IELTS Writing Samples

Response: It is argued that all individuals including youngsters should save money for their future. I agree with this idea as it can contribute significantly to empower their economic status and it can serve as a reliable source for their retirement period. To begin with, investments starting at an early age would enable younger individuals to improve their economic status. That is to say, allocated money for investments can be utilized to actively participate in starting a business which could be used to develop a sustainable income and gain more money. Additionally, it can be a reliable source in case of any economic crisis, in the world of uncertainties. For instance, in 2008, the whole world suffered from an economic problem that happened globally that notably affected many individuals, having such habits like saving money can protect them while facing financial issues; therefore, it can be highly recommended that young people practice such habits as it can relieve their financial burden. Moreover, many individuals struggle with providing their basic needs in their retirement period, such as health. It is predictable that most of the elderly would not be able to work and make money, considering this factor and also lack of proper health insurance in many countries, it can be a perfect idea to save money to be used in their old-age. Lots of elderly who are suffering from serious disease like cancer requiring surgical treatment which is costly, depend on their savings to treat their conditions. For example, in USA, insurance does not cover many diseases and people should pay themselves, in the presence of ineffective healthcare networks and lack of proper cooperation of insurance companies, many of them die without having the chance to seek for treatment. Ton conclude, investing money not only can have positive impact on individual's economic status but also, is known as a reliable source which could be used for their future health problems.

Response: It is argued that all individuals including youngsters should save money for their future. I agree with this idea as it can contribute significantly to empower their economic status and it can serve as a reliable source for their retirement period. To begin with, investments starting at an early age would enable younger individuals to improve their economic status. That is to say, allocated money for investments can be utilized to actively participate in starting a business which could be used to develop a sustainable income and gain more money. Additionally, it can be a reliable source in case of any economic crisis, in the world of uncertainties. For instance, in 2008, the whole world suffered from an economic problem that happened globally that notably affected many individuals, having such habits like saving money can protect them while facing financial issues; therefore, it can be highly recommended that young people practice such habits as it can relieve their financial burden. Moreover, many individuals struggle with providing their basic needs in their retirement period, such as health. It is predictable that most of the elderly would not be able to work and make money, considering this factor and also lack of proper health insurance in many countries, it can be a perfect idea to save money to be used in their old-age. Lots of elderly who are suffering from serious disease like cancer requiring surgical treatment which is costly, depend on their savings to treat their conditions. For example, in USA, insurance does not cover many diseases and people should pay themselves, in the presence of ineffective healthcare networks and lack of proper cooperation of insurance companies, many of them die without having the chance to seek for treatment. Ton conclude, investing money not only can have positive impact on individual's economic status but also, is known as a reliable source which could be used for their future health problems.

Response: Our lives are like a roller coaster which is filled of astonishing and dismal moments. While a group of people is of the opinion that we should accept that times of difficulties are an inseparable part of life, another cluster believes we should strive a lot to overcome one hurdle after another. In my perspective, the harder we try, the better life can be expected. On the one hand, some opine, escaping the reality is not logical. There are some unpredictable issues which are out of our control. For example, Iran is suffering from an economic basket case, and thanks to inflation, recession and sanctions, the situation has gotten worse. This way, many businesses and corporations are about to go bankrupt. Many suffer from a shortage of state-run occupations. So, it is not fair to put all the blame on the shoulders of individuals to develop an independent life. This may affect their mental health negatively, something like self-pity. On the other hand, overcoming challenges is what success is all about. Hardships can motivate us to progress better and faster. It makes a contribution to increase creativity, initiative and mental power. For example, those who suffer from a lack of government jobs can run their own business. This way, not only do they fulfil the sense of accomplishment in their life but also it contributes to GDP of country. Moreover, difficulties play a very significant role in learning new lessons. For example, those who do not have a clue about money management, will improve their skills and knowledge about financial affairs. This leads to having a satisfied life during moribund economy. In conclusion, although accepting the reality can reduce our tension, attempting to achieve our desired goals can make our lives much more meaningful and purposeful.

Response: A group of individuals present the view that they should learn about other subjects in addition to their main major, whereas others believe that it is more important to focus on their study and allocate all of their time and attention to receive a qualification. I strongly agree with the former opinion. On the one hand, a group of people justifiably argue that they should know about other extra subject. This group mention that they should gain some extra knowledge about other field, while they study in a different major. For instance, while an individual study engineering, they might be passion about art and music. They believe that they have to pay attention to both fields as they are able to use one of them for earning money and use another one to calm themselves in their difficult situations. These kinds of individuals like to do numerous tasks at a time and are able to handle them meanwhile finishing them with success. On the other hand, another group of people claim that they should spend all of their time on their main field and just broaden their knowledge in that specific subject. They insist that should they learn another skill or learn about other subjects, they will distract from their main purpose. They believe it would be better for them to finish their study at first and after that they learn new skills. While, this will lead to success in one major, but they forget that they have a limited time in the world. However, I do not find all of these reasons convincing as they can use their waste time such as the time which they spend on social media or their commuting time on learning a new skill that they want. To conclude, in my opinion students should learn about different subjects except their main field because they can turn to a multitask person and be successful in many aspect of their life. Moreover, as people are able to use their waste time to gain new knowledge, no excuse is acceptable.

Response: It is an indisputable fact that owning or renting houses has become a pressing issue in today’s society, sparking widespread debate among individuals and governments, and people have differing opinions about this matter. This essay will examine both perspectives and explain why I strongly believe that having a rented house has numerous disadvantages. Therefore, owning your own home would be the best solution. The debate over whether owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people is beneficial or detrimental is far from settled, as compelling evidence exists to support both perspectives. Many people hold the view that being a house owner is extremely important. While others argue that it depends on the household. The main reason why people are against renting houses is that if you buy the house you live in, you do not have to worry about moving anymore. Also, it is indeed considered as a long-term investment. Being a house owner means that one can design their home the way they can imagine. Therefore, you will have fewer concern about paying rent. Advocates of the rental, argue that it also provides numerous benefits, such as moving out once in a while, which gives you the sense of diversity in your daily life. Therefore, if an individual is a diversity-seeking human, this life style would provide numerous benefits for them. This clearly demonstrates that the merit is only beneficial for the certain group. On the other hand, many believes spending money on a residence is considered as a waste of money, since the price for villa and cottages are extremely high and only the wealthy group could possibly afford it. To conclude, both views have their own merits. From a broader perspective, it becomes evident that the advantages of having your own house far outweigh its drawbacks. Taking all factors into account, it is evident that this point of view remains the most viable solution in the long run.

Response: It is believed that, improving the quality of life should be considered as the priority of science. I contend that, while mainly this statement is justifiable, to some extent, all progress in science should not necessarily take place to favor people's lives. On the one hand, scientific progress could initially follow different aspects. Regardless of its goal for human's comfort, science could definitely follow other aspects such as merely satisfying researcher's curiosity about unknown. Many of research and explorations in different fields of science are being conducted in order to obtaining more information about things which are not completely discovered. One of the brilliant examples of this, is many space explorations which have not had any significant impact on the quality of life. These explorations are primarily done to acquire more in-depth insight on things that humans have not had much material about. However, noteworthy is that they may not have any intentional goal to affect life on earth, but several of them are beneficial indirectly; take the satellites for instance, which are a relief for anticipating weather. Hence, I believe that, most of scientific projects and developments should be initially conducted with the aim of bringing comfort for human-beings. The reasons are twofold. First of all, making effort to bring sustainability to society will ultimately benefits science in return. With a society which does not have any struggle for maintaining the stability and everything have been prepared for a good quality of life, governments are able to put more focus and attention for scientific developments. Further, it is a necessity to eliminate problems which are exist in world which sometimes pose a risk for human existence. From the past up to now, scientists have attempted to eliminate difficulties in communities so that people enjoy the better quality of life. For example, all of researchers who have made effort in history to find cure for ailments that were risks for human life. In conclusion, while it might seem that not all progress in science are in favour of humans ,I believe , their ultimate goal is to bring comfort to us.

Response: In recent years, the daily time that children use their smartphones has increased significantly which leads to several concerns regarding its effects on their well-being. Although some people believe that this is a part of human development which can provide children access to the latest information and technologies, others argue that it can affect their physical and mental health. This essay will examine the advantages and disadvantages of this global trend and argue why its negative effects outweigh the benefits. Accessing smart devices like new generations of cell phones, can be extremely beneficial. They can not only connect people by transferring their voice and video but also can integrate many applications into one single device. For instance, they can share the children's precise locations with their parents to ensure they are safe and well. In addition, smartphones can assist students in accessing multimedia learning materials which can be accessible anytime and anywhere. These features can provide better opportunities for educational advancement and growth. In contrast, spending extended time using a mobile device encourages a sedentary lifestyle for children. For instance, It might lead to eye strains, obesity, or posture issues for them. In addition, it might cause mental problems as well and make them unable to concentrate on their study at school. In conclusion, while technological advancement can make the world a better place to live and grow for everyone including youngsters, we should be aware of its downsides, especially for minors. Therefore, I strongly believe that using these devices should be strictly limited and controlled by people who are responsible for children.

Response: In today's world, the tendency to migrate overseas has increased significantly among individuals. Although some feel that professionals should be kept in their home countries so as not to cause shortage, I completely agree with those who believe all people should be free to choose their work environment. On the one hand, it could be argued that a substantial amount of money has been dedicated to train experts by governments. The more doctors and engineers leave their own countries, the more job vacancies may be created, enforcing authorities to employ some foreign professionals as alternatives. This cycle can impose a financial burden on societies, leading to a economic crisis. Additionally, it is said that people may lose the sense of commitment to their own country when migrate abroad. To elaborate, national identity is undeniably important to both countries and individuals, making them known globally. When professionals migrate to other countries permanently, they may be influenced by the culture of their destination countries and forget about their traditions. On the other hand, experiencing a sense of freedom is a crucial human right. If professionals had been forced to work in their birth countries, the chances would be high that they feel deprived of freedom. These feelings cam discourage them to perform better in their workplaces, leading to a sharp decrease in expected outcomes. Moreover, individuals like to have the opportunity to expand their knowledge by migrating to different countries. It is obvious that some privileged countries such as developed nations have far better facilities to offer. Take the USA as an example; this wealth country has been offered lots of opportunities to all individuals to hone their skills, making people keen to migrate there to benefit from these chances. To sum up, although I acknowledge that professionals' migration can cause some difficulties like financial crises, I wholeheartedly believe that they should be allowed to choose their country freely.

Response: In recent years, argues revolving around financial issues have become more controversial. It is now newly believe that all individuals from all of the group ages should save money for their future. I find myself among those who fully subscribe this statement due to some rational reasons. Financial literacy should be internalize in children from very early ages in kindergartens and schools. Money-saving is considered to be among these crucial meanings that are requiered to be taught. In this way, children completely comprehend if they save money, they will reach their desired goals much easily. As a result, people might save money for their future goals and targets they endeavour to achieve. Trying to spend less and aiming to save for buying a house or a car, go on a trip or some personal staff, for instance, reminds individuals to stick to their dreams although it may be tough. Moreover, there is always a probability for some unexpected events which cannot be prevented. Fires, earthquakes, car accidents or even robberies are among these accidents that are out of our control and may lead to financial losses. Thus, it is logicaly acceptable to save some money for these catastrophies. Therefore, this foresightedness is needed as there is no guarantee for what will happen in the future. This saving money can also contribute to limiting the extra expenses that only impose additional costs on the budget. So, people compel to prohibit themselves from allocating a huge amount of money to purchasing a piece of equipment which they are aware will remain useless. To recapitulate what has been discussed above, from my standpoint it is completely reasonable to accept all of the people should save money from the present since some unexpected accidents which impose considerable losses cannot be prevented. Moreover, this attitude learns both youngsters and elderly to avoid wasting money to reach their achievements.

Response: In today’s digital world, a wide range of ways to compete with others have emerged. Whereas many people push themselves in competition with other people in all aspects of life, many still drive pleasure from cooperating with other people, rather than fighting against each other. Although both believes are true and have their own benefits, I would like to lean toward the former. For the majority of the society cooperation in everyday life can be an extremely positive experience. Working together allows individuals to have the opportunity to communicate and gain new information from others. A good example is that, companies that divide employees in groups to handle projects together could have better results since people in the group help each other to solve the problems even if it is not their responsibility to have the best outcome, they will put so much efford to finish the project. Competition is an efficient way to improve the quality of life. Individuals can try harder and increase their knowledge after compering themselves with others in community. Comparison encourage people to trust themselves, set goals and try to reach it.Olympic games are a good example of competition among human which arise unbelievable talents between trainers with some recorded in gines book. In conclusion, even though some would rather cooperation with others in society due to enjoying themselves working and communicating with others, I would rather to compete myself with others in so many aspects of life in light of being more hardworking in each part of life, as well as more creative.