IELTS Writing Samples

Response: There have been competing views on whether highly qualified people should work in the country where they trained. In my opinion, they should be free to work wherever they want in order to achieve maximum career fulfillment. Mandating that skilled workers stay in the country that trains them helps to avoid brain drain. Without this policy, many of them may move to another country that pays better and offers a higher standard of living. If a country loses the bright minds that innovate and build companies, its economy will suffer. However, I do not think that the policy in question is an ideal way to prevent brain drain because forcing a worker to stay in a place where they do not want to be can stifle their creativity and productivity. Those on the other side of the argument say that highly trained people should be free to move, a practice that enables them to find fulfillment in work. There are lines of work a person can do only in certain regions. For example, if engineers who trained in India want to work with the world's latest technology, their best choice is to go to the US and work for tech giants like Amazon and SpaceX. Only when a person is doing what they want can they find fulfillment in their careers. Since fulfilled workers are more likely to reach their full potential, I agree that the educated should have the freedom to choose where they want to work. In conclusion, while requiring skilled professionals to work in the country where they are trained can prevent the loss of talent, I believe it is best to grant them freedom of movement because they are more likely to reach their full potential when they feel fulfilled by their work.

Response: It is important to consider how people should react in difficult circumstances. While some people think acceptance can be helpful in challenging situations, such as financial difficulties or undesirable jobs, I would agree with those who believe people should transform adverse conditions into better ones. To begin with, accepting a severe situation can reduce individuals’ stress levels. This is because when people refuse to accept their circumstances, they have to take action to alter unfavorable conditions. Consequently, the process of change often involves risk, such as losing a steady income or facing new uncertainties, thus may lead to more anxiety. Conversely, those facing financial struggles might find peace in accepting their current situation, as seeking alternative could put them under pressure. Therefore, for some, acceptance provide a sense of stability and relief, especially when the potential for improvement seems limited or unreachable. However, progress is only attainable when someone is open to the possibility of having a different life. For example, consider a person stuck in a dead-end career, monotonous role, if they choose to stay due to fear of change, they might deprive themselves of the chance of find a fulfilling job they are passionate about, but also in the long term, this might increase the hazard of depression and other mental health issues. In contrast, if they take step to improve their situation, such as acquiring new skills or applying for better role, they may achieve not only a higher salary but also greater job satisfaction and personal fulfillment. In conclusion, although accepting difficult conditions may offer short-term relief, I believe trying to improve these situations is vital to achieving success and personal advancement.

Response: In recent times, shoppers in many countries have the option to buy food from all over the world at supermarkets. In my view, while it can sometimes negatively affect local producers and the quality of imported food, overall, the positives are more significant. On the one hand, the availability of global food products in supermarkets can present two major challenges. One problem is that it can reduce the sales of locally produced food and lead to joblessness and potential bankruptcy for local producers and farmers as they usually struggle to compete with famous international brands. Many customers would probably prefer more widely-known brands, viewing them as more reliable, which can greatly reduce the demand for local products. Importing food from other countries can also affect both its freshness and quality. Because of the long distances required for transportation, imported food is usually not as fresh as locally produced options and may include preservatives or additives, which could be harmful to health. Despite these drawbacks, the benefits of having access to a diverse range of global food products cannot be ignored. Firstly, it leads to increased consumer choices and allows them to buy a product based on their preferences, dietary needs, or cultural background. For instance, Iranian immigrants in Europe and North America can purchase ingredients of Iranian cuisines, such as saffron, from supermarkets, and enjoy cooking traditional local food. In addition, importing food products from various countries helps international trade and the economy. The exchange of food between countries can create new occupational opportunities, and strengthen their economic relationship. This can also encourage local farmers to stay in the competition and offer higher quality products and more varied options. In conclusion, while the accessibility of global food products in supermarkets around the world is not without drawbacks, I believe we gain more than we lose from this development.

Response: In modern times, people in many countries can access to foods from different parts of the world, thanks to the globalization that has brought this opportunity. While it poses negative impacts on our planet, I believe that it has its positive aspects as well. Firstly, migrants can purchase their favorite products from different countries. In this globalized world, many people have migrated to experience more. With availability of their national foods and products they can sooth their home-sickness, which allows them to be more productive. For instance, Iranian national cuisine comprises various ingredients that can hardly be found in other places. As a result of this phenomenon, Iranian can still cook their cherished meals even in other countries. Secondly, individuals can experience other national dishes from all around the world. For example, nowadays people from European countries can sample foods from Asia or Affrica and broaden their knowledge about other ethnicities. Therefore, people can strike up a conversation with their foreign friend over their foods, which can act as a powerful medium to foster friendships. However, transporting products around the globe can cause greenhouse gases’ levels to rise, which eventually may result in climate change and environmental issues. Although this development may have drawbacks, in my opinion its advantages outweigh its disadvantages. In conclusion, people from many countries can now purchase goods from other countries. While some might argue that this can undesirable consequences, I contend that this trend can foster unity and understanding for people. By taking other measures like promoting electrical vehicles or planting more trees, the problems of this globalized phenomenon may be mitigated.

Response: In the present climate, ecological issues have become a matter of concern for many individuals.While some insist on the extinction of certain flora and fauna around the globe as the most vital matter today, others, including myself, claim that there are other pressing environmental obstacles to take into account.On one side of the argument, some maintain that with the loss of certain animals and various species of plants in different regions, the Earth's ecological balance might be hampered.They propose that loss of habitat due to the misguided policies and government's regulations worldwide contribute to animals and plant to go extinct, which should be considered as the main environmental issue. For instance, the number of Tigers in Iran is significantly dwindling due to the lack of preservation practices. Thus,it is implied that raising awareness and implementing policies to aviod mitigating the ecological effects, are of paramount importance.On the other hand, many state that some root problems , in particular climate change, are more inconsequential to point out. These challenges bring about a chain of other devestating issues and events, like pollution, droughts and floods , alterations in climate and ultimately loss of habitat and different species.By taking an active role in combating climate change, other challenges which are factor in , would also be resolved.Hence, a collective effort to reduce the climate change impacts is suggested.In the final analysis, although losing different plants and animals species is one of the most concerning issues in this day and age, resolving more fundemental obstacles in particular climate change is more feasible option.I find myself among those who concur with the latter belief.

Response: Currently, it is possible to find various products from different parts of the world, all in one place, such as a supermarket. I am of the opinion that it has two major positive impacts. To begin with, this helps residents get familiar with other cultures and cuisines. Since foods from other countries are widely available, individuals can purchase the exported ones, and give them a try. Moreover, it may encourage them to search for the origin of that food. Consequently, they gain more insight into that country, and its history. For example, most of the people in the world may not get the chance to visit Mexico in their lives; however, they can taste its local food in their own hometown, which allows them to learn more about that region, as well. Another argument is the fact that it adds to the diversity of nutrients people receive from foods. They notice a wider range of options to buy, so they can opt for different meals to eat everyday. Hence, they get variety of nutrients as the ingredients of products differ from one another. In my country, for instance, the import of Japanese food, such as sushi, leads to greater consumption of seafood, which was considerably less in the past. As a result, it has changed and improved the eating habits in my country to some extent. To sum up, I believe that finding numerous food products from other cuisines, provides the opportunity to learn more about their traditions and food heritage. Additionally, it benefits people nutritionally, by providing larger amount of nutrients.

Response: The environmental challenges we face today are numerous and complex, leading to differing opinions on which issue should be prioritized. Some people believe that the loss of specific plant and animal species is the most pressing environmental problem, while others argue that there are more significant issues to address. On the one hand, individuals argue that the priority issue is the loss of species of plants and animals. In fact, they refer to the critical role that biodiversity plays in maintaining healthy ecosystems. Each species contributes to the balance of its environment, and extinction of even a single species can have far- reaching consequences. Moreover, the loss of animal and plant species and biodiversity serves as a warning signal for broader environmental degradation. When species disappear, it shows that ecosystems are under pressure human activity such as habitat destruction and overexploitation of natural resources. On the other hand, others argue there are more pressing environmental problems for humanity and the planet. Climate change, for example, is a global crisis that effects weather patterns, see levels, food security. The increase in extreme weather events, such as hurricanes and droughts, directly impacts human populations and wildlife alike. Additionally, pollution whether it be air, water, or soil has damage effects on health and ecosystems. Proponents of this view that while species loss is concerning, it is often a symbol of larger issues, such as climate change and habitat destruction, which require urgent attention. To sum up, while the loss of plant and animal species is a serious environmental concern, it should not be viewed in isolation. we have try to maintain ecosystem.

Response: The environmental challenges we face today are numerous and complex, leading to differing opinions on which issue should be prioritized. Some people believe that loss of specific plants and animal species is the most pressing environmental problem, while others argue that there are more significant issues to address. On the one hand, individuals argue for prioritizing issue is the loss of species of plants and animals. Infact, thay refer to the critical role that biodiversity plays in maintaining healthy ecosystem. Each species contributes to the balance of its environment, and extinction of even a single species can have far- reaching consequences. Moreover, loss of species animals and plants and biodiversity serve as a warning signal for broader environmental degradation. When disappear species, shows that ecosystem is under pressure human activity such as habitat destruction and overexploitation of natural resources. On the other hand, others argue there are more environmental problems for humanity, planet. Climate change, for example, is a global crisis that effects weather patterns, see levels, food security. The increasing of extreme weather events, such as hurricanes and droughts, directly impacts human populations and wildlife alike. Additionally, pollution weather it be air, water, or soil has damage effects on health and ecosystems. Proponents of this view that while species loss of is concerning . it is often symbol of large issues, such as climate change and habitat destruction, which require urgent attention. To sum up, while a loss of species of plants and animals is a serious environmental concern, it not should be viewed in isolation. we have try to for remain ecosystem.

Response: Mobile phones, nowadays, contains essential features with entertainment also. There has been a large growth seen in usage hours of smartphones among youngsters There are several reasoris behind this situation and I find this development more beneficial than negative. Both the reasons and my view is elaborated further. The first reason for overusage of smart devices by youngsters is the social benefit they provide The smart phone connected with internet opens up the large possibilities, from creating new friends to communicating with them over social media. For instance, a child in my neighbourhood chats for hours with his school friends over Facebook (a social media) and also spend time over online video sharing phone application. Moreover, the mobile gaming, specially multiplayer games, is another major reason for the situation. Children plays different kind of games over mobile for the entertainment purpose and they involve themselves in games in such a manner, that they forget about the timing and other work to do. However, I believe that smartphones have also increased the knowledge of pupils. It has developed some important social skills, such as communication skill, team work and many more, by allowing them to work and play in groups, without the restriction of distance. In addition, children can learn through internet by watchin online videos and reading articles, which ultimately helps them in their studies as well as language skills. For example, whenever my niece require to know about something, he searches it over the internet and learns from it. Moreover, multiplayer online gaming improves their multitasking ability and it also gives them a competitive environment Overall, I agree that overusage of smartphones on regular basis is harmful for them, but if given proper guidance, mobile phones can help them in learning some life-long skills

Response: It is crucial for people to be risk-seekers in terms of personal and professional aspects. While there are some undeniable drawbacks in taking risks, I think merits of choosing risks are more considerable, which both of them will be discussed in the following essay. When people make risky decisions, they may face some problems in their practical and private aspects of their lives. Regarding making unexpected professional decisions, they may lose their positions of their current work if they want to change their career. For instance, if someone threaten his career life to change his workplace suddenly, this person may find it difficult to find a well-paid job. In addition to this, if he or she cannot find his or her desired work, they find it difficult to return to their initial job. Moreover, when people decide to make a dangerous change in their personal lives and want to borrow a huge amount of money, they may not be able to run up huge debts because clearing debts requires managerial knowledge. However, people need to embrace risks in their lives to achieve its benefits in their personal lives. Life without taking risks is boring to people, so if they do repetitive activities, they experience meaningless lives. On the contrary, a life with fluctuation enlightens people’s minds because the more actions they do, the more their brains process information. Consequently, they can make wiser decisions in different parts of their lives. Additionally, they are more experienced in different aspects of their lives, so they recognize that they enjoy having a sense of accomplishment, which results in sensing usefulness. Furthermore, when people prefer to experience risky lives, they will have more opportunity to become successful in their practical aspects of their lives. When people want to become successful in their studies, they need to avoid working for a long time, which is a risky decision, especially in the countries suffer from economic issues, such as inflation. Nevertheless, when they become successful in their exams, they can make bright futures for themselves. For example, Mohammad Reza Aref who was a talented student at Tehran University, sacrificed his job in order to focus on the subjects of his university more deeply. His risky decision took off, and he could create educational prospects for himself as he could gain high marks, and could be accepted in Sharif University of Technology as a professor. Therefore, when people accepts risks, they will be able to become successful in their professional lives. In conclusion, with regard to decide in a risky manner, people may encounter some problems, namely job losses and facing financial complicated situation, while there are some benefits of making risky decisions, including climbing educational ladder and enjoyment of lives. I believe that positive points have more weight than the negative ones.