IELTS Writing Samples

Response: It is widely accepted that a high quantity of food and drink have a high levels of sugar, that causes a lot of illnesses and health issues. A group of people claim that sugary products should be sale by higher price, and as a result people will eat less sugar and sweet products. I disagree with this opinion, and I will explain my reasons. On the one hand, I think companies ought to produce sweetie snacks and drink by less amount of sugar. Besides, Companies can add natural sugar to products like stevia sugar, which is sweet as much as normal sugar, and it is not unhealthy. Not only sugar is not harmful for our body, but also it is an essential nutrient for our brain and helps us think better. People, especially children and athletes have to eat sweetie drink and food, and it is not fair to increase the price of those products. In addition, from my perspective, expensive sweet product is not a good way to convince people to eat less sugar. In my opinion, this action will turn people more greedy, and they will have more desire to eat more sugar. in addition, they will store sugar and sweet products. As a result, there will be a chaos in the market. Due to the sedentary lifestyle, it is crucial for individuals to be more active and eat healthy food. I believe that concept should be taught to the members of society. In conclusion, increasing the price of that kind of products will not be a permanent solution. I believe it will not create any drastic changes. Although, this action will reduce the usage of sugar in a short while, after a time people will eat more sugar and sweet drink compare to the past. Individuals should be aware of the disadvantages of sugar, and try to eat more healthy and have a better lifestyle.

Response: Some individuals believe that in recent years, a significant decrease in the number of rare animal and plant species has become the major issue for the environment, while others argue that numerous environmental challenges exist and require adequate attention. I personally think that the latter opinion is more cogent. On the one hand, some people claim that the most crucial environmental challenge is the loss of particular species, both flora and fauna. They believe that this problem can have a devastating impact on the food chain because some of these special plants and animals are the main food for other important species. Therefore, the extinction of them can disrupt the balance of ecosystem and reduce biodiversity, which seems such an irreversible damage, making it an urgent issue. On the other hand, I personally agree with those who argue that other vital issues, including pollution and deforestation, can play a major role not only in human life, but also in the environment. Air, soil, and water pollution, which are pervasive problems, are immediate threats to health of human and the environment. For instance, long exposure to air pollution can cause various diseases, ranging from asthma to lung cancer. Additionally, plastic waste in the ocean can put the marine life at risk because they are mostly non-biodegradable and can remain in the nature for years. Another noticeable issue is deforestation that often results from overdevelopment of land. This problem can have a detrimental influence on soil condition and leads to soil erosion. Consequently, soil erosion may increase the likelihood of climate change and severe floods and droughts. In conclusion, there are different views about environmental problems. Some individuals believe that the significant reduction in the number of rare species of animals and plants is the most crucial issue, while I think that there are a vast number of environmental challenges that contribute to devastating effects.

Response: While some people advocate for owning housings insteade of renting them due to their welfare's situation and psychological traits, others claim that spending so much money on accommodation only prevents you from enhancing your wealth. On one hand, possessing a residence has its own psychological benefits for individuals. It is also true that in every culture and country peoplemalways prioritize purchasing their homes above anything else. I believe that people do that in order to feel secure and safe in a chaos world. Besides, living in somewhere safe and tranquil can avoid you negative emotions like anxiety and depression caused by being undecisive and insecure. Although there are many countries that people are daily experiencing a steady rise of expenses, so they have no choice to purchase every item they can today instead of not buying them tomorrow. This phenomenon is often seen in developing countries in Asia and Africa. For example, In my country (e.g., Iran), our salaries do not rise with other prices, and housings cost twice more than they worthed last year; so in this situation, whoever that bought an accommodation last year is not able to buy one now. On the other hand, critics of this method believe that putting a noticeable part of your budget in accommodation can cease you from progressing for many years, as you could do a business with your money and make significant profits. Athough the value of the house will increase with other prices; however, you will not be able to use a part of that money on other expenditures. In conclusion, owinig your home, despite bringing the feelings of relief and satisfaction can also protect you from volital and unstable prices. However, in a stable society with reasonable prices, spending a substantial part of your budget on housing would not be the wisest decision to make.

Response: Music is often seen as a powerful tool to connect people with each other. In my opinion, it is one of the best tranquilizers that human beings have ever created. Although, there is some truth in the argument that music can bring people together, but it is not always effective for all cultures and age groups. On the one hand, it is widely accepted that music has numerous benefits for individuals. For instance, it is a common idea that music is a universal language that can communicate emotions across cultural barriers. Also, international events such as concerts and universal festivals that have international music, attract global audiences. Moreover, genres like rock and pop have been enjoyed by different generation over time. On the other hand, Music has its downside. Cultural preferences and generation differences are two of them. To explain, traditional music from one culture may be is unfamiliar or less appreciated by others. Furthermore, younger and old people may have very different tastes in music, which can create division more than unity. For example, although, some music genres like rock and rap are more enjoyable between youth, middle aged have less tendency to hear those. In conclusion, I agree with the idea that music can bring people together, but it also has limitations when it comes to cultural and generation differences. Music plays a vital role in connecting people, but it should be seen as one factor among many in fostering unity.

Response: It is argued that whether some professionals such as doctors or engineers should work and stay in the country which they were educated, or they should be free to choose the country they want to work and live in. This essay will discuss both views prior to declaring the writer's opinion. It is worth considering that if professionals like physicians and engineers work in their own country, they can have a huge amount of benefits for it. In fact, with working in their country, they compensate for the money which their government has paid to educate them. In addition, because they are in the highest levels of their countries education, they can develop sciences by teaching younger students in colleges and universities.For example, my friend who holds a Ph.D in civil engineering, teaches at Tehran university to educate the next generations of elite students in Iran. Thus, if doctors and engineers stay in their own countries, they can help in many ways. On the other hand, it is acceptable for doctors and engineers if they want to immigrate to another country to pursue their career in a new environment. One of the main reasons is that they can work in the country which they are guest and gain experience, and then share their achievements with their home country. Moreover, some professional stems of medical or engineering sciences need special equipment which may not be available in the host country. So, doctors and engineers can work with those equipment in the place when they immigrated to and gain expertise and then help their own country to build those equipment. For instance, many engineers from Iran, Immigrate to its neighbor countries in order to learn about their new discoveries in different sciences and to share these developments with the engineers of Iran. Therefore, the immigration of physicians and engineers has some indirect benefits for the host country. In conclusion, although in the first place, the immigration of professionals may seem to have some drawbacks, but in my opinion, its benefits like gaining expertise in their profession or how to work with different equipment in their career, may outweigh its drawbacks by far.

Response: It is crucial for individuals to make significant changes in their career and personal lives. It has its own advantages and disadvantages. In this essay, I will argue both sides, and I will explain my personal opinion. Overall, I agree with that people have to take risks in their lives, since risky decisions make them to be a better version of themselves. A group of members of the society claim that individuals ought to take risks in their life and try to come out of their comfort zone. They believe that nothing good will happen if people do not experience new situations. For instance, when a man decides to change his job, in the first step, he has to quit from his current office and take that risk that will be possible to do not find a decent job immediately, and he is going to live without money for a while. This decision has another side. He tries as hard as he can to broaden his knowledge and improve his skill. This makes a progress in his personality and career path of this man. On the other hand, sometimes taking risk has drawbacks. If you decide to do anything just base on your feeling, or people words, it would destroy your personal or professional life. For example, If someone suggests you to lose your wight in a short time with new drug, and you decide to do it without any research or asking expert's opinion, you do not get the best outcome. You may lose weight at the first, however you probably hurt to your body and you may put yourself at risky situation. In conclusion, I claim that it is significantly important to take new challenges and risks. Not only does it helps us to get have a better life, but it also makes us to learn new topics and manage difficult situations. In addition, it is important to make decision rationally. In this way, the advantages of taking risk outweigh the disadvantages definitely.

Response: While some people admonish their children to endeavour constantly inorder to achieve their high goals, others argue that this method could lead children to anxiety and other psychological diorders just to reach this ideal perfection. On one hand, encouraging the youths by the elderlies is a prevalant phenomenon among every culture, whereas they believe, ensuring their chidren about their potentials,talents, and sources can enhance their self-esteem and self-perception. Meanwhile, there are many well-known role models who prove the fact that whenever individuals begin to believe in themselves they cross the boundries and soar to high levels. For instance, a very famous scientist named Thomas Edison, who was a unfortunate failure from his teachers perspectives, experienced a very successful life and achievements just by paying heed to her mother's applaud and guidance . On the other hand, when you work hard despite thriving, during the path, you will experience so many difficulties that make this statement less efficient. when you make children take too much responsibilities, while you are expanding their abilities it is possible that you are undermining their tolerance in the meantime. In other words, pushing them relentlessly will cause psychological disorders like anxiety and depression; anxiety emerges when they are behind their scheduls and depression occurs when they do not meet their predicted goals. Moreover, the aim of that saying is to make possible whatever you want whenever you desire it only by trying; however, there are situations in our lives that are not under our control. For example, you may wish for something that is impossible in terms of logic and physics like flying or running faster than a cheetah, so no matter how hard you try and practice you will never live that moment. In conclusion, a successful and prosperous child is someone who has wise and supportive advisers in times of need and crisis. However, those advisers should behave in a way that assist children to become the best version of themselves not especially someone perfect and flawless.

Response: There is an ongoing debate about whether, accepting an unpleasant situation or making efforts to improve it. Some individuals claim that it is more reasonable to be adapted to the unsatisfied situations, while some other people believe that it is crucial to enhance that negative occasion rather than just accept it. I personally think that the latter opinion is more cogent. On one hand, some people prefer to stay in their current situation, even though that situation is disappointing and undesirable, which can be engaging with a dissatisfactory occupation or being in a tight budget, because they typically find it challenging to struggle with problems and deal with them. This means that they may think that there is no alternative solution for their current issue. Moreover, changing can be frightening and hard for some individuals. Therefore, they choose to accept the situation to get away from possible future dangers. On the other hand, I agree with those advocate the idea that people must try to find a way to resolve negative circumstances and enhance their situation due to the fact that not only can staying in a negative and disappointing situation have detrimental impacts on the mind, but also it can put mental health at risk. For instance, if people choose to stay in a job that makes them feel unsatisfied, they can lose their passion and motivation which can lead them to excessive frustrations and exhaustions. Additionally, the more they try to improve damaging circumstances, they higher quality of life they may have. take lack of money, for example, if they accept shortage of money and avoid making efforts to enhance it, they probably confront with various economic hurdles, which can significantly affect their lives in a negative way. In conclusion, while other's opinion is that people should feel satisfied with their financial or work position, I believe that they need to put all their efforts into improving the situations that are inappropriate for them.

Response: The idea that in some countries, customers can buy all kinds all food produced around the world is popular. From my point of view, access to all types of food in many countries has some favorable aspects, which will be addressed in this essay. First and foremost, a variety of food in supermarkets in some countries provides a situation in which immigrants who would like to have their traditional food, easily buy their favorite food and it may cause recalling their memories. For instance, my family, who has migrated abroad, are extremely keen on trying Iranian food again. If this change spreads all over the world, it will resolve immigrants’ desires. Furthermore, some part of the world has many limitations in the variety of food so all their original food is restricted to only several types. Thus, the distribution of other food especially the ones that are categorized as nutrient-rich can be helpful for their citizens in order to have more options to choose from. For example, some people like to taste Italian food for several reasons like its taste, being nutrients, etc., in this situation is not necessary to travel to Italy, and they are able to buy it from a supermarket in their neighborhood. By way of conclusion, the issue that nowadays usually all kinds of food are available in supermarkets in some countries is a positive or negative development is controversial. As far as I am concerned, providing a condition in which some people in the world have access to a variety of food has positive points, which have been discussed throughout the essay.

Response: in the future no one is not willing to buy newspapers or books because they can read everything through online platforms. I strongly agree with this idea for several reasons that will be discuss in the following paragraphs. First and foremost, one of the most significant factors that contribute this idea is that these days technology have incredibly growth and this growth will have continue. Nowadays people following news and all new information throughout social media like Instagram or other applications so they do not need to buy newspaper like past just for reading new news. Furthermore there are some internet books which are free and they can download them easily without any paying and every day this facilities more and more have increase. Nevertheless, from an alternative perspective, all of us know that for produce each sheet of paper a large number of trees are cute down and this phenomenon destroyed the forest. Some people who are environment lover particularly forest say that in the future the governments should expend online access to all materials and information, because this approach can reduce buying newspaper and book. In contrast, can decreased human damages for forests. In conclusion, Taking everything into consideration, I completely agree with this idea. These days technology provide plenty of facilities for reading any information and it will be growth in the future so individuals who read printed newspaper and book will be less in the future.