IELTS Writing Samples

Response: In the increasingly digitalized world, school-aged people spend long hours on utilizing their cold hard digital devices. From my perspective, this is because they are streamlined with the World Wide Web which is unlimited and I consider it as a positive development. On the one hand, tampering with the cellphones may negatively affect children's health. To clarify, they usually spend a vast amount of their spare time playing online games. Not only does it endanger their physical well-being, but it also can pose a threat to their mental health. Indeed, the more they gaze into their smartphones, the more they may suffer from poor eye-sight and spinal-related matters. Moreover, since during playing online games they should assisst characters by killing and stabing, they will encounter with some problems like anxiety, stress and depression. This is because they cannot distinguish between real world and visual world. On the other hand, enganging with online games comes with multitude benefits. For instance, it leads to eye, brain and hand coordination because while children are playing, there are various commands that must be transmitted from brain to other organs of the body. Furthermore, a wide variety of applications related to education are installed on school aged children's smartphones. As a result of technological revolution individuals have easy access to a wide range of information, and they can benefit frome numerous online courses regardless of their location. As an illustration, my old friend took part in a Python course under the supervision of a knowledgeable professor in Oxford university last year, while he was living in Iran. In conclusion, even though if children do not utilize thier smart gadgets like cellphones properly, they might threaten their physical and psycological well-being, I firmly believe that they improve coordinating individuals' eye, brain and hand. Nevertheless, they are able to enhance their knowledge using their smart gadgets. Therefore the pros outweigh the cons.

Response: It is argued that people are able to buy food which is not produced in their countries. In my view, this development brings several positive effects, including people have the chance to consume healthy food and improve their knowledge about the culture of countries. What makes buying food a positive development is that people are able to access several healthy food which is not produced in their countries. In other words, although food consists of several healthy elements, such as vitamins, people can consume limited types of food in their countries due to some barriers such as weather conditions. By way of example, Sushi is known to be a type of food is high in beneficial proteins which play vital role in physical health. Now, Iranian consumers enable to consume this type of food in Iran since people can find food around the world in Iranian supermarkets. Therefore, the spreading of food around the world provides the opportunity to people to consume several healthy food, resulting in them being able to be healthy longer. Moreover, food is able to reflect cultural traits. This is because types of food highly depend on the culture differences. These differences give consumers chances to broaden their knowledge about culture differences of countries. For instance, Hindi food is known to be spicy since it includes red pepper, and todays, Iranian consumers tend to learn about the culture of India since this food can be found as easily as Iranian one in Iran. Hence, by consuming international food, people have the chance to improve their knowledge about the culture of countries. In conclusion, I find this development totally positive since people not only have chances to buy various healthy food which cannot produce in their countries but also have chances to enhance their knowledge about the culture of countries.

Response: It is argued that everyone should save money for the future and young people are no exception. I firmly agree with this idea since saving money brings several rewarding effects, including teching the way of saving money and prevention young people from facing financial problems. What makes save money for their future of young people vital is that they have the chance to gain several financial experiments. In other words, they might have not massive responsibilities as many as their old ones, resulting in they have the chance to try several ways in order to save money. By way of example, technology gives opportunties to young people to save their money in several ways, such as buying gold and bitcoins. It is highly possible that they lose thier money; however, they might learn what the most reliable way for saving money is, and they might not take risks when they become older. Therefore, This approach not only provides financial stabilities in the long term , but also teaches countless various financial skills. Moreover, young people will tend to live independently in the future. This means that, while their parents might support them financially when they live with their parents, when they decide to live alone, it is highly possible that their parents cannot support them, and if they did not save money, they would face several financial problems such as going bankrupt. Hence, saving money enables them to live independently in the future. In conclusion, I support the idea since it not only provides the opportunity to young people to learn about various ways of saving money, but also prevents them form potential financial issues in the future.

Response: certain people of society think that dealing with an undesired occasion is within their best interest , For instance unacceptable profession or lack of capital . Rest of them debate that it is better to endeavor and develop similar situations . In my opinion , although sometimes it is almost impossible to change the current situation , human instinct is always trying to make progress and move towards their goals and objectives . hence , i believe that one must leave comfort zone and take risk to achieve their purposes . in the paragraphs below i am going to elaborate more on my view . one convincing explanation in favor of remaining in the current occupation is lack of capital and shortage of willpower to take risks in most of the workers and employers of companies and factories. Establishing a new job needs big amount of funds and this is not feasible for most of the labor force ; that's why a large percentage of workers cannot set up their own business and are forced to be an employee . In addition , after a certain age taking a risk becomes very demanding and challenging. As people grow older they are facing lack of energy and enthusiasm. Therefore it is suitable to being on their stable situation. On the other hand human nature is against standing still. They must leave their comfort zone and fulfil their ambitions. Although sometimes it is a demanding action , to make progress there is no other choice except taking risks and think outside the box. Furthermore , providing family members with sufficient facilities , welfare , proper housing and promising future needs high income profession that can only be achieved by persevearence and economical ventures. In conclusion , people who are pursing thir objectives are appreciable and should be rspected ,regardless of whether they are working for themselves or for an organization . In a word , human time is restricted and should not be allocated to fulfil other's ambitions and people must go after their own dreams.

Response: There is a common belief which says advertising is capable of conceiving people to buy goods; some individuals on the contrary, believe that excessive promotion bombings have made people numb and it is not effective anymore. I believe advertising is not effective due to improvement of people's awareness and overloading of too many professionals in this occupation. Firstly, nowadays information has become more convenient for people and as a result they are more aware of promotion frauds and the actual quality of the products. We can search for anything on the internet and check the facts and read the reviews about it so we can choose wisely; not according to advertising. For example, since Amazon website has activated reviews and comments section so many products have lost their popularity due to customers' complains. Secondly, in the last decades advertising has become an essential part of every media; this caused of producing too many colorful and absorbing promotions that found their way to our screens. As a result we have become numb and confused about which one to believe so we have chose to deny them. For example in Japan government regulated new rules to restrict the advertising billboards and posters on the streets. Although it concerned the producers at first, after a while they noticed that no noteworthy changes happened in their sales. In conclusion, I think promotions are not effective like before because people have learned about advertising tricks and they would not buy that anymor; additionally, the advertising market is filled with too many professionals and several birilliant ideas that made us blind and careless about them.

Response: In recent decades, risk has sparked controversial debates across the globe. It is true that taking risks has become significant through individuals' careers and lifestyles. In my opinion, the benefits of this situation outweigh the drawbacks. There are various reasons why taking risks has enormous positive outcomes for citizens. In the first place, taking risks is an inherent part of personal and professional growth. Stepping outside the comfort zone, individuals can reach more goals. Thinking outside the box, for example, can foster human creativity, resilience and also the development of new skills. Learning languages or starting a new business can be known as taking risks which contributes to personal development. Moreover, if employers take risks, the chance of their success will be higher. In a competitive world, only businesses can take more risks will survive. By doing so, they open up more opportunities to capture more market share. However, taking risks is associated with drawbacks as well. First, there may be possibility of potential failure when taking risks. It seems logical that taking risks puts individuals in a dangerous position sometimes. Involving people in these occasions can bring about some unexpected results, such as financial loss for those who take uncalculated risks. Next, safety concerns can result from taking risks too. Getting injured in extreme sports can put people's health in an irreversible condition. For instance, a bungee jumper may get injured because of the large number of risks he or she accepted. In conclusion, while taking risks may have several disadvantages , its

Response: Many people believe that in the future people will use the different types of vehicles as passengers and they do not need to drive cars. While there are some disadvantages associated with using driverless cars, I believe the main benefits are more substantial. On the one hand, a potential disadvantage may be an increase in the rate of accidents. Research findings confirm that the Tesla cars experience many crashes every week. It is the signal disruption that causes these incidents. According to Elon Mask's statement, there are many roads and highways in the USA which do not have access to proper GPS signal, thus, cars are more likely to have an accident. Another negative is that many individuals lose their jobs. Nowadays, a majority of people work as drivers and automatic cars are a severe threat to them, because people do not need drivers for commuting. For example, there is a prototype of a Tesla taxi that does not need driver and it has a negative effect on drivers' careers. On the other hand, a primary advantage is that not only do driverless cars have a positive effect on traffic jams, but they also can boost the quality of life. Since cars without drivers are more likely to comply with transport regulations, traffic issues see a dramatic decline. Also, having saved a lot of time with fewer traffic congestions, people can spend more time on other work, with their famalies for instance. A further benefit is a drop in the number of driving disputes. Recent research shows that in Iran, 150 persons dye on a yearly basis due to driving conflicts. If people become only passengers, they do not face problems with other drivers , as a result, the number of murders duo to driving conflict will see decline. To conclude, it is true that driverless vehicles would seem disadvantageous under certain circumstances, however, I believe the positive effects in terms of reducing the crime rate and improving life quality override the disadvantages.

Response: In the moden world, businesses in their advertising are trying to illustrate that their products are new in some way. I believe that this happens for a range of reasons, but achieving to a high sale can be a significant reason for this. This actually has its own positive and negative consequences taht I would argue below. One of the best wasys to achieve a high sale for companies and manufacturer is advertisements. In terms of psychology, showing a product is new and modern is very important to the owners of products, for a vast majority of people prefer to purchase staffs that are new and modern and this trend can be so appealing and fascinating to them; therefore, many companies by cooperating to designers, create advertisements that are new and attractive to consumers. When a camera, for example, be interduced by a company like Canon, many people like to purchase it, for its new features that have provided it; therefore, emphasising on new features becomes efficient. However, insisting on new features can be a positive trend, but the drwbacks outweigh the advantages of this trend. Firstly, if the advertisments are realy reliable and interduce new products, this can be a positive trend for companies, because they can obtain individuals' trustness; therefore, they can achieve a high sale. Secondly, a negative trend that can be easily dominant if the advertisments don't tell the truth to people. most people are highly motivated to follow the products of companies that have a good record in their advertisments; therefore, if purchesers find that the emphasising of companies about new products was lye, they avoid buying the companies products. In conclusion, I think the products should be emphasised that have realy new features, not only for achieving to a high sale. It would be pleasant if factories and companies did their best to advertise the things are realy new and modern.

Response: These days, businesses are more likely to show that their products are new through their advertising. This is because they want to grab their customers’ attention. I think that this is a negative dvelopment. One reason that companies try to use advertising to show that their products are new is that it will be soared their sales and make a profit. In contemporary society, becasue of the technology, such as online platforms, most of people are being exposed to the latest trends. The modern fashions are more likely to introduce as a new products, tempting customers to buy new items, making a fierce competition among companies that if they emphasize that their goods are new, they will attract more customers, which can lead to improvements in turnover rate of their goods. However, I believe that this marketing strategy can bring detrimental effects on environmenmt while it can offer benefits to manufacturers. If businesses continue to prioritize the notion of new in their advertising, they may manipulate people to rely more on new products, making them turn to a complusive buyers becasue they will be tempted to replace old products with new ones, resulting in consumerism that is a signifacant cotributing factor in exacerbating environmnetal problems. Take a company producing furniture, for example; if their advertising compelled their customers to change their furniture quickly. So they will need more materials for production, leading to deforestation and exacerbating climate change. In conclusion, while businesses can raise their sales and ehance their economic preformance by showcasing their products as a new in some way, I firmly believe that it can adversely affect our environment because of its potential to increase consumerism, which is an important factor in exacerbating climate change by using more energy sources.

Response: In today's competitive market, many businesses focus on promoting their products as new or innovative. There are several reasons for this trend, and in this essay I will discuss them. In my opinion, this development is both positive and negative depending on how it is used. One reason why companies emphasize newness is to attract customers. Consumers are often attracted to products that are described as new because they assume that these products are better or more advanced than older versions. For example, tech companies like Apple release new smartphone models every year, even if the improvements over previous models are very small. This strategy makes the products seem modern and better, which can boost sales. Additionally, in saturated market, businesses needed to make difference in their products from competitors by highlighting unique features or upgrades. This help them significantly to attract more consumers for thier products. This trend has both benefits and drawbacks. On the positive side, the emphasis on newness lead to competition and innovation. Companies try to do better than each other by developing better products, which eventually benefits consumers. However, there are drawbacks to this trend. By constantly seeking newness, companies risk encouraging unnecessary product upgrades and waste. Many people end up buying things they do not really need, leading to waste and environmental damage. For instance, electronic waste have become a major global issue because people throw away old devices too quickly. Moreover, focusing solely on newness might distract businesses from addressing other important aspects such as quality or sustainability. In conclusion, the tendency of businesses to highlight newness in advertising is due to saturated market and technological growth. While it promotes innovation and competitiveness, it also contributes to overconsumption and waste. Therefore, I believe this trend has both positive and negative aspects and should be managed carefully.