IELTS Writing Samples

Response: Nowadays, people do have access to means of transportation and can transfer easily from time to time. While some believe that professionals, such as doctors and engineers should be free to work in other countries, I, however, firmly believe that experts need to work in the country where they did their training. Some people believe that professionals should be free to work in other countries. It could be argued that experts who work in another country can bring their expertise to bear on global issues. For example, a doctor can concentrate on infectious diseases on a global scale. Some believe that when someone works in a different community, they can learn from other cultures. Consequently, this process of working abroad may broaden their knowledge and might be effective in some ways. On the other hand, I completely believe that professionals should work in an environment where they are trained. First, they acquired their skills according to their country’s standards. For example, the rules of construction vary from country to country, and it is good for engineers to work in their own country. Second, experts are more familiar with their own country’s environment. Similarly, they may be more comfortable with their colleagues. For example, not only are lawyers trained in their own country’s rules, but they also can interact easily with their countrymen. The third and most important factor is that they should repay the country that invested in their education. In other words, they have had free education and now it is time for them to repay the government for the cost of their education by working in the country where they studied. All of this being said, although working in another country may lead experts to focus on global issues, it is good for professionals to stay in their own country to pay off government investment in training. Therefore, on balance, I wholeheartedly believe that professionals should stay in their own country, and work in their own community.

Response: Nowadays, people do have access to transportation means and can transfer easily from time to time. While some believe that professionals, such as doctors and engineers should be free to work in other countries, I, however, firmly believe that experts need to work in the country they did their training. Some people believe that professionals should be free to work in other countries. It could be argued that experts who work in another country can bring expertise to bear on global issues. For example, a doctor can concentrate on infectious diseases in the scale of the world. Some believe that when someone works in a different community, they can learn from other cultures. Consequently, this process of working abroad may broaden their knowledge and might be effective in some ways. On the other hand, I completely believe that professionals should work in the environment that they had trained. First, they acquired their skills according to their country’s standards. For example, the rules of construction vary from country to country, and it is good for engineers to work in their own country. Second, experts are more familiar with their own country’s environment. Similarly, they may be more convenient with their colleague. For example, not only are lawyers trained with their own country’s rules, but they also can interact easily with their countrymen. The third and most important factor is that they should repay the country that invested in their education. In other words, they have had free education and now it is time for them to repay the government for the cost of their education by working in the country where they studied. All of this being said, although working in another country may lead experts to focus on global issues, it is good for professionals to stay in their own country to pay off government investment in training. Therefore, on balance, I wholeheartedly believe that professionals should stay in their own country, and work in their own community.

Response: There a view that an effective method to gather people from various cultures and age groups together is by using music. I firmly agree with this statement and in this essay I will discuss the reasons for it. To begin with, it is important to acknowledge that music can be utilized in different ways to promote unity among people from different traditions. For example, in musical festivals, not only many fans of various artists from different countries have an opportunity to attend in their favorite musicians’ concerts but also they can enjoy a shared musical experience with others. To illustrate, Selena Gomez is a famous singer who annually arrange massive tour shows in many countries, and thousands of people from different nations and cultures usually participate to her concerts, thus to share a common interest and bond with other people who also support the same artist. As for different age groups, the vast majority of young generation are increasingly becoming interested in old songs. This is because while the internet and social media play a crucial role on teenagers’ music tastes, a lot of old music have gained so much popularity on TikTok and Instagram these days. For instance, rock music from 1960s are trending today’s, leading teenagers connect with that era, and learn more about the previous generations. This could result in a stronger bond between the youth and their elders, as they can now enjoy the same songs and have more subjects of conversation. In conclusion, I completely agree that music is a great approach which can build a strong connection between younger generations and the older ones, and also gather many people from all around the world together, therefore breaking down the barriers between different cultures.

Response: Nowadays, due to consumption of excessive amounts of sugar which are found in packaged food and drink products, a significant proportion of people suffer from health disorders. It is said that if sugary products cost increases, it motivates individuals to cut down on sugar consumption. While this notion can be sometimes beneficial, I completely disagree with that. To begin with, experts argue that the only group who benefits from increasing the price is brands and manufacturers because they usually produce a low-quality product which not contain high levels of nutrients. The only thing that they focus on is enhancing the packaging and taste to finally increase their sells and profits. Unfortunately customers who are addicted to sugary food strive to spend a significant part of their salary to purchase them at all cost without considering how much money they are wasting. Second, raising the price can have detrimental effects on economy. Since many of these products are made overseas, governments have to spend a large number of their annual budgets to import these kinds of goods or the primary ingredients which are used to manufacture these products. It not only cause a great deal of budget are wasted on unnecessary items, but also it will cause many health disorders such as obesity and diabetes. In conclusion, increasing the price cannot be a deterrent against the consumption of sugary food due to encouraging companies and brands to produce a rubbish which only attract addicted consumers. Moreover, with increasing the price, governments will lose a huge amount of money to import unnecessary materials which are hazardous for the well-being of society.

Response: Some individuals argue that advertising is highly effective at convincing us to make purchase. In contrast, others believe that advertising has become so pervasive that we have grown indifferent to it. Although advertising has become prevalent, l believe that it still can grabs our attentions and is very successful at enticing us to buy products. On the one hand, the proponents of advertising believe that it is greatly efficient at encouraging us to buy things. The most compelling reason justifying this assertion is that advertising can influence on people’s emotion by using some useful strategies, making it a significant tool for brands. For example, if companies want to reach more customers, they can use celebrity endorsement, an important contributor at giving products an exaggerated account, leading to turning us into impulsive buyers. In other words, advertising can use as a method of promotion which is very beneficial for us, helping us to distinguish inferior products from quality ones, resulting in spurring us to buy the goods. On the other hands, others assert that advertising is so prevalent so it is no longer important for us. This is because nowadays advertisement is seen everywhere such as billboards, televisions, and social media. That is to say, due to the susceptible to a wide range of advertising, we will try to stay alert to the influence of advertising. For instance, if we want to watch a movie, we will encounter an array of advertisement during movie which is often annoying and distracting, leading to choosing sites, not including them. Therefore, we will be less receptive to attention-grabbing advertising messages. In conclusion, while advertising exists everywhere and it is so widespread, l firmly believe that advertising not only can tempts us to buy the product but it also grabs our attention due to using persuasive methods, such as celebrity endorsement, and targeting customer’s emotions.

Response: There are opposing ideas whether students should focus on their main major of study or they can follow other subjects besides their principal one. I stand with the latter statement. On the one hand, those who believe in concentrating on a main qualification define it as the solution to reach maximum function. As individuals pay all their attention to a subject, they are more likely to become experts in that specific area. For example, there is a psychological theory which indicates that if people spend 10,000 hours channeling all their attention to a specific subject, they will become masters. In addition, considering the fact that students may struggle with many distractions, following a unique pattern lowers the chance of dealing with disruptions. On the other hand, many students, including myself, believe that a broader understanding of various subjects is beneficial for young generation. Nowadays, living in a global village has uplifted the demand to acquire sufficient knowledge in order to make progress on a social scale. If students learn various aspects of science along with their major field of study, they will be able to address the challenges of living in a multi-dimensional world and promote an erudite society. For example, if biology students learn about economics, they can overcome possible financial difficulties in their future lives. In conclusion, while concentrating on a single subject may offer some benefits academically, it is of paramount importance to consider all aspects of an individual's interests besides their main subjects.

Response: Purchasing foreign food products is currently possible for supermarkets costumers in numerous countries. Local consumers and economy benefit greatly from broader range of choices and more opportunities, respectively. However, in my opinion, the damage to production sector of the economy and capital outflow are irreparable. A product manufactured in the United States may appear on supermarket shelves in China, Japan or various European countries. This development has provided customers with a diverse array of options, enabling them to select products that more precisely align with their preferences. For example, the diabetic community in the United States would opt for food products with lower, or no sugar content. American manufacturers might introduce them a beverage with higher level of sugar, while their European counterparts, using different formulas, might offer drinks with lower or no artificial sweeteners to cater their needs. Furthermore, selling products abroad typically creates a mutually beneficial situation for companies and destination countries. To remain competitive in the market, companies must lower the final prices of their products. Strategies such as circumventing transportation costs by constructing food production facilities in the host country and employing local workforces are often adopted to effectively serve this purpose. This not only creates more job opportunities, but also attracts more foreign capital. Importing, on the other hand, can adversely affect the manufacturing sector. A market inundated with foreign goods might constrain the prospects for domestic production. A constant producing-sales cycle ensures sustainable economic growth in the production sector. This fragile cycle could simply be interrupted by the import of foreign-manufactured goods offered to consumers at reduced prices, exerting pressure on domestic producers, which ultimately leads to the contraction of the production sector. Cutting-edge technologies implemented in developed countries yet exacerbate the issue for underdeveloped or developing nations, where the production costs exceed those of imported items. This trend increases capital outflow as merchants are urged to import more foreign food products. Valuable foreign currencies, such as US dollars or Euros, which should be allocated to a country’s infrastructure development or be invested in vital industries, education, or public health, are extravagantly spent on importing food items that could be produced domestically. Therefore, if imports are unchecked, they harm local manufacturing and divert crucial financial resources from essential sectors, stifling economic growth and development. In conclusion, while importing foreign food products offers consumer variety and economic opportunities, it significantly harms local manufacturing and diverts crucial financial resources, stifling economic growth and development. Balancing imports with domestic industry protection is essential for sustainable growth.

Response: There is an argue among people about either accepting challengable situations like satisfying job and low income, or try to improve and change that situations.In this essay, i am going to discuss both views and provide reasons for each while i believe that is essential to keep balance between them and explaining why is it so. On the one hand,accepting harder situations in different aspect of life by human would lead to decrease unsatisfaction feelings and reduce anxiety. Happines caurage individuals not to compare themselves with other and show more interest to their job or social level that meant to choose their own pathway of life.A person can be more self confident when following their ideas which significantly affect well being among individuals and maintain healthier community. For instance, people with lower level of income which already get used to the average lifestyle and decrease their expectations from life already stopped racing with others in different levels and happy about their current situation also can handel harder occasions without panicking. On the other hand, trying to change undesirable situations in life could improve human being in different aspects of life such as career and education as well as social connections. Fighting back with problems and not simply accepting destiny could move people forward through success and not giving up on their dreams.For example, the best way to experience better quality of life is to have better income from the job that a person is talented in and can perform creativity which make that person unique. And obvious example is the owner of apple company who was throw out of school due to low marks but never stop trying and finally became one of the most famous person in world. In my opinion, while accepting the bad situation by human can directly affect satisficationary feeling and reduce depression ,Although, trying to change harder situations to smooter ones is the way to not lose any opportunities and increase the capacity of individuals by giving them reasons for trying. So a person should be able to recognize when is the right time to try and when to stop struggling and accept the reality.

Response: In many cultures, owning a home is considered an essential part of life and a key indicator of success and stability. This preference for homeownership over renting can be attributed to several reasons. Firstly, owning a home provides a sense of security and financial stability. Homeownership often eliminates the uncertainties of rising rental costs and eviction, giving individuals a sense of long-term control over their living environment. Additionally, owning property is seen as an investment that increases in value over time, allowing homeowners to build wealth. Cultural values also play a significant role. In many societies, homeownership is linked to social status and personal achievement, symbolizing financial independence and responsibility. For families, owning a home offers stability, particularly for raising children. However, this preference can have both positive and negative consequences. On the positive side, it encourages financial discipline, as people often save diligently to afford a home. It also fosters stronger community ties, as homeowners tend to settle in one area for extended periods. On the negative side, the emphasis on homeownership can pressure individuals to take on significant debt through mortgages, leading to financial stress. Furthermore, in regions where housing prices are high, this focus may widen economic inequalities, as those who cannot afford homes may feel left behind. In conclusion, while the desire for homeownership can provide financial and emotional benefits, it may also create economic challenges for some individuals. Striking a balance between owning and renting is crucial to ensure accessibility and stability for all.

Response: It is often argued that tolerating difficulties like job dissatisfaction or financial hardship would be a better choice rather than trying to deal with them. Whereas I contend that neglecting problems can bring about more complex circumstances so that we should solve problems. On the one hand, there are some reasons why numerous people believe that we should cope with difficulties. In fact, a number of challenges in life are not solvable due to several reasons. To clarify, the most important reason is that they are beyond our control which means we cannot do anything effective to change that situation. According to the recent research at Yale university, trying to change these situations potentially can lead to learned helplessness which defined as a state that someone accepts his unlucky after frequent attempts to improve awful situation. On the other hand, although some situations are not changeable, most of the time we can improve circumstances in a way that we feel better to avoid more drawbacks and this is an obligation. Firstly, problems in our lives are in a repetitive circle. In other words, some problems result in other harmful problems and it continues as long as we ignore them. For instance, tolerating an exhausting workplace or ill-mannered manager might lead to job dissatisfaction. With neglecting this situation we face with more serious consequences such as depression, anxiety, emotional difficulties and even suicide thinking. Moreover, solving problems make people feel more confident. Psychologically, self-confidence is the most impactful element that is required to progress in life. To conclude, some people believe that tolerating hardship or ignorance is a good choice in life due to the nature of many problems that is unchangeable. While other and I consider difficulties as a temporary situation which can be solved by hardworking. It is effective to prevent more problems and improving self confidence.