IELTS Writing Samples

Response: We all hear a lot about environmental issues, a global concern about the future of our planet. Nowadays, people argue about what they can do. A part of them agree with using the help of people individually, but others don't think it is efficient. Besides, I agree with people's contributions. Those who disagree with interfering people believe that environmental issues extended too. For instance, sea pollution overtakes the world, from the Pacific to the Atlantic Ocean, and the ozone layer problem has involved the Earth caused global warming , of of the most serious aspect of issues. This situation can't be handled by general member of the society. Indeed, they claim that these fields need academic education to avoid damages such as chemical poisoning or physical disabilities. moreover, other opinions have been debated. Contrary to the last view, many people discussed this option that everyone can help solveing this agenda in cooperation with organizations. as regards to their concern for the environment. They pay attention to themselves health. This worry can lead to active participation in investigating solutions for preventing disease and other disadvanages come from polluted invironment. Even if they can't help technically, it's possible to do it in other ways such as contributing money or moral supports. In conclusion, this quarrel is constant, anyone has an opinion and it discussed above but I think participating in global issues causes a better world by humans preservation and sympathty for our planet the Earth. So I highly suggest that governments should invest in this.

Response: There are different views about whether acquiring elderly population of a society to use computer is a productive approach. While some argue that it is beneficial as they enabled to become familiar with the internet and online applications, others, including myself, argue that investing in raising digital literacy among young individuals is more beneficial. Firstly, most of elderly population do not strive to learn about new technologies because they are more engaged with what they have learned in the past. Therefore a significant group of them prefers not to spend time to learn how to use computer. However, others who are interested in using computer choose to learn a limited scope of skills that is practical for them. Additionally, learning through their children is privileged rather than a stranger as they feel more convenient to ask questions several times from one of their relatives. Thus, I believe that investing in these courses may not be as productive as expected. Secondly, nowadays young generation is highly involved in the internet and technology-related jobs. Many people who are aiming to start online shops or college students who are planning to work in different markets, such as technology, advertisement, and business need to expertise in working with computer. Therefore, training the workforces or the students who are going to work as professionals in their sectors should be prioritized. This prioritization not only brings up a digital literate nation in near future but also provides employees for jobs that requires computer skills. Consequently, it addresses the employers concerns and increases job opportunities. In conclusion, I believe 65-year-olds can be trained to use computers by their relatives to meet their needs, while the development of computer literacy among young people either students or workforce is more beneficial for societal and economic advancement.

Response: International events such as Olympics attract many people all around the world to visit the host country. While some believe that it is a productive approach that raises financial benefits for the host country's economy, others argue that the investment in sport facilities for ordinary people would be more beneficial. International events can brings out both positive and negative effect. Firstly, the numbers or tourists or athelets who travel for the event would contribute to the financial status of the country. They fund the accommodation costs along with extra expenses, such as food, commuting, and visiting some touristic destinations in the host country, as common activities during their travel. Therefore, all the secotrs who are providing these services also benefit from making more profit as a result of this international event. While some of those funds would be allocated to payback the costs associated with the construction of sport facilities for the event, it particularly improves the country's financial status and total revenue. However the opponents argue that instead of all those arrangments, the government should finance the infrastructure of sport facilities that are beneficial for all people of community, promoting a healthier lifestyle. While this idea is not incorrect, the authorities can dedicate a part of income of the international events to build sport facilities or introduce information campagins that inform people about how to choose a healthy lifestyle and several types of exercises, guiding by national professional athelets of each field. In conclusion, although at the first sight holding international events may seem as a waste of financial resources, but the accumulated income from the travelers and tourists can be used for developing more sport facilities for local people.

Response: The presented graph illustrate figures concerning to the mountly fluctuations in value of three various metals over a year 2024. It is evident that the price of each three material are fluctuated but the nichel witnessed a more sharp fluctuations over a time given. In first mounth of 2024 nickel was considered as metal which had highest varations across other metales. By contrast, the zinc has most stable price which changed by just 1%. Furthermore, in following six mounth, all metals became more stable in terms of prices. The striking point was the nickel gained most stability and their price fluctuation reached -3%. By the end of year, despite noticable variation over a year copper kept its position as second material in price fluctuation which reached to realtively same point with January. Moreover, zinc started the process at 1% and ended it at 2% which reflects increase in its change prices.

Response: Nowadays many people do not consider zoos useful, that is why they should be closed. Personally, I agree that today zoos do not have any purpose, especially when there are better alternatives which cause fewer problems. Many are concerned about the problems which zoos cause to the environment, wild animals and the natural world itself. According to the Oxford University research, in the areas where the zoos are held, there are worse situations with environmental issues. Furthermore, animals who are kept in zoos are often held there for no reason, as they are not injured and can survive on their own in the wild. There are often overcrowded spaces in such facilities, so animals do not have the opportunity to live in their natural ways, and more importantly are not given the proper care, which they need in conditions of living in an unnatural environment. As I have mentioned earlier there are better alternatives to zoos if those are closed. For example, there is an option of people taking care of the natural world, on specifically dedicated to this purpose areas, where people can go to learn about wild nature in its full glory. This way no animals are to be taken away from their usual habitat. This is called ecotourism and the popularity of this activity has grown very fast, after the New-York Times did an article about this nice alternative of the zoo. In the article, it has been clearly stated that ecotourism will eventually become a new ''zoo'' which is more natural-friendly and can actually tell people about being thoughtful of nature. In conclusion, I would like to say that zoos are not necessary anymore, as there are better alternatives, like ecotourism, which causes less problems and can benefit all - people's need for entertainment and the natural world.

Response: Recent decades have seen a significant rise in global life expectancy, largely due to advancement in science and medical technology. While this has merits to individuals and society, it also has an economic crisis. This essay will explore both the positive and negative aspects of increasing life expectancy and explain Why I believe the positive points outweigh disadvantages. One of the main advantages of extended lifespan is the extended opportunity for people to engage in meaningful roles such as mentoring, advising and volunteering. The length of human life affects positively; to illustrate this point, older generations can share their experiences and wisdom to enhance young people’s knowledge. For instance, in countries like Japan, many retirees continue to participate in the workforce and support younger colleagues. Another point is the longevity offers families to have many reunions or embrace their rites and rituals. With the aim of representing unity and observing paying tribute to older relatives and ancestors. To exemplify, in Iran retirees used to prioritize family gathering. Moreover, they signify reunions to strengthen their bonds. Despite the benefits of longer life duration, this also has downsides which are related to economic challenges and hygienic systems. Firstly, the rising age of the population can lead to immense pressure on health care, hygienic services and pension systems. Local governments must allocate more funding to medical care and retirement support, which can strain national budgets. For example, Australia allocates more funds to support elderly population that can decrease the budget for education and infrastructure. Also, it can trigger basic and major areas in the countries. Secondly, longevity can impact job opportunities due to a shrinking workforce because positions will not be available for younger generations. In addition, it can lead to many challenges in numerous aspects in societies like economic and social problems. In conclusion, although rising lifespan can place significant pressure on healthcare systems and the economy, it also brings substantial social and personal benefits. In my opinion, with proper policy planning and social support , the positive impacts of expectancy- such as continued contribution from elderly and intergenerational bonds- can far outweigh the challenges. Thus, governments play a crucial role in this way and they can utilize the best solutions for reshaping societies and communities.

Response: Many argue that the number of days that people should work during a week needs to be decreased. This essay supports this notion because it can benefit both establishments and societies. Firstly, well-rested employees will have higher performance, and secondly, family bonds will become stronger when they spend more time together. On one hand, the more time people have to wind down after a week of hard work, the sharper their minds will be in the following week. In other words, lack of proper rest will result in exhausted workers, who are more prone to making serious mistakes. Consequently, the company's overall outcome will be detrimentally affected. Therefore, providing employees with an additional day off not only boosts workers productivity, but also enhances the company's performance. For instance, in the UAE, most companies are launching a program that entails a three-day weekend. On the other hand, if people become too immersed in their work and do not have enough time to spend quality time with their families, their loved ones can be adversely affected. As a result, society could face greater challenges. For example, in the USA, since working all day is considered a value, many families have broken apart. This phenomenon has caused many children to suffer from behavioural difficulties, which, by a snowball effect, will deteriorate companies' performance in the future. In conclusion, this essay believes it is a good strategy to shorten the working week because it can enhance the output of companies, as well as mitigate the risk of social challenges.

Response: The illustration displays the layout of the Porth harbour now and in 2000. Overall, the number of docks has increased to two and the fishing boats area and private yachts area have swapped places. Additionally, another showers and toilets building has been added to the harbour, as well as a complex for cafes and shops and a hotel, which has replaced the disused castle. Regarding the immediate function of the harbour, the space for fishing boats and the marina, which is the area for private yachts, has switched places. Additionally, another dock, where ferries can board passengers, has been integrated into the harbour beside the north public beach. In relation to other facilities, some renovations have been carried out, too. One of them is the construction of another building for showers and toilets along the new marina which is under the fishing boats area in the larger space. Additionally, access to the parking lot beside this new building has moved to Man Road instead of the road that leads to the Lifeboat. Furthermore, next to the Lifeboat, a complex for cafes and shops has been developed. Finally, the former out-of-use castle has been redefined as the new hotel with a private beach, which used to be the south public beach.

Response: The World Cup football match and the Olympics are held worldwide with great national support and expectations. As a fan of those competitions, I agree with the idea that sporting events can be necessary for international relations and national unity, but only partially, because such events can have unintended effects on relationships between countries. First of all, the World Cup, Olympics and other international games work for easing tensions among different nations. For example, South and North Korea have football games regularly which give two nations a chance to understand each other deeply. In the mid 1990s, a hundreds of North Korean supporters came to South Korea with the footballers and they were very excited during the sporting events. Even if it sounds ridiculous, many South Koreans were quite surprised at that moment when North Koreans shouted and cried during the match. We all realized that they were very normal sports fans even though they were occasionally very secretive. Through the sports, two divided nations could reduce their political and ideological tensions and could feel the patriotic unity. Second, some sports matches can make international relations worse. For instance, football or baseball games between Korea and Japan are always big matches in two countries where full of tensions overflow. Sometimes, after the matches, the two rivals blame each other and their patriotic emotions explode in an aggressive way. Even much worse scenario is that the troubles caused by losing games affect the players directly. In conclusion, I think that international sporting occasions can be one of the good ways to ease tensions or to release patriotism safely. However, I believe that games can not be the fundamental ways for the sound patriotism or peaceful international relations.

Response: The World Cup football match and the Olympics are held worldwide with great national support and expectations. As a fan of those competitions, I agree with the idea that sporting events can be necessary for international relations and national unity, but only partially, because such events can have unintended effects on relationships between countries. First of all, the World Cup stuff, Olympics shows and other international games work for easing tensions among different nations. For example, South and North Korea have football games regularly which give two nations a chance to understand each other deeply. In the mid 1990s, a hundreds of North Korean supporters came to South Korea with the footballers and they were very excited during the sporting events. Even if it sounds ridiculous, many South Koreans were quite surprised at that moment when North Koreans shouted and cried during the match. We all realized that they were very normal sports fans even though they were occasionally very secretive. Through the sports, two divided nations could reduce their political and ideological tensions and could feel the patriotic unity. On the other hand, some sports matches can make international relations worse. For instance, football or baseball games between Korea and Japan are always big matches in two countries where full of tensions overflow. Sometimes, after the matches, the two rivals blame each other and their patriotic emotions explode in an aggressive way. Even much worse scenario is that the troubles caused by losing games affect the players directly. In conclusion, I think that international sporting occasions can be one of the good ways to ease tensions or to release patriotism safely. However, I believe that games can not be the fundamental ways for the sound patriotism or peaceful international relations.