, I opine that this message that children can reach their goals by being determined might have more benefits than drawbacks. The advantages include the fact that trying can become a motivational factor for children and the drawback is that not everything is achieved by trying.

Response: In the present climate, alterations in the form of publications have sparked an immense amount of heated debate. There is a claim that in the following years, paper books have become obsolete and nobody will purchase them since these books are available on the Internet. I, for one, do not subscribe to this standpoint. There exist several justifications why printed publications are possibly on the market in the future. Firstly, it cannot be overlooked that not everyone is comfortable with reading materials online. Many are used to studying paper magazines. They study their lessons on paper from school to the institutes of further education, so they will probably prioritize buying printed books over reading them on a website. Furthermore, it has been scientifically proven that spending too much time on screens can lead to eye strain and other health-related problems. According to a research project conducted at the University of California, over 67 percent of graduates who studied for their exams online complained about not observing their environment clearly. This is not comparable with a mosest 5 percent of those who studied paper books. What is more, websites and blogs usually charge their users and are not free. In other words, people may have to subscribe to online channels by paying a particular amount of subscription. By way of illustration, a popular mobile application named Citera has provided the public with current events. It posts latest pieces of news immediately after they occur. The drawback, however, is that it receive a significant deal of money to give this beneficial service. What can be concluded from the above is that I do not accede to the view that printed materials will become out of date and no one shops for them. There might be numerous reasons, including reading newspapers on screens of computers may not be the preference of users. Another rationale is that these screens can considerably hurt our eyes and ultimately, the majority of online websites may not be freely usable.

Response: In the present climate, accommodation has sparked an immense amount of heated debate. It has been claimed that people in some nations are more inclined to buy a house instead of renting it. I believe this matter can have many reasons, such as the high expenses of renting and the challenges of moving. In my perspective, this may be a positive development. There exist several justifications why individuals tend to owe a home. Firstly, the prices of renting are so high that tenants may have to spend the overwhelming majority of their income on paying renting. Take Iran, for instance. Due to the high rates of inflation and other economic problems, tenants are obliged to dedicate a considerable proportion of their salary to renting. What is more, when renting a house, residents may have to move out of the home after a particular time. As axiomatic as it may sound, the period of renting is set in a contract, so when this time finishes, tenants must move into another house. Concerning the created condition, it can be beneficial. One of the most important reasons may be the fact that purchasing a home can be a strong motivation to save up money. Individuals may make every single effort to earn more money by, for example, working overtime. Although this subject may seem hard and challenging in the first few years, it can benefit the public in the long run. While owing their accommodation, people are not forced to pay landlords. Furthermore, they are able to reside in their houses as long as they desire. What can be concluded from the above is that I argue it might be a positive circumstance that citizens prefer to have a house rather than renting it since one is motivated to be more active and work more hours to be able to afford to purchase a home.

Response: It is argued by people that among environmental issues, loss of certain animals and plants is of paramount importance. While others believe there are more considerable matters compared to the previous category. Nowadays, there are some particular species suffering from environmentally harmful practices. For instance, water contamination by factories poisons a vast majority of fisheries and other aquatic animals. Or some certain types of plants cannot adapt to the changes brought by climate change or global warming. As a matter of fact, these species can be related to a food-chain, and their absence in the chain might finally affect humans as well. Nevertheless, extinction of species, who were not able to cope with difficulties, is a natural phenomenon from thousands of years ago. Infact, devastation of other features is more significant and decisive for sustaining environment. Two common examples which spring to mind are expansion of hole of Ozone layer and reduction of consumable water. Indeed, the impacts of these issues are indispensable, and there must be immediate actions carried out to inhibit the intensification of circumstances which all the lives depend on. I agree there are vital environmental problems that can put severe impacts on a significant number of livings especially humans. Therefore, coping with them has priority to any other problems, including loss of certain species. In conclusion, each animal or plant has their own value and loss of them can be influential to environmet and other livings. However, there are more considerable isuues which are in connection with a broader papulation of creatures, and solving them comes at the first stage.

Response: In the present climate, finding the best situation has become a field of mind for people. There are two conflicting views among them. Due to some individuals opine that it is better to adjust to a bad situation because of what some problems can offer them, others including myself hold the view that making a satisfying situation by trying hard is more logical. Regarding the first viewpoint, proponents of accepting a disaster position believe that they do not have other options to align with them. In the competitive job market, finding the best career has become a significant issue among citizens. If they left their position, they would not be able to find another work. Moreover, the inflation rate is increasing day by day, as a result of this it seems logical to acknowledge that a majority of people are under pressure due to this happen and they do not have any way to adjust to their situation. Opponents of this view argue that humans have a vital ability to change their lives. It is the nature of them to be hard work and gain everything they want. With technology advent, most people are equipped with technological devices such as mobile phones which pave the way for them to improve their lives. What makes a positive approach is the fact that it is possible for individuals either to launch their business on social media or gain inadequate information to follow their interests. On the other hand, it is said that people are concerned about their situation as well as their future, but it is better to change our lives by being industrious and hardworking. It is revealed that if society has satisfaction about their life, not only can boost their mental health but also crucial for developing country. Accepting a terrible situation brings several drawbacks to humans and the whole society. Also, the government must support all of the members of society, especially the young generation. In conclusion, while some argue that adjusting to bad situations is more reasonable compared to leaving them, others believe that they abide by technology and it is better to choose and create the best positions for themselves.

Response: One of the important arguments among environmentalism is worring for lossing of particular species of plants and animals this time. Althogh, it is one of the greatest aspects of environmental problems, in my opinion some other issuse are as main as lossing especial especies. From an overall perspective, the growth of number of people, causes the over usage of environmental sourses, hunting and cultivating some kinds of species increased drastically recently. Indeed, environment not to be able to foster again rapidlly. Ultimatelly the balance between consuming and applying is damaged. Additionaly, some unique kind of animals were hunted, it is because collectors pay extra money for them. For instance, Hindian tigger hase been extincted, resulting in hunting for years and enhanced local people incomes. However, it is a popular idea these day, in my opinion over polluted is simultaneously realy dangerious for plants and animals this time. Litter are expanded in the suburbs and forest, smog of factories and cars is emissioned due to burn coal in developing countries. Not only we use the vast amounts of vegetables and meet of animals but also desrtoyed their habitats. Furthermore, People should be much more concern about side-effect of their treats. For example, after rised air pollution in tehran 80 % of local birds are migrated and never returnd . In conclusion, my firm belif is, while the loss of particular species of plants and animals is an important topic this time, overpllution and over consumption is as important as other topics and aslo intense lossing the diverce of species in the world.

Response: When encounering to a difficulty, people are divided in two categories. One group surrenders and the other one strives to defeat the issue. I strongly believe man is capable of almost everything and giving up must be the last choice. Indeed, it is possible for each person to come across to a heinous condition and acknowledging it might seem the best choice compared to struggling with it. In other words, a certain challenge, which is impossible to solve, might happen to someone, and after several endeavours the person may not manage to solve it, the result which causes frustration and depression. Therefore, accepting them at the first stage might be an optimal option for one, similarly it can help them to concentrate on the other important matters rather than wasting their time on trying impractical solutions. For example, one might be unconvinced ith their job, which were the only option for them to get employed in, and they spend the half of their day with hatred of the situation that they cannot change, thus they must accept the circumstances. However, I totally disagree with the previous beliefe, and I believe with deligence nothing is impossible for human. Infact, if we yield at the beginning without showing any effort, we would not find out whether we were capable of resolving the problem. On the other hand, each person needs to increase their problem solving skills, because getting over the challenges is vital to learn from them and progress. To illustrate, Michael Jordan was a terrible player when he was in high school. He even was not admitted to attend in the school team. But he did not give up and he tried harder. Eventually, he became the best Basketball player of all time. In conclusion, difficulties might seem

Response: Being able to benefit from good situations is a basic human right. Although some feel that it is better to accept a bad situation, I completely agree with those who believe that trying to make a positive change in such situations is far more beneficial. On the one hand, it could be argued that sustaining an unsatisfactory job or poverty is preferable. Supporters of this view say that trying to improve bad situations can be totally risky. Individuals might be obligated to defend their improvements at the expense of their meaningful relationships with their colleagues especially their managers. Additionally, it is said that some people are not aware of the damaging effects of bad situations on their physical and mental well-being. For instance, the poor may have no concept of how restricted their facilities are as they are obligated to work hard all the time, limiting their free time to dedicate to raising their awareness. On the other hand, I strongly believe that people would be able to achieve more accomplishments in better situations. Being surrounded by a challenging circumstance can decrease individuals' motivation, preventing them from performing better. However, the more people are able to make constructive changes in their circumstances, the more they manage to achieve groundbreaking accomplishments. Moreover, individuals can stay far healthier by avoiding conflicts and toxic atmosphere, either mentally or physically. Take an unpleasant workplace atmosphere as an example; when people have to argue with their co-workers or chairmen, it deprives them of focusing on their personal growth. To sum up, despite the fact that making changes can be risky to some extent, I believe that accepting bad situations such as poverty is far worse. So, trying to improve unpleasant situations is worth the risk.

Response: Being able to benefit from good situations is a basic human right. Although some feel that it is better to accept a bad situation, I completely agree with those who believe that trying to make a positive change in such situations is far more beneficial. On the one hand, it could be argued that sustaining an unsatisfactory job or poverty is preferable. Supporters to this view say that trying to improve bad situations can be totally risky. Individuals might be obligated to defence their improvements at the expense of their meaningful relationships with their colleagues especially their managers. Additionally, it is said to some people are not aware of the damaging effects of bad situations on their physical and mental well-being. For instance, the poor may have no concept about how restricted their facilities are as they are obligated to work hard all the time, limiting their free time to dedicate to raise their awareness. On the other hand, I strongly believe that people would be able to achieve more accomplishments in better situations. Being surrounded by a challenging circumstance can decrease individuals' motivation, refusing to perform better. However, the more people are able to make constructive changes in their circumstances, the more they do manage to achieve groundbreaking achievements. Moreover, individuals can stay far healthier by avoiding conflicts and toxic atmosphere either mentally or physically. Take an unpleasant work place atmosphere as an example; when people have to argue with their co-workers or chairmen, depriving them from focusing on their personal growth. To sum up, despite the fact that making change can be risky to some extent, I view that accepting bad situations such as poverty are far worse. So, trying to improve unpleasant situations is worth risking.

Response: It is argued among some people that nowadays, the most important of enviromental problems is the loss of particular species of plants and animals. Others believe that there more important environmental issues. While I accept that the extinction of animals and plants is one the most important problems, I believe that there are more important environmental problems which I will argue them below. On the one hand, it is believed by some people that the loss of particular species of plants and animals would be the most important environmental problem. They believe this, for two main reasons: Firstly, the continuing of humans' lives isn't possible without the existance of many speceis of animals. For instance, the existance of a particular type of insects is essential for agricultural activities. Secondly, by extinction of many types of plants, condition will be highly difficult for producing food products, for almost the production all types of food products depends on plants. for example, the grean-tea production can not be continued without the existence of a special type of plant. On the other hand, there are many types of environmental problems that are more essential than the loss of particular species of plants and animals. I believe that air polution that produced by factories or muchines traffic, is the most important of our environmental issues. air polution causes many types of disease for humans. Many types of heart, breathing, skin and eyes diseases are created beacause of air polution. For instance, the city of tehran is one of the most pulluted city all around the world, therefore most people are bothering from a wide rage of diseases; by contrast, cities without a lot of pullotion have the lowest number of sick people. Water pollution is the other dangerous problem. The pollution of water can easily influence on the health condition of humans. For instance, people who live in villages have less diseases related to stomache like stomachace. In conclusion, I believe that nowadays, we have more important environmental problems than the loss of particular species of plants and animals; however, extiction of plants and animal is highly important.