Some people say that every human being can create art, while others think only those born with the ability can create art. Discuss both views and give your opinion. Creating art has always been a controversial topic among people. Some believe that making a piece of art is directly related to an artist's talent, while others think that everyone, with or without any specific aptitude, is able to create art. In this essay, I will explain why the first group's notion is more logical than the other. On the one hand, some people believe that every human being is born with a specific talent that, if discovered and focused on, can flourish into a natural ability to create invaluable art. However, the vast majority of people do not have enough opportunity to become familiar with their talent, so most of these abilities remain undiscovered. In addition, many are not capable of pursuing their natural abilities, even if they are fortunate enough to find them. Therefore, numerous people live without creating a single piece of art. For example, we see many people with great voices who are not successful singers. On the other hand, the idea that only a few people with innate ability can create art is more sensible. Given that only a rare few are born with exceptional ability, it is effortless for them to create a perfect piece of art. In this case, even if others spend countless hours, a huge amount of energy, and a lot of money, they may reach nowhere. Hence, well-known artworks with valuable artistic merit are rare, as only a few people with natural ability in these areas can create them, while others are not able. In conclusion, although some people agree with the notion that every individual is able to create art, we must consider that finding and following these talents is extremely difficult. Other people, however, disagree with the first group and say that only a few people with natural ability can create art, which seems more logical to me because the number of valuable artworks and famous artists is rare.