IELTS Writing Samples

Response: These days, life expectancy is much more than any other period of time, in numorous countries. Some argue that this the more eldery people we have, the more challenges are raied for the authorities. While others hold the opposite view and believe that the society can take more advatages of ageing people. Despite some narrow merits to this notion, I am leaning towards the former group and in this essay I will elaborate on my reasons. In the modern era, thanks to the privalaged medical cares which are approachable in even far reaching areas, people are less encountered to life-threatening disease, as a result they live more than their forefathers. However, as the population grows in a staggering rate, dealing with the elderly's affairs has its challenges. For instance, when the population of ageing people is high, more younger people have to work harder to provide them. In addition, medical services will be highly demanding due to the fact that ageing people are more in danger of exposuring to cronic diseases, and this, in turn, put an extra burdun in governments' shoulder to treat these retired groups of people. On the contrary, when there are more aged people in a country, it is attributted to the long-term successful policies of a government to increase life span among their residents, which is admireable. Moreover, in this situation, there will be the more experienced people in the society, which could be beneficial for families with younger members, who want to nurture thier children basede on cultural morals. In conclusion, while some are in favor of existing more elderly in the society, I foster the opposite view, as facing with numorous aging people leads to the more up coming challenges, including the more expences in terms of medical facilities as well as the more living costs.

Response: While I believe longer weekends have extensive benefits for employees and their families, it is not essential to add more days to the weekend, because there are various alternatives to improve the quality of people's lives. On one hand, longer weekends provide individuals with more opportunities to focus on their social life and mental health, rather than spending just two days. Significantly, three or even four days of continuous leisure enable people to manage their relationships and plans more efficiently in order to overcome their daily challenges. For instance, based on the most recent research on relationships, a noticeable group of couples broke up due to being overly occupied with their work; therefore, not having enough time to communicate with each other. Dealing with health problems is another crucial result of working too much in a week; whereas, overworking confronts people with several negative emotions such as sadness, boredom, and anxiety. When you work twelve hours a day, without even knowing, you are making yourself exhausted and fretful, which may harm those who are around you, and finally, when you realize many parts of your life are falling apart, anxiety emerges from the shadows. On the other hand, extending weekend days is not the only way. For example, if we do not consider our week periods as seven days, it enables us to have ten-day periods, and in every ten days, we manage to have four days of break and six days of work. In this case, overall, we will have twelve days of rest and eighteen days of work, which is almost similar to our present, real numbers. Another approach could be instead of adding days to weekends, to reduce daily work hours in order to spend the rest of the time with family and friends. However, many argue that the first approach is more pleasant, because even going to work, five days a week , exhausts them mentally but I believe having a few more hours to yourself every day is better than having nothing at all. In conclusion, I firmly agree with a plan where governments, employers, and managers consider their employees' well-being more and try to promote their welfare, which could only be possible with the right management and program.

Response: In recent times, businesses increasingly highlight the uniqueness of their products in advertising. This trend is primarily driven by the desire to attract more customers and boost sales. In my view, this development is positive as it enhances consumer awareness and encourages innovation. One of the main reasons businesses emphasize that their products are "new" is to capture consumers' attention in a competitive market. Companies rely on generating revenue to cover operational costs, such as employee salaries and rental expenses. For example, advertising new features or improvements in a product can attract customers who are looking for the latest technology or more efficient solutions. By doing so businesses are more likely to attract customers and increase profits, which can then be reinvested to enhance product quality or expand operations. Moreover, companies often advertise environmentally friendly or sustainable features of their products, addressing a growing concern among consumers who are increasingly conscious of the impact of their purchases on the environment. Therefore, emphasizing uniqueness helps businesses achieve financial stability and respond to societal trends. In my opinion, this trend is positive because it raises consumer awareness about product quality and encourages more informed purchasing decisions. When customers are faced with a wide variety of goods, it can be difficult to decide which product is the best. By clearly advertising a product's unique features or advantages, businesses can guide them in choosing products that meet their specific needs. For example, knowing that a product is made with eco-friendly materials or advanced technology allows shoppers to make decisions based on values such as sustainability or innovation. Additionally, this approach fosters healthy competition among businesses, pushing them to continuously improve their offerings to meet evolving consumer expectations. Ultimately, this benefits both the companies and their customers by promoting higher standards in product development. In conclusion, the emphasis on new and unique products in advertising is a strategy used by businesses to attract more customers and increase sales. I believe this is a positive development, as it not only raises consumer awareness but also promotes higher-quality, eco-friendly products in the market

Response: It is often said that music has the power to unite and connect people, regardless of their cultural backgrounds or ages. I completely agree with this view, and will give my reasons below. Music can certainly reach across cultural and national boundaries and bring people together. Perhaps the best example of this would be the Live Aid concerts that took place back in the 1980s, and which were broadcast to a global audience. Two live events were held simultaneously in the UK and the US, and the objective was to raise funds for famine relief in Ethiopia. The concerts were a huge success, both in terms of the number of people around the world who watched them and their impact on international public awareness of the famine. They demonstrated, I believe, that music truly is the planet’s global language. Just as it transcends cultures, music also has the ability to connect people from different generations. Regardless of age, we can all enjoy a memorable melody, a strong rhythm or a beautiful singing voice, and the best songs seem to have the same magical effect on all of us. This would explain why televised music competitions, such as ‘The X Factor’ or ‘The Voice’, are such popular prime-time shows. These programmes attract incredibly broad audiences because singing and popular songs appeal to children, parents and grandparents alike. I would argue that no other form of entertainment can bring families together in this way. In conclusion, I believe that music is unique in its capacity to create shared experiences between people, irrespective of culture and age.

Response: It is often said that music has the power to unite and connect people, regardless of their cultural backgrounds or ages. I completely agree with this view, and will give my reasons below. Music can certainly reach across cultural and national boundaries and bring people together. Perhaps the best example of this would be the Live Aid concerts that took place back in the 1980s, and which were broadcast to a global audience. Two live events were held simultaneously in the UK and the US, and the objective was to raise funds for famine relief in Ethiopia. The concerts were a huge success, both in terms of the number of people around the world who watched them and their impact on international public awareness of the famine. They demonstrated, I believe, that music truly is the planet’s global language. Just as it transcends cultures, music also has the ability to connect people from different generations. Regardless of age, we can all enjoy a memorable melody, a strong rhythm or a beautiful singing voice, and the best songs seem to have the same magical effect on all of us. This would explain why televised music competitions, such as ‘The X Factor’ or ‘The Voice’, are such popular prime-time shows. These programmes attract incredibly broad audiences because singing and popular songs appeal to children, parents and grandparents alike. I would argue that no other form of entertainment can bring families together in this way. In conclusion, I believe that music is unique in its capacity to create shared experiences between people, irrespective of culture and age.

Response: In some countries, individuals prefer to have home for themselves instead of renting home. I think saving money is really significant for some people. So, they believe that with buying home can save more money and this is positive appreciation. Indeed, I have 2 main reasons for my view. first of all, when people rent the house, they should transport after ending of their constant. So they have to pay lots of costs for transforming. Thus, they try to buy the home and save their income. In some countries such as, my country, Iran, almost of people work hard in order to buy the home because of our adverse economy. we have tough financial situation. Also, annual homes become more expensive than last year because of our high inflation. secondly, in some countries, individuals feel more relax in their own home and it is important to them. Actually, they can change inside or yard of their home without any stress. while if you rent the home, you would not have allowed that change the decoration. In addition, some people could not grow the plantes in their garden since, they rent the homes and the homes do not belong them. people who buy the home, feel a sense of stability and security. In conclusion, in some countries that have rising inflation, almost of citizens choose to buy the homes instead of renting them because they tend to have financial investment. Moreover, people feel more comfortable in their own homes than in the rented one.

Response: Many countries are facing the migration of rural dwellers into urban areas, which has resulted in a noticeable reduction in the rural population. I firmly believe that this phenomenon not only raises problems in the countryside but also poses challenges for cities, which this essay will substantiate. Today, thanks to the stimulating facilities that modern cities provide for their residents, more and more people are tending to relocate from their pastoral homes to vibrant urban centers. However, as the number of people living in cities grows, the demand for facilities will rise dramatically. If authorities cannot rise to these upcoming challenges, it may lead to sprawling cities and the emergence of shantytowns on the outskirts. This, in turn, brings related problems, namely poor sanitation and hygiene, which can create a breeding ground for crime. Conversely, as rural inhabitants abandon their hometowns, these idyllic areas may become desolate without any residents. Because they have left these districts behind, advancement and progress in these areas are likely to decline. Nonetheless, some may view this issue as a positive outcome, believing that fewer people living in villages and the countryside will help maintain their rustic charm. However, in my opinion, the local inhabitants of each area are the essence of those places, and they would be better off staying in their hometowns. In conclusion, while the hectic pace of life and the allure of urban living tempt many rural residents to move to cities, preserving the charm of the countryside is a responsibility of its inhabitants and should be a priority for them.

Response: All vehicles including cars, buses, trucks will not need drivers to be controlled in the future. People just as a passengers will be these vehicles during trip. I believe that the advantages of driverless by far outweigh disadvantage. There are several advantages such as reduce traffic congestion, diminish accidents, improve safety and increase mobility.one of the most significant advantages of driverless vehicles is their ability to reduce the number of traffic accidents. By eliminating human error, which is the primary cause of most wccident. As a result, driverless vehicles can detect and respond to their surroundings more quickly and accurately than human drivers, reducing the risk of accidents. Moreover, driverless vehicles can provide transportation for people who are unable to drive themselves, such as elderly or those with disabilities. Despite this, there are several disadvantages, one of the most pressing concerns is the potential for job loss among human drivers, including truck drivers, taxi drivers and delivery drivers. Furthermore, could lead to hacking or syber attacks which could found safety and security.one of the disadvantage is dependence technology could lead to a decline in driving skills and loss of independence for individuals. In sum up, in the future, autonomous vehicles will be replaced with current vehicles.as well as driverless vehicles offer substantial advantage in terms of safety, reduce traffic congestion, my standpoint, the advantage of driverless for by outweigh disadvantage.

Response: While some people argue that they have sufficient potential to study two majors simultaneously in order to enhance their ability and insight, others assert that this approach will only lead to distraction and deficiency. I believe, although both perspectives ultimately, value the spirit of education both of them have their valid claims. On one hand, studying two majors can be really frustrating and exhausting for most; however, there are still many ingenious and innovative students who can study two fields withouth losing any concentration. In this case, when students are able to learn from a broader source, consequently they will be able to have a wider view on subjects in comparision to others. For example, if you tend to pursue attention components of the brain, you will need neuro-cognitive science besides psychology due to the necessity of working with special equipment and computer programs. On the other hand, from the perspective of choosing quality over quantity, many advocate for only one main subject to study. They argue that concentration is the essential key to learning profoundly and to reach this goal, one should discard all the distractions and follow just the pivotal way. Specialising in every single field takes several hours of studying and hard work. Studying multiple subjects might increase your general knowledge efficiently; however, it would not assist you to the highest qualification measures. In conclusion, it depends on one's educational potential whether to study a major or two. While I acknowledge the value of concentrated studying, I firmly believe that with the growth of interdisciplinary studies, the need for knowing other fields becomes more essential every day.

Response: Is it important for people to take risks, both in their professional lives and their personal lives. Do you think the advantages of taking risks outweigh the disadvantages? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. There are two main perspectives when it comes to making decisions. Whether you wish to trust your heart or your mind, in other words, to act by logic or feelings, you are obligated to choose only one way. While some might argue that the only worthy pattern is the one followed by reasons and logic, others believe that taking risks and listening to their hearts have changed their paths of life incredibly. On one hand, when you have to make a life-changing decision, you would rather scrutinize every aspect of that situation in order to not have regrets after the outcomes. In this case, you have enough time to utilize other people's wisdom and experience, and play the odds. The results are most welcomed when you try to diminish the element of surprise. I believe when you are dealing with huge personal or professional problems in your life, it makes more sense to have a comprehensive view that entails multiple factors in order to make the best possible decision. On the other hand, some argue that taking risks has its own benefits and advantages. For example, these people are symbols of courage and free spirit in public belief. Undeniably, there have been times in our lives that only by making prompt decisions, we turned the circumstances in our favor, so in a fair statement, all hasty decisions do not end up catastrophically. Besides, many well-known faces like Steve Jobs and Thomas Edison had to take risks and those decisions led to great success for them. I also believe that some sometimes, when we are not one hundred percent sure of our decision and its results, it is better to take chances and let the universe handle the situation. In conclusion, it depends on you and your personality whether you prefer to take your chances as much as possible, or try to think the whole condition through. I myself, as a person that tends to act by logic, think that the advantages of taking risks do not outweigh the disadvantages.