IELTS Writing Samples

Response: In terms of commercials, in modern world, businesses normally are asserting that their goods are new in some methodes. Despite the fact that this is one of the key factor of advertising, it can have some negative repercussions. There are several reason why I would argue in the favour of positive effectivness of this idea. First of all, this claim captures the audience's attention with the aim of they can be update by purchasing the products. For a well-known example, Coca Cola always depicts new taste of cola, even though everybody knows their new products are the same with a slight difference. Secondly, not only can it motivate individuals to buying your products, but also it can make your former custumers more loyal. For example, had there been a business and not displayed their new goods, I would have not bought from them since I did not notice about the new. Finally, the more advertising you do, the more custumers you have. It is needless to say that the main key point of commercials is emotional appeal and influence on people's motivation. On the other hand, it is remarkable that advertising with the aim of showing off new products, makes a buzz marketing for a specific period which is perfect for businesses. Nevertheless, using lies in the slogan can lead the business to bankrupting. For example, if the Apple company says they added a new artificial intelligence in their new Iphone and this is a big lie, nobody will not believe them again for their next project. In conclusion, this day and age, there are a variaty of businesses emohasizing the words of new products as a catchphrase in their advertising. Although, this could have positive results, they must be careful about the words that they are using.

Response: In some individuals point of view, the best method in order to gathering people with variety of cultural background and generations is music, Despite the fact that I agree up to a point with the main idea with the aim of different cultures, I partly disagree about effect of music to bring defferent generations together. There are several reasons why would I argue in favour of music is usefull in terms of gathering people of several nations. First of all, it is needless to say that music includes almost all human feelings and every human in the world with any language or culture can understand the feeling message in any music. For instance, in my country most of the time when somebodey is in a sad mood he listens a music in Alternative genre and he does not give the laguage into account. Secondly, humans are instinctively paying attention to the music and it is not dipended to the bachground of the music's culture. For a shining example, nowaday, there are several musictions around the world play music in the street and residents alway wait for listenig their music, no matter if they are in rush or not. On the other hand, the main reason why I tend to refuse the effect of music on binrging individuals with different ages is differences between generations are one of the key factors of music taste and as they say : the higher age goes to, the lower understanding comes to you. For example, it is remarkable that the taste of a person from the silent generation is different with a Gen Z person and music can not communicate them toghether. In conclusion,even though music is the best solution for comunitation between humans with different cultures, it is not a good way in terms of ages as a result.

Response: Music has been an integral part of human lives. A large group of people emphasizes that music is a viable mean of connection and communication regardless of diverse cultural backgrounds and age differences. Although there are numerous beliefs to the contrary, some including myself, believe the advantageous impact of music in establishing connections. The critics of the music being one of the ways to connect people calim that language is an indispensible factor regarding connection. To illustrate this, English is an international language that enables us to engage worldwide in commerce, economy and even art, despite our cultural backgrounds and age.It is the language that can bridge the difference and merge different people together not music.Furthermore, they opine that what makes a song impactful is the lyrics and the feelings that the words can evoke and provoke into a person's mind not just the tune. For instance, a Latin individual may not find a persian song compelling enough ,due to language barrier, while that song might be memorable for Iranians. On the other hand, the adherents believe that music has the power to gather an excessive number of people from different nations without the need to learn the languages. Take Worldcup songs as an example, many individuals connect with the tune of the the song and memorize the ryhthm and end up indulging and enjoying it collectively even they can not understand the lyrics.Another point to consider is that music has been in human civilization far more than emergence of language.This showcases the fact that music is a more straightforward way for people to connect that has been existed for centuries.Hence, we are wired to connect by music no matter the age and culture. In the final analysis, even though the impact of the language should not be ignored, I find myself among the supporters of the idea that maintain the music as one of the ways that can connect people with different backgrounds.

Response: Taking risks is an inevitable aspects of our lives, both in work and personal life. I believe that despite the negative impacts of taking risks, there are more advantages to taking risks. On one hand, taking more risks in life leads to more learning opportunities since, whether in win or loss results, they provide important experience, This can prepare people to tackle unpredictable problems in the future. For instance, when people gamble by leaving their comfort zones and entering a new job position, this might be a little risky at first but in the long term can foster a sense of confidence and resilience. On the other hand, it is obvious that taking any steps or actions in life is comes with some danger such as failure or losing something. For example, investing in the stock market with fluctuations in this market may lead to failure and as a result, losing a noticeable amount of money. In conclusion, while taking risks and accepting their consequences may have some drawbacks and negative effects on lives, in my opinion, not only this can be benefitial in our professional life but also can help improve the personal part of our lives.

Response: In some cultural backgrounds, children believe that if they make an effort hardly adequate, they can earn their longings. Despite the fact that there are several benefits in hard working for individuals who are adults, there are some negative effectiveness for children. On the one hand, in order to make a case for advantages of attempting hardly, it is needless to say, not only can hard trying gain personal knowledge, but also it can make stronger adults. Moreover, it remarkable that stronger men are more successful parents. For instance, a man who has been graduated from Harvard university and learnt aroma of courses can lead his children to have better future. Additionally, not only do families need a good leader, but also society needs tough leader. The more stronger leader we have, the more successful society we have. For a perfect example, there are many big leaders are mentioned in the world's history such as: Abraham Lincoln in the US and Darius the great in Iran. As a side note, with the aim of have a good lifestyle, we need to have discipline and the key factor of discipline is to try hardly. On the other hand, in term of drawbacks of hard trying in childhood. It might have crucial damage for eigther children' body or mental health. Fruthermore, play games and make fun in are to assess the significatnce of chidhood for everybody. Nevertheless, hard trying keeps them away from this basic need. For example, I had made an effort so hard on my education or work in my childhood, he would have had issues with making friends. In conclusion, the belief of young generatons in some nations is that obtaining everything needs to attempt strongly sufficient has more pros than cons.

Response: In recent times, an increasing number of business highlight in their advertising that their products are unique. This is because they desire to attract more consumers and increase their sells as well as unique methodes. In my opinion, this developement is positive due to the attention to some significant factors. One of the main reasons for showing alternative advertisements is absorbs more cleints and consumers. A compony for achieve to financial stable and gain profit, require to sell their products and earn money. They should be able to supply budget for survival their business, for example workers' salaries, and rent a accommodations. All of them need to atract customer by advertising. As a consequence, many people find these product more useful and encourage buy them. By the more selling, the more income will gain that can utilize for improving one company. Additionally, espetial technique they use may can damage the environment which is can be a important concern in world's today. For these reasons, Business owners advertise differently to achieve their goals. I consider this trend posetive due to be awareness individuals about special company's products. For example when people go shopping, most of the time they confuse among various goods that which one is better. So, if they know about products' quality by presenting information in advertisements, leading to easier and informed decision. As a consequence, thy buy a product which is more reliable and safer. Moreover, several citizens are concerned about their sorrunding, and atmosphere. When they relize of friendly-environmentally products of one company, more encourage to purchase these comedeties. In conclusion, the growing trend of presenting products which is produced in unregular ways to reach income growth by attracting more customers. I believe this trend positive in terms of possessing high-quality and compatible with environment.

Response: Nowadays, Most children turn to over using smartphones. This can because of our severe dependecy of high tech devices, as technology is growing. In my opinion, although relying too much on smartphones and other technological devices is harmful either for children or adults, having a balance in using these kinds of instruments can be useful. There are some negative points on children's spending hours daily on smartphones. Firstly, a vast number of children are not able to manage their time and put a balance in their usage of smartphones. Therefore, they can not concentrate on their lessons and as a consequence they get bad grades in their classes and affect their future prospects. For example, research findings show, children who have a limitation on their hour of smartphone's usage benefit from higher grades in their lessons. Secondly, they can be manuplated by some adults who want to take advantages of children, as connection and social media are vastly growing and there is no supervision on most of them. If parents effectively monitor their children's usage of smartphones and the enternet, these kind of cases can be prohibited. Finally, using too much of phones lead to less physical activity and cause to a sedentary lifestyle and health problems for them. On the other hand, children's usage of smartphones can be highly beneficial. Children can take online courses and attend to them via their mobile phones. In the pandemic of COVID-19 teachers have thaught lessons online and via smartphone. Moreover, smartphones offer an opportunity for children to connect with their peers. They can improve their communication skills. Some useful social media, such as, you-tube provides a unique learning experience for children. Therefore, they can inhance their knowledge regarding variety fields of their interest, history, science, and gadgets. In conclusion, in my opinion, to maximising positive aspects of smartphone's usage in children, having balance, limitation, and monitoring are essential.

Response: It has been predicted that, as everything is becoming online, no one would rather buy physical books and newspaper. I strongly agree with this statement and in this essay, I will attempt to outline its reasons and provide my perspective. No one can ignore the effects of digitalization on every aspect of our lives in today’s world. New technologies, specially internet, has made everything easier and more accessible like books and news. Compering to past, the rate of buying books and newspapers has been significantly decreased which is one of the result of digitalization. There are many benefits in online news and e-books which people notice them very soon. Specifically, individual’s behaviors due to reaching news online is so convenient; online news not only are free and easy to access, but also include different points of views of a new. For example, in a society which most of the newspapers forced to have the same idea about an event by government, online news could cover and discuss various aspect of it. Even though, online books have not been popular as online news yet, the demand for e-book had significantly increased. Some people still prefer physical books because of various reasons. Firstly, the value of hand books are much more than newspapers. Collecting and storing books in personal library is some’s pleasures and hobbies. Secondly, reading hand books has a nostalgic feeling and make more connection to human soul. For example, when someone have thumbed through a book; it feels more special than scrolling a screen. Finally, unlike online news, most of the e-books have payment and make buying physical books more logical. In conclusion, there will be no demands for newspapers and physical books in future and new technology could updated the current usages of them too.

Response: Choosing the best method to achieve goals by children is highly debatable topic these days. it is sometimes thought that in some cultures, pupils are often told to receive their desired goals by overcoming one hardship after another. Despite a few disadvantages associated with this view, I believe that its benefits greatly outweigh the cons. Positively, no one can deny that hardwork can often make up for a lack of talent to achieve goals in some cultures. A main advantages of this view is that if children want to have an identity in society in the future, they can enough practice to be professional in their skills. As a result, they find suitable jobs related to their skills, followed by good positions in society. Another point to consider is that it is worth giving children motivation to hardwork because it can be more effective for those who are suffer from a lack of self-assurane. As a result, they can believe themselves are capable of obtainig their desired goals. Negatively, there are some drawbacks to trying more enough to obtain specific goals. The principal issue with this view is that it may be mentaly hurt children because it gives them stress when they would not perfectly deal with challenges and problems. Because there is a posibility of failing in achieving their goals. Moreover, if due to some cultures children were forced to try hard to achieve anything, they would show possibility to be more creative in different areas. For example, my parents do not force me to implement their ideas, and consequently, I become more independent in my ideas and can obtain my goals. However, this incidence is less likely to occure and lots of people are not involved in this type of issue. In conclusion, weighting both sides of the arguments, I would say that although in some cultures pupils show less creativity and dependency because they are forced to try hard, it is more important to give them motivation and be aware of practicing one day after another to be more seccessful in their future and job market.

Response: It is predicted that in the coming years all cars, buses and trucks will be autonomous. Therefore, individuals will no longer see drivers in these modern vehicles. While there will be some disadvantages to these cutting-edge vehicles, I believe that their benefits will be far weightier than their drawbacks. On the one hand, I concede that driverless cars could eliminate the joy of driving. There is a large portion of individuals who derive immense pleasure from driving, so the advent of driverless cars may deprive these people of this enjoyment. It could be argued that, AI-driven buses might pose a threat to our safety. Take terrorist hackers as an apparent example; if they manage to hack into a bus’s database, they may have the chance to take a heavy toll on our security. Another drawback is the high initial costs of producing driverless trucks. To elaborate, implementing autonomous truck technology requires substantial investment in research, development and infrastructure, which could become a financial burden for the nation. On the other hand, although the downsides to driverless vehicles could be valid concerns, I strongly believe that there will be many more significant upsides to these state-of-the-art vehicles. Firstly, self-driving cars will provide individuals with independent mobility. Therefore, disabled people, the elderly and individuals who cannot drive conventional cars will have the opportunity to commute with their own vehicles. Secondly, automated buses could enhance safety. These kinds of vehicles, can reduce the risk of accidents caused by human errors, making public transportation safer for both passengers and other road users. It goes without saying that, a large portion of fatal accidents is due to human errors, which might be eradicated by the emergence of driverless buses. Finally, autonomous trucks can offer lucrative efficiency. That is to say, these kinds of trucks will be able to operate around the clock without requiring breaks or rest periods, enabling more effective use of time. Likewise, driverless trucks might eliminate the need for human drivers, which can lead to significant savings on labor costs. In conclusion, although I acknowledge that the transition to entirely driverless cars, buses and trucks in the future may present some drawbacks, I strongly believe that these innovative vehicles will bring tangible benefits to humanity.