This section presents a professionally wirtten variation of your essay and highlights the differences.
Nowadays many people do not consider zoos useful, that is why they should be closed. Personally, I agree that today zoos do not have any purpose, especially when there are better alternatives which cause fewer problems.
Nowadays, many people do not consider zoos useful, which is why they should be closed. Personally, I agree that zoos no longer serve a meaningful purpose, especially when better alternatives exist that cause fewer problems.
Many are concerned about the problems which zoos cause to the environment, wild animals and the natural world itself. According to the Oxford University research, in the areas where the zoos are held, there are worse situations with environmental issues. Furthermore, animals who are kept in zoos are often held there for no reason, as they are not injured and can survive on their own in the wild. There are often overcrowded spaces in such facilities, so animals do not have the opportunity to live in their natural ways, and more importantly are not given the proper care, which they need in conditions of living in an unnatural environment.
Many are concerned about the negative impact zoos have on the environment, wildlife, and ecosystems. Research from Oxford University indicates that areas surrounding zoos often face more severe environmental issues. Furthermore, many animals kept in zoos are not injured or endangered and could survive independently in the wild. These facilities frequently suffer from overcrowding, depriving animals of the space and natural behaviors they require. Additionally, they often fail to provide the specialized care needed for animals living in artificial environments.
As I have mentioned earlier there are better alternatives to zoos if those are closed. For example, there is an option of people taking care of the natural world, on specifically dedicated to this purpose areas, where people can go to learn about wild nature in its full glory. This way no animals are to be taken away from their usual habitat. This is called ecotourism and the popularity of this activity has grown very fast, after the New-York Times did an article about this nice alternative of the zoo. In the article, it has been clearly stated that ecotourism will eventually become a new ''zoo'' which is more natural-friendly and can actually tell people about being thoughtful of nature.
As previously mentioned, superior alternatives to zoos exist. One such option is ecotourism, where people can observe and learn about wildlife in their natural habitats without removing animals from their ecosystems. Dedicated conservation areas allow visitors to experience nature in its true form while promoting environmental awareness. The popularity of ecotourism has surged, particularly after The New York Times published an article highlighting its benefits over traditional zoos. The article emphasized that ecotourism could become the new, more sustainable way to educate people about nature while fostering respect for wildlife.
In conclusion, I would like to say that zoos are not necessary anymore, as there are better alternatives, like ecotourism, which causes less problems and can benefit all - people's need for entertainment and the natural world.
In conclusion, zoos are no longer necessary, as alternatives like ecotourism present fewer drawbacks and greater benefits—fulfilling both human curiosity and the need to protect the natural world.