Writing evaluation result for: Some people say that the main environmental problem of our time is the loss of...

Your essay addresses both views and provides a clear opinion, which meets the task requirements. However, the argument could be more balanced. The second view (climate change and pollution) is somewhat underdeveloped compared to the first view (loss of species).
Some points lack clarity due to grammatical errors (e.g., "negative lon-term impact," "if they becom extinct," "irreversibel manner"). These affect the coherence of your argument.
The conclusion is present but could be more nuanced—acknowledging the importance of both issues while reinforcing your stance.

The essay has a logical structure, but some transitions between ideas are abrupt. For example, the shift from discussing species loss to climate change could be smoother.
Repetition occurs in some places (e.g., "animal and plants species" is mentioned multiple times without variation).
Some sentences are awkwardly phrased, making the flow less natural (e.g., "Human provide our food from natural resources and animals").

There are several spelling and word choice errors ("dut" instead of "due," "qaulity of like" instead of "quality of life," "simulantely" instead of "simultaneously"). These reduce clarity.
Some vocabulary is repetitive (e.g., "particular species" is used frequently). More varied synonyms (e.g., "endangered wildlife," "biodiversity loss") would improve lexical range.
Some phrases are unnatural (e.g., "damaging ozone layer" should be "damage to the ozone layer").

There are multiple grammatical errors:
- Subject-verb agreement issues ("Human provide" → "Humans provide").
- Incorrect verb forms ("if they becom extinct" → "if they become extinct").
- Missing articles ("damaging ozone layer" → "damaging the ozone layer").
- Sentence fragments ("They aslo harm human health by making air and soil polluted, which not only decrease the qaulity of like but also cause long-term negative effects on our health.")
More complex sentence structures (e.g., conditional sentences, relative clauses) would improve the grammatical range.

Balance the Discussion – Give equal depth to both views before stating your opinion.
Proofread for Errors – Correct spelling, grammar, and word choice to improve clarity.
Use Synonyms & Varied Structures – Avoid repetition and include more complex sentences.
Strengthen the Conclusion – Summarize both sides more clearly before reinforcing your stance.

With these adjustments, your essay will be more coherent, accurate, and persuasive. Keep practicing!

Your essay addresses both views and provides a clear opinion, which meets the task requirements. However, the argument could be more balanced. The second view (climate change and pollution) is somewhat underdeveloped compared to the first view (loss of species).
Some points lack clarity due to grammatical errors (e.g., "negative lon-term impact," "if they becom extinct," "irreversibel manner"). These affect the coherence of your argument.
The conclusion is present but could be more nuanced—acknowledging the importance of both issues while reinforcing your stance.

The essay has a logical structure, but some transitions between ideas are abrupt. For example, the shift from discussing species loss to climate change could be smoother.
Repetition occurs in some places (e.g., "animal and plants species" is mentioned multiple times without variation).
Some sentences are awkwardly phrased, making the flow less natural (e.g., "Human provide our food from natural resources and animals").

There are several spelling and word choice errors ("dut" instead of "due," "qaulity of like" instead of "quality of life," "simulantely" instead of "simultaneously"). These reduce clarity.
Some vocabulary is repetitive (e.g., "particular species" is used frequently). More varied synonyms (e.g., "endangered wildlife," "biodiversity loss") would improve lexical range.
Some phrases are unnatural (e.g., "damaging ozone layer" should be "damage to the ozone layer").

There are multiple grammatical errors:
- Subject-verb agreement issues ("Human provide" → "Humans provide").
- Incorrect verb forms ("if they becom extinct" → "if they become extinct").
- Missing articles ("damaging ozone layer" → "damaging the ozone layer").
- Sentence fragments ("They aslo harm human health by making air and soil polluted, which not only decrease the qaulity of like but also cause long-term negative effects on our health.")
More complex sentence structures (e.g., conditional sentences, relative clauses) would improve the grammatical range.

Balance the Discussion – Give equal depth to both views before stating your opinion.
Proofread for Errors – Correct spelling, grammar, and word choice to improve clarity.
Use Synonyms & Varied Structures – Avoid repetition and include more complex sentences.
Strengthen the Conclusion – Summarize both sides more clearly before reinforcing your stance.

With these adjustments, your essay will be more coherent, accurate, and persuasive. Keep practicing!