Question: The most important aim of science should be to improve people’s lives. To what extent do...

Marking Generated by Free AI Models

You are on the free tier, which uses free AI models. They can occasionally be slow, unstable, or temporarily unavailable. Balang Plus uses premium models for faster, more reliable, and higher-quality marking.

Click on red question marks (?) to see an explanation for each change. Some changes are only suggestions and don't mean the original is necessarily wrong.
Some people believe that the optimal goal of scientific workswork should be to enhance the quality of people's lives. While scientists should try to developedevelop their knowledge in scientific subjects, I agree with the idea that it is most crucial to make improvmentsimprovements in our lives. On the one hand, it is vital for scientistscientists to aquireacquire more information about their area of specialization. One of their purposes can be expanding the knowledge they already have by doing more research and experimentexperiments. Finding new discoveries will change the periviousprevious false information and contribute to gaingaining a better understanding of the world, humans, and many other various unknown issues. For example, the information about the space has changed throughout human existanceexistence, and now we have more knowledge about planets, stars, and their characteristics. However, I believe enhancing people's lives is an essencialessential aim for scientistscientists. One of the main aspects that should be improved is health problems. Scientific experiments should be done on viruses or other causes of illnesses in order to discover more effective medicine, so rapid recovery can be possible for patients. AdditionalyAdditionally, creating new machines for assisting doctors, operating in the safest way is crucial. For example, recently doctors are provided with the assisstanceassistance of robots for doing delicate operations. By doing these measures, risks to human's health will be reduced. Furthuremore Furthermore, preserving the environment is important for us and even for the next generations. Scientific experiments can be done on fossil fuels for making them less harmful for humans. They can also can find better ways of utilizingutilising renewable sources of energy like solar, wind, and water power. This leadesleads to a healthier air and cleaner water in our environment, which can maintain our health condition and plant for many years from now tointo the future. In conclusion, scientists should work on obtaining new information about the science itselfeitself, while keeping the improvement of people's lives their most important aim.
See more samples for this topic
Check your essay for this topic
Overall Band Score
6.5
Overview
Vocabulary Range
Loading
Linking Words
Loading
Spelling
Loading
Grammar Accuracy
Loading
Grammar Range
Loading
Cohesion
Loading
Paragraph Structure
Loading
Task Response
Loading
Word Count
sufficient
While we are confident in our score estimation, you are not guaranteed to receive the same score in an official test.

Feedback

Task Response

The essay addresses the prompt effectively by discussing the importance of science in improving people's lives. It presents a clear position, agreeing with the statement that the primary aim of science should be to enhance the quality of life. The response provides relevant examples, such as advancements in health and environmental preservation, to support the argument. However, the essay could benefit from a more balanced discussion by acknowledging other potential aims of science, such as pure knowledge acquisition or technological advancement, and explaining why these are secondary to improving human life.

Coherence and Cohesion

The essay is generally well-organized, with a clear introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion. The use of linking words and phrases, such as "on the one hand," "however," and "furthermore," helps to guide the reader through the argument. However, some transitions could be smoother. For instance, the shift from discussing health improvements to environmental preservation could be more clearly connected to the overarching theme of improving human life.

Lexical Resource

The essay demonstrates a good range of vocabulary, with appropriate use of terms related to science and health, such as "viruses," "medicine," "renewable sources of energy," and "fossil fuels." There are some spelling errors, such as "develope" (develop), "aquire" (acquire), "perivious" (previous), "essencial" (essential), "Additionaly" (Additionally), "assisstance" (assistance), "Furthuremore" (Furthermore), "leades" (leads), and "itselfe" (itself), which should be corrected to improve the overall lexical accuracy.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy

The essay generally uses a range of grammatical structures accurately, including complex sentences and passive constructions. However, there are some grammatical errors that need attention, such as subject-verb agreement ("scientist" should be "scientists") and article usage ("the information about the space" should be "information about space"). Additionally, some sentences could be rephrased for clarity and conciseness.

Suggestions for Improvement

  1. Task Response: Consider discussing other potential aims of science and why they might be secondary to improving human life.
  2. Coherence and Cohesion: Ensure smoother transitions between ideas and maintain a clear connection to the main argument.
  3. Lexical Resource: Correct spelling errors and consider using synonyms to avoid repetition.
  4. Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Pay attention to subject-verb agreement, article usage, and sentence structure for clarity.

Overall, the essay presents a clear argument with relevant examples but could benefit from addressing counterarguments and improving language accuracy.