Question: Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation, such as an unsatisfactory j...
Marking Generated by Free AI Models
You are on the free tier, which uses free AI models. They can occasionally be slow, unstable, or temporarily unavailable. Balang Plus uses premium models for faster, more reliable, and higher-quality marking.
Click on red question marks (?) to see an explanation for each change. Some changes are only suggestions and don't mean the original is necessarily wrong.
There is an opposing view on whether to get along with accepta bad situation, such as a lack of occupational fulfillment, or try to make a difference. In this essay, I will discuss both perspectives and explain why I strongly agree with the latter viewpoint.
It is believed by many that they should accept what they are dealing with, since it is a part of their destiny and they have no control over it. For example, a number of manyindividuals who suffer from severe diseases do not usually show any willingness to be treated, as they believe their lives have to mustbe like this and it is their fate. Besides, a majority of people do not want to bother themselves and improve the stagesituation in which they are stuck, in spite of despitebeing aware of its drawbacks. Some even assume they will be considered greedy if they try to change circumstances, such as trying to get seekinga promotion in their workplace.
On the other hand, most people think they should not be content with their current situation. They argue that although human beings must avoid being greedy, it is a part of their nature to have a tendency striveto boostimprove their quality of life and reach perfection. Moreover, they believe that if primitive humans had not taken any steps toward a more modern life, many state-of-the-art gadgets and cutting-edge tools would not have been created.
In conclusion, I believe that not only is it beneficial to change bad situations in order to have a better life, but it is also necessary if we want to witness developmentprogress in the world.
While we are confident in our score estimation, you are not guaranteed to receive the same score in an official test.
Feedback on Your Essay
Task Achievement:
Your essay addresses both views and presents a clear opinion, fulfilling the task requirements.
The examples provided (e.g., people with diseases, workplace promotions) help illustrate the arguments.
However, the discussion of the first view (accepting bad situations) could be more developed. For instance, you could explore practical reasons (e.g., financial constraints, lack of opportunities) why people might choose acceptance.
The conclusion is clear but could be slightly more nuanced—acknowledging potential challenges in improving situations would strengthen it.
Coherence and Cohesion:
The essay is logically structured with clear paragraphing.
Some transitions between ideas could be smoother. For example, the shift from the first to the second viewpoint feels abrupt—a linking phrase (e.g., "However, others argue...") would help.
The conclusion effectively summarizes the discussion but could better connect back to the arguments made earlier.
Lexical Resource:
Vocabulary is generally strong (e.g., "occupational fulfillment," "cutting-edge tools").
Some phrasing is awkward or unnatural (e.g., "get along with a bad situation" → "accept a bad situation"; "boost their quality of life" → "improve their quality of life").
Avoid repetition (e.g., "bad situations" is used multiple times—consider synonyms like "adverse circumstances").
Grammatical Range and Accuracy:
Grammar is mostly accurate, but there are minor errors:
"It is believed by many that they should accept what they are dealing with, since it is a part of their destiny..." → "Many believe they should accept their circumstances, as they see them as part of their destiny..." (more concise).
"Some even assume they will be considered greedy if they try to change circumstances, such as trying to get a promotion..." → "Some fear being seen as greedy if they strive for change, such as seeking a promotion..." (more natural phrasing).
Sentence structures are varied, but some complex sentences could be refined for clarity.
Suggestions for Improvement:
Expand on the first view—explain why acceptance might be pragmatic, not just fatalistic.
Improve transitions—use linking words to guide the reader between arguments.
Refine word choice—replace repetitive or awkward phrasing with more natural alternatives.
Proofread for grammar—ensure complex sentences are error-free.
Overall, this is a strong response with clear arguments. With minor refinements, it could be even more effective.