IELTS Writing Samples

Response: In many nations, life expectancy is increasing compared to the past. In my view, even though governments have no choice but to face some monetary challenges, the benefits of this trend are more considerable since not only younger generation can be more hopeful when they know that they can live longer lives, but also they can receive advice from the older generation, which can be directed in order to make decisions more wisely. It is undeniable that when people’s lives become longer, societies encounter financial issues. When people age longer lives, a considerable portion of the population is made up by the elderly. As a result, businesses cannot work efficiently because the ratio of adept workers decrease as the elderly cannot work effectively at the workplace. Consequently, less products are manufactured, and governments cannot earn from the companies considerably. Also, when these people reach their retirement ages, they are required to receive pensions, so governments need to allocate a great deal of the budget of the country to these members of the society. Therefore, it is not worth the money if individuals live longer because not only their performances at the workplace are not efficient, but also governments should devote some money as pension to them. Despite the mentioned problems, if people live longer lives, they hope that in the future they can lead happier lifestyles. If life duration of people was extremely short, younger generation would not definitely enjoy their lives because they find it useless to continue their lives. As a result, they would become depressed and would face some mental problems, such as anxiety. However, when their life expectancy is longer, they will eagerly engage themselves in their lives. In this case, they even hope that when they become retired, they will be able to enjoy the peace and quiet of their lives in their early ages, which increases their happiness. Furthermore, the presence of the elderly is crucial to younger generation because younger individuals can be navigated to success when they receive advice from the seniors. Older members of the community are mature adults who have experiences different situations during their lives, so they are valuable sources of advice for the youngsters. For instance, when younger people face some monetary challenges in their lives, their grandparents can make them aware of the fact that they cannot become a millionaire overnight, and should invest their money wisely in appropriate ways. Moreover, as seniors have met numerous people with different characteristics, they can help their children to find the best people for marriage. Thus, if life expectancy grows, the younger generation can receive useful information of the elderly, which navigates them towards success. In conclusion, in many places, people’s life duration has become longer. While this can make some problems for societies, I believe that merits of this pattern, such as creation of hope in younger people and receiving advice from the elderly, are more significant.

Response: Every society has its particular belief. There is a common belief among families in some cultures that everything could be achievable if any individual put its all effort which they transfer it to their kids. There are advantages and drawbacks in this statement. The idea that everything could be achieved with hard working, and transferring it to the children, would bring some personal issues for human. Natural accidents could have a negative impact on the process to the success. So, when someone dedicate all his life and childhood to achieving one aim, then getting any negative result from the procedure could damage their confidence. Moreover, lack of confidence, could face them a lot of issues in their path. In the other word, the less confidence they have, less focus the get. For instance, Arat who was a teenage swimmer in Iran and his aim was gold Olympic medal, but he had injured in car accident before the Olympic. He did not have chosen for the competition and he lost his confidence and On the other hand, believing our ability as a human, could have a huge impact on being successful. Believing that everything can be achieved by working hard, give people a meaning for their life and their work. Moreover, having this idea, can push every individual to their goal. As a result, they are not going to give up all the experiences they got in this path, and they will be close to their purpose. For example, Elan Musk, did an unsuccessful satellite lunch in 2019. But he did not give up his dream and he is trying . until two month ago which his dream came true. To conclude, believing in hard working could be both beneficial and detrimental. It has some positive impact to pursue dreams, while, it could cause mental damage for some people.

Response: Nowadays, access to international foods and fruits from supermarkets and shopping malls has become more prevalence. I believe it can bring several benefits to locals and tourists. One of the advantages of this global food access is that locals can consume their desirable agricultural products that originally have not been cultivated in their country. For instance, when I worked out in a gym and went for a diet, Avacado was one of my main fruits in my diet regimen. Not only does this fruit have less Callories among others but it also boosts stamina and prevents muscle weakness during endurance exercices. Unfortunately, Avocado is not a local fruit in Iran. However, I could easily purchase it from a nearby supermarket, as it is imported from countries with tropical climates. Therefore, locals can enjoy accessing to international foods and fruits that are not usually cooked or grow in their country. Moreover, the more international foods are available in a country, the more convenient would be for tourists. Establishing numerous international restauants in tourist hotspots ensure that people with different tastes can be attracted to the area, increasing tourist influx and bring economic and financial benefits to the host's government. Furthermore, this can improve cultural exchange and connects people globally, familiarizing them with different nations' cuisines and traditional dishes. For instance, a new turkish restaurant has been developed in our city, teaming with customers who saught after turkish dishes, such as Burok. Even, some people have been encouraged to find the receipes and learn how to cook them. Thus, as international foods get more available in a country, not only can captivate tourists to the area but also different foods of countries can assimilate into the local cultures, making people socially and emotionally closer. In conclusion, I believe it is beneficial to have access to international food products from supermarkets and restaurants, as it can have essential advantages for both locals and tourists. Locals can taste the agricultural products that is not harvested in their own country and enjoy their tastes and reap their health benefits. Furthermore, it can lead in more tourist influx and people can gain knowledge about other cultures and traditional dishes.

Response: There have been competing views on whether highly qualified people should work in the country where they trained. In my opinion, they should be free to work wherever they want in order to achieve maximum career fulfillment. Mandating that skilled workers stay in the country that trains them helps to avoid brain drain. Without this policy, many of them may move to another country that pays better and offers a higher standard of living. If a country loses the bright minds that innovate and build companies, its economy will suffer. However, I do not think that the policy in question is an ideal way to prevent brain drain because forcing a worker to stay in a place where they do not want to be can stifle their creativity and productivity. Those on the other side of the argument say that highly trained people should be free to move, a practice that enables them to find fulfillment in work. There are lines of work a person can do only in certain regions. For example, if engineers who trained in India want to work with the world's latest technology, their best choice is to go to the US and work for tech giants like Amazon and SpaceX. Only when a person is doing what they want can they find fulfillment in their careers. Since fulfilled workers are more likely to reach their full potential, I agree that the educated should have the freedom to choose where they want to work. In conclusion, while requiring skilled professionals to work in the country where they are trained can prevent the loss of talent, I believe it is best to grant them freedom of movement because they are more likely to reach their full potential when they feel fulfilled by their work.

Response: It is important to consider how people should react in difficult circumstances. While some people think acceptance can be helpful in challenging situations, such as financial difficulties or undesirable jobs, I would agree with those who believe people should transform adverse conditions into better ones. To begin with, accepting a severe situation can reduce individuals’ stress levels. This is because when people refuse to accept their circumstances, they have to take action to alter unfavorable conditions. Consequently, the process of change often involves risk, such as losing a steady income or facing new uncertainties, thus may lead to more anxiety. Conversely, those facing financial struggles might find peace in accepting their current situation, as seeking alternative could put them under pressure. Therefore, for some, acceptance provide a sense of stability and relief, especially when the potential for improvement seems limited or unreachable. However, progress is only attainable when someone is open to the possibility of having a different life. For example, consider a person stuck in a dead-end career, monotonous role, if they choose to stay due to fear of change, they might deprive themselves of the chance of find a fulfilling job they are passionate about, but also in the long term, this might increase the hazard of depression and other mental health issues. In contrast, if they take step to improve their situation, such as acquiring new skills or applying for better role, they may achieve not only a higher salary but also greater job satisfaction and personal fulfillment. In conclusion, although accepting difficult conditions may offer short-term relief, I believe trying to improve these situations is vital to achieving success and personal advancement.

Response: In recent times, shoppers in many countries have the option to buy food from all over the world at supermarkets. In my view, while it can sometimes negatively affect local producers and the quality of imported food, overall, the positives are more significant. On the one hand, the availability of global food products in supermarkets can present two major challenges. One problem is that it can reduce the sales of locally produced food and lead to joblessness and potential bankruptcy for local producers and farmers as they usually struggle to compete with famous international brands. Many customers would probably prefer more widely-known brands, viewing them as more reliable, which can greatly reduce the demand for local products. Importing food from other countries can also affect both its freshness and quality. Because of the long distances required for transportation, imported food is usually not as fresh as locally produced options and may include preservatives or additives, which could be harmful to health. Despite these drawbacks, the benefits of having access to a diverse range of global food products cannot be ignored. Firstly, it leads to increased consumer choices and allows them to buy a product based on their preferences, dietary needs, or cultural background. For instance, Iranian immigrants in Europe and North America can purchase ingredients of Iranian cuisines, such as saffron, from supermarkets, and enjoy cooking traditional local food. In addition, importing food products from various countries helps international trade and the economy. The exchange of food between countries can create new occupational opportunities, and strengthen their economic relationship. This can also encourage local farmers to stay in the competition and offer higher quality products and more varied options. In conclusion, while the accessibility of global food products in supermarkets around the world is not without drawbacks, I believe we gain more than we lose from this development.

Response: In modern times, people in many countries can access to foods from different parts of the world, thanks to the globalization that has brought this opportunity. While it poses negative impacts on our planet, I believe that it has its positive aspects as well. Firstly, migrants can purchase their favorite products from different countries. In this globalized world, many people have migrated to experience more. With availability of their national foods and products they can sooth their home-sickness, which allows them to be more productive. For instance, Iranian national cuisine comprises various ingredients that can hardly be found in other places. As a result of this phenomenon, Iranian can still cook their cherished meals even in other countries. Secondly, individuals can experience other national dishes from all around the world. For example, nowadays people from European countries can sample foods from Asia or Affrica and broaden their knowledge about other ethnicities. Therefore, people can strike up a conversation with their foreign friend over their foods, which can act as a powerful medium to foster friendships. However, transporting products around the globe can cause greenhouse gases’ levels to rise, which eventually may result in climate change and environmental issues. Although this development may have drawbacks, in my opinion its advantages outweigh its disadvantages. In conclusion, people from many countries can now purchase goods from other countries. While some might argue that this can undesirable consequences, I contend that this trend can foster unity and understanding for people. By taking other measures like promoting electrical vehicles or planting more trees, the problems of this globalized phenomenon may be mitigated.

Response: In the present climate, ecological issues have become a matter of concern for many individuals.While some insist on the extinction of certain flora and fauna around the globe as the most vital matter today, others, including myself, claim that there are other pressing environmental obstacles to take into account.On one side of the argument, some maintain that with the loss of certain animals and various species of plants in different regions, the Earth's ecological balance might be hampered.They propose that loss of habitat due to the misguided policies and government's regulations worldwide contribute to animals and plant to go extinct, which should be considered as the main environmental issue. For instance, the number of Tigers in Iran is significantly dwindling due to the lack of preservation practices. Thus,it is implied that raising awareness and implementing policies to aviod mitigating the ecological effects, are of paramount importance.On the other hand, many state that some root problems , in particular climate change, are more inconsequential to point out. These challenges bring about a chain of other devestating issues and events, like pollution, droughts and floods , alterations in climate and ultimately loss of habitat and different species.By taking an active role in combating climate change, other challenges which are factor in , would also be resolved.Hence, a collective effort to reduce the climate change impacts is suggested.In the final analysis, although losing different plants and animals species is one of the most concerning issues in this day and age, resolving more fundemental obstacles in particular climate change is more feasible option.I find myself among those who concur with the latter belief.

Response: Currently, it is possible to find various products from different parts of the world, all in one place, such as a supermarket. I am of the opinion that it has two major positive impacts. To begin with, this helps residents get familiar with other cultures and cuisines. Since foods from other countries are widely available, individuals can purchase the exported ones, and give them a try. Moreover, it may encourage them to search for the origin of that food. Consequently, they gain more insight into that country, and its history. For example, most of the people in the world may not get the chance to visit Mexico in their lives; however, they can taste its local food in their own hometown, which allows them to learn more about that region, as well. Another argument is the fact that it adds to the diversity of nutrients people receive from foods. They notice a wider range of options to buy, so they can opt for different meals to eat everyday. Hence, they get variety of nutrients as the ingredients of products differ from one another. In my country, for instance, the import of Japanese food, such as sushi, leads to greater consumption of seafood, which was considerably less in the past. As a result, it has changed and improved the eating habits in my country to some extent. To sum up, I believe that finding numerous food products from other cuisines, provides the opportunity to learn more about their traditions and food heritage. Additionally, it benefits people nutritionally, by providing larger amount of nutrients.

Response: The environmental challenges we face today are numerous and complex, leading to differing opinions on which issue should be prioritized. Some people believe that the loss of specific plant and animal species is the most pressing environmental problem, while others argue that there are more significant issues to address. On the one hand, individuals argue that the priority issue is the loss of species of plants and animals. In fact, they refer to the critical role that biodiversity plays in maintaining healthy ecosystems. Each species contributes to the balance of its environment, and extinction of even a single species can have far- reaching consequences. Moreover, the loss of animal and plant species and biodiversity serves as a warning signal for broader environmental degradation. When species disappear, it shows that ecosystems are under pressure human activity such as habitat destruction and overexploitation of natural resources. On the other hand, others argue there are more pressing environmental problems for humanity and the planet. Climate change, for example, is a global crisis that effects weather patterns, see levels, food security. The increase in extreme weather events, such as hurricanes and droughts, directly impacts human populations and wildlife alike. Additionally, pollution whether it be air, water, or soil has damage effects on health and ecosystems. Proponents of this view that while species loss is concerning, it is often a symbol of larger issues, such as climate change and habitat destruction, which require urgent attention. To sum up, while the loss of plant and animal species is a serious environmental concern, it should not be viewed in isolation. we have try to maintain ecosystem.