IELTS Writing Samples

Response: It is said that the working week should decrease and the workers' weekends should increase. I agree with this statement and what I believe is that if workers have enough time to rest, the quality of jobs they do will grow. Moreover, they will spend more money in their leisure time which is beneficial for the economy. Firstly, workers who have enough time to rest mostly have better mental health than people who have long working week because they have the chance to reduce their stress and relax their bodies for doing their job in the week again. In other words, they will be more energetic in their career because they had a perfect weekend with their families and friends and they can follow their hobbies; thus, this brings satisfaction in their lives and helps them to focus more on their jobs. For example, these days in some of the big companies employers understand that if they take hard on their workers to work for long periods, the quality will fall significantly. Workers usually make more mistakes because they are tired and cannot do tasks in the best way. Furthermore, if the weekend expands, workers will have more time for different activities and they will spend more money in their free time. This means, there will be economic growth in amusement because people who work hard are more likely to save their money and do investments. For instance, my father worked 24/7 in his life and we were always busy at the weekends. He did not have a chance to spend his money on hobbies he liked weekly so he used to save it by buying gold for when he has the time to go on a vacation or for other leisure activities. In summary, I agree that weekends should be longer and working weeks should be shorter because it is necessary for workers’ mental health and helps them to relax to do their jobs better, also this leads to economic growth in amusement.

Response: People have different views about the future of books and newspapers, some believe there will be no physical paper and everything will be electronic, while others think that is wrong. I am among the second group and I think paper will always and forever exist. First of all, I reckon there will be some people who want a paper book due to different reasons. First, this priority could be because of eye health, some people may not be comfortable with E-books because of the blue light or the size of the screen or eye allergic to light in fact I am one of them. second maybe they just prefer books and newspapers over digital gadgets because books state feelings for example when I personally read a book I totally feel myself in the story like I am there i suppose it is because books give a feeling of life, and this is probably because they are made from trees and come from nature, and they keep this fresh feeling. On the other hand, there is a huge possibility that the most proportion of books become online. I state that based on different reasons, it could be due to financial stuff as books are expensive while E-books have reasonable prices. digital books are better at environmental stages and transformation also they are more accessible. But after all, paper books and newspapers will be kept within the electronic books since there is always some individual who prefers nostalgia over technology despite all the benefits it has.

Response: It is crucial for individuals to make significant changes in their career and personal lives. It has its own advantages and disadvantages. In this essay, I will argue both sides, and I will explain my personal opinion. Overall, I agree that taking risks have more benefits, since risky decisions make them to be a better version of themselves. A group of members of society claim that individuals ought to take risks in their life and try to come out of their comfort zone. They believe that nothing good will happen if people do not experience new situations. For instance, when a man decides to change his job, in the first step, he has to quit from his current office and take that risk that will be possible to do not find a decent job immediately, and he is going to live without money for a while. This decision has another side. He tries as hard as he can to broaden his knowledge and improve his skill. This makes progress in his personality and career. On the other hand, sometimes taking risk has drawbacks. If you decide to do anything just base on your feeling, or people words, it would destroy your personal or professional life. For example, If someone suggests you to lose your wight in a short time with new drug, and you decide to do it without any research or asking expert's opinion, you do not get the best outcome. You may lose weight at the first, however you probably harm your body and you may put yourself in a risky situation. In conclusion, I claim that it is significantly important to take new challenges and risks. Not only does it help us to have a better life, but it also makes us to learn new topics and manage difficult situations. In addition, it is important to make decision rationally. In this way, the advantages of taking risk outweigh the disadvantages definitely.

Response: Phone usage has become quite a significant matter in this very decade, and many people have found it hard to avoid in their spare time. To what I perceive it has both benefits and drawbacks, but there is a boundary to be set for everything that many people seem to forget about. That being said, it surely has turned into a formidable challenge for its users. First and foremost, it's an irrefutable fact that this technology has brought ease and excellence to the community. The work of hours is now done in only a few minutes in break time. Getting updates about society, checking emails, messaging, or having phone calls no matter the distance has allowed us to connect, communicate, and answer any query needed. Our phones are now professional computers where you can find numerous apps for management, organizing data, learning languages, reading books, etc. These can aid people in educating themselves, working remotely, and having side jobs to provide for their families. Its functionality such as Bluetooth, calculator, health trackers, and many more features has made us dispense with a lot of equipment. In addition, our phones and apps are packed with so many dopamine triggers like games, social media, and music. They act as slot machines for the young generation especially. The rewards from games whether it's money or mere applause for getting to the next level, the "likes" people get on Instagram, and the feeling of relaxation and happiness are all due to the dopamine released in our brains. Although validation and satisfaction are indeed needed in our daily lives, many other ways exist to achieve that necessary feeling because phone omnipresence can lead to compulsive use and dependency. Furthermore, screen addiction can affect our mental health. the ubiquitous negative influence is felt by the crowd when our phone battery runs out. Many are unable to pass the time and enjoy the moment since they have forgotten or haven't learnt at all to communicate, study, or work effectively without technology. Health is the next topic to be concerned about. Excessive vain data from social media and news can only bring headaches, anger, sleeplessness, and dissatisfaction to individuals. Not to mention neck and back pain or vision decrease caused by light emitted from screens. To conclude, cell phones are now mainly used as portable entertainment devices and side works which can be very beneficial, yet the reliance on them can act as hurdles to quality time, interactions, and independence of oneself. The key is to be conscious and have a balance in life. But due to the circumstances of life and its prevalence, I am on the verge of believing that digital detox is needed even on the subway back home let alone in our free time.

Response: A group of pupils in university tend to learn extra subjects besides their main subjects. Some individuals claim that they ought to focus only on their curriculum for a qualification. It has its own benefits and drawbacks. This essay discusses both sides. I strongly agree that students should study different topics and broaden their knowledge. To begin, a large number of people argue that student at colleges have one responsibility, and it is to study as hard as they can, and they have to get great scores in their exams. This group explains that if students prefer to get high scores, they would study only the subjects that are thought in university. They believe in this way students are more capable, and they will become more expert in their field. For instance, a medical student has to pay attention to main subjects at university to become a better doctor and save people's lives, and do not waste time for other subjects. On the other hand, some individuals argue that student have to study variety topics, and explore new dimensions in the world. For example, it is widely accepted that an architecture student has to have knowledge in art, history, mathematics, and science. In addition, it is not possible to teach all these subjects through university's lessons, as a result this student has to has a self-study about related topics in order to be more professional in his/her career. In conclusion, I think student have to make priorities about the subjects that they want to study. The university's lessons come first in this way. I believe studying about other related subjects are essential for college pupils. Not only does it help them to expand their knowledge, but it also helps them to get higher scores and be more skilled in their job.

Response: In recent years, there has been a noticeable increase in the number of individuals discussing the topic of academic diversity and studying multiple fields simultaneously. Some argue that studying other subjects has proven to be effective in various professional and practical areas, while critics strongly oppose this view and contend that it distracts Scholars and its results have not been satisfactory. In this essay, it will be argued that a balance between acquiring diverse knowledge and deepening specialization is crucial for optimal educational development. To begin with, there is an argument to be made that a broader knowledge base is acquired when additional subjects are studied, enabling more effective problem-solving across interdisciplinary fields. For example, exposure to psychology courses is often found to be beneficial for computer science learners, as a deeper understanding of user behaviour is developed, ultimately resulting in better software design. For this reason, it is evident that integrating knowledge from various domains leads to a more comprehensive understanding of complex issues, enhancing the ability to tackle diverse challenges. On the other hand, there is a widespread belief that a greater depth of knowledge is developed when pupils concentrate solely on their primary field of study, which is essential for achieving specialization and expertise. This perspective is supported by the example of medical students who achieve a higher level of proficiency when their time is entirely devoted to mastering medical principles and practices. Thereafter, it is obvious that focused study allows for a deeper understanding of complex concepts, essential in fields that require precise knowledge and skills. In conclusion, while the importance of broadening one’s understanding base is evident due to its benefits in fostering interdisciplinary skills, the significance of developing expertise in a focused area cannot be overstated. A balanced approach that encompasses both expanding expertise and achieving specialization is essential for the sustainable development of individuals and societies.

Response: A group of pupils in university tend to learn extra subjects besides their main subjects. Some individuals claim that they ought to focus only on their curriculum for a qualification. It has its own benefits and drawbacks. This essay discusses both sides. I strongly agree that student should study different topics and broaden their knowledge. To begin, a large number of people argue that student at colleges have one responsibility, and it is to study as hard as they can, and they have to get great scores in their exams. This group explain that if students prefer to get high scores, they would study only the subjects that are thought in university. They believe in this way students are more capable, and they will become more expert in their field. For instance, a medical student has to pay attention to main subjects at university to become a better doctor and save people's lives, and do not waste time for other subjects . On the other hand, some individuals argue that student have to study variety topics, and explore new dimensions in the world. For example, it is widely accepted that an architecture student has to have knowledge in art, history, mathematics, and science. In addition, it is not possible to teach all these subjects through university's lessons, as a result this student has to has a self-study about related topics in order to be more professional in his/her career. In conclusion, I think student have to make a priorities about the subjects that they want to study. The university's lessons come first in this way. I believe studying about other related subjects are essential for college pupils. Not only does it help them to expand their knowledge, but it also help them to get convenient scores and be more skilled in their job.

Response: Certain cultures confer on children the possibility of achieving anything with diligence. This belief comes with its own fair share of benefits and downturns. Believing that the sky is the limit motivates children to explore their potential skills and encourages perseverance among young citizens. The prejudice that the unknown is equal to danger has a significant impact on the guidance that parents and teachers provide for students. Although children dream big, their out-of-the-box thinking habit is demotivated by society and parents' preconceptions of nuance and innovation. As a result, instead of setting high, valuable goals, these young souls choose mundane careers. Therefore, a culture within which children are reared to believe they have countless potential allows them to explore uncharted territories and unlock their potential abilities. They learn how to think outside the box and use imagination and creativity to bind the world to their will. Moreover, by inciting hardwork, children learn to be persistent and resilient in order to achieve their goals. However, this way of thinking can cause unrealistic expectations and put unhealthy pressure on young children. By implementing that everything would be possible if one works hard, only one aspect of achievement is considered. Luck, hardwork, and one's status in society are combined to make the magic sauce of success. By eliminating each factor, the chance of making one's dream become a reality decreases dramatically, and its viability bottoms down. However, as all these factors haven't been introduced to individuals, they have unrealistic expectations of themselves. They believe that hardwork comprises the whole recipe and try to make up for the luck and states portion by further emphasising diligence. Additionally, by insisting on the importance of hardwork, children are forced to burn till the last mental fuel. This expectation can cause detrimental effects on individual's minds and increase the hazard of mental diseases. Depression and anxiety can result from the high pressure of constant work without respite. In conclusion, while hard work can be beneficial, unrealistic results expected to be brought by it can heighten the pressure on children's minds and highlight its disadvantages.

Response: People working in the advertisement industry have long made effort to produce convincing commercials. Using psychology and studying human behaviors, they are now emphasizing on the nobility of their products. This phenomenon could lead to destructive impacts on societies. Firstly, it is no secret that due to humans’ curious nature, they can get easily attracted to new things. Using this trait to their benefit, experts in advertisement business make an attempt to manipulate individuals into purchasing their product by convincing them that it possesses qualities that cannot be found in their rivals’ goods. Furthermore, people are more likely to buy things that they believe are new. For instance, by making people think that the latest version of a smartphone has brand-new features, while it might not be even true, they tend to wait in ques to achieve it. It is now clear why companies are utilizing this method in their commercials. As any other trend, this technique also holds drawbacks for the public. According to human rights activists, such practices are considered dishonest and ethically wrong, as they affect people without their knowledge. This would ultimately result in lack of trust and reliability in communities, which is a growing concern in advanced countries. In conclusion, the selfishness of human race dates back to when we were first created, and it continues to date in the form of selling products using nudging and other manipulations. I believe that this development, if practiced honestly, can be constructive, but its drawbacks outweigh the advantages. Governments should take measures, such as reviewing commercials beforehand, with regard to this phenomenon.

Response: People working in the advertisement industry have long made effort to produce convincing commercials. Using psychology and studying human behaviors, they are now emphasizing on the nobility of their products. This phenomenon could lead to destructive impacts on societies. Firstly, it is no secret that due to humans’ curious nature, they can get easily attracted to new things. Using this trait to their benefit, experts in advertisement business make an attempt to manipulate individuals into purchasing their product by convincing them that it possesses qualities that cannot be found in their rivals’ goods. Furthermore, people are more likely to buy things that they believe are new. For instance, by making people think that the latest version of a smartphone has brand-new features, while it might not be even true, they tend to wait in ques to achieve it. It is now clear why companies are utilizing this method in their commercials. As any other trend, this technique also holds drawbacks for the public. According to human rights activists, such practices are considered dishonest and ethically wrong, as they affect people without their knowledge. This would ultimately result in lack of trust and reliability in communities, which is a growing concern in advanced countries. In conclusion, the selfishness of human race dates back to when we were first created, and it continues to date in the form of selling products using nudging and other manipulations. I strongly believe that claiming your production is new, while it can easily be proven otherwise, is dishonest. Governments should take measures, such as reviewing commercials beforehand, with regard to this phenomenon.