IELTS Writing Samples

Response: Studing beyond the main subject at university has gaind popularity among many students who aim at further developing knowledge in other areas. Although some believe that this trend can be negative, I stand with those who feel that it can have positive impact on students quality of life. In the one hand, opponents of multitasking believe that it can nagatively impact on people's qualification. First, the main reason why it is advers is that their knowledg is simplistic. They can not handle works especially the ones that need experties. However,It might be true they understand basic things about that area but it might not be enough. Secondly, it is said that job markets usually tend to be competetive. People who have a profound skills and comprehension of that subject, are more preferred than those who have a shallow information. On the other hand, I believe that students who make an effort to learn several tasks can have a bright future. They might find new solutions to address various problems just by having knowledge in different topics. I strongly think that this ability allows them to be more creative in critical thinking and find innovative ways to solve problems. Moreover, having wealth of knowledge helps them be better managers at work. They have a fair data about different professions, so they clearly understant the importance of other careers. Therefore I think the more they know about other subjects, the more they tend to support other efforts. In cunclusion, not only can learning about diverse subjects be beneficial due to enhancing creative thinking, but it can also lead students to become considerate administer. Therefore i think that the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages in terms of brilliant future.

Response: There has been an argument between two groups of people. Some of them belive that being copetetive ether at work or school can bring numerous benefits for people, while others feel that collabiration are far important than being in an environment where everyone tries to stand out. On the one hand, it is said that competition can enormesly provide multitud of advantages for individuals in their daily lives. As they make an effort to foster their knowledge and skills in their area of expertise. It is believed that in these kind of enviroments many thrive to read more books, enroll in different curses or follow tutorials that are available on online sites to boost their information. in order to surpass from their counterparts. Furthermore, this trend helps them be more motivated. Usually people who are recognised as the best recieve complimention from others which can posirively contribut to their self-confidence. On the other hand, advocaters of cooporation beleive that working as a team is more vitial than being the best person. They feel that resourcful people who have a wealth of knowledge can share their data with others so as to help them become sucsessful. To them, being the best one is nowhere near as satisfaction as witnessing others growth. The more people achieve their goals, the more they become gratfull. Moreover, it will be created an atmosphere that every one feel safe as there is enough space to become better and better without being under pressure of judgment or feeling of inefficient. Personally, I think that both being competetive and cooperative are crutial but under certain circumstances. Although being a person who aimed to become the best in their experties can be beneficial as they tend to learn more, being too competetive can lead to anxiety and stress due to perfectionism. This trend might give them a feeling that they are nither enough nor competent. On the other side, despite of good effects that collaboration can provide for people which contributes to their well-being, they might finally find it exhausting and monotonous. So I feel that competition can provoke inscentives to work harder,but should be limited to evoid harmfull consequences. In cunclusion, Not only can competion creat an environment where stimulates individuals motivation, but it can also allow them to recieve valuable complement for their achievments. On balance, I would claim that both sides are true in different ways. Because having teamwork skills are as essential as being competetive in terms of having a healthier community.

Response: it is claimed that life expectency has increased nowadays and some people believe this can be problematic for governments regarding the expenses; however, the pros of elderly population for the sake of society exceed the disadvantages widely. On the one hand, the critics of this approach point out to the additional costs that aging populations bring about to governments. With the growing number of older people, the subsequent health problems are inevitable. Governments are allocating huge budgets to tackle medical issues of the elderly, as it is their responsibility. Furthermore, old people are not efficient enough for daily work duo to lack of their physical and mental potential and they are less likely to help with the economic progress. As a result, they are considered as a burden to governments. On the other hand, there are numerous advantages about living with an elderly regarding personal and social scales. Firstly, old people such as grandparents are essential for family foundations; so that they can strengthen their emotional bonds. For example, grandchildren tend to visit their grandparents on a weekly basis and this would result in a greater connection between all members of a family. In addition, taking care of an elderly may provide many job opportunities duo to the demand of better medical support that these people need. For instance, many people would pay considerable money to immigrants who are seeking for jobs to look after their elderly. To conclude, there are opposing ideas whether ageing population is challenging for governments or they are beneficial to society, this essay firmly agrees with the latter statement.

Response: It is anticipated that future transportation vehicles rely heavily on automated systems that would enable them to be entirely driverless. Although some might argue their affordability, others, myself included, admit that their benefits are far more than their drawbacks. It is undeniable that mass producing driverless cars is set to be more costly than regular vehicles. Establishing an error-free application that works smoothly alongside many cameras and other appliances is not going to be cost-effective , hence these cars are highly unlikely to be an economical choice for everyone. Take Tesla company as an example , it currently producing hybrid cars which are not as affordable as other fuel-reliant cars.Thus, if comapnies like Tesla manufacture driverless cars, they might be expensive for some individuals to afford them. On the other hand, driverless vehicles offer a plethora of advatageous aspects.The first and foremost is their convenience. By the use of vehicles without any driver , passangers can rest, socialize or even watch movies while commuting. In addition to that, individuals with disabilities can utilize these cars which will streamline their car travel experience.Furthermore, the applications being used in these specialized cars will be designed and coded to safeguard human safety first, therefore they would not drive above the speed limit which results in fewer accidents and injuries or death.For example, many truck drivers have hazardous accidents due to exhuastion, conversely by having driverless trucks they always are aware of potential dangers of the roads and consequently protect their passengers at any costs. In the final analysis, driverless vehicles are forecasted to be prevalent in a forseeable future. Some might doubt their ubiquity due to being expensive , however, I find myself among the supporters of them since they provide more convinence and safer travels.

Response: Nowadays, big companies and even small producers pay special attention to advertisements for their products. there are some discussions about the influences of advertisement on people. many people think advertising is not as efficient as past. while others believe that advertising can persuade people to buy things. I totally agree with the second opinion for some reasons that will be discussed in this essay. To begin with, one of the most important measures that every company has to take is introducing their products to people. So, the first reason for the importance of advertising is a necessary need to introduce people new stuff. If people do not know anything about what a company produces, then it will be predictable for the company to go bankrupt. Moreover, the second reason that plays a key role in marketing is competition among companies. as everyone knows, each producer has to make creative advertisements for itself. Nowadays, there is a link between how a company introduces itself to people and the profit it makes in the market. For instance, there is a huge competition among drinking companies throughout Canada to persuade individuals to choose them and they try to convince people that they are the best. As another example, car manufacturers made a huge profit from advertising in the last decade. In conclusion, advertising is one of the most essential factors that may help sellers to introduce their products even today, as well as in the past. The essential need to make people aware of new staff in the market and stay in the competitive atmosphere of the market are the two main reasons that support this assumption.

Response: There is a discussion about the future of books and magazines. Some people believe that there will not be any printed newspapers or published books in the future. However, in contrast to this view, it may not be as possible as people reckon about the future. I agree with this prospect in some specific aspects that will be discussed in this essay. To begin with, nowadays, technology intends to make everything online. There are some advantages and disadvantages points about this approach and people may agree or disagree with this. On the other hand, the question is: is this practical in the future? As time passed, individuals preferred to read and write digitally more than using paper, therefore, in the last decade, many newspaper offices and book publishers were bankrupted. Moreover, using letters in offices is declined by governments and people, who care about the environment. So, this is something common that is supposed to predict in the future any type of paper-based content will not exist. Apart from that, as everyone knows, trees are the main ingredient in the process of making paper. Due to the lack of resources for timbers in the long term future, so, it will not be possible to consume our resources as common as people did. By considering this important factor, it may be more logical to imagine the world with no paper in the future. In conclusion, I totally agree with this assumption. there are some reasons such as: improving technology, environmental reasons, and lack of resources may tell us: that the possibility of abandoning parers in the future is significant.

Response: There is a discussion about the future of books and magazines. Some people believe that there will not be any printed newspapers or published books in the future. However, in contrast to this view, it may not be as possible as people reckon about the future. I agree with this prospect in some specific aspects that will be discussed in this essay. To begin with, nowadays, technology intends to make everything online. There are some advantages and disadvantages points about this approach and people may agree or disagree with this. On the other hand, the question is: is this practical in the future? As time passed, individuals preferred to read and write digitally more than using paper, therefore, in the last decade, many newspaper offices and book publishers were bankrupted. Moreover, using letters in offices is declined by governments and people, who care about the environment. So, this is something common that is supposed to predict in the future any type of paper-based content will not exist. Apart from that, as everyone knows, trees are the main ingredient in the process of making paper. Due to the lack of resources for timbers in the long term future, so, it will not be possible to consume our resources as common as people did. By considering this important factor, it may be more logical to imagine the world with no paper in the future. In conclusion, I totally agree with this assumption. there are some reasons such as: improving technology, environmental reasons, and lack of resources may tell us: that the possibility of abandoning parers in the future is significant.

Response: In the near future there will be no drivers for vehicles, and passengers will travel with these driverless cars. Although with driverless cars, the work-force in this area can be allocated to othere high demand jobs, I believe that there are more drawbacks because driverless cars are increadibly dangerous. With driverless cars, more people can work in other jobs that require more employees. In this economy there is always a lack of human work-force in high demand jobs such as nursing. If drivers get replaced by automatic vehicles, these people can work for other jobs. For instance, in the UAE, there was a high demand in IT jobs, as a result, the government has decided to replace all taxis with automatic ones to allocate the drivers to other high requested jobs. However, I believe that vehicles without drivers are extremely dangerous and the government can manage the work-force by setting a good plan. Vehicles without drivers can be a threat to people’s lives. Although AI has been taking the places of some jobs, when it comes to driving, it requires more thinking. Vehicles without drivers can be very dangerous and cause car crashes since they are machines that run algorithms and may fail during driving. For example, in 2018, a woman reported that her Tesla car stopped working in the middle of a highway and blocked the road. I believe that there are high chances of car crashes with driverless cars, and they are a risk to human safety. In conclusion, although driverless vehicles have some benefits such as allocating human work-force to other high demand jobs, the disadvantages are more as it can be very risky for people’s lives.

Response: While it could be argued that we should try to change our bad situations such as economic and career problems, there is a viewpoint against this statement that says the best way is to tolerate such situations. In my opinion, though sometimes it is hard to move towards great opportunities, we should do our best to change such situations. On the one hand, some suppose that trying to change everything that might sound bad in your view will lead to unpleasant results. For example, an employee working with a low salary but in a stable situation is willing to resign from the current work to start his own business without considering unexpected circumstances and experiences. It is more likely that this person will lose the least money each month because it sounds illogical to become successful in running a private business. On the other hand, some argue that the world gives us this chance to live once. Consequently, it is logical to fight to get whatever we are willing. For example, it is significantly important when a patient is fighting against a severe illness such as cancer. Staying in such a situation and not following the cure protocol will result in death which is against human beings' nature. I also support the idea that humans are risky creatures. In other words, it is a part of the survival process as it could be seen that taking risks has been an inseparable part of evolution. In conclusion, there are two viewpoints on whether we should tolerate terrible conditions or should try to improve unwanted situations such as jobs, and insufficient salary.

Response: In some countries, people place considerable importance on owning a home rather than renting one. This essay will explore the reasons behind this trend. While homeownership does offer certain benefits, I would argue that the disadvantages of this tendency outweigh the advantages. There are several reasons why people might prioritize owning a home over renting. Firstly, homeownership allows individuals to make long-term plans and personalize their living space according to their preferences. For instance, homeowners can redesign or modify their property without restrictions, which is often not possible for tenants who may be required to vacate after a short rental period. In other words, renting is typically a temporary arrangement, limiting renters’ ability to feel truly settled. Additionally, in many developing countries, homeownership is seen as a form of financial security. With high inflation rates, owning property becomes a way to safeguard one’s income by qinvesting in an asset that appreciates over time, rather than spending a significant portion of monthly earnings on rent. Despite the advantages, I believe that this emphasis on homeownership can have adverse effects on the economy. One key issue is the inflation of property prices, often driven by speculation and lack of regulation in the housing market. When real estate transactions are primarily controlled by profit-driven developers, property values can escalate rapidly, placing undue financial strain on average citizens and making homeownership increasingly unattainable. Moreover, developers may prioritize profit over quality, constructing low-standard buildings without adhering to safety measures such as earthquake resilience. This not only threatens public safety but also erodes trust in the real estate market. In conclusion, although the trend towards homeownership is popular in many countries, it brings significant economic risks. In my view, in a stable economic system, renting may offer more financial flexibility and stability, making it a more practical choice than homeownership.