Balang
  • Home
  • Speaking
  • Blog
lemon logo
Balang is committed to revolutionizing language learning, empowering individuals worldwide to achieve their aspirations through innovative technology and personalized education.
Terms of ServicePrivacy PolicyRefund Policy
Contact
Email
telegram logo
Telegram

Question: Some university students want to learn about other subjects in addition to their main subj...

Click on red question marks (?) to see an explanation for each change. Some changes are only suggestions and don't mean the original is necessarily wrong.
A group of pupils in university tend to learn extra subjects besides their main subjects. Some individuals claim that they ought to focus only on their curriculum for a qualification. It has its own benefits and drawbacks. This essay discusses both sides. I strongly agree that students should study different topics and broaden their knowledge. To begin, a large number of people argue that studentstudents at colleges have one responsibility, and it is to study as hard as they can, and they have to get great scores in their exams. This group explains that if students prefer to get high scores, they would study only the subjects that are thoughttaught in university. They believe in this way students are more capable, and they will become more expert in their field. For instance, a medical student has to pay attention to main subjects at university to become a better doctor and save people's lives, and do not waste time foron other subjects. On the other hand, some individuals argue that studentstudents have to study a variety of topics, and explore new dimensions in the world. For example, it is widely accepted that an architecture student has to have knowledge in art, history, mathematics, and science. In addition, it is not possible to teach all these subjects through university's lessons,; as a result, this student has to has aengage in self-study about related topics in order to be more professional in his/her career. In conclusion, I think studentstudents have to make priorities about the subjects that they want to study. The university's lessons come first in this way. I believe studying about other related subjects areis essential for college pupils. Not only does it help them to expand their knowledge, but it also helps them to get higher scores and be more skilled in their job.
This section presents vocabulary suggestions. Highlighted words are either too simple or are repeated more than 3 times . Please note that some suggested alternatives might require changes to other parts of the sentence.
This section presents a professionally wirtten variation of your essay and highlights the differences.
A group of pupils in university tend to learn extra subjects besides their main subjects. Some individuals claim that they ought to focus only on their curriculum for a qualification. It has its own benefits and drawbacks. This essay discusses both sides. I strongly agree that students should study different topics and broaden their knowledge.
A group of university students often chooses to learn additional subjects alongside their main courses. Some individuals argue that they should concentrate solely on their curriculum to achieve their qualifications. This approach has its own benefits and drawbacks. This essay will discuss both perspectives. I strongly believe that students should study diverse topics to broaden their knowledge.
To begin, a large number of people argue that student at colleges have one responsibility, and it is to study as hard as they can, and they have to get great scores in their exams. This group explains that if students prefer to get high scores, they would study only the subjects that are thought in university. They believe in this way students are more capable, and they will become more expert in their field. For instance, a medical student has to pay attention to main subjects at university to become a better doctor and save people's lives, and do not waste time for other subjects.
To begin with, many people argue that students in college have one primary responsibility: to study diligently and achieve excellent scores in their exams. This group contends that if students aim for high grades, they should focus exclusively on the subjects taught at university. They believe that this approach allows students to become more proficient and specialized in their fields. For instance, a medical student must concentrate on core subjects to become a competent doctor capable of saving lives, rather than wasting time on unrelated topics.
On the other hand, some individuals argue that student have to study variety topics, and explore new dimensions in the world. For example, it is widely accepted that an architecture student has to have knowledge in art, history, mathematics, and science. In addition, it is not possible to teach all these subjects through university's lessons, as a result this student has to has a self-study about related topics in order to be more professional in his/her career.
On the other hand, some individuals argue that students should explore a variety of subjects and discover new dimensions of knowledge. For example, it is widely accepted that an architecture student needs to possess knowledge in art, history, mathematics, and science. Furthermore, it is often impossible to cover all these subjects within the university curriculum. As a result, students must engage in self-study on related topics to enhance their professionalism in their careers.
In conclusion, I think student have to make priorities about the subjects that they want to study. The university's lessons come first in this way. I believe studying about other related subjects are essential for college pupils. Not only does it help them to expand their knowledge, but it also helps them to get higher scores and be more skilled in their job.
In conclusion, I believe that students should prioritize the subjects they wish to study, with university courses taking precedence. However, I also think that studying additional related subjects is essential for college students. Not only does it help them expand their knowledge, but it also enables them to achieve higher scores and become more skilled in their future careers.
See more samples for this topic
Check your essay for this topic
Overall Band Score
6
Overview
Vocabulary Range
Loading
Linking Words
Loading
Spelling
Loading
Grammar Accuracy
Loading
Grammar Range
Loading
Cohesion
Loading
Paragraph Structure
Loading
Task Response
Loading
Word Count
sufficient
While we are confident in our score estimation, you are not guaranteed to receive the same score in an official test.

Feedback

Task Achievement

  • Strengths: The essay addresses the prompt by discussing both views on whether university students should focus solely on their main subjects or explore additional subjects. The writer provides a clear opinion, supporting the idea that students should broaden their knowledge by studying different topics.
  • Areas for Improvement: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from more specific examples or evidence to strengthen the arguments. For instance, providing data or studies that show the benefits of a broader education could enhance the discussion.

Coherence and Cohesion

  • Strengths: The essay is generally well-organized, with a clear introduction, body paragraphs discussing each viewpoint, and a conclusion that summarizes the writer's opinion.
  • Areas for Improvement: The transitions between ideas could be smoother. For example, the essay could use more linking words or phrases to connect ideas within and between paragraphs, enhancing the flow of the argument.

Lexical Resource

  • Strengths: The vocabulary used is appropriate for the topic, with terms like "curriculum," "qualification," and "self-study" effectively conveying the subject matter.
  • Areas for Improvement: The essay could benefit from a wider range of vocabulary to avoid repetition and to express ideas more precisely. For instance, instead of repeatedly using "subjects," synonyms like "disciplines" or "fields of study" could be employed.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy

  • Strengths: The essay demonstrates a good command of basic grammar, with mostly correct sentence structures and verb tenses.
  • Areas for Improvement: There are some grammatical errors that need attention, such as subject-verb agreement ("student have" should be "students have") and article usage ("a student has to has" should be "a student has to have"). Additionally, varying sentence structures could improve the overall readability and sophistication of the writing.

Overall Impression

The essay effectively discusses both sides of the argument and presents a clear opinion. To enhance the quality, the writer should focus on providing more specific examples, improving coherence with better transitions, expanding the range of vocabulary, and correcting grammatical errors. With these improvements, the essay would present a more compelling and polished argument.