IELTS Writing Samples

Response: The number of people travelling from countrysides toward capitals and big cities around the world is on the rise. This trend is causing problems to rural areas as well as bringing out drawbacks for cities which both require careful considerations. However. the negative aspects of this migrating pattern deserve careful attentions which I will elaborate on this issue in the following essay. On the one hand, as village settlers move to mega cities, the population of manpower in those remote areas will drop significantly, which have negative effects on both industries and local residents. The first and foremost, in terms of industrial facet, the companies in such places encounter lack of sufficient workforce because the prominent workers have travelled to big cities for better job prospect and achieving higher income. In this context, employers are obliged to pay higher wages to adept worker for commuting long distances from other adjacent towns which has a direct detrimental influence on the domestic economy. Additionaly, not only would this trend pose threat to organisations, but also locals have to face the consequences of this menace. For example, if a person wants to repair an impared equipment in his or her house in those remote regions, he or she will have to bring in an expert from another cities within a country which is costly and a daunting job, undoubtedly. On the flip side, as a result of growing population rate in destination cities, consequences including poorer air-quality, polluted environment, and lack of decent jobs for city dwellers are inevitable. As an illustration, the more citizens are working, the more fossil fuel is needed to operate both private and public transport vehicles which considerably contributes to polluting weather and environments as well, because of emiting a high amount of Carbon-dioxide and exhaust fumes. On top of that, as long as demands for jobs are escalating in overcrowded capital cities, unemployement rate will surge assuredly that requires immediate measurements in order to stop the rot, otherwise negative outcomes become impossible to mend. In conclusion, as indicated above, travelling people from rural areas to urban ones is considered an undesired process which has multi-faceted demerits for both environments, like increasing unemployment figure in megalopolis coupled with decreasing the number of workforce in remote regions. I firmly believe this pattern is the last thing every nation wants.

Response: Nowadays, many individuals living in villages are migrating to large towns, resulting in a decline in the population of rural areas. This phenomenon can offer certain advantages to those who move, but it often leads to significant consequences for society as a whole. On one hand, young people who leave their small towns for larger cities find a wealth of opportunities. They have access to a diverse range of activities, including modern clubs, leisure facilities, and various career options. Consequently, by relocating to urban areas, they are likely to experience a more fulfilling life. As they secure employment more easily and earn higher incomes, they can spend their earnings on things that interest them. On the other hand, if an increasing number of people continue to leave rural regions, there will be a shortage of individuals to fulfill essential responsibilities. Professions such as agriculture, farming, and animal husbandry may face extinction if there are not enough people to carry out these vital tasks. The most critical consequence of this trend would be food shortages. If there is insufficient food for the population, it becomes irrelevant where people live or what resources are available to them; everyone will suffer equally. Therefore, it is not a wise decision to deplete small towns of their populations. In conclusion, while the prospect of finding better job opportunities and earning higher salaries is appealing to many, it does not justify the severe repercussions that can arise for society as a whole. Thus, the disadvantages of increased migration from villages to metropolises outweigh the benefits.

Response: All over the world, humans have started to move in metropolises even the ones in countryside this caused a disbalance in number of people living in them. I personally think this a negative development, because having more people in a city then its capacity causes several issues. However, in many cities there are several ways of transport its citizens always had hard time to move from one location to another. Imagine a big increase in the population and moving from one part of a city to another it makes it even harder because the public transports have limited capabilities as well as the roads. This CO^2 produced by the cars would pollute the air. For example, Tehran is a good example of a city by which the rural parts of the town have moved in to city center, this caused over population in every inner part of the city and a massive decrease in air quality. On the other hand, by people leaving the outer layer of cities this will cause the jobs there suffer from lack of workers also makes the residence over there move into the city. This causes over population in city centers and, will increase the competition in renting and buying a house and anything which has a higher demand causes in increase of prices many cities with high number of residences suffer from the same problem for instance, Hong Kong China with almost 8 million residence suffers from lack of houses for its residences. Inconclusion, governments are in charge of the countryside population and have authorities to control and take care of them by providing jobs and services for better life experience

Response: Suburban residents migration to cities is a widespread phenomenon. This reduction in the rural populace comes with its fair share of advantages and downturns; however, I am of the opinion that its negative impacts outweigh the benefits. Moving to urban areas is believed to be beneficial not only to individuals but also to wildlife. Rural areas usually do not have sufficient amenities needed for certain professions; thereby, moving to urban areas might open doors to uncharted territories by venturing into which individuals will be able to unleash their potential. Moreover, human beings have extended their living areas at the expense of destroying floras' and faunas' habitats. This practice is usually uncontrolled in the countryside, where people are not educated enough to consider the long-term effects of their actions. Therefore, poaching, ungovernable fishing, and wilful tree chopping represent a concerning issue that needs to be addressed. With the displacement of suburban residents, wildlife gets a chance to rejuvenate and lower the extinction rates. Meanwhile, migrated individuals get a chance to cherish their hometown reservoirs by receiving a thorough education on pressing matters and learning the importance of controlled usage of natural resources. However, the exodus from lands to cities can bring about damaging consequences both for individuals and society at large. People aim to migrate in order to ameliorate their lives; however, hopes for a better life are often dashed as overpopulation puts an enormous strain on the infrastructure of cities and their ability to provide basic needs. Unable to provide decent housing, inadequate education for one's children, and low quality of life in shanty towns can trigger the high mental pressure already imposed by the alienated, frantic pace of life. This lack of serenity and unaccustomedness can cause irreparable repercussions, such as chronic anxiety and depression. In addition, Healthy, nutrious food consumption is an integral factoral of overall well-being. As farmers migrate, the sheer number of workers on land will decline, and harvests and domestic animal breedings will fall accordingly. This shortage in food provision can cause famine across the country, and hinders citizens well-beings. In conclusion, the allure of urbanisation pales in the face of food shortages and mental health issues.

Response: It is claimed that there is a decline in the population of countryside as a result of rural immigration to cities in several countries. Whilst I believe rural people have right to enjoy higher standards of living, I presume that this trend may give rise to some urban sprawling and air pollution. On the one hand, people living in the countryside usually are deprived from numerous facilities such as, higher educational systems and better healthcare systems. If they move to big cities, for example, they can enjoy attending more facilitated universities and hospitals. In addition, getting graduated from a top ranked university, may enable them to find a decent and rewarding job which contributes to higher standards of living. On the other hand, immigration to cities, albeit useful for rustic people, require a efficient infrastructure. This is to say that, immigration to cities may not only lead to overpopulation but also air pollution. Due to the fact that, urban sprawl is often the result of unplanned city development and a large number of residence who are seeking for a dwelling. Moreover, public transportation might not be able to assist people in meeting their transport needs and the increase in the usage of private cars can lead to air pollution. In conclusion, I affirm, despite the fact that living in a city provides many useful opportunities, the city should be well-infrastructure to be the host of migrants as this action can cause many systemic and environmental problems.

Response: In many communities, people in the countryside are travelling permanently to metropolises. This trend results in a decline in the population of these places. I think this is a negative trend because it can bring crowdedness for cities, and resulting problems related to high density in population. Additionally, activities related to producing food in towns blur. When people from smaller towns move to bigger cities, the cities face a massive amount of population, which leads to some problems. Clearly, cities boast a number of citizens, and suffers from density of population because they are not big enough to provide enough space for people to settle different places of the city. Consequently, people’s time may be wasted during traffic density. Moreover, resulted stand still traffic jams can bring air contamination because when cars are stopped, a huge amount of carbon dioxide releases to the air, which results in illnesses, such as heart disease and high blood pressure. Therefore, cities cannot be appropriate places for living permanently for many people due to the problems coming from population density. Furthermore, if many rural people move to big cities, food producing become scarce. Rural areas have important roles in providing necessary products and food for their country because the countryside boasts high-quality soil and rainfall, which are crucial for farming. For example, gardeners who live in the countryside have access to specific types of gardening soil. In addition, horticulturists are able to use appropriate methods of irrigation in their gardens, they have a crucial role for providing different types of fruits, such as apples and oranges. As a result, if people who engage themselves in gardening and raising cattle leave their hometown and emigrate to cities, food producing area face a considerable amount of damage because less people are available in cities to provide food for the country. Thus, leaving many rural people from their hometowns is a negative phenomenon because this immigration can influence the food providing of the countries detrimentally. In conclusion, many people living in towns are moving from their hometowns to bigger cities. This pattern has brought a decrease in the population of rural areas, which is a negative point because when the population raises in cities, they face some problems related to crowdedness. In addition to this, decrease in the population of rural areas can make issues related to food providing.

Response: Nowadays a large number of individuals from suburbs are moving to cities in numerous countries. As a result, the number of people who are living in the countryside is dwindling. This change has its own pros and cons; however, I believe the negative impacts of this action outweigh the benefits. This essay explains the drawbacks of the increasing immigration to cities. To begin with, the first impact of moving to cities effects on developments of rural places. When people move to cities, and the number of residents in suburbs decrease, there will be less demand for developments, and providing more public facilities. As a result, government will not assign budget for developments in these areas, and people who are living over there will experience difficult situations. For instance, when fewer people live in rural area, the new roads will not establish definitely, besides, the old roads will not be maintained in most cases. In this situation the communication will become a serious problem for local people. It is widely accepted that this issue has negative impacts on cities. For instance, the rise of population in cities increase the air pollution, traffic, and noise especially in big cities. Therefore, individuals in cities ought to struggle with problems such as living in crowded places, driving in rush hours, and spending a lot of time in traffic. In this circumstance, the unsatisfaction of life will increase drastically. It is obviously considerable that government ought to overcome new obstacles like providing new public facilities for a greater number of societies in some cities in short time. Although at the first glance it would be a progress to create new facilities like schools, healthcare services, and hospitals, it would be a challenge for government to manage the crowded cities, and due to the increase in mismanaging, people will live in chaos in some areas. In conclusion, I claim that the increasing of the number of people who tend to live in cities has several disadvantages, and people who are in charge have to set rules to control the number of immigrations to cities.

Response: Nowadays a large number of individuals from suburbs are moving to cities in numerous countries. As a result, the number of people who are living in countryside is dwindling. This change has its own pros and cons, however, I believe the negative impacts of this action outweigh the benefits. This essay explains the drawbacks of the increasing immigration to cities. To begin with, the first impact of moving to cities affects on developments of rural places. When people move to cities, and the number of residents in suburbs decrease, there will be less demand for developments, and providing more public facilities. As a result, government will not assign budget for developments in these areas, and people who are living over there will experience difficult situations. For instance, when fewer people live in rural area, the new roads will not establish definitely, besides, the old roads will not maintain in most cases. In this situation the communication will become a serious problem for local people. It is widely accepted that this issue has negative impacts on cities. For instance, the rise of population in cities increase the air pollution, traffic, and noise especially in big cities. Therefore, individuals in cities ought to struggle with problems such as living in crowded places, driving in rush hours, and spending a lot of time in traffic. In this circumstance, the dissatisfaction of life will increase drastically. It is obviousely considerable that government ought to overcome new obstacles like providing new public facilities for more number of society in some cities in short time. Although at the firts glance it would be a progress to create new facilities like schools, healthcare services, and hospitals, it would be a challenge for government to manage the crowded cities, and due to the increase in mismanagement, people will live in chaos in some areas. In conclusion, I claim taht the increasing of the number of people who tend to live in cities has several disadvantages, and people who are in charge have to set rules to control the number of immigrations to cities.

Response: Nowadays a large number of individuals from suburbs are moving to cities in numerous countries. As a result, the number of people who are living in countrysides is dwindleing. This chaneg has its own pros and cons, however, I believe the negative impacts of this action outweight the benefits. This essay explain the drawbacks of the increasing immigration to cities. To begin with, the first impact of moving to cities affects on undevelopments of rural places. When people move to cities, and the number of residents in suburbs decrease, there will be less demand for developments, and providing more public facilities. As a result, goverment will not assign budget for developments in these areas, and people who are living over there will experince difficult situations. For instance, when fewer people live in rural area, the new roads will not establish definitely, besides, the old roads will not maintaine in most cases. In this situation the communication will become a seriouse problem for local people. It is widely accepted that this issue has negative impacts on cities. For instance, the rise of population in cities increase the aire pollution, traffic, and noise especially in big cities. Therefor, individuals in cities ought to struggle with problems such as living in crowded places, driving in rush houres, and spending a lot of time in traffice. In this circumstance, the unsatisfaction of life will increase drastically. It is obviousely considerable that government ought to overcome new obstackles like providing new public facilities for more number of society in some cities in short time. Although at the firts glance it would be a progress to create new facilities like schools, healthcare services, and hospitals, it would be a challenge for government to manage the crowded cities, and due to the increase in mismanagementing, people will live in chaos in some areas. In conclusion, I claim taht the increasing of the number of people who tend to live in cities has several disadvantages, and people who are in charge have to set rules to control the number of immigrations to cities.

Response: Nowadays a large number of individuals from suburbs are moving to cities in numerous countries. As a result, the number of people who are living in the countryside is dwindling. This change has its own pros and cons; however, I believe the negative impacts of this action outweigh the benefits. This essay explains the drawbacks of the increasing immigration to cities. To begin with, the first impact of moving to cities effects on developments of rural places. When people move to cities, and the number of residents in suburbs decrease, there will be less demand for developments, and providing more public facilities. As a result, government will not assign budget for developments in these areas, and people who are living over there will experience difficult situations. For instance, when fewer people live in rural area, the new roads will not establish definitely, besides, the old roads will not be maintained in most cases. In this situation the communication will become a serious problem for local people. It is widely accepted that this issue has negative impacts on cities. For instance, the rise of population in cities increase the air pollution, traffic, and noise especially in big cities. Therefore, individuals in cities ought to struggle with problems such as living in crowded places, driving in rush hours, and spending a lot of time in traffic. In this circumstance, the unsatisfaction of life will increase drastically. It is obviously considerable that government ought to overcome new obstacles like providing new public facilities for a greater number of societies in some cities in short time. Although at the first glance it would be a progress to create new facilities like schools, healthcare services, and hospitals, it would be a challenge for government to manage the crowded cities, and due to the increase in mismanaging, people will live in chaos in some areas. In conclusion, I claim that the increasing of the number of people who tend to live in cities has several disadvantages, and people who are in charge have to set rules to control the number of immigrations to cities.