IELTS Writing Samples

Response: It is believed that, improving the quality of life should be considered as the priority of science. I contend that, while mainly this statement is justifiable, to some extent, all progress in science should not necessarily take place to favor people's lives. On the one hand, scientific progress could initially follow different aspects. Regardless of its goal for human's comfort, science could definitely follow other aspects such as merely satisfying researcher's curiosity about unknown. Many of research and explorations in different fields of science are being conducted in order to obtaining more information about things which are not completely discovered. One of the brilliant examples of this, is many space explorations which have not had any significant impact on the quality of life. These explorations are primarily done to acquire more in-depth insight on things that humans have not had much material about. However, noteworthy is that they may not have any intentional goal to affect life on earth, but several of them are beneficial indirectly; take the satellites for instance, which are a relief for anticipating weather. Hence, I believe that, most of scientific projects and developments should be initially conducted with the aim of bringing comfort for human-beings. The reasons are twofold. First of all, making effort to bring sustainability to society will ultimately benefits science in return. With a society which does not have any struggle for maintaining the stability and everything have been prepared for a good quality of life, governments are able to put more focus and attention for scientific developments. Further, it is a necessity to eliminate problems which are exist in world which sometimes pose a risk for human existence. From the past up to now, scientists have attempted to eliminate difficulties in communities so that people enjoy the better quality of life. For example, all of researchers who have made effort in history to find cure for ailments that were risks for human life. In conclusion, while it might seem that not all progress in science are in favour of humans ,I believe , their ultimate goal is to bring comfort to us.

Response: There has been a controversial view which says the most significant objective of science should be to provide individuals with a comfortable life. While I concede that it is one of the important aims of science, I strongly believe that it is not the most significant aim. On the one hand, science should enhance individuals' living conditions. Nowadays, we have access to many modern technologies more than ever before which can facilitate our lives. Being one of the chief responsibilities, governments should consider providing people with an acceptable living condition as one of the important aims of science. Take artificial intelligence as an example; scholars can empower robots and machines with this groundbreaking technology to do many laborious tasks in favor of humans. On the other hand, despite the benefits of improving people's lives, I still believe that there are two aims which are more significant. Firstly, I believe that scientists should discover an effective way to protect the environment and endangered animal species. Undoubtedly, the environment plays an indispensable role in our lives, providing individuals with food, oxygen, and water. Therefore, scientists and academics should find ways not only to protect the environment for future generations but also to compensate for the damage which humanity has dealt so far. Likewise, there are many animals which tackle numerous viruses which can bring health issues for people. Consequently, the extinction of animals can pose a significant threat to individuals’ well-being. Secondly, I believe that the most important aim of science is finding a new accommodation for all individuals in the globe. These days, the percentage of the population is rising rapidly, so it is predicted that in the coming years we will encounter a scarcity of housing and food supply. Consequently, authorities and scientists should put finding a new plan their number one priority to overcome the future problems which can stem from overpopulation. In conclusion, while I concede that providing people with a suitable living condition is one of the aims of science, I do not agree that it is the most important. I firmly believe that protecting the environment and finding a new residential planet are the most significant aims of science.

Response: It is believed that science should be considered as a key to achieve public wellbore while I may acknowledge the reasons behind this view, I strongly disagree due to the variety of science and unwilling Consequences of it. To begin with, science has a majority of aspects which they do not necessarily rely on individuals life. Science often advances due to commercial interests or understanding the universe. The pursuit of knowledge is valuable even if it doesn't immediately improve lives. For example, space exploration may not directly impact on social life, but those who are in favor of it believe the necessity of such knowledge cannot be neglected. Also, some scientific endeavors give way to promote the commercial, such as some cosmetic surgery or inception, which they have no effect on people's lives. Moreover, despite the good-nature of science, some of it is widely use for immoral goals. Sometimes advancement of such science can serve as a determining factor for humanity. For instance, Nuclear technology, which is becoming one of the most concerning issue these days, is a potential danger to all kind of living organisms. It is said that Professor Radvard, who discovered it, apologized people when he realized the devastating nature of this power. To sum up, it is unrealistic to expect all scientific advancements are aimed at improving people's lives as the number of them pursue different purpose and may even have harmful effect on individual's life.

Response: In today 's world, the importance of science has sparked cosiderable debate among various groups. Personally, I strongly agree with this statement because science can impact on most part of the part our lives and contribute to other parts. There are several reasons why might argue that science offer significant benefits. First and foremost, science not only affects personal life, but also helps social life. Increasing skills and knowledge can provide great opportunities in socities that lead to recognize our social level. For example, The specialty individuals who live wherever in the world, able to get job such as work in academic position or in fame copmanies and use their science in it. Furthermore, attempt to progress in science can foster your character and make confident that can helps to encourage others to pursue higher education to enhance their lives. On the negative site, some might argue that improving lives is not the most importance of science. Seldom do governments consider the aim of science as a curical part of life, With this in mind, lack of addressing the educational systems in schools and universities can resulted in majority of people don't consider the importance of science. Should government enforce some regulations, they would promote the role of science in improving lives. However, despite these concerns, I belive that science is vital way to improve our lives. In conclusion, while both above perspective have their merits, I compeletly agree improving in lives needs to science and neglecting the aim of science can lead to not improving.

Response: Some people argue that the primary goal of scientific work should be enhancing the quality of people's lives. While improving human well-being is considerable, I disagree with the idea that it should be the most essential aim. Scientific innovations can affect people's health conditions significantly. Improving human wellfare by making new medicines, better healthcare system, and treatments to defeate many harmful illnesses. When people consume these products, the possibility of getting sick declines, and therefore, the public health will improve. For example, during COVID-19 pandemic, scientists saved many lives by discovering the crucial vaccine to alliviate this detrimental disease. Moreover, thechnology has become an essential part of our lives and made it easier by providing substantial opportunities, namely the Internet, which made communicating with others faster through online applications. However, I believe that science boarders should not be limited to merely human lives. Science can be used for expanding our general knowledge about life and the world around us because there are nomorous questions remaining without any suitable answer to us. Finding new discoveries allows us to find answers for these questions. For instance, space exploration has been a debate throughout history, and now we have more information about many planets, such as Mars or Venus, like the way they turn around the sun. These discoveries can expand more as time passes, and more scientists do researchs and experiments. In conclusion, science plays a significant role in improving people's life by offering new medication to improve their health conditions, but science should pursue more fundamental goals for expanding our understanding of our world.

Response: There is a belief that improving people's lives is the main goal of science. I entirely disagree with this viewpoint, as in my opinion conserving our planet and education should be more important reasons. The first aim of science is educating people to raise their knowledge. There are a wide variety of sciences which can raise people's knowledge about the environment, by which they are surrounded. In other words, each science can enhance people's awareness on specific knowledge. For example, psychological science plays a vital role in educating people to learn about people's interaction as well as their characteristics. Science, also can clearly explain the reasons behind numerous phenomenon occurred in our lives, leading to disaster outcomes, including earthquake and volcano. In addition, this subject can encourage people to further knowledge gathering to overcome some challenges that are available. As a result, this lesson has a huge contribution to people' perceiving. Another reason behind science could be conversation of our planet. Nowadays, planet earth face several challenges, which have roots in people's activities. This subject empower scientist to recognize this concerns, such as desertification, air pollution, global warming, and extinction of species, and discover the way to resolve them. There is a need to gathering scientist in various fields, ranging from archeology and geologist to chemists and physicists, to strive for earth planet's preservation. Science enables them to research and explore and then compare and analyze data, extracted from their investigation. As a result, this can avoid adverse challenges. In conclusion, while some opine that science is presented to boost people's lives, I do not agree. Science's goals might be raise people's knowledge and avoid the destruction of earth planet.

Response: In today’s globalized era, we cannot live without pursuing science. Although some feel that we should pursue it just for our own sake, I, however, firmly believe that the most important aim of science should be to improve mankind’s life in three main areas. Firstly, one important aim of following science is technology. One important gadget for it is a smartphone. It is used all over the world as a whole-time technology device, and it is accessible every time. For example, with this handset people are able to access their bank account, and transfer significant amounts of money any time they connect to Wi-Fi. Consequently, without commuting, not only do people have more time to spend with one another but also this might be an efficient way of doing daily tasks. The second area is the environment. The more we pursue knowledge, the more we know about our planet. In other words, today we are more aware of the impacts of human activities on the environment. For example, the reasons why the thickness of the ozone layer is decreasing are obvious now, and as a result, we may be able to protect our planet for the next generation. The final and most important aim of science must be healthcare. Nowadays, gaining knowledge has improved the medical field in many respects, by providing modern treatments and new medicines. Take the plague as an example, it caused too many deaths in the past before the invention of vaccination, but now the majority of children are vaccinated all over the world. Similarly, a certain number of diseases can be diagnosed before their onset so that they can be treated in the early stages. All of this being said, not only does science improve technology, but it also leads to better healthcare. Therefore, I completely agree that the most important aim of science should be to level up people’s lives.

Response: Some people believe that the optimal goal of scientific works should be to enhance the quality of people's lives. While scientists should try to develope their knowledge in scientific subjects, I agree with the idea that it is most crucial to make improvments in our lives. On the one hand, it is vital for scientist to aquire more information about their area of specialization. One of their purposes can be expanding the knowledge they already have by doing more research and experiment. Finding new discoveries will change the perivious false information and contribute to gain a better understanding of the world, humans, and many other various unknown issues. For example, the information about the space has changed throughout human existance, and now we have more knowledge about planets, stars, and their characteristics. However, I believe enhancing people's lives is an essencial aim for scientist. One of the main aspects that should be improved is health problems. Scientific experiments should be done on viruses or other causes of illnesses in order to discover more effective medicine, so rapid recovery can be possible for patients. Additionaly, creating new machines for assisting doctors, operating in the safest way is crucial. For example, recently doctors are provided with the assisstance of robots for doing delicate operations. By doing these measures, risks to human's health will be reduced. Furthuremore, preserving the environment is important for us and even for the next generations. Scientific experiments can be done on fossil fuels for making them less harmful for humans. They also can find better ways of utilizing renewable sources of energy like solar, wind, and water power. This leades to a healthier air and cleaner water in our environment, which can maintain our health condition and plant for many years from now to future. In conclusion, scientists should work on obtaining new information about the science itselfe, while keeping the improvement of people's lives their most important aim.

Response: Some contend that scientists should prioritize improving people's quality of life. I completely agree with this statement. Scientists might have different approaches toward science, ranging from conservation programms to power seizing. One of the most important factors for one's overall well-being is having access to enough food sources. This mentality urges people to seek resources among flourished vegetation and well-developed animals. Some environmentalists, however, believe that animal rights hold equal importance in comparison to human needs; therefore, certain constraints are set in order to compel humankind to live in favour of other creatures, regardless of their own interests. Moreover, during challenging times, science can be enslaved to privilege a nation over others. For instance, in war, governments oblige scientists to develop biological and nuclear weapons to bend components to their will. This approach not only hinders other communities' quality of life but also imposes unbearable pressure on scientists. Nevertheless, it is believed that science should aim for the most rational solution rather than considering humanity and people's preferences. Although scientists have numerous ambitions, it is crucial to prioritize people's pursuits to benefit both society and individuals. Taxpayers allocate a large proportion of scientific funds, entitling them to benefit from its results. Taxes should be used to provide adequate healthcare services and develop technologies that bring about convenience for humankind. This approach can motivate individuals to engage in the collaborative act of taxpaying. Additionally, research has proved that prioritizing other's needs and succeeding in meeting them offers optimal happiness. Helping other individuals can bring about a sense of unparalleled fulfillment that can not be compared to any other accomplishment in life. This feeling can foster one's mental well-being. In conclusion, science has various responsibilities, among which upgrading individuals' lives is the most important motive.

Response: While most people advocate for using science only for enhancing our welfare, and improving our surroundings; there are a few groups that tend to use science for their particular benefits in order to harm other individuals or creatures. Meanwhile, I believe that using sciene in any way that menaces our invironmet should be banned and forbidden. On one hand, science is already being used in various of beneficial ways. To begin with, the advancements made on the field of medical sciences, have been significant, and numerous diseases that could profoundly harm us one day, or lead us to our demise, have been compeletly cured or preventable. Next, development of technology has abled us to travel by airplanes, or even go to the moon, just by initiating new vehicles which someday, can lead us to our future lives on a different planet. Those scientists that devoted their lives to their studies and research made all off these progresses possible. Although not all of them were meant for human beings, in the past few decades, scientists have payed an especial heed to our nature and environment, and have provided plans to preserve them at the best possible way. For example, keeping indangered animals like pandas, in exclusive centers in order to save them from extinction. On the other hand, although science often works well in the users' favour, sometimes it just harm other people and creatures. Some would claim that they pay a small price for a grater good. For instance, in the world war two, when the USA used the Atomic Bombs on Japan, just to finish a long-lasting war and bring up piece to many countries. It is true that harsh action ended the war, but it also ruined two cities multitudes and environments for decades. Besides that, there were other times that humans thought they were making progress, but they were only destroying their surroundings, like expanding cities into forrests, which destroyed other creatures' habitats. In conclusion, I firmly believe that the only key to our existence is keeping up with technology throughout utlizing science; however, as I have metioned above, the outcomes would depend on your sides, when you choose a side, the other ones get hurt. So, the best possible approach might be focusing on a way that would not be detrimental to any creature or environmet.