IELTS Writing Samples

Response: Currently, it is possible to find various products from different parts of the world, all in one place, such as a supermarket. I am of the opinion that it has two major positive impacts. To begin with, this helps residents get familiar with other cultures and cuisines. Since foods from other countries are widely available, individuals can purchase the exported ones, and give them a try. Moreover, it may encourage them to search for the origin of that food. Consequently, they gain more insight into that country, and its history. For example, most of the people in the world may not get the chance to visit Mexico in their lives; however, they can taste its local food in their own hometown, which allows them to learn more about that region, as well. Another argument is the fact that it adds to the diversity of nutrients people receive from foods. They notice a wider range of options to buy, so they can opt for different meals to eat everyday. Hence, they get variety of nutrients as the ingredients of products differ from one another. In my country, for instance, the import of Japanese food, such as sushi, leads to greater consumption of seafood, which was considerably less in the past. As a result, it has changed and improved the eating habits in my country to some extent. To sum up, I believe that finding numerous food products from other cuisines, provides the opportunity to learn more about their traditions and food heritage. Additionally, it benefits people nutritionally, by providing larger amount of nutrients.

Response: In several countries in recent years, individuals are able to go to a supermarket and purchase foreigner food products from different parts of the world. It has its own pros and cons. This essay discusses both sides of this issue. In general, I believe it is a positive development since it can be used to make a progress in the economy and boost the level of satisfaction of people. It is widely accepted that having opportunity to buy products from different countries increases competition in a country. In this circumstance, domestic producers ought to produce items with higher quality to compete with foreigner peers. As a result, people are able to choose the better product. For instance, chocolate like Nutella and Jif are really delicious and yummy. Companies in my country would produce chocolate according to the global standards, if they want to stay in the market. In this way, interior companies will create chocolate with high quality. On the other hand, it has several drawbacks. A group of people tend to buy only branded products and foods from other countries. They claim that domestic products do not have acceptable quality. As a result, if companies do not level up their food, they would deal with breakdowns. In addition, a large group of members in society will lose their job. It means that society will counter with economic and social issues. In conclusion, I argue that it is critical to make a balance between using interior and exterior products. Domestic companies should to take advantages of the competitional market. Not only does it help them to produce foods with convenient quality, but it also helps them to earn more money by selling more foods.

Response: It is said that these days in a lot of countries, food products are always available for buyers in markets all around the world. What I believe is that this idea is positive development because it has made life easier and helps food industry to grow widely. This essay will argue these statements. Firstly, one of the positive points considered to be living easily and freely. As can be seen, people do not need to search for food anymore because it is provided in quantity they want in different shops. In other words, although initially individuals had to go to long distance to provide something to eat, now consumers can focus on other aspects of life and hunger is not a significant issue. For example, various groups of people had to replace their location because of the lack of food but now there are number of supermarkets in one street and no one have to do those hard tasks. On the other hand, the growth of food industry has merits like more job opportunities. What should be mention is that people are working in many fields connected to this market these days and new careers are developing in this field every day. For example, they harvest plants, collect the raw materials, do the packaging in factories, transport them to other places, and at the end sell the products. In summary, having access to food products in markets all over the world makes life easier for consumers and this action helps this industry to progress and in my opinion these developments considered to be positive.

Response: The idea that in some countries, customers can buy all kinds all food produced around the world is popular. From my point of view, access to all types of food in many countries has some favorable aspects, which will be addressed in this essay. First and foremost, a variety of food in supermarkets in some countries provides a situation in which immigrants who would like to have their traditional food, easily buy their favorite food and it may cause recalling their memories. For instance, my family, who has migrated abroad, are extremely keen on trying Iranian food again. If this change spreads all over the world, it will resolve immigrants’ desires. Furthermore, some part of the world has many limitations in the variety of food so all their original food is restricted to only several types. Thus, the distribution of other food especially the ones that are categorized as nutrient-rich can be helpful for their citizens in order to have more options to choose from. For example, some people like to taste Italian food for several reasons like its taste, being nutrients, etc., in this situation is not necessary to travel to Italy, and they are able to buy it from a supermarket in their neighborhood. By way of conclusion, the issue that nowadays usually all kinds of food are available in supermarkets in some countries is a positive or negative development is controversial. As far as I am concerned, providing a condition in which some people in the world have access to a variety of food has positive points, which have been discussed throughout the essay.

Response: The accessibility to various nations’ foods by purchasers has become tremendous in a wide number of lands in Hyper Stores. From my perspective, this phenomenon is a positive one. Cultural exchange is one of its most significant merits. As a result of the worldwide availability of numerous country’s cuisines, eaters might be fond of having more information regarding not only the recipes of those meals but also concerning those indigenous individuals who have cooked them. Therefore, by either exploring the Internet or asking local people, such as the cook or the chef of that restaurant, their traditions and thoughts can be transferred. The economic boom is another affirmative impact of this happening. Along with food, other endemic products of different regions can find the potential to attract those clients who have eaten those areas’ dishes due to being interested in their cultures. To exemplify, once eating Ainu, a reputable and scrumptious Japanese cuisine, an American could be provoked to wear a Kimono, the traditional costume of Japan, to complete their sense of joy and simulate a quite Japanese atmosphere. Moreover, taste growth is a great achievement of the vast availability of global meals. Although many territories possess plenty of flavors, there are still new ingredients in the world to be tasted. If a multitude of national meals enters the international market, foreigners get familiar with some tastes that they have not ever experienced, and this can lead to flavor diversity. For instance, Europeans are often disinterested in Thai food, which is drastically spicy, and owing to meeting that on their grocery shopping and purchasing a sample, the tendency to get used to this never-tasted item is very likely to rise. To conclude, the food market has become global in the majority of districts, and by visiting shops and malls, they can be bought by the customer. This trend has some advantages, such as transferring cultures, economic expansion, and development in flavors.

Response: It is certainly true that in most countries, individuals are now purchasing meals from different states in the malls. In my opinion, the merits of this case are more than its demerits. On the one hand, there can be a number of drawbacks of buying varying food made around the world. Firstly, there is a possibility that the quality of those dishes is unacceptable. What I mean by this is that while the products are inspected before they are brought to supermarkets, they are likely to lose their calories and deteriorate in quality over time as well as ultimately, become unhealthy. For instance, according to researches, approximately 20% of people in Uzbekistan are suffering from various diseases due to consuming meals produced in other countries. Secondly, the import of food to a state might be a causative factor in the failure of sales of local food centers. To be more precise, consumers can be crazy about the dishes of other countries and more and less buy local food. On the other hand, some individuals, including me, feel that there are several benefits of consuming food made abroad. Firstly, their unique and tasty flavour can be enjoyed and eaten more by local people. This will undoubtedly be a great source of income for businessmen engaged in foreign food trade. Secondly, local grocers whose sales are failing can create new innovations and novelties, namely, new types of food products and recipes in order to rise the number of customers again. To conclude, I strongly believe that the downsides bringing foreign food into malls can be dominated by its advantages like making a huge contribution to the country's stock market and motivating local entrepreneurs.