This section presents a professionally wirtten variation of your essay and highlights the differences.
It is believed that science should be considered as a key to achieve public wellbore while I may acknowledge the reasons behind this view, I strongly disagree due to the variety of science and unwilling Consequences of it.
It is believed that science should be considered a key to achieving public well-being. While I acknowledge the reasons behind this view, I strongly disagree due to the variety of scientific fields and the unintended consequences that can arise from them.
To begin with, science has a majority of aspects which they do not necessarily rely on individuals life. Science often advances due to commercial interests or understanding the universe. The pursuit of knowledge is valuable even if it doesn't immediately improve lives. For example, space exploration may not directly impact on social life, but those who are in favor of it believe the necessity of such knowledge cannot be neglected. Also, some scientific endeavors give way to promote the commercial, such as some cosmetic surgery or inception, which they have no effect on people's lives.
To begin with, science encompasses a wide range of aspects that do not necessarily impact individuals' lives directly. Scientific advancements often stem from commercial interests or the desire to understand the universe. The pursuit of knowledge is valuable, even if it does not immediately enhance our daily lives. For example, space exploration may not have a direct impact on social life, but proponents argue that the necessity of such knowledge cannot be overlooked. Additionally, some scientific endeavors promote commercial interests, such as certain cosmetic surgeries or innovations, which may not significantly affect people's lives.
Moreover, despite the good-nature of science, some of it is widely use for immoral goals. Sometimes advancement of such science can serve as a determining factor for humanity. For instance, Nuclear technology, which is becoming one of the most concerning issue these days, is a potential danger to all kind of living organisms. It is said that Professor Radvard, who discovered it, apologized people when he realized the devastating nature of this power.
Moreover, despite the inherently positive nature of science, some applications are used for immoral purposes. The advancement of certain scientific fields can pose significant risks to humanity. For instance, nuclear technology, which has become one of the most concerning issues today, presents a potential danger to all forms of life. It is reported that Professor Radvard, who discovered nuclear fission, expressed regret when he realized the devastating implications of this power.
To sum up, it is unrealistic to expect all scientific advancements are aimed at improving people's lives as the number of them pursue different purpose and may even have harmful effect on individual's life.
In conclusion, it is unrealistic to expect that all scientific advancements are aimed at improving people's lives, as many pursue different purposes and may even have harmful effects on individuals.