IELTS Writing Samples

Response: It is widely accepted that a high quantity of food and drink have a high levels of sugar, that causes a lot of illnesses and health issues. A group of people claim that sugary products should be sale by higher price, and as a result people will eat less sugar and sweet products. I disagree with this opinion, and I will explain my reasons. On the one hand, I think companies ought to produce sweety snacks and drink by less amount of sugar. Besides, Companies can add natural sugar to products like Stoya, which is sweet as much as normal sugar, and it is not unhealthy. Not only sugar is not harmful for our body, but also it is an essential nutrient for our brain and helps us think better. People, especially children and athletes have to eat sweety drink and food, and it is not fair to increase the price of those products. On the Other hand, from my perspective, expensive sweet product is not a good way to convince people to eat less sugar. In my opinion, this action will turn people more greedy, and they will have more desire to eat more sugar. in addition, they will storage sugar and sweet products. As a result, there will be a chaos in the market. Due to the sedentary lifestyle, it is crucial for individuals to be more active and eat healthy food. I believe that concept should be taught to the members of society. In conclusion, increasing the price of that kind of products will not be a permanent solution. I believe it will not create any changes significantly. Although, this action will reduce the usage of sugar in a short while, after a time people will eat more sugar and sweet drink compare to the past. Individuals should be aware of the disadvantages of sugar, and try to eat more healthy and have a better lifestyle.

Response: Nowadays, many people who have health problems rather than visit specialist doctors to relieve their pain, adopt some alternative methods such as taking medicines and other treatments. From my point of view, following arbitrary approaches for mitigating aches may have irreparable impacts on people’s bodies and minds, and it is not recommended at all. To commence with, a notable part of society would rather google everything to solve their problems, and medical issues are no exception. There is a massive variety of unreliable sources on the internet, so the manner of treatment for all illnesses is accessible. However, two problems are incomparable, especially in the remedial field. For instance, if children suffer from stomach, taking the wrong tablets, which are advised on the internet, could result in devastating their digestive system. More importantly, many people rely on other people’s suggestions in order to solve their medical problems. They adopt untested approaches to alleviate their pain, but it is probably the worst method because ordinary people are not experts in the medical context, so they may give some piece of advice that deteriorates problems. For instance, a person suggested the acupuncture method to my grandmother in order to treat her pain, and after a while, she got skin disease. If she had visited a skilled doctor, she would not have suffered from this illness. By way of conclusion, the idea that some people with health problems prefer to employ alternative remedial approaches instead of visiting a doctor is a popular topic. As far as I am concerned, there is no better method than visiting a skillful doctor, and the arbitrary approaches may have princes influence due to the fact that the reasons, which have been discussed in this essay.

Response: Nowadays, many people who have health problems rather than visit specialist doctors to relieve their pain, adopt some alternative methods such as taking medicines and other treatments. From my point of view, following arbitrary approaches for mitigating aches may have irreparable impacts on people’s body and mind, and it is not recommended at all. To commence with, a notable part of society would rather google everything to solve their problems, and medical issues are no exception. There are a massive variety of unreliable sources on the internet so that the manner of treatment for all illness is accessible. However, two problems are incomparable especially in the remedial field. For instance, if children suffer has stomachs, taking wrong tablet, which are advised on the internet, could result in devastating their digestive system. More importantly, many people rely on other people’s suggestions in order to dissolve their medical problems. They adopt untested approaches to alleviate heir pain, but it is probably the worst method because ordinary people are not expert in medical context, so they may give some piece of advice which deteriorates problems. For instance, a person had suggested the acupuncture method to my grandmother, after a while she got skin disease. If she had visited a skilled doctor, she would not have suffered from this illness. By way of conclusion, the idea that some people with heath problem prefer to employ alternative remedial approaches instead of visiting a doctor is a popular topic. As far as I am concerned, there is no better method than visiting a skillful doctor, and the arbitrary approaches may have princes influence due to the fact that the reasons, which have been discussed in this essay.

Response: While many people hold the view that engineers and doctors should serve in the country where they acquired their knowledge, Others are of the opinion that there is no constraint for them, and they can choose where to work arbitrarily. From my point of view, professionals have the right to choose the place where they feel better. On the one hand, numerous people state that training is based on each country’s conditions for doctors and engineers. For instance, UAE is a coastal country, which means it has a soft solid, so a civil engineer who trained in a mountainous country is not really skillful in constructing buildings there. Also, some diseases are specific to a region like malaria, and maybe a doctor who lives in Nordic countries does not know anything about that. Therefore, it is better for professionals to work where they are trained. From another angle, many people are proponents of the opinion that there is no limitation for professionals in terms of choosing where they would rather work. Most people firmly believe that doctors and engineers can adapt themselves to tough situations, for they have sufficient knowledge and literacy to overcome vast problems. As far as I am concerned, even may have some issues in their original country where they trained, which convinces them to immigrate somewhere so that they have the opportunity to extend their proficiency and experience. For example, the non-advanced automotive industry in Iran provides a situation in which approximately most experienced people in this field prefer to go abroad in order to employ their ideas in other countries. By away conclusion, whether professionals like doctors and engineers should work in the country where they trained or not is a popular topic these days. In my opinion, this issue totally depends on the professionals’ decision and they are free to choose their career path.

Response: In the modern world, technology is growing faster than ever before. One important example of such developments is automatic vehicles which have gained popularity among a wide range of consumers. While this trend possesses some benefits, I believe that the drawbacks are far more significant.   On the one hand, the first advantage of driverless automobiles is convenience. It is no secret that driving can sometimes be stressful and distressing, mostly while one is stuck in the traffic. With this new feature, people would be able to enjoy their ride regardless to the occurrences on the streets. Secondly, this phenomenon could lead to a decrease in the road accidents and death toll alike. Autopilot mode is engineered to minimize collisions and other unfortunate calamities using satellite mappings, artificial intelligence and machine learning. That is why many people are more likely to opt for such vehicles.   On the other hand, a machine might not necessarily guarantee the passengers’ safety. The knowledge of these cars comes from their limited sources, and the way they were programmed. Therefore, they are incapable of making required decisions in urgent situations. In this sense, a human driver can be considered more trustworthy. Moreover, technologies are closely tied to bugs and unforeseen virtual invasions. It is easier for potential attackers to manipulate the system to cause problems without leaving any trail. So, humans’ lives are at higher risk while driving without a driver.   In conclusion, experts always discover new solutions for the issues individuals might encounter, and the drawback mentioned above is no exception. But as long as such problems are not solved, it is safe to say that the disadvantages of automatic cars overweighs its benefits.

Response: There are differing perspectives on the effects of extended lifespan on contemporary life. While some individuals contend this phenomenon poses some financial issues, others advocate this brings some profits. This essay cliam that the advantages of ageing popullation are over its disadvatages. On the one hand, living for more years brings hope and a sense of assurance in communities as people have more time to enjoy life and achieve to their desires. This not only do has favorable impacts on indivituals' personal worlds, but also brings happiness for their relations. An illustration of this is children have attendances of their parents longer in their life. In other words, people have a opportunity to live more with their beloveds. On the other hand, gavernments abliged to allocate more portion of the national finance on retirment payments. This seems more money should spend on pensioners who have not take a part in ongoing cammercial activities. Thus, thay are not benefitioal in terms of an economical veiw. However, from my perspevtive, they are as a treature for companies, enterprises and business unites, as they can bring flurishing and make a maket lucrative via sharing their experiences and awareness in jobs. For instanse, if entrepreneurs and pioneers have lived more, communities would have achieved economic booms, as thay can give valuable advices to more peolpe who want launch a business. In conclusion, notwithstanding that extending lifespan leads to increaing fund in pensions, it enhanses positive senses in indivituals and their relations, and boost commercial units by their jobs experiences. Thus, the advatages of this phenomenon outweigh the disadvantages,

Response: In recent years, as cities have been providing the newest technologies to residents, the number of people migrating from rural areas to urban areas is increasing. I believe this trend, simultaneously, has both benefits and drawbacks. It is an undeniable fact that people living in cities, have significantly more access to various modern facilities and amenities, such as fast public tranportation, luxurious shopping malls, more job opportunities, etc, compared to those living in countryside and villages. For these reasons, cities, especially megacities and metropolitans, have become much more attractive for rural individuals. In this regard, the boom in the urban population and higher labor workforce in different industries located in the cities, not only will improve the living standard of the whole society, but also, will help the country’s economy thrive in the long-term. So we can say that this kind of migration, is advantageous for the country. On the other hand, continuing this development, may probably lead to such detrimental effects on some areas associated to the rural life, like agricultural industry. In other words, the less people in the countryside, the less workforce for working in agriculture area. According to this fact that farming and agriculture, play a crucial role in the productivity and the independence of the country, regarding producing a wide range of food products, it may have such a negative impact on the nation. Additionally, this may contribute to a period of stagnation in the long-run. To sum up, although moving from rural areas to cities has its own advantages for both the society and individuals, we should prioritze the population balance between these two areas in order to have a flourishing society in various aspects.

Response: In recent years, as cities have been providing the newest technologies to the residents, the number of people who are migrating from rural areas to urban areas are increasing. I believe this trend, simultaneously, has both benefits and drawbacks. It is a deniable fact that people living in cities, have significantly more access to various modern facilities and amenities, such as fast public tranportation, luxurious shopping malls, more job opportunities, etc, compared to those living in countryside and villages. For these reasons, cities, especially megacities and meteropolitans, have become much more attractive for rural individuals. In this regard, the boom in the urban population and higher labour workforce in different industries located in the cities, not only will improve the living standard of the whole society, but also, will help the country’s economy thrive in the long-term. So we can say that this kind of migration, is advantagous for the country. On the other hand, countinuing this development, may probably leads to such detrimental effects on some areas associated to the rural life, like agricultural industry. In other words, the less people in the countryside, the less workforce for working in agriculture area. According to this fact that farming and agriculture, play a crucial role in the productivity and the independence of the country, regarding producing a wide range of food products, it may have such a negative impact on the nation. Additionally, this may contribute to a period of stagnation in the long-run. To sum up, although moving from rural areas to cities has its own advantages for both the society and individuals, we should prioritze the population balance between these two areas in order to have a flourishing society in various aspects.

Response: In recent years, as cities have been providing the newest technologies to the residents, the number of people who are migrating from rural areas to urban areas are increasing. I believe this trend, simultaneously, has both benefits and drawbacks. It is a deniable fact that people living in cities, have significantly more access to various modern facilities and amenities, such as fast public tranportation, luxurious shopping malls, more job opportunities, etc, compared to those living in countryside and villages. For these reasons, cities, especially megacities and meteropolitans, have become much more attractive for rural individuals. In this regard, the boom in the urban population and higher labour workforce in different industries located in the cities, not only will improve the living standard of the whole society, but also, will help the country’s economy thrive in the long-term. So we can say that this kind of migration, is advantagous for the country. On the other hand, countinuing this development, may probably leads to such detrimental effects on some areas associated to the rural life, like agricultural industry. In other words, the less people in the countryside, the less workforce for working in agriculture area. According to this fact that farming and agriculture, play a crucial role in the productivity and the independence of the country, regarding producing a wide range of food products, it may have such a negative impact on the nation. Additionally, this may contribute to a period of stagnation in the long-run. To sum up, although moving from rural areas to cities has its own advantages for both the society and individuals, we should prioritze the population balance between these two areas in order to have a flourishing society in various aspects.

Response: Taking risks is an essential factor in all sides of people’s living such as professional and personal and it is undeniable. From my point of view, although taking risks may have irreparable impacts on our lives, it has a key role in our successions, for the reasons which will be discussed in this essay. First and foremost, making progress requires some crucial factors and the most important one is running risks. In other words, everyone wanting to be successful should put themselves in dangerous circumstances; otherwise, hard work and knowledge are not merely adequate. There are several people who are industrious, but they are not sufficiently courageous to take risks in their professional or personal lives, so they do not have considerable accomplishments. Furthermore, taking risks is a great tool for people to recognize their capabilities. If individuals put themselves into perilous situations, they can comprehend how much they are capable of handling a tough situation. Moreover, running risks and as a result bravery equips us to make an informed decision because there is nothing to worry about. Even though the proponents of this theory believe risks are not advisable and we should lead a smooth life both professional and personal, in my opinion, taking risks saves us from a monotonous life and brings about numerous achievements. By way of conclusion, many people consider risks as a vital parameter in people’s professional and personal lives. As far as I am concerned, taking risks has more favorable aspects for the reasons that have been brought up and clarified in this essay.