IELTS Writing Samples

Response: Diverse perspectives regarding acceptance and alteration a bad bad situation are prevalent among individuals. Some individuals argue that the best approach in bad situation is receptivity, others think that it is better to attempt and enhance these situations. Personally, I believe that trying for chang offers several substantial benefits. This essay will critically examine both facets of the argument with explanation. On the one hand, many support the idea of attempting for improve because it can lead to numerous positive outcomes, such as acquire new skills and progress. If someone wants to change a bad condition for better, they will examine all the possible solutions. Consequently, they can learn many new skills and experiences, and they are more likely to achieve success than other. Additionally. they strengthen their dedication and hard-working. For instance, if a student fail to accept in their favorite university, they put all of their effort for boosting their qualification and trying for the next time. As a result, attempting for alteration has numerous advantages, namely, gaining new qualifications and new motivation. On the other hand, some believe that it is better to accept the situation. They argue that acceptence can lead to balance and a peacefull life. This is because if individuals encounter an unpleasent situation, they do not blam themselves, instead they enjoy with what they have. Thus, they feel less anxiety and self-blaming. For example, a person with a low-salary accept this income and use their free time for persuing their interest and hobbies. As a result, due to acceptence they may have a balance in their life rather than trying for change all the time. In conclusion. despite potential benefits like less anxiety and a balanced life, which comes with acceptance, I strongly belive that trying for change has many advantages including achieving success and self improvement.

Response: It is often argued that people should stay in an unsatisfying job or situation, while others contend it is our merit to live in a better situation. I personally firmly agree with the second group and I will elaborate on this viewpoint in the following paragraphs. When it comes to living in miserable conditions, it is widely acknowledged that when a company goes bankrupt, almost all their employees decide to resign, meanwhile, there might be a few workers who receive a shortage of salary and they think if they stay and work hard, the company might see an increasing trend in success. Consequently, when an employee decides to work in this situation, he might spend all their youth on something that is not valuable. When he gets older and faces difficulties, he might live in a state that does not even have enough budget to provide medical healthcare. On the other hand, if someone opts to live in a satisfying state and has enough confidence to desire this situation, this person can easily have a better life. For example, when an individual encounters bad conditions, he might decide something logical for their future, thus he can seek new job opportunities or a better place to have a secure financial situation and they can also allocate a separate budget for his family's future, and more importantly, he enjoys his work condition. In conclusion, while it is true that sometimes being patient might be beneficial for our job. However, I think it is more vital to not take the risk and pursue a better job condition, thus it has an effect on our later years and the family's sufficient budgets.

Response: While some individuals contend that accepting tough conditions is the optimal approach, others argue that improvement in the conditions should be preferable. This essay will discuss both perspectives before presenting my point of view. On one hand, some individuals are opposed to the changes. They believe that what people experience is part of their lives so that they should acknowledge challenges and difficulties, which leads to a stability in their lives. For instance, working in a position which provides insufficient satisfaction is more convenient than acquiring new skills and roles for another occupation. Moreover, adapting with difficulties can help people to acknowledge what they have and avoid consumerism because they strive to put up with financial instability. For example, insufficient budgets can oblige individuals to do less impulsive shopping, contributing to enhanced tolerance of the condition. On the other hand, proponents of development believe that by making enough efforts people can have better lives. They argue that the acceptance of challenging conditions can leave behind people from progress and success, which can deteriorate situations. Once people accept financial problems should be accepted, they may lose what they have and become homeless because they try to acknowledge the condition instead of making money to alleviate it. Furthermore, people may suffer from emotional diseases like depression and isolation when they are not satisfied with what they do, leading to less productivity in the workplace. To conclude, while some individuals argue that the adaptation of adverse conditions can enhance stability and tolerance in their lives, I believe that people should strive to convert the conditions because accepting the problems can not only worsen the condition but also make people depressed and less productive.

Response: While a group of people believes that we should accept unpleasant experiences, others think that it is better to turn those bad experiences into good ones rather than accepting them. While I agree with the opinion of the first group to some extent, I firmly believe that the other group is completely right. On the one hand, some people think that accepting bad events is better than facing the problems, and they might be right to some extent. Although, it is worthy to try to change the bad situations, we should consider that sometimes we cannot improve anything as we do not have any control over problems. In such situations, we should not blame ourselves and complain about what has happened to us. Thus, the best way is to accepting those situations and try to stay strong. For instance, when someone have a disease, it is obvious that it was not that person's fault and in most cases, they are unable to change the situation. Therefore, all they can do is to be patient and increase their tolerance. On the other hand, other people believe that the best solution is to face these issues and try to change them, and I firmly agree with them. First of all, we should always be strong and optimistic. We should have faith and try to upgrade ourselves . Therefore, we should always work towards making bad situations better by our hard work. Moreover, it is better to try and fail rather than being passive all the time. Sometimes, some problems are not unchangeable, but it is our way of thinking that makes solving those problems impossible for us, while they can easily be solved with our effort. Therefore, it is always better to have faith in ourselves and try to improve concerning situations. In conclusion, although I partly agree with the opinion of the first group, I firmly believe that another group is right as it is always better to try to change the bad situations rather than accepting them for many reasons.

Response: It is argued that some people prefer to remain content with circumstances in undesirable situations, while others make efforts to change the existing situation. In my opinion, doing your best even in challenges will lessen the distance to your goal. Some people don’t strive to overcome challenges because they believe in fate. They contend that trying to improve life means fighting with fate. These people tolerate a permanently unfavorable, job, partner, or even government for many years due to the belief that fate doesn’t change. Moreover, some people obey the present circumstances because of fear. For example, some workers are dissatisfied with their job salary, but they will never explain it to their employers to prevent being fired. As a result, workers remain dissatisfied because they don’t take measures to change their situation. On the contrary, those on the other side of the argument say opportunities are hidden in hardships. Only people who can consider these challenges as opportunities will be successful. We have seen many people in history who overcame hardships and accomplished their mission. For example, a great Persian poet called Ferdowsi wrote a poem in 30 years. He spent a lot of money and time on writing f to complete Shahnameh and he also mentions in his poem that he's lost most of his wealth in this way. Ferdowsi went through many challenges, but now we can see one of the most valuable Persian masterpieces. In conclusion, considering both views on whether staying unchanged is effective or making an effort, I believe that hardships test individuals' capability and determination. So, incapable people will stay unchanged and be influenced by fate and fear.

Response: It is argued that some people prefer to remain content with circumstances in undesirable situations while others make efforts to change the existing situation. In my opinion, doing your best even in challenges will lessen the distance to your goal. Some people don’t strive to overcome challenges because they believe in fate. They contend that trying to improve life means fighting with fate. These people tolerate a permanent unfavorable, job, partner, or even government for many years due to the belief that fate doesn’t change. Moreover, some people obey the present circumstances because of fear. For example, some workers are dissatisfied with their job salary, but they will never explain it to their employers to prevent being fired. As a result, workers remain dissatisfied because they don’t take measures to change their situation. On the contrary, those on the other side of the argument say opportunities are hidden in hardships. Only people who can consider these challenges as opportunities will be successful. We have seen many people in history who overcame hardships and accomplished their mission. For example, a great Persian poet called Ferdowsi wrote a poet in 30 years. He spent a lot of money and time on writing f to complete Shahname and he also mentions in his poem that he's lost most of his wealth in this way. Ferdowsi went through many challenges but now we can see one of the most valuable Persian masterpieces. In conclusion, considering both views on whether staying unturned is effective or making an effort, I believe that hardships test individuals' capability and determination. So, incapable people will stay unturned and be influenced by fate and fear.

Response: There is an opposing view on whether to get along with a bad situation, such as a lack of occupational fulfillment, or try to make a difference. In this essay, I will discuss both perspectives and explain why I strongly agree with the latter viewpoint. It is believed by many that they should accept what they are dealing with, since it is a part of their destiny and they have no control over it. For example, a number of individuals who suffer from severe diseases do not usually show any willingness to be treated, as they believe their lives have to be like this and it is their fate. Besides, a majority of people do not want to bother themselves and improve the stage in which they are stuck, in spite of being aware of its drawbacks. Some even assume they will be considered greedy if they try to change circumstances, such as trying to get a promotion in their workplace. On the other hand, most people think they should not be content with their current situation. They argue that although human beings must avoid being greedy, it is a part of their nature to have a tendency to boost their quality of life and reach perfection. Moreover, they believe that if primitive humans had not taken any steps toward a more modern life, many state-of-the-art gadgets and cutting-edge tools would not have been created. In conclusion, I believe that not only is it beneficial to change bad situations in order to have a better life, but it is also necessary if we want to witness development in the world.

Response: There is an opposing view as to whether to get along with a bad situation, such as lack of occupational fulfillment, or try to make a difference. In this essay I will discuss both perspectives and explain why I strongly agree with the latter view. It is believed by many that they should accept what they are dealing with, since it is a part of their destiny and they have no control over it. For example, a number of individuals who suffer from severe diseases, do not usually show any willingness to be treated as they believe their lives have to be like this and its thier fate. Besides, a mojority of people do not want to bother themselves and improve the stage which thay are stuck in spite of being aware of its drawbacks. Some even assume it is considered as greed, if they try to change circumstances, such as trying to get promotion in their workplace. On the other hand, most people think they should not be content with their current situation. They argue, although human being must avoid being greedy, it is a part of their nature to have a tendency to boost their quality of life and reach the perfection. Moreovere, they believe if primitive humans had not taken any steps toward a more modern life, many state-of-the-art gadgets and cutting-edge tools have not been created. In conclusion, I believe not only is benefitial to change bad situation in order to having better life, but also it is necessary if we want to witness of development in the world.

Response: Some believe that it’s important to be accepting of negative circumstances when they occur whereas others emphasise that it’s better to try to seek solutions in such situations. This essay discusses both perspectives and why I believe that the arguments for seeking solutions are stronger. There are two main reasons why people believe that we must be accepting of bad circumstances. First of all, we often cannot avoid bad situations. Since these situations can’t always be avoided it’s best to just accept the reality. For instance, economic downturns can lead to the company we work for going bankrupt and in this case, we should not feel hard done by if we lose our job. In addition, unnecessary stress can be caused by dwelling on our current circumstances. If we are accepting of our circumstances this can allow us to maintain a positive mood and to continue enjoying our life despite a setback. However, others argue that we should have a proactive attitude and find solutions to any negative predicament. The main benefit of this approach is that it may lead to eustress which helps to motivate us to find solutions. For instance, if we lose our job we should focus on finding a new job to solve the problem of being unemployed. Additionally, focusing on solutions can divert some of our negative emotions such as a feeling of bad luck or guilt into more positive emotions such as feelings of empowerment in our ability to solve our problems. In conclusion, I believe both sides of the argument have merits. However, I believe it’s better to focus on finding solutions because it increases the likelihood of solving our problems and maintaining a positive mental attitude, which is far more important than the benefits of avoiding stress through being accepting of our circumstances.

Response: In the average world, all the time, there are some times that everybody can love that and the others might not love and as a whole it depends to every person’s characteristic, but what is important is that such people who do not enjoy, do not try to change bad situation or alter their position. The other group do not persuade and try to solve the problem. To be honest I am a person who does not endure in bad circumstances and try handling and changing may bad times. In this essay I want argue about both thinking line. Today’s life through the world is full of different situations that some of them are satisfying and the other can be boring. For example good salary and occupation are enjoyable and the other hand shortage, illness and bad relationship are harmful for most people and in every position some people prefer staying and as a fighter try to control the bad situations. These person have high flexibility and sustainable nature. They believe that bad and good cannot be eternal and after every shortage, this situation will be changed. Investing on positive ability and good point is their belief and they struggle to find and learn big lesson in every unsatisfied period. Other group there is people who attempt to don’t aspect bad thing and always try to control every time. Most of the time they suffer from high scarce and because of this they lose current life and try forget unfavorable things. Actually they live in big denial and this kind of being can born unenjoyable moment for them. Most of them do not recognize their ability and live in mental fight with their selves because their internal and core beliefs of live is happiness and for gain this competition they do every job while most of the time we cannot fine any kind of positive emotion in their life. In conclusion I should say we can not say which of this being is good or bad and it dependent to that job or position and I think both of them is important and the necessarily of thing will define our behavior; what is important is that do not forget or ability and distinguish which type is better and beneficial.