This section presents a professionally wirtten variation of your essay and highlights the differences.
it is believed that the most crucial environmental problem in today's world is the extinction of important species. others believe there much more important obstacles to tend to. the second group are emphasizing on general treats to the planet. in contrast, the first group believe that preserving each specie is a small gesture with great benefits. although both points of views seem eligible, my opinion align more with seconds view.
It is believed that the most critical environmental problem in today's world is the extinction of important species. Others argue that there are far more pressing issues to address. The second group emphasizes broader threats to the planet, while the first group maintains that preserving each species is a small but impactful gesture. Although both perspectives have merit, my opinion aligns more closely with the latter view.
on the one hand, it is believed that our planet is suffering from major issues that require immediate actions and lives of individual creatures might be unimportant compare to them. human destructive behavior damaged environment noticeably and it will bring us to a point that makes us unable to repair it. for instance, cutting down trees of tropical jungles in a large scale and significant increase in carbon dioxide emissions had resulted in global warming and climate changes.
On the one hand, our planet faces major environmental crises that demand immediate action, making the survival of individual species seem insignificant in comparison. Human activities have caused severe damage to the environment, pushing it toward irreversible decline. For instance, large-scale deforestation and the dramatic rise in carbon emissions have led to global warming and climate change, posing existential threats to ecosystems worldwide.
on the other hand, some people think that to preserve nature small steps should be taken and saving a few particular endangered animal or planet is a much easier and more intellectual move. there are some key creatures in any habitat that losing them will hurt its foundation. all species are living in food chains and loss of a low member will disturb others. moreover, some animals and plants are providing a suitable atmosphere to live in by their actions and have domino effects on others' lives. for example, one of them are beavers that by making dams on rivers, slow the water flew and let other animal drink the water much easier and make their nests and homes around the water.
On the other hand, some argue that protecting nature requires incremental efforts, and safeguarding specific endangered species is a practical and strategic approach. Certain species play pivotal roles in their habitats, and their loss could destabilize entire ecosystems. All species are interconnected through food chains, and the disappearance of even a minor member can disrupt others. Additionally, some animals and plants actively sustain their environments, creating conditions that support other life forms. For example, beavers construct dams that slow water flow, providing easier access to water for other animals and creating habitats around these water sources.
in conclusion, necessary measures must be taken in matter of large global problems and it isn't wise to just attend to save pre-extinction species. however, I believe some animals are extremely important and should considered as key members of the planet. therefore, we shouldn't lose focus on them to just look at the big picture.
In conclusion, while urgent action is needed to address large-scale global issues, it would be unwise to neglect the protection of endangered species. I believe that certain animals are indispensable to the planet’s balance and should be prioritized. Therefore, we must not lose sight of their importance while focusing on broader environmental challenges.