IELTS Writing Samples

Response: As a part of society who prefers to read books and magazines online due to the expenses, I believe online reading provides people more time and less expenditures. On the other hand some would argue that printed contexts wont hurt your health condition as much the screens and some people feel more comfortable and pleased just by feeling the texture of books and papers in their hands. In my opinion, as a college student, not every one possesses enough budget to afford all aspects of their livelyhood, and books can be one of the separable part when it comes to reducing costs. There are many approachable ways that enable us to reach that goal such as borroing books, or buying secondhand books, or my priority, reading the online books. When you choose the online books you will recieve the gift of time; instead of squandering time on finding books on the stores you are able to manage your spare time more efficiently. In my experienc, during my final exams, when I read from a book on my laptop and write down the headlines, I find more time to revise and learn the lessons by heart. Although since reading books, news papers, and magazines got widespread, the number of individuals wearing glasses has been constently rising, some people think that reading on the screens has exacerbated the situation. Now many scientific resources claime that the idea of computer systems being more harmfull than printed books is merely a myth and there is not enough evidence to support this idea. Another protest to online matterials is the sensation of papers or leather-covers in your hands that many find it qiute soothing and relaxing. For example, a significant part of our elderlies prefer to read book while they are sitting on a chair and drinking hot beverages. In conclusion, from a conprehensive view, it depedns to users whethere tend to purchase their books and news papers online or from bookstores. Some people try to face the situation logically and some prioritize their feelings and comforts first all the time.

Response: In terms of how people must behave in their work office, at school or , there are two schools of thought. One claims that rivalry would be beneficial. On the other hand, others assert that people should accompany each other instead of competing. However, both of these approaches will be discussed in this essay, in addition to mine. First and foremost, it is an undeniable fact that employers have been putting a considerable amount of both physical and mental pressure on their employees shoulder since the arrival of our tech-driven era. Developed technology gave rise to emerging a toxic atmosphere between companies, especially the boards of directors, in order to prove to each other which one is better in providing services to customers. Based on psychological facts, you will become what your surroundings vibes are. Moreover, pupils are focusing on numerical results, rather than what they have really learned. They are sacrificing quality for quantity. Principals contribute to this situation through arising a sense of unreal proud or making students to compare themselves with each other, which can leak into their souls. In this regard, when these mentioned people come back home after their work hours or school, they tend to behave this way since it has become a core part of their personality as its long-term effects. On the contrary, there are individuals who view this concept from a different angle. Such people that would prefer cooperation, believe that the more they interact with others, the more experienced they would become. For instance, when either a person who you care about or a stranger is in trouble, and you take a step to help them, not only you convey a sense of empathy, but also there is a chance for you to learn something new in this occasion from them. It is worth mentioning that it has a positive effect on boosting your daily mood due to helping a human being. Additionally, imagine a school, office or a family in which its members are constantly turning green with envy, and want to surpass each other. At the end, there is nothing left but a ruined cozy corner, which once was supposed to witness their delighted relationship. Therefore, they consider cooperation a necessity to make progress in every aspects of their lives, not racing. In conclusion, I am a proponent of both the former and the latter, striking a perfect balance. Despite all the drawback lay behind the competition concept, if people should live a happier life, full of success and respect, it is their responsibility to figure out where they should show sympathy or contestation.

Response: Science has played an integral role in shaping the modern world and solving serious problems faced by human beings. There is a notable brief that the most pivotal purpose of science is to enhance individuals' lives. I strongly agree with this view, as scientific discoveries have significantly improved the quality of life and spurred technological progressions that address global issues. One of the key measures of science is to advance the quality of citizens' lives. This means that scientific endeavours can make daily living easier and more comfortable, especially in fields like healthcare, technology, and communication. One primary example is the invention of antibiotics, which has undoubtedly reduced mortality rates and saved millions of lives. Furthermore, people's interactions can be influenced by the progression of technology in communication such as the Internet, which allows access to instant information and enhances societal welfare. In addition to improving the quality of the citizens, the discovery of science is essential in terms of technological progress. Science breakthroughs like renewable energy, have increasingly impacted a better life. For instance, the innovation of solar energy has essentially decreased the use of fossil fuels as well as fulfilled energy demands worldwide. Similarly, the introduction of electric vehicles has contributed to alleviating climate change, benefiting from good air quality and a better environment. In conclusion, I firmly believe that improving people's lives is the most important aim of science. From enhancing the quality of everyday challenges through medical innovations to advancing technological progress that tackles obstacles globally, science has ensured individuals lives. Therefore, scientific advancements should be the priority to address problems all around the world.

Response: These days, numerous individuals tend to employ various kinds of medications but not seeing a skilled doctor. Althogh nowdays, thanks to the easy accessibility to the medical information, as well as people's awareness, it is more convenient for all to treat themselves that way, I strongly disagree with this approach, and will elaborate my opinion in this assey. Today, due to the prevalences of technology, it is common for many people to reach the internet for searching their symptoms, when it comes to health prolems. Moreover, there are lots of inticing advertisements on fake medicines with promise of definite treatment, which fradually tempt patients to follow them. However, I am convinced that these methods not only cannot bring them their health, but also result in even a major health condition. Professional docters served many years in universities to gain adequet knowledge in order to help people with disorders and illnesses. Additionally, paitients should be visited in person, hence only an skilled doctor regarding thier previous experiences can diagnose the definite illness. Therefore, it is recommened to first see a doctor without any hesitation when you face even a minor health problem, as it can be cured with little medicares if it is noticed at its primary stages. In conclusion, while reaching to other medications can be easy and fast enough to take them, skillful doctores are specificly there for this purposes. Moreover, following wrong information can lead to irriversible problems that even professional docters cannot dael with.

Response: While many people hold the view that advertising is regarded as a persuasive and efficient way to buy products, others are of the opinion that advertising cannot attract us anymore because it is really common. From my point of view, although some people still choose the goods they need based on the advertisements, it is becoming an annoying approach to presenting products. On the one hand, a notable part of each society has trust in advertising and whenever need to evaluate a product, they do it by the popularity of that. It is obvious that one of the ways in which a product becomes popular is to advertise it frequently, especially in the media. In addition, they believe that when a product is advertised, an opportunity is provided to be familiar with all aspects of that product so that it is really helpful for customers to compare goods. From another angle, other people state that advertising is ineffective anymore due to the fact that it is widespread and common. During the day nearly most people are bombarded by various Ad in everywhere such as on social media, the street, Television, etc., and often cause some trouble for us including distraction. Moreover, it is too annoying when everywhere someone goes, is encountered by one of these advertisements. For example, in the middle of an exciting TV program suddenly a commercial ad pops up and makes everyone furious. As far as I am a proponent of this idea, nowadays advertisements are too much and pervasive so that they lose their effectiveness and efficiency. In conclusion, whether advertising is an extremely successful and efficient method to persuade people to buy goods or not is a controversial issue. My viewpoint is that these days advertising probably not only is not an effective way but also is considered an irritating approach to convince people to buy a product.

Response: It is a widespread belief that printed newspapers and books will not be used in the future because people can read everything they want online free of charge. From my point of view, although buying printed newspapers and books is less popular in the future, many people would rather printed newspapers and books for several reasons. To commence with, a notable part of the elderly will prefer to buy newspapers and book due to the fact that they would not be partly familiar with technology. It would be more convenient for old people to keep the traditional way which is buying printed newspapers and books. Furthermore, some people strongly believe that reading the hardcopy versions of books and newspapers is more memorable than reading online. They point out that books provide you to highlight wherever a reader wants and more importantly a reader can feel the writer’s emotions when touches papers. As well as the mentioned reasons, reading online books and newspapers for a while can have detrimental impact on the readers’ eyes and it is undeniable. Some research has provedthat If people’s eyes are exposed to artificial light for a long time, so it will result in diminishing their eyesight. In conclusion, owing to the fact that it is free to read everything online, no one will tend to buy printed newspapers and books. In my opinion, buying hardcopy of books and newspaper is not going to be abolished for the reasons that have been brought up in this essay.

Response: Some people around the world hold the view that ownership of a home instead of renting one is crucial. This belief arises from several aspects like being worried about the future and the ability to save money. From my point of view, this situation brings an unfavorable aspect to lives which will be discussed in this essay. To commence with, the main issue that people care about is the future of children, so they make numerous efforts to buy a house even though it is small in size. parents who worry about the future of their children would like to provide an accommodation where their children can live there without distress. In addition, because the major part of a family’s expenditure is rent, buying a house is regarded as the most effective way to save money. For instance, most Iranian people believe that buying a house is a kind of profitable investment. The notable point which usually overlooked is that this behavior has negative features such as ignoring pleasure. The only purpose of living is to reach happiness and it is undeniable. Some people spend a remarkable part of their lives working in order to earn adequate money to buy a house which may lead to dissatisfaction in the late age of their life. Furthermore, they may miss the enjoyable time of their life such as the time when they can play with their children. For instance, one of my colleagues, who is the founder of a well-known company, always feels regretful about why he was not at his daughter's wedding party owing to the fact that he had to work. In conclusion, some people all over the world are of the opinion that it is vital to have a home instead of renting one. The reasons for this belief and also the minus point of that have been brought up and clarified vividly.

Response: In contemporary society, sugar has become an indispensable component of most processed foods and beverages. However, the high levels of this substance can lead to numerous detrimental effects on our health. In this context, some people argue that sugary products should be priced higher to reduce sugar consumption among the population. I partially agree with this viewpoint for several reasons. It is an undeniable fact that the prices of products play a significant role in shaping individuals' shopping habits. In other words, when it comes to purchasing items, high prices are often seen as a deterrent for many consumers. They typically prefer to buy more affordable products rather than expensive ones. Consequently, if sugary foods were to become more costly, they would likely become less popular over time. However, it is important to note that this price increase may have little effect on a substantial number of people who consider sugar an integral part of their diet. Many of them are willing to spend considerable amounts of money to continue enjoying their favorite sugary foods and drinks. On the other hand, there are several other effective strategies to discourage individuals from purchasing products with high sugar content. Firstly, the government could implement regulations that restrict the sale of sugary products in the market. Additionally, manufacturers should focus on producing foods and beverages with lower sugar levels to offer healthier alternatives. Finally, producers can utilize natural substitutes for sugar, such as grape extract or palm sugar, to sweeten their products without compromising health. In conclusion, while increasing the prices of sugary products could have a significant impact on reducing people's inclination to buy these treats, I believe there are also other viable methods to address this issue.

Response: Nowadays, sugar has been an indispensible part of most of the produced foods and drinks, which obviosly, high level of this substance, brings about many detrimental effects to our health. In this regard, people have argue that sugary products should have higher prices in order to decrease the sugar consume among people. I partly agree with this view for some reasons. It is an undeniable fact that the prices of products has an important role on shopping habits of individuals. In other words, when it comes to shopping stuff, being expensive is considered a deterrent factor for most people. They usually prefer to purchase more affordable products rather than expensive ones. As a result, high cost sugary foods, become less popular in a long-term. However, it should be mentioned that this price increasing, may have no effect on a large number of people who made sugar, an intersting part of their diet. Promptly, they spend a considereable amount of money to continue experiencing their favourite sugary foods and drinks. On the other hand, there are several other feasible ways to deter individuals from buying products with high level of sugar. Firstly, the solution is for the government to establish some restricting laws for markets related to sell sugary products. Additionally, factories should manufacture foods and drinks with lower level of sugar in order to represent much healthier products. Finally, producers are simply able to use such natural substitutes for sugar to make the foods sweet, such as grape extraction or palmsugar. To sum up, although rising sugary products can have remarkable effect on reducing people’s passion for buying these delicacies, I belive there are also some other ways to mitigate this problem.

Response: In many contries around The World, rural people are moving to cities. So the population in the countryside is decreasing. Do you think this is a positive or negative development? examples from your own knowledge or experience. Overpopulation in mega cities, particularly in developed countries has posed governments a great burden, and the most recognized reason is the rural immigration. On the other side, governments have brought this to their own by placing the main substatial facilities and organization in these cities. I believe, although these mega cities need an extensive workforce with toughtful strategies and policies governments can manage the situation more effectively. On the one hand, when governments dedicate most of their budget to provide cities with great services and facilities, it makes the rustics feel overlooked. Besides, when cities become the center of all activities there will be more job opportunities as well. Those in villages who do not desire to work in rural jobs decide to come to cities in pursuit of other positions. I believe about two decades ago this system was working perfectely, however now due to overpopulation the countrysides are expanding. Actually, the problem in here is not only expanding cities but also weakening of rural economy. Rustics are still the crucial part of countries economy, and by their depopulation governments will take the main hit. The demographic rated portray that the population of the rustics has diminished meanwhile the numbers in cities are rising. The worst mistake of govrnment was advetizing the city-life and disparaging the rerul-life. When the delusional idea of livinig a perfect life in cities became widespread there was no cessation there. These demographic shifts were not only the ruslts of job opportunities in the cities, it was also due to the cultural changes that made the rustics more willing to live in the cities. For example, there are more advertisements occuring in the city site rather than rural sites. In conclusion, from both city and rural sides, these changes have caused several problems which we now can clearly see. The outcomes of this situation are destructive to economy and govenments should use proper policies to avoid them.