IELTS Writing Samples

Response: All cars, buses and vehicles will have no driver in the future. Individuals, who use cars or buses, are passengers and they do not have control over deriving. It has its own advantages and disadvantages. This essay evaluates both sides. Overall, I believe that its benefits outweigh its drawbacks and It will be helpful to use driverless cars. We are living on the edge of technology, and it is obviously accepted that technology has a significant impact of every aspect of our lives, and transportation is not an exception. One of the effects of technology is producing the driverless cars. It has several advantages. For instance, it helps to reduce the number of car accidents significantly. Every day numerous car accidents happen due to the human errors. For example, drivers are sleepy and exhausted, leading to reduced attention. In addition, drivers, especially younger ones, used to check their smartphone while deriving. All these situations are caused accident by human. Driverless cars focus on driving only and nothing can distract them from the road. As a result, the number of accidents will be decreased if people use driverless cars. On the other hand, it has some drawbacks. It is really hard to trust to the technology and give all the control of vehicles to Artificial intelligence. It is widely considered that driverless cars like all the other intelligence products will have some bugs. There is not any certainty that driverless cars will have no technical issues. For instance, I see some situations in movies that the program of a driverless car has a tiny technical problem, and it was impossible to control the car manually. As a result, it was totally impossible to turn on the car. In addition, fixing the driverless cars need huge amount of money and experts. In this circumstance only a few numbers of members of society are able to fix these cars. In conclusion, I claim it is completely hard to evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of driverless cars, however I believe it is worthy to use them in the future.

Response: All cars, buses and vehicles will have no driver in the future. Individuals, who use cars or buses, are passengers and they do not have control over deriving. It has its own advantages and disadvantages. This essay evaluates both sides. Overall, I believe that its benefits and drawback will be equal, and neither of them outweigh the other one. We are living on the edge of technology, and it is obviously accepted that technology has a significant impact of every aspect of our lives, and transportation is not an exception. One of the effects of technology is producing the driverless cars. It has several advantages. For instance, it helps to reduce the number of car accidents significantly. Every day numerous car accidents are happened due to the human errors. For example, driver is sleepy and exhausted, and he/ she has less attention to the road. In addition, drivers, especially younger ones, used to check their smartphone while deriving. All these situations are caused accident by human. Driverless cars focus on driving only and nothing can distract them from the road. As a result, the number of accidents will be decreased if people use driverless cars. On the other hand, it has some drawbacks. It is really hard to trust to technology and give all the control of vehicles to Artificial intelligence. It is widely considered that driverless cars like all the other intelligence products will have some bugs. There is not any certainty that driverless cars will have no technical issues. For instance, I see some situations in movies that the program of a driverless car has a tiny technical problem, and it was impossible to control the car manually. As a result, it was totally impossible to turn on the car. In addition, fixing the driverless cars need huge amount of money and experts. In this circumstance only a few numbers of members of society are able to fix these cars. In conclusion, I claim it is completely hard to evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of driverless cars, however I believe it is worthy to use them in the future.

Response: While some specialists argue that sweet products are real dangers to our health, and one of the most effective ways to prevent them is by increasing their prices, critics claim that although raising prices is a rational way, consuming food based on carbohydrates has roots in our traditional dishes, so most people will be unsatisfied and tend to resist this change. Meanwhile, I believe that we will not be able to eradicate carbohydrate completely from our diets due to the fact that they are a significant part of our invaluable cultural foods. On one hand, raising prices will definitely limit individuals' consumption, and many believe that by continuing this trend, sugar may lose its charm for people and ultimately lose its popularity. As it is written in every diet-related book, after not using sweet products for fourteen days, besides losing weight, other foods will taste better in your mouth and this factor will persuade you to eat other materials instead of sugar more than before. Now, not using sugar due to its high cost will be another way to manage adults and children's urges to purchase more. On the other hand, not all adults and even children have a sweet tooth, and increasing prices will be unfair to them because they deliberately do not overuse sugar. For example, if you consider birthday cakes as one of our traditions, for those people who have sweet consumptions only on their birthdays, overpaying for a piece of cake is totally unfair. In addition, when governments raise sugar's value, they will attract people's attention to the issue and in contrast to their intentions, it may lead to using sugar even more than before. In conclusion, I believe if governments are considering this approach to achieve the goal of a heathier society, they should arise the prices gradually and in the shadows in order to not receive people's harsh reactions. Finally, from my personal perspective, eating sweet food is something related to our cognitive processes and it can not be ommited from our lives overnight; conversely, it should become a habit and be tought in our childhood.

Response: While most people advocate for using science only for enhancing our welfare, and improving our surroundings; there are a few groups that tend to use science for their particular benefits in order to harm other individuals or creatures. Meanwhile, I believe that using sciene in any way that menaces our invironmet should be banned and forbidden. On one hand, science is already being used in various of beneficial ways. To begin with, the advancements made on the field of medical sciences, have been significant, and numerous diseases that could profoundly harm us one day, or lead us to our demise, have been compeletly cured or preventable. Next, development of technology has abled us to travel by airplanes, or even go to the moon, just by initiating new vehicles which someday, can lead us to our future lives on a different planet. Those scientists that devoted their lives to their studies and research made all off these progresses possible. Although not all of them were meant for human beings, in the past few decades, scientists have payed an especial heed to our nature and environment, and have provided plans to preserve them at the best possible way. For example, keeping indangered animals like pandas, in exclusive centers in order to save them from extinction. On the other hand, although science often works well in the users' favour, sometimes it just harm other people and creatures. Some would claim that they pay a small price for a grater good. For instance, in the world war two, when the USA used the Atomic Bombs on Japan, just to finish a long-lasting war and bring up piece to many countries. It is true that harsh action ended the war, but it also ruined two cities multitudes and environments for decades. Besides that, there were other times that humans thought they were making progress, but they were only destroying their surroundings, like expanding cities into forrests, which destroyed other creatures' habitats. In conclusion, I firmly believe that the only key to our existence is keeping up with technology throughout utlizing science; however, as I have metioned above, the outcomes would depend on your sides, when you choose a side, the other ones get hurt. So, the best possible approach might be focusing on a way that would not be detrimental to any creature or environmet.

Response: While there are meny advocates for driverless vehicles due to their ease of use and satisfying speed, critics assert that the automatic technology will never substitute for humans, because they will always have errors; therefore, you may never assure that they are completely safe after all. However I belive that the convenience of today's world is a result of our ancestors following and keeping up with technology, then if we aim for enhancing our welfare we would better to take risks and keep going with the flow. On one hand, autopilot vehicles do not have to waste time on their personal needs, then litterally they will help you in order to manage your schedual more effectively and exploit your time and opportunities. For example, you may have seen more than once that a driver refused to do their service due to their personal circumstances, however this problem would be easily solved because these machines are constently available. Besides, as it utlizes the most recent technology and high speed Internet simultaneously, it is able to change your paths and find the shortest and fastest one in no time, and without any hesitation. Although many present drivers are already using navigating maps, most of them cannot trust applications' results because of their previous experiences. On the other hand, these vehicles just like humans are not exempt from errors. For instence, just like humans have to repair their cars when it is neccessary, robots have to deal with these unpredicted accidents as well. I believe that as long as these automatic vehicles are being authorized by someone in a far distance they the situation is secure; however, if they become particularly independent, in times of most needed, they will be out of our control. this kind of independence and disobeidence, can lead to disastrous outcomes, such as hurting the passengers inside or outside of the machine. In conclusion, however inteligence technology is the key to a brighter future, I firmly believe, specially in the more prominent tasks, leavining a dvice to its own can bring catastrophic outcomes. Finally, for our sakes, It would be better that we learn how to authorize them as well as enjoy their services.

Response: Global sugar consumption has significantly surged over the past few years, consequently, leading to an increase in health problems. To mitigate this issue, many people advocate that drinks and food products that contain high sugar levels should be made more expensive. I strongly concur with the suggestion as I believe that high costs would discourage people from buying such products. In recent years, we have observed an increase in snacking culture leading to various health problems. Empirical evidence from various studies proves that diseases such as obesity and diabetes have substantially increased, furthermore, the statistics show that the main cause of this rise is poor eating habits and sedentary lifestyle. To overcome this challenge, reducing sugar intake is paramount, and the most effective way to do so is to make it less easily available by increasing the prices. Increasing prices will make these products less affordable, decreasing consumption. However, high prices alone would not be efficient, the introduction of low-sugar alternatives at lower prices is also necessary. For instance, the Coca-Cola company introduced Diet Coke, but it was a little more expensive than regular Coke, so the majority of individuals preferred to continue drinking regular Coke as it was cost-effective. A survey was done, and the conclusion suggested that if Diet Coke was cheaper, more consumers would be motivated to purchase it. In conclusion, there is a dire need to bring some changes to control global sugar consumption, as health problems are skyrocketing. The most important step is to make the products with high sugar levels less affordable to the general public, so they have to think twice before purchasing them. Furthermore, introducing healthier products at cheaper prices would encourage people to make better choices.

Response: It is widely accepted that a high quantity of food and drink have a high levels of sugar, that causes a lot of illnesses and health issues. A group of people claim that sugary products should be sale by higher price, and as a result people will eat less sugar and sweet products. I disagree with this opinion, and I will explain my reasons. On the one hand, I think companies ought to produce sweety snacks and drink by less amount of sugar. Besides, Companies can add natural sugar to products like Stoya, which is sweet as much as normal sugar, and it is not unhealthy. Not only sugar is not harmful for our body, but also it is an essential nutrient for our brain and helps us think better. People, especially children and athletes have to eat sweety drink and food, and it is not fair to increase the price of those products. On the Other hand, from my perspective, expensive sweet product is not a good way to convince people to eat less sugar. In my opinion, this action will turn people more greedy, and they will have more desire to eat more sugar. in addition, they will storage sugar and sweet products. As a result, there will be a chaos in the market. Due to the sedentary lifestyle, it is crucial for individuals to be more active and eat healthy food. I believe that concept should be taught to the members of society. In conclusion, increasing the price of that kind of products will not be a permanent solution. I believe it will not create any changes significantly. Although, this action will reduce the usage of sugar in a short while, after a time people will eat more sugar and sweet drink compare to the past. Individuals should be aware of the disadvantages of sugar, and try to eat more healthy and have a better lifestyle.

Response: Nowadays, many people who have health problems rather than visit specialist doctors to relieve their pain, adopt some alternative methods such as taking medicines and other treatments. From my point of view, following arbitrary approaches for mitigating aches may have irreparable impacts on people’s bodies and minds, and it is not recommended at all. To commence with, a notable part of society would rather google everything to solve their problems, and medical issues are no exception. There is a massive variety of unreliable sources on the internet, so the manner of treatment for all illnesses is accessible. However, two problems are incomparable, especially in the remedial field. For instance, if children suffer from stomach, taking the wrong tablets, which are advised on the internet, could result in devastating their digestive system. More importantly, many people rely on other people’s suggestions in order to solve their medical problems. They adopt untested approaches to alleviate their pain, but it is probably the worst method because ordinary people are not experts in the medical context, so they may give some piece of advice that deteriorates problems. For instance, a person suggested the acupuncture method to my grandmother in order to treat her pain, and after a while, she got skin disease. If she had visited a skilled doctor, she would not have suffered from this illness. By way of conclusion, the idea that some people with health problems prefer to employ alternative remedial approaches instead of visiting a doctor is a popular topic. As far as I am concerned, there is no better method than visiting a skillful doctor, and the arbitrary approaches may have princes influence due to the fact that the reasons, which have been discussed in this essay.

Response: Nowadays, many people who have health problems rather than visit specialist doctors to relieve their pain, adopt some alternative methods such as taking medicines and other treatments. From my point of view, following arbitrary approaches for mitigating aches may have irreparable impacts on people’s body and mind, and it is not recommended at all. To commence with, a notable part of society would rather google everything to solve their problems, and medical issues are no exception. There are a massive variety of unreliable sources on the internet so that the manner of treatment for all illness is accessible. However, two problems are incomparable especially in the remedial field. For instance, if children suffer has stomachs, taking wrong tablet, which are advised on the internet, could result in devastating their digestive system. More importantly, many people rely on other people’s suggestions in order to dissolve their medical problems. They adopt untested approaches to alleviate heir pain, but it is probably the worst method because ordinary people are not expert in medical context, so they may give some piece of advice which deteriorates problems. For instance, a person had suggested the acupuncture method to my grandmother, after a while she got skin disease. If she had visited a skilled doctor, she would not have suffered from this illness. By way of conclusion, the idea that some people with heath problem prefer to employ alternative remedial approaches instead of visiting a doctor is a popular topic. As far as I am concerned, there is no better method than visiting a skillful doctor, and the arbitrary approaches may have princes influence due to the fact that the reasons, which have been discussed in this essay.

Response: While many people hold the view that engineers and doctors should serve in the country where they acquired their knowledge, Others are of the opinion that there is no constraint for them, and they can choose where to work arbitrarily. From my point of view, professionals have the right to choose the place where they feel better. On the one hand, numerous people state that training is based on each country’s conditions for doctors and engineers. For instance, UAE is a coastal country, which means it has a soft solid, so a civil engineer who trained in a mountainous country is not really skillful in constructing buildings there. Also, some diseases are specific to a region like malaria, and maybe a doctor who lives in Nordic countries does not know anything about that. Therefore, it is better for professionals to work where they are trained. From another angle, many people are proponents of the opinion that there is no limitation for professionals in terms of choosing where they would rather work. Most people firmly believe that doctors and engineers can adapt themselves to tough situations, for they have sufficient knowledge and literacy to overcome vast problems. As far as I am concerned, even may have some issues in their original country where they trained, which convinces them to immigrate somewhere so that they have the opportunity to extend their proficiency and experience. For example, the non-advanced automotive industry in Iran provides a situation in which approximately most experienced people in this field prefer to go abroad in order to employ their ideas in other countries. By away conclusion, whether professionals like doctors and engineers should work in the country where they trained or not is a popular topic these days. In my opinion, this issue totally depends on the professionals’ decision and they are free to choose their career path.