IELTS Writing Samples

Response: While some contend that product advertisements have a significant impact on our purchases, others argue that their mundanity has made them unnoticeable. Although I believe that advertisements can significantly influence one's buying habits, I am of the opinion that their remark has become less noticeable nowadays. Advertising can be extremely influential because of how they are made and human nature . Advertisements are usually made based on algorithms and results gained by social studies. Those who produce these alluring images and videos are aware of individual's needs and pursuits. Therefore, by highlighting one's needs, they can easily pursue one to buy a product. Moreover, as human beings, we seek guidance from other people and try to fit into a community by mimicking other people's behaviours. Watching advertisements, in which users assert the advantages of a certain product, unconsciously captivates individual's minds to reach for the advertised item in order to gain the same happiness as an advertiser and earn a ticket into the user's community. Although the impact of advertisements is undeniable on one's approach toward buying, with the rise of financial literacy and the need for personal uniqueness, advertisements have become less dominant in the business world. Along with the democratization of knowledge among the public, more people have become aware of the deceptive effects of marketing techniques, and are trying to consciously steer clear of falling prey to the allure of these glittering images and videos. Furthermore, modern culture motivates a sense of uniqueness. As a result, people tend to opt for unique, distinguished objects instead of generalized products. In conclusion, advertisements can be extremely influential by fostering a communal sense among buyers. However, as more people have become aware of advertising methods, their impact migh be hindered. The need to be distinct is also a barrier in the way of advertisements success.

Response: It is said that these days in a lot of countries, food products are always available for buyers in markets all around the world. What I believe is that this idea is positive development because it has made life easier and helps food industry to grow widely. This essay will argue these statements. Firstly, one of the positive points considered to be living easily and freely. As can be seen, people do not need to search for food anymore because it is provided in quantity they want in different shops. In other words, although initially individuals had to go to long distance to provide something to eat, now consumers can focus on other aspects of life and hunger is not a significant issue. For example, various groups of people had to replace their location because of the lack of food but now there are number of supermarkets in one street and no one have to do those hard tasks. On the other hand, the growth of food industry has merits like more job opportunities. What should be mention is that people are working in many fields connected to this market these days and new careers are developing in this field every day. For example, they harvest plants, collect the raw materials, do the packaging in factories, transport them to other places, and at the end sell the products. In summary, having access to food products in markets all over the world makes life easier for consumers and this action helps this industry to progress and in my opinion these developments considered to be positive.

Response: These days, due to changes in humanity's way of living, the Earth is facing serious environmental problems. While some believe that the primary environmental issue is the loss of specific species of plants and animals, I align with those who argue that there are more pressing environmental challenges. On the one hand, the loss of particular species of plants and animals is said to be the main environmental problem of our time. Firstly, it could be argued that this may affect ecosystems. For example, the process of water purification that is directly connected to some marine creatures would be disturbed. Similarly, our climate regulation that follows from a specific plant may be affected. Moreover, some people believe that medical resources might be affected by the loss of these species, and agricultural diversity would be decreased to a limited number. In other words, a specific type of plant that used to be used in producing a medicine will not be available. On one hand, the loss of particular species of plants and animals is often cited as the main environmental problem of our time. Firstly, it can be argued that this loss adversely affects ecosystems. For example, the process of water purification, which is directly linked to certain marine creatures, would be disrupted. Similarly, climate regulation, which relies on specific plants, may also be compromised. Moreover, some people contend that the loss of these species could impact medical resources and lead to a decrease in agricultural diversity, resulting in a reliance on a limited number of crops. In other words, a specific type of plant that was previously used in the production of medicine may no longer be available. On the other hand, I firmly believe that there are more important environmental problems. Firstly, I would argue that one important issue is resource depletion; overuse of water and soil degradation are two examples. How do these problems threaten sustainability and human survival? The next problem is pollution. Personally, I believe that plastic and water pollution are some of the far-reaching problems that humans face. Water pollution makes marine creatures poisoned, and this may affect the food chain. Consequently, this process causes damage to our health. Finally, and most importantly, is climate change. It directly affects all aspects of life and the Earth. For example, crop shortages, extreme weather, and rising sea levels are the most significant impacts of climate change. On the other hand, I firmly believe that there are more significant environmental problems that warrant our attention. Firstly, I would argue that resource depletion is a critical issue; the overuse of water and soil degradation are two prominent examples. These problems threaten sustainability and human survival. Another major concern is pollution. Personally, I believe that plastic and water pollution are among the most far-reaching challenges that humanity faces. Water pollution can poison marine life, which in turn affects the food chain and ultimately damages human health. Finally, and most importantly, climate change poses a direct threat to all aspects of life on Earth. For instance, crop shortages, extreme weather events, and rising sea levels are some of the most significant impacts of climate change. All of this being said, although the loss of particular plants and animals may affect ecosystems, there are much more important problems that should be considered. Therefore, on balance, I believe that climate change is the issue we should focus on. In conclusion, while the loss of specific plants and animals may indeed affect ecosystems, there are far more critical issues that deserve our focus. Therefore, I believe that climate change is the paramount issue we should prioritize.

Response: These days, because of change in humankind’s way of living, the Earth is facing with some serious environmental problems. While some believe that the main environmental problem is the loss of particular species of plants and animals, I, however, agree with those who feel that there are more important environmental problems. On the one hand, the loss of particular species of plants and animals is said to be the main environmental problem of our time. Firstly, it could be argued that this may affect ecosystems. For example, the process of water purification that directly connected to some marine creatures would be disturbed. Similarly, our climate regulation that follows by a specific plant may affected. Moreover, some people believe that medical resources might be affected by the loss of these species, also agriculture diversity would be decreased to a limited number. In other words, a specific type of plant that used to be use in producing a medicine will not be provided. On the other hand, I firmly believe that there are more important environmental problems. Firstly, I would argue that one important issue is resource depletion; overuse of water and soil degradation are two examples. How these problems threaten sustainability and human survival? The next problem is pollution. Personally, I believe that plastic and water pollutions are one of the far-reaching problems that human faces. Water pollution makes marine creatures poisoned, and this may affect food chain. Consequently, this process causes damages in our health. Finally, and the most importantly is climate change. It directly affects all aspects of life and the Earth. For example, crops shortage, extreme weathers, and rising sea levels are the most impacts of climate change. All of this being said, although the loss of particular plants and animals may affect ecosystems, there are much more important problems that should be considered. Therefore, on balance, I believe that climate change is the issue we should think about it.

Response: People have different views about owning or renting a house, I suppose that would be better to buy a house if someone has the ability to handle financial stuff. I think like this because I see that in my family, my fox and my uncle have the same amount of money, but we decide to buy a house while my uncle rents a house and with the rest of the money by a really expensive car, after years he lost his car and the money he rented the house was less valuable, but our money became much more because houses become expensive. Another reason for supporting my idea is my country's problems, Iran in recent decades has had a really bad economic situation, nobody can buy a house in recent years because prices are becoming more and more every second and also people having problems with providing their necessary nutrients as a result no one thinks about buying a house while the price for renting is also increasing with an astonishing rate. If anybody in my country rents a house this year, for the next year he or she will not be able to rent the same house with the same amount of money. So after all my personal experiences, I think people are right to decide to buy over rent because it has too many benefits, for example, it is like saving money for the future of your children while you can live in it until then and also you are reliving that if something happens you always have a banknote. beyond this, I reckon moving from one house to another or leaving the neighborhood when you are renting a house are tough things and also bring children to stress because they have to leave all their friends, but if you buy a house there is no need to do all of that hard stuff. In conclusion, in my honest opinion, some people choose to buy over rent because of benefits like saving money, don't be worried about raising prices for house renting, no need for moving, no pressure on children, and a sustainable life.

Response: In several countries across the globe, individuals prefer to own an accommodation, and buying a house takes priority over renting one. The origins of this phenomenon seem to stem from several reasons, while I personally believe that this situation can be negative and its disadvantages outweigh the advantages. In this essay, I will discuss the reasons and explain my point of view. On of the primary reasons that contribute to this trend arises from the human nature that is such that it typically intends to belong somewhere and make it its own. This means that the majority of people prioritize the ownership of an accommodation because the likelihood of losing it can reduce and it may allow them to live a more stable life. For instance, those who rent an apartment require to extend their contract or seek for another place after one year. Moreover, some people consider their own habitation as a reliable wealth; when they face financial challenges in their lives, they can sell it and utilize the money to resolve financial issues. Although in the vast number of countries, the preference of buying a house has been significantly increased in recent years, I believe that this trend has more drawback. Firstly, if the demands for buying a house increase, the price of housing can raise significantly; therefore, some individuals who lack money, may suffer from this situation. In addition, renting apartments or houses is the source of income for the owners of them, and a decrease in demands for renting an accommodation can lead them to financial challenges, making huge gaps in society. In conclusion, owning a house or an apartment plays a significant role in people's lives, in some countries. Several reasons contribute to it, though I consider it as a negative situation in society.

Response: While some people advocate for using music as an international language for communication between diversities, other assert that although music can imply certain feelings, it is still an abstract contest, so it can lead to misunderstangs and disagreements. Meanwhile, I believe by rising the number of emmigrants in different countries, music could be one of the possible options for people to communicate and socilize. On one hand, every culture enjoys its own traditional music style, therefore, as a certain song or lyric is precious and invalueable to its purposed group, it might not spur that much emotions in folks other cultures. Although there are various songs that are pleasant to every age group or ethnic. In the past, people only knew the local or national musics of their region; however, this issue was resolved by the advent of internt and social media, which play crusial roles in advertising and popularizing the songs of other nationalities. For instance, nowadays, no matter where you live, you have onlin, virtual access to your favorit singers' concerts, street plays, or other festivals; and the most encouraging component here for individuals is that there are a multitude of people with different ages and nationalities that are enjoying musics or even lyrics of a particular language that they all know well. On the other hand, this trend is not always appealing in different situations. As you can see, Jaz music, which is highly popular in America, is not even known in many countries and playing this type of music not only does not spur any excitement in peopl but also bores or frustrates them. Another example would be spanish music, in some depressed and calm countries where people are not partial to dancing and cheerful songs, this type of music with rapid and exciting rythems that make you more active while dancing, might not be well-accepted. Moreover, every ethinc has its own taditional songs besides its special dancing that only their people know and perform. Inadditon, when you try to include foreigners in this phenomenon it migh end in misunderstandings due to not believing or respecting your culture enough. In conclusion, I firmly believe, as music is the dynamic spirit of every society, it can also be a bridge between all diversities to entract with eachother and acknowledge new information about other cultures and generations in order to have a more integrated and tranquil society.

Response: A group of people claim that educated persons like doctors and engineers have to work in the country that they studied and became an expert. While some people argue that they have to make it base on their desires, and they have this chance to work in every country that they want. This essay discusses both sides. I agree with the second group, and I believe that people have to work in the country that they want to work. In every country, government usually assign a huge budget for universities and colleges and provide great facilities for students. As a result, when a person studies in a country, this person is using public money for personal goals. In fact, the money that other people pay as taxes or other excuses, is spending for his/her purpose. As a result, a large group of people believe that it is fair to make people to work in their country and use their knowledge and specialty to make improvement over there. On the other hand, some members of society claim that it is a personal decision, and people ought to be free to make decision about their career and its place. For instance, young people decide to study abroad, however after their graduation some of them decide to come back to their own country, and serve to their people. In conclusion, I believe that it is more convenient to let individuals to make decision about the country that they wish to work. In this way, people have more passion to serve to the selected country. Not only does it make them happier, but also it is possible to use their experience in different countries. Due to the progress of technology, it is significantly easy to communicate with experts all around the world and use their abilities and knowledge.

Response: Nowadays with the rapid advancement of technology, the way that people access information has significantly changed. Many people now turn to the internet for news and this caused a widespread belief of deleting the newspaper and books in the future. Although I agree with this idea up to a point, I find it hard to accept books or newspapers will be disappear in the future. On the one hand, catching the news online have several benefits. Easy and free access to information, environmental benefits, and instant updates and convenience are some of them. More and more content is available online for free, from new articles to books. Many websites provide free versions of e-books and make it unnecessary to purchase physical copies. Moreover, as concerns about deforestation and environmental impact grow, many people are tending to shift to digital reading in order to reduce cutting trees down and carbon footprint. Also, online content can be updated instantly and news are more current in compare with printed version. On the other hand, reading printed version of news and books have its fan due to many reasons. Such as: preference of physical books, cultural and nostalgic value, and digital fatigue. Firstly, the feel of a paper book, its weight and smell are major part of the enjoyment of reading. Secondly, libraries and bookshops carry emotional and intellectual importance that digital versions can not replicate. Finally, spending long hours reading from screens can cause eye strain and discomfort. In conclusion, while digital reading will likely to continue to grow, it is unlikely that printed books will completely disappear soon. Many people still value the physical experience, and access to online news or books is not always free or convenient for everyone.

Response: The effectiveness of either competition or collaboration at school, and at work sparks a controversial debate among people. While some individuals believe that being competitive can encourage people to be innovative, others contend that cooperating can contribute to personal growth. This essay will investigate both perspectives before presenting my viewpoint. Proponents of competition assert that people in the competitive world can maximize their efforts to accomplish their goals. They believe that competitive environments can motivate people to try harder in order to stay ahead, and reach their goals. Similarly, competitive individuals make an effort to come up with new ideas and solutions to overcome challenges, leading to finding innovative ideas and logical answers for problems. For instance, at a workplace, employees who have an inclination to get promotion try to find rational answers for issues and present practical ideas. Individuals who advocate collaboration believe through team working people can acquire some significant skills. When people are working together, they interact with each other in various aspects of projects which can build their communication skills. Moreover, cooperation includes lots of work sharing and responsibility that requires tolerance and respect for other people's opinion, contributing to personal development which is crucial for their future life. For example, students through group activities not only do their school assignments but also learn some life lessons, so they can prepare for life. In conclusion, while some people advocate the benefits of a competitive environment, others believe a cooperative atmosphere can help people to burgeon their personality. In my point of view, people should cooperate with each other and learn different skills as long as they try to reach their goals.