IELTS Writing Samples

Response: In today's world, we should pay more attention to our diet. With regard to this fact, companies that produce products with high amounts of sugar should be banned or at least rise thir price to encourage people to consume less sugar. I think that is not a reasonable soulotion. First of all, I disagree with this point of view because raising prices effect so many people on society and bring poverty with it self, and the biggest damage in this example is for workers on realevent factories because as the time manager dosent feel good profite with his or her manufactures, he or she will reduce the workers salary. Instead of this, government should do some positive activities like: free confrences, advertising a healthy diet with usage of radio, tv, podcasts, bilbords... The second biggest help, I reckon come from sience. Individuals use sugar in many different activities for example: making cake or coffee or event for switing the tea. Consequently, people are not able to just eradicate sugar from their lives. so sientists should help both factories and people to continue their activities with just a little difference, and that is replacing sugar with another natural thing which has not bad effects on human body. In conclusion, a healthy diet is completely necessary and it is good to reduce our daily useage of sugar, but finding the true way is a little difficult. While some people may offere to sell sugary products with higher prices, I assume that is not the answer, the right way happens with the help of both government and science.

Response: Some health problems can be caused by consuming too much high-in-sugar foods and beverages. I totally disagree with the statement of considering higher prices in sweet goods because this can increase the costs of other goods and result in monetary extreme situations. Additionally, sugary goods are not always detrimental to people’s health, so people should be aware of correct intake of these foods in order to adapt their sugar consumption to their diets. It is generally believed that increasing the cost of foods leads to increment of other goods. The price of different items are correlated because people are always trading with each other, so if the cost of a product increases, the price of other items will see upward trends, as well. As a result, when people who want to buy sugary foods face an increment in the cost of sugary products, they have no choice but to increase the price of their own products in order to combat the lack required money for buying sugary products. Consequently, when the prices of many items increase, hard economic situations appear, so all the citizens and even the governments face some challenges, such as recession, inflation to name but a few. Therefore, increasing the price of sweetened goods is not an efficient way for restricting people from buying these foods and drinks. Admittedly, foods and drinks which are high in sugar can bring diseases, however, they contain some minerals which are crucial for humans’ bodies. For example, if governments limit consumption of sweet foods in a strict way, people face some diseases, namely low blood pressure, because people need necessary minerals in order to continue their livings in an healthy way. Nevertheless, consuming too much sugar results in some diseases, such as diabetes and high blood pressure. However, people cannot strike a balance for their sugar consumption by monetary aspects because their behavior should receive more attention, not their pockets. Instead, In order to make a compromise between these two issues, people should be aware of the exact amount of sugar consumption for each age, which can be done by food scientists via mass media and social media. Thus, consumption of sweet foods and drinks should not be controlled by increasing the price of these goods, while making aware people of the right consumption of them is more effective. In conclusion, many goods which contain a great deal of sugar can bring illnesses for people. One probable solution is considering an increment in the price of foods and goods, while I claim that his is a negative development because when the price of these foods increase, costs of other items will increase, too. Moreover, people’s knowledge of using sweeteners should be increased by skilled doctors and there should not be any restriction in sugar consumption.

Response: Some health problems can be causes by consuming too much high-in-sugar food and beverage. I totally disagree with the statement of considering higher prices on sweet goods because this can increase the costs of other goods and resulting monetary extreme situations. Additionally, sugary goods are not always detrimental to people’s health, and people should be aware of correct intake of these foods in order to adapt their sugar consumption to their diets. It is generally believed that increasing the cost of specific foods leads to increment of other goods. The price of different items are correlated because people are always trading with each other, and if cost of a thing increases, the price of other things will see an upward trend. As a result, when people who want to buy sugary foods face increment in the costs of sugary products, they tend to increase the price of their own products in order to combat lack of money for buying sugary products. Consequently, when the prices of many items increase hard economic situations are brought for all the citizens and even the governments, recession, inflation, to name but a few. Therefore, increasing the price of sweetened goods is not an efficient way for avoiding people from buying these foods and drinks. Admittedly, foods and drinks which are high in sugar can bring diseases, however, they contain some minerals which are crucial for humans’ bodies. For example, if governments restrict consumption of sweet foods in a strict way, people face some diseases, namely low blood pressure, because they need necessary minerals in order to perform in an optimum way. Nevertheless, consuming too much sugar results in some diseases, such as diabetes and high blood pressure. However, people cannot strike a balance for their sugar consumption by monetary aspects. Instead, In order to make a compromise between these two issues, people should be aware of the exact amount of sugar consumption for each age, which can be done by food scientists via mass media and social media. Thus, consumption of sweet foods and drinks should not be controlled by increasing the price of these goods, while making aware people of the right consumption of them is more effective. In conclusion, many goods which contain a great deal of sugar can bring illnesses for people. One probable solution is considering an increment in the price of foods and goods, while I claim by increasing the price of these foods, costs of other items will increases, too. Moreover, people’s knowledge of using sweeteners should be increased by skilled doctors and there should not be any restriction in sugar consumption.

Response: Many health problems, ranging from diabetes to obesity, are associated with consuming foods high in sugar. Some argue that raising the prices of sugary products can discourage excessive consumption. I partly agree with this statement, as the proposed solution may be effective in some countries but not in others, and I will highlight my reasons below. On the one hand, in many developing countries, people often do not have high-paying jobs and struggle with financial problems. As a result, they need to be cautious about their daily spending. Consequently, increasing the price of high-sugar foods can lead to a reduction in sugar consumption. In Iran, for example, people face uncontrollable inflation. This has resulted in removing some products from their shopping carts because they need to buy more economical items. Therefore, in these countries, the financial limitations make it harder for people to afford costly sugary products, leading to better health outcomes and fewer issues stemming from excessive sugar consumption. On the other hand, in developed countries, where people are financially stable, other long-term methods need to be considered to curb the consumption of sugary items. In these countries, the economy often relies on mass-production, thereby prohibitive pricing could lead to unemployment, as manufacturers of sugary food and drinks might face a loss of sales. This situation could potentially result in closures and bankruptcies. Furthermore, one of the best options is to improve public awareness through education and advertisement, especially for children and the elderly, who are more prone to developing diseases like diabetes and obesity. By doing this, people will become more aware of the detrimental consequences of eating sugar and will be able to plan for a balanced diet in the long-term. In conclusion, while increasing prices may be effective in developing countries facing economic turmoil, developed countries should focus on long-term solutions like education on balanced diets to prevent negative consequences for the economy and public health.

Response: There is a considerable amount of sugar in the majority of processed food and drink products, which can put people’s health at risk. There is an ongoing debate about whether these sugary products should have high prices to lead individuals consume less sugar in their lives. I personally disagree with this point of view, and in this essay, I will outline my reasons. From an economic perspective, an increase in price of sugary products can affect some jobs that are related to these products, such as bakeries, because they generally utilize sugar to bake cakes and cookies. If these sugary ingredients become more prohibitive, those people require more money to pay for them and it can significantly affect their financial stability and may decrease the number of profits for them. In addition, I think making these products expensive cannot be a reasonable choice because the majority of them consist a significant part of people’s daily food. Therefore, an increase in the price of them may have a negative impact on their lives, putting strain on their financial situation. Furthermore, the majority of humans prefer to be free when they intend to make a decision; restricting them can affect negatively. Consequently, they require a freedom for choosing what they want to consume, and putting strain on them to not to buy sugary products may increase the sense of dissatisfaction in their lives. In conclusion, although consuming sugary products and food can be a threat to human health, I personally disagree with the idea of raising the price of manufactured food and drink that contain a considerable amount of sugar because not only does it have a destructive impact on their economic situation, but it may contravene human right and freedom.

Response: It is widely accepted that a high quantity of food and drink have a high levels of sugar, that causes a lot of illnesses and health issues. A group of people claim that sugary products should be sale by higher price, and as a result people will eat less sugar and sweet products. I disagree with this opinion, and I will explain my reasons. On the one hand, I think companies ought to produce sweetie snacks and drink by less amount of sugar. Besides, Companies can add natural sugar to products like stevia sugar, which is sweet as much as normal sugar, and it is not unhealthy. Not only sugar is not harmful for our body, but also it is an essential nutrient for our brain and helps us think better. People, especially children and athletes have to eat sweetie drink and food, and it is not fair to increase the price of those products. In addition, from my perspective, expensive sweet product is not a good way to convince people to eat less sugar. In my opinion, this action will turn people more greedy, and they will have more desire to eat more sugar. in addition, they will store sugar and sweet products. As a result, there will be a chaos in the market. Due to the sedentary lifestyle, it is crucial for individuals to be more active and eat healthy food. I believe that concept should be taught to the members of society. In conclusion, increasing the price of that kind of products will not be a permanent solution. I believe it will not create any drastic changes. Although, this action will reduce the usage of sugar in a short while, after a time people will eat more sugar and sweet drink compare to the past. Individuals should be aware of the disadvantages of sugar, and try to eat more healthy and have a better lifestyle.

Response: It is widely accepted that a high quantity of food and drink have a high levels of sugar, that causes a lot of illnesses and health issues. A group of people claim that sugary products should be sale by higher price, and as a result people will eat less sugar and sweet products. I disagree with this opinion, and I will explain my reasons. On the one hand, I think companies ought to produce sweetie snacks and drink by less amount of sugar. Besides, Companies can add natural sugar to products like stevia sugar, which is sweet as much as normal sugar, and it is not unhealthy. Not only sugar is not harmful for our body, but also it is an essential nutrient for our brain and helps us think better. People, especially children and athletes have to eat sweetie drink and food, and it is not fair to increase the price of those products. In addition, from my perspective, expensive sweet product is not a good way to convince people to eat less sugar. In my opinion, this action will turn people more greedy, and they will have more desire to eat more sugar. in addition, they will store sugar and sweet products. As a result, there will be a chaos in the market. Due to the sedentary lifestyle, it is crucial for individuals to be more active and eat healthy food. I believe that concept should be taught to the members of society. In conclusion, increasing the price of that kind of products will not be a permanent solution. I believe it will not create any drastic changes. Although, this action will reduce the usage of sugar in a short while, after a time people will eat more sugar and sweet drink compare to the past. Individuals should be aware of the disadvantages of sugar, and try to eat more healthy and have a better lifestyle.

Response: While some specialists argue that sweet products are real dangers to our health, and one of the most effective ways to prevent them is by increasing their prices, critics claim that although raising prices is a rational way, consuming food based on carbohydrates has roots in our traditional dishes, so most people will be unsatisfied and tend to resist this change. Meanwhile, I believe that we will not be able to eradicate carbohydrate completely from our diets due to the fact that they are a significant part of our invaluable cultural foods. On one hand, raising prices will definitely limit individuals' consumption, and many believe that by continuing this trend, sugar may lose its charm for people and ultimately lose its popularity. As it is written in every diet-related book, after not using sweet products for fourteen days, besides losing weight, other foods will taste better in your mouth and this factor will persuade you to eat other materials instead of sugar more than before. Now, not using sugar due to its high cost will be another way to manage adults and children's urges to purchase more. On the other hand, not all adults and even children have a sweet tooth, and increasing prices will be unfair to them because they deliberately do not overuse sugar. For example, if you consider birthday cakes as one of our traditions, for those people who have sweet consumptions only on their birthdays, overpaying for a piece of cake is totally unfair. In addition, when governments raise sugar's value, they will attract people's attention to the issue and in contrast to their intentions, it may lead to using sugar even more than before. In conclusion, I believe if governments are considering this approach to achieve the goal of a heathier society, they should arise the prices gradually and in the shadows in order to not receive people's harsh reactions. Finally, from my personal perspective, eating sweet food is something related to our cognitive processes and it can not be ommited from our lives overnight; conversely, it should become a habit and be tought in our childhood.

Response: Global sugar consumption has significantly surged over the past few years, consequently, leading to an increase in health problems. To mitigate this issue, many people advocate that drinks and food products that contain high sugar levels should be made more expensive. I strongly concur with the suggestion as I believe that high costs would discourage people from buying such products. In recent years, we have observed an increase in snacking culture leading to various health problems. Empirical evidence from various studies proves that diseases such as obesity and diabetes have substantially increased, furthermore, the statistics show that the main cause of this rise is poor eating habits and sedentary lifestyle. To overcome this challenge, reducing sugar intake is paramount, and the most effective way to do so is to make it less easily available by increasing the prices. Increasing prices will make these products less affordable, decreasing consumption. However, high prices alone would not be efficient, the introduction of low-sugar alternatives at lower prices is also necessary. For instance, the Coca-Cola company introduced Diet Coke, but it was a little more expensive than regular Coke, so the majority of individuals preferred to continue drinking regular Coke as it was cost-effective. A survey was done, and the conclusion suggested that if Diet Coke was cheaper, more consumers would be motivated to purchase it. In conclusion, there is a dire need to bring some changes to control global sugar consumption, as health problems are skyrocketing. The most important step is to make the products with high sugar levels less affordable to the general public, so they have to think twice before purchasing them. Furthermore, introducing healthier products at cheaper prices would encourage people to make better choices.

Response: It is widely accepted that a high quantity of food and drink have a high levels of sugar, that causes a lot of illnesses and health issues. A group of people claim that sugary products should be sale by higher price, and as a result people will eat less sugar and sweet products. I disagree with this opinion, and I will explain my reasons. On the one hand, I think companies ought to produce sweety snacks and drink by less amount of sugar. Besides, Companies can add natural sugar to products like Stoya, which is sweet as much as normal sugar, and it is not unhealthy. Not only sugar is not harmful for our body, but also it is an essential nutrient for our brain and helps us think better. People, especially children and athletes have to eat sweety drink and food, and it is not fair to increase the price of those products. On the Other hand, from my perspective, expensive sweet product is not a good way to convince people to eat less sugar. In my opinion, this action will turn people more greedy, and they will have more desire to eat more sugar. in addition, they will storage sugar and sweet products. As a result, there will be a chaos in the market. Due to the sedentary lifestyle, it is crucial for individuals to be more active and eat healthy food. I believe that concept should be taught to the members of society. In conclusion, increasing the price of that kind of products will not be a permanent solution. I believe it will not create any changes significantly. Although, this action will reduce the usage of sugar in a short while, after a time people will eat more sugar and sweet drink compare to the past. Individuals should be aware of the disadvantages of sugar, and try to eat more healthy and have a better lifestyle.