IELTS Writing Samples

Response: These days in many countries all around the world, people have access to foods and other products that are manufactured in other countries. I firmly believe this is a negative development that can affect both our environment and local economies. In this essay, I will express my opinion and support it by providing explanation and relevant examples. First of all, these products have to travel long distances to reach their destinations either by cargo ships or airplanes. For example, a company like Nestle produces most of its products in European countries like Germany and Austria, before distributing them all around the world. These long journeys result in devastating environmental consequences by contributing to carbon emission and global warming. As a result, those products that have been manufactured abroad has a higher carbon footprint compared to locally produced foods. In addition, importing food from other countries can hurt local economy by creating an unjust competition between international corporations and locally owned businesses. Those big companies, such as Coca-Cola, may use strategies such as price dumping to take control of the market and put domestic businesses out of competition. However, small domestic companies don’t have the necessary resources to compete in this scenario, and will end up filing for bankruptcy. In conclusion, buying products manufactured abroad not only affects local economies by putting small domestic businesses out of competition, but also have a significant effect on our planet and global warming by contributing to carbon emission. In my opinion, it is better if people support domestic businesses by purchasing locally produced foods and other products.

Response: Some people think that processed food and drink products include a considerable amount of sugar, which has detrimental impacts on our health condition, and in order to tackle this problem these products should be sold in higher prices. While I agree that making them costly can be benefitial to a certain extend, I believe raising awareness and accessing organic food are be better solutions. On the one hand, governments can impose heavy taxes on manufacturers, which produce food and beverages containing significant sugar proportion. Therefore, companies reflect this high taxes on their products and will sell them more expensively, so people only would by these foods only on special occasions and events. People gradually consume these products less because they do not wish to waste a lot of mony on sugary products and this contributes to improving public health. On the other hand, educaing people would have more sustainable benefits on our health. Theaching children initially from school will lead them to a better understanding of the food they use, and raising the awaraness of their parents through campaigns would be beneficial for the whole family. The reason is that children will learn from their parents and preserve this healthy lifestyle when they become adults. Furthermore, increasing the accessibility to healthy organic food can be an advantagous way for enhancing public diet and lifestyle. The more people consume highly nutrisious food, the more healthy they become. By assisting farmers and their products, selling them at a lower price, and making them easier to access for general people, the false habit of eating sugary foods will disappear eventually, and people adopt a healthy lifestyle. In this way, the roots of the problem will be indicated. In conclusion, making sugary foods and drinks expensive will be effective only to some extend. However, there are more practical ways for improving public health, such as education and organic food.

Response: It is argued by many that music can bring various people from different backgrounds together, whether they are old or young. There are numerous factors that contribute to this matter. In this essay, I will examine some of these reasons and explain why I agree with this claim. To begin with, I believe one of the major reasons that music can bring people together is that it is a universal language between not only the elderly and the youth but also individuals from different cultures and backgrounds. For example, at a university welcome party, although students from different backgrounds might not understand each other's languages, they can have fun, dance with each other, and enjoy the party because of music, without speaking. Furthermore, I believe that a deep emotional connection to music is part of human nature. To illustrate, if sad Arabic music is played for an English person, they might burst into tears, even without understanding its meaning. Another significant reason for this is that music plays a noticeable role in making a party or gathering much more pleasant. Despite the huge gap between generations, for instance, whenever music is played at a wedding, grandparents and children start dancing and cheering up, regardless of their ages, since music provides a vibrant and lively atmosphere. Moreover, at the opening of the Olympics, people from all around the world and different nations sing along with the music and dance, even though they might not understand the meaning of its lyrics. In conclusion, while different people might have various interests or thoughts, music can bring them together and lead to bonding among people as it is a fun, shared experience. So, I agree that music can bring people closer.

Response: It is argued by many that music can bring various people from different backgrounds together, whether they are old or young. There are numerous factors that contribute to this matter. In this essay, I will examine some of these reasons and explain why I agree with this claim. To begin with, I believe one of the major reasons that music can bring people together is that it is a common language between not only the elderly and the youth but also individuals from different cultures and backgrounds. For example, at a university welcome party, although students from different backgrounds might not understand each other's languages, they can have fun, dance with each other, and enjoy the party because of music, without saying a word. Furthermore, I believe that a deep emotional connection to music is part of human nature. To illustrate, if a melancholic Arabic melody is played for an English person, they might burst into tears, even without understanding its meaning. Another significant reason for this is that music plays a noticeable role in making a party or gathering much more pleasant. Despite the huge gap between generations, for instance, whenever music is played at a wedding, grandparents and children start dancing and cheering up, regardless of their ages, since music provides a vibrant and lively atmosphere. Moreover, at the opening of the Olympics, people from all around the world and different nations sing along with the music and dance, regardless of understanding its meaning. In conclusion, while different people might have various interests or thoughts, music can bring them together and lead to bonding among people as it is a fun, shared experience. So, I agree that music can bring people closer.

Response: Some of the younger generations spend times routinely on their smartphones. I believe it is happening due to lots of reasons like fast pace of our changing world and the positive aspects of the new technologies and there are more positive factors rather than negative ones in this development. It is obvious the mobile phones are being more popular among children due to a variety of reasons. First of all, our world is changing unstoppably and new technologies like smartphones are crucial to make us adapted with this phenomena. For example, mobile phones can help us to communicate with our dear ones as well as outer world. In addition, this type of technology nowadays is vital source of finding what is happening around us children can consume news with their phones. Furthermore, this technology is gate to social media and other fun activity. As reason, pupils will use it more and more and there is general trend of using it in every aspects of their life. Hope fully, negative aspects of this phenomena are less than we thought to be and the positive aspects show they have outweighed the drawbacks. However, using mobile phones in high amounts of time in a routine life style can hurt children mental health, in some ways can help them to earn high amounts of independency because of their access to a vast source of what they need in their life also it’s a crucial tool to communicate with their families, friends and other dear ones so draw backs are much less than the benefits. Another negative point of this development is the damages that using of mobile phones in long period can cause to our physical health, however, it can be used as personal trainer as well as a good source of motivation. In conclusion, some pupils spend hours every day on their mobile phones it is happening because of their undeniable need to adjustment to the fast pace of our world and their crucial need to communicate and earning news plus entertain their selves. I believe its positive development however there are some draw backs, the positive ones out weigh them.

Response: It is argued by many that music can gather various people from different backgrounds together. Whether they are old or young. There are numerous factors that contribute to this matter. In this essay I will examine some of its reasons and explain why I agree with this claim. To begin with, I believe one of the major reasons that music can bring people together is that it is the common language between not only the elderly and the youth, but also individuals from different cultures and attitudes. For example, in the welcome party of universities although students who come from different backgrounds might not understand each others' languages, they can have fun, dance with each other and enjoy the party because of music without saying even one word. Furthermore, I assume obsession with music is a part of humans' nature. To illustrate, if a sad arbic music is played for an english person, he might bearst into tears without understanding its meaning. What I also consider another significant reason for this is that music plays an noticeable role in making a party or gathering much more pleasant. Despite the huge gap between generations, for instance, whenever music is played in a wedding party, grandparents and children start dancing and cheering up regardless of thier ages, since music provides a vibrant and lively atmosphere. Moreover, in opening of Olympics people from all around the world and nations sing along with music and dance regardless of understanding its meaning. In conclusion, while different people might have various interests or thoughts, music can bring them together and lead to bonding among people as it is a fun shared experience. So, I agree that music can close people together.

Response: Some people believe that professionals, such as doctors and engineers, should be required to work in the country where they received their training. Others, however, think they should have the freedom to work wherever they wish. Both views have their merits, and this essay will discuss them before presenting my own opinion. On the one hand, requiring professionals to work in their home country can prevent critical shortages of skilled workers. For example, in many developing countries, there is already a lack of doctors and engineers, and allowing these experts to migrate abroad could worsen the situation. Furthermore, governments often invest heavily in training these individuals, providing them with subsidies or free education. Therefore, it is reasonable to expect them to contribute to the development of their home country. Some may even consider it unfair or unethical for professionals to use the resources of one country and then work elsewhere, as this can be seen as a betrayal of national trust. On the other hand, individuals have the right to choose where they work. In today’s globalized world, opportunities are not limited by borders, and professionals often move to other countries to seek better salaries, working conditions, or career advancement. Forcing them to stay could demotivate them or even lead to a loss of talent. Instead of imposing restrictions, governments should focus on creating attractive environments for skilled workers. For instance, countries like Canada and the UK provide substantial funding and support to professionals, ensuring they can work without financial or administrative worries. In my opinion, while it is important to address the issue of "brain drain," restricting professionals from emigrating is neither ethical nor practical. Governments should focus on retaining talent by improving infrastructure, offering competitive salaries, and ensuring job satisfaction. Ultimately, professionals will be more likely to stay in their home country if they feel supported and valued. In conclusion, although requiring professionals to remain in their home country may solve immediate challenges, respecting their freedom to choose is essential. By addressing the root causes of migration, countries can encourage skilled individuals to stay and contribute to national progress.

Response: Discussing about professionals, who educating in their country has two different sides. Some people believe that, experts have to be required to help indiviuals in their country, whilest, others think that restricting experts is falls approach. On one hand, due to the lack of professionals immigration of them, can make problems for countries. So, some people believe that, they should stay and work for their countries to prevent these issues. Moreover, providing educating facilities for them has significant cost for countries. Governments make investment in their experts to work for their country and help to develop that. So if they learn essential skill in their own country and working with that in another country may be considered as betrayal by individuals. On the other hand, everyone is free to choose their way. Therefore, no one do not have to decide for other to what they have to do. With the word being globalize, people are faced by numerous opportunities. So, assuming that restricting experts from immigration is true approach, may lead to take inappropriate measures. Insted of that, authorities should provide sutiable infrastructure for professionals to help them work without no worry about side issues. For example , in modern countries such as Canada or UK, many funding are allocated to professionals, which means that, they dont have any worry about money problems. In my opinion, judging expert for immirating from one country, when they do not have any support from authorities is an unfair judgement; despite that, government should try to convince them to stay and work in their own country by providing facilities for them. In conclusion, thought immigrating experts may produce long term issues for country, we have to respect for everyone's freedom. professional can work in another country and we can just try to providing appropriate situation for them to stay.

Response: In many developed countries, life expectancy is rapidly growing. It is important to consider the negative and positive effects of increasing elderly population on both society and policy makers. This essay will explain why I believe the drawbacks of having elder citizens are outweighed by its benefits. On the one hand, senior citizens are usually equipped with a lot of wisdoms and experiences that can pass them than to the younger generation. This is because their life experiences can help young people to become more self-sufficient and provide more skillful and competent workforce for their countries. For instance, work related to education such as, being a mentor and university professor are perfects for the elderly, and they can take a big step to nurturing and educating youngsters by sharing their life journey. As a result, increasing well-educated workforce in society can lead to countries’ economic growth and development. On the other hand, one of the pressing problems of this trend is the high rate of unemployment. The reason for this is that as more and more people are in work, therefore there would be fewer and fewer jobs to go around. Consequently, young people find it difficult to find to break into their desired professions. Another issue is about the high cost of living. This is because as a greater number of people live out more of their lives in retirement, they may run out of money in their pensions and thus have to depend on their families and government for financial support. In conclusion, I think that the disadvantages of joblessness and financial troubles that a longer life span may present government and society are greater than the advantages of educating younger individuals.

Response: It is widely acclaimed that the more challenging a hobby is, the greater satisfaction one will derive from it. However, I personally do not agree with this view. When it comes to leisure activities, individual characteristics play a pivotal role in determining the type of activity one chooses. Many people indulge in risky and novel hobbies, where the complexity of the task is secondary to the adrenaline rush they experience throughout the activity. The increasing number of young people opting for extreme sports serves as a prime example. Not only do participants engage in such activities to confront their fears, but they also seek the exhilarating surge of energy that courses through their veins, providing them with an unforeseen sense of excitement. Moreover, the social circle with whom one engages in a hobby is of paramount importance. For instance, there are several types of board games that are remarkably popular in my country, which do not require extreme physical or mental abilities and can be enjoyed by children as young as nine. During family gatherings, it is common to see all members of a family, regardless of age, playing card games, creating cherished childhood memories for children and fostering a safe, joyful atmosphere for the elderly. Taking these factors into account, it is abundantly clear that various reasons contribute to how much one can enjoy an activity, regardless of its level of difficulty. I do not believe that the only way to find enjoyment in a hobby is through the challenge it presents.