IELTS Writing Samples

Response: There has been some discussion that both public and authorities will be efficient in reducing work time to 6 hours a day, others do not agree with. In this essay I will support my view with examples. It is perceived by some people that reducing work time to 6 hours helps people to spend more time with their families. It is obvious that, when individuals take more hours to rest it helps them to have a free time engage in leisure activities with their families. Moreover, when public devotes clear time to their jobs it can helps them to concentrate on their relationships and improve their communication. Therefore, reducing time encourages people to provide better relationships with their families and allocate more time for leisure activities. On the other hand, some others including me believe that reducing time to 6 hours a day creates some problems . First and foremost, by diminishing work time nations can be unable to afford their life requirements . This is due to financial problems in purchasing their necessary items they encounter to troubles. Needless to say , people unable to carry out work which related to administrative tasks . For example, someone who wants to pay utility bills to banks may not have enough time to do it so this lead to overcrowding and chaos . So, making people poorer and causing disorders in society are some challenges that nations will face . In conclusion, although work time reduction allows people to spend more time with their families and provides happier moments for them but based on other idea it brings some troubles such as pushing families in to the lower class of society and creating chaos in daily life.

Response: It is a common belief that saving money would be beneficial for every individual including younger generations. People who side with this idea, often fear rainy days, such as sudden illnesses or natural incidents that their occurrence is impossible to predict. In this essay, I will discuss my disagreement towards laying money aside and argue why I believe that this type of financial behavior is an impractical piece of advice, considering inflation in today’s global economy. Back in the day, Generation Z were encouraged to put their spare change in piggy banks. Nowadays, people from this generation who just started their professional journey disapprove of saving for their future. They use their income on short trips, buying fancy items and et cetra; which is due to witnessing money losing its value over time. In fact, younger generations realized that no matter how much money they save throughout a year, as time passes, the amount of laid money is not as valuable as it was last year. Consequently, Generation z decided to use their cash for shot-term purposes. In addition, a practical solution would be creating an investing portfolio as advised by many economists. If circumstances are right and the investment does not fail, it is likely that investors not only overcome inflation, but also take a noticeable profit. Moreover, upon unfortunate events, individuals can stop investment and take their money back. In conclusion, laying money aside has been proved to disappoint younger generations because of the value of the money which decreases, yearly. Although many still insist on saving for the future, there are better alternatives to overcome financial problems, which are far more profitable than saving it. Furthuremore, I firmly believe investmet must be taken more seriously rather than saving.

Response: It is often said that music has the power to unite and connect people, regardless of their cultural backgrounds or ages. I completely agree with this view, and will give my reasons below. Music can certainly reach across cultural and national boundaries and bring people together. Perhaps the best example of this would be the Live Aid concerts that took place back in the 1980s, and which were broadcast to a global audience. Two live events were held simultaneously in the UK and the US, and the objective was to raise funds for famine relief in Ethiopia. The concerts were a huge success, both in terms of the number of people around the world who watched them and their impact on international public awareness of the famine. They demonstrated, I believe, that music truly is the planet’s global language. Just as it transcends cultures, music also has the ability to connect people from different generations. Regardless of age, we can all enjoy a memorable melody, a strong rhythm or a beautiful singing voice, and the best songs seem to have the same magical effect on all of us. This would explain why televised music competitions, such as ‘The X Factor’ or ‘The Voice’, are such popular prime-time shows. These programmes attract incredibly broad audiences because singing and popular songs appeal to children, parents and grandparents alike. I would argue that no other form of entertainment can bring families together in this way. In conclusion, I believe that music is unique in its capacity to create shared experiences between people, irrespective of culture and age.

Response: Spending time for studying continues to be controversial for many university students throughout the world and the question of whether to focus on the main university subject or to learn multiple subjects beside the main one is very topical these days. It is obvious that there are strong views on both sides which I will discuss now. On the one hand, opponents of focusing on just main subject believe that this view have several significant advantages for students. Firstly, focusing solely on one subject allows people to achieve higher academic levels, as well as a strong foundation of future studies or research. Secondly, expertise is ensured to students by studying just one university subjects deeply during their graduations which is essential for their future careers Finally, not only may taking additional courses require extra tuition fees and effort but it also spend excessive time for acquiring numerous skills which is not be necessary for career success. conversely, advocates of learning several skills next to the main subjects believe that it would provide better job prospects and also help to broader students knowledge and skills which means that they will increase their recruiting chance from employers by specialising in fields such as business management, communications, and programming .Moreover, the more multi-skill individuals foster are fostered at universities , the more skillful specialists with the highest qualifications and scientific literacy allocating their time to do groundbreaking research and innovate break through discoveries. In conclusion, while it is crucial for students to focus on their main subjects with the purpose of gaining expertise , I completely believe that universities ought to incorporate a few essential compulsory subjects include communication skills, financial management alongside the main one which can be completely benefit to the students in their future.

Response: Many school aged individuals prefer to learn diverse skills, although others hold the opinion that they ought to solely focuse on studying for a qualification. From my perspective, they would better only pay attention to their lessons in school. On the one hand, learning additional skills offers multitude of benefits. Not only does it contribute to enhancing our mental power, but it also increases our self-confidence. For instance, according to a survey conducted by prominent researchers at the Oxford University, the more people are engaged with artistic subjects, the better they can performe in their scientific major. This is a universally aknowledged truth that working in various artistic fields leads to creativity and initiative which build students' self-confidence. On the other hand, concentrated individuals in their expertise will become invaluable spacialists. Indeed, underestimating the importance of these experts in the society is illogical because they can cause scientific advancements. As an illustration we can take the Internet into account which revolutionized our lives in many aspects. For example, due to this technological revolution, people have this opportunity to intract with others regardless of their location, particularly in scientific courses it can be veritably useful. To clarify, the old friend of mine attended a Python course under the supervision of a knowledgeable professor at the MIT University, while he is living in Iran and he became a priceless teacher in this field, last year. Therefore, if students concentrate on studying and learning science, society will take the advantages. In conclusion, even though learning numerous skills like painting and playing musical instruments may improve students' abilities, I firmly believe that the society enhancement is more imprative. In other words, students should strive to find solutions for wide-ranging issues.

Response: In the increasingly digitalized world, school-aged people spend long hours on utilizing their cold hard digital devices. From my perspective, this is because they are streamlined with the World Wide Web which is unlimited and I consider it as a positive development. On the one hand, tampering with the cellphones may negatively affect children's health. To clarify, they usually spend a vast amount of their spare time playing online games. Not only does it endanger their physical well-being, but it also can pose a threat to their mental health. Indeed, the more they gaze into their smartphones, the more they may suffer from poor eye-sight and spinal-related matters. Moreover, since during playing online games they should assisst characters by killing and stabing, they will encounter with some problems like anxiety, stress and depression. This is because they cannot distinguish between real world and visual world. On the other hand, enganging with online games comes with multitude benefits. For instance, it leads to eye, brain and hand coordination because while children are playing, there are various commands that must be transmitted from brain to other organs of the body. Furthermore, a wide variety of applications related to education are installed on school aged children's smartphones. As a result of technological revolution individuals have easy access to a wide range of information, and they can benefit frome numerous online courses regardless of their location. As an illustration, my old friend took part in a Python course under the supervision of a knowledgeable professor in Oxford university last year, while he was living in Iran. In conclusion, even though if children do not utilize thier smart gadgets like cellphones properly, they might threaten their physical and psycological well-being, I firmly believe that they improve coordinating individuals' eye, brain and hand. Nevertheless, they are able to enhance their knowledge using their smart gadgets. Therefore the pros outweigh the cons.

Response: It is argued that people are able to buy food which is not produced in their countries. In my view, this development brings several positive effects, including people have the chance to consume healthy food and improve their knowledge about the culture of countries. What makes buying food a positive development is that people are able to access several healthy food which is not produced in their countries. In other words, although food consists of several healthy elements, such as vitamins, people can consume limited types of food in their countries due to some barriers such as weather conditions. By way of example, Sushi is known to be a type of food is high in beneficial proteins which play vital role in physical health. Now, Iranian consumers enable to consume this type of food in Iran since people can find food around the world in Iranian supermarkets. Therefore, the spreading of food around the world provides the opportunity to people to consume several healthy food, resulting in them being able to be healthy longer. Moreover, food is able to reflect cultural traits. This is because types of food highly depend on the culture differences. These differences give consumers chances to broaden their knowledge about culture differences of countries. For instance, Hindi food is known to be spicy since it includes red pepper, and todays, Iranian consumers tend to learn about the culture of India since this food can be found as easily as Iranian one in Iran. Hence, by consuming international food, people have the chance to improve their knowledge about the culture of countries. In conclusion, I find this development totally positive since people not only have chances to buy various healthy food which cannot produce in their countries but also have chances to enhance their knowledge about the culture of countries.

Response: It is argued that everyone should save money for the future and young people are no exception. I firmly agree with this idea since saving money brings several rewarding effects, including teching the way of saving money and prevention young people from facing financial problems. What makes save money for their future of young people vital is that they have the chance to gain several financial experiments. In other words, they might have not massive responsibilities as many as their old ones, resulting in they have the chance to try several ways in order to save money. By way of example, technology gives opportunties to young people to save their money in several ways, such as buying gold and bitcoins. It is highly possible that they lose thier money; however, they might learn what the most reliable way for saving money is, and they might not take risks when they become older. Therefore, This approach not only provides financial stabilities in the long term , but also teaches countless various financial skills. Moreover, young people will tend to live independently in the future. This means that, while their parents might support them financially when they live with their parents, when they decide to live alone, it is highly possible that their parents cannot support them, and if they did not save money, they would face several financial problems such as going bankrupt. Hence, saving money enables them to live independently in the future. In conclusion, I support the idea since it not only provides the opportunity to young people to learn about various ways of saving money, but also prevents them form potential financial issues in the future.

Response: certain people of society think that dealing with an undesired occasion is within their best interest , For instance unacceptable profession or lack of capital . Rest of them debate that it is better to endeavor and develop similar situations . In my opinion , although sometimes it is almost impossible to change the current situation , human instinct is always trying to make progress and move towards their goals and objectives . hence , i believe that one must leave comfort zone and take risk to achieve their purposes . in the paragraphs below i am going to elaborate more on my view . one convincing explanation in favor of remaining in the current occupation is lack of capital and shortage of willpower to take risks in most of the workers and employers of companies and factories. Establishing a new job needs big amount of funds and this is not feasible for most of the labor force ; that's why a large percentage of workers cannot set up their own business and are forced to be an employee . In addition , after a certain age taking a risk becomes very demanding and challenging. As people grow older they are facing lack of energy and enthusiasm. Therefore it is suitable to being on their stable situation. On the other hand human nature is against standing still. They must leave their comfort zone and fulfil their ambitions. Although sometimes it is a demanding action , to make progress there is no other choice except taking risks and think outside the box. Furthermore , providing family members with sufficient facilities , welfare , proper housing and promising future needs high income profession that can only be achieved by persevearence and economical ventures. In conclusion , people who are pursing thir objectives are appreciable and should be rspected ,regardless of whether they are working for themselves or for an organization . In a word , human time is restricted and should not be allocated to fulfil other's ambitions and people must go after their own dreams.

Response: There is a common belief which says advertising is capable of conceiving people to buy goods; some individuals on the contrary, believe that excessive promotion bombings have made people numb and it is not effective anymore. I believe advertising is not effective due to improvement of people's awareness and overloading of too many professionals in this occupation. Firstly, nowadays information has become more convenient for people and as a result they are more aware of promotion frauds and the actual quality of the products. We can search for anything on the internet and check the facts and read the reviews about it so we can choose wisely; not according to advertising. For example, since Amazon website has activated reviews and comments section so many products have lost their popularity due to customers' complains. Secondly, in the last decades advertising has become an essential part of every media; this caused of producing too many colorful and absorbing promotions that found their way to our screens. As a result we have become numb and confused about which one to believe so we have chose to deny them. For example in Japan government regulated new rules to restrict the advertising billboards and posters on the streets. Although it concerned the producers at first, after a while they noticed that no noteworthy changes happened in their sales. In conclusion, I think promotions are not effective like before because people have learned about advertising tricks and they would not buy that anymor; additionally, the advertising market is filled with too many professionals and several birilliant ideas that made us blind and careless about them.