This section presents a professionally wirtten variation of your essay and highlights the differences.
In today's world, villagers have a tendency to migrate to cities and benefit from city life. Although some feel that it is a positive trend, I firmly believe that it can have a heavy toll on our lives in three main areas.
In today's world, there is a noticeable trend of villagers migrating to cities in search of a better life. While some may view this as a positive development, I firmly believe that it can have significant negative consequences in three main areas.
Firstly, rural individuals are moving to cities to facilitate their living conditions. While I concede that city life may increase their quality of life because of various facilities, they are more likely to suffer from air pollution in megacities. To elaborate, when people occupy green areas, the chances would be high that they breathe fresh air and be healthier than city-dwellers. As a result, by being surrounded by a large number of vehicles, factories, and other industrial equipment in cities, their well-being might be at stake.
Firstly, rural individuals often move to cities to improve their living conditions. Although I acknowledge that city life can enhance their quality of life due to various amenities, it also exposes them to severe air pollution, particularly in megacities. For instance, when people inhabit green spaces, they are more likely to breathe fresh air and maintain better health compared to city dwellers. Consequently, being surrounded by a high concentration of vehicles, factories, and industrial activities can jeopardize their well-being.
Secondly, housing is another area of concern. Many supporters to immigration from the countryside to modern cities claim that the safety and facilities of city buildings are far better and all individuals have the right to use them. However, I would argue that the more people move to cities, the more accomodations can be required to accomodate them at the expense of their security and comfort. Consequently, the constructions may no longer be in appropriate conditions.
Secondly, housing is another critical concern. Proponents of migration from rural areas to urban centers argue that the safety and facilities of city buildings are superior, and that everyone has the right to access them. However, I contend that as more people flock to cities, the demand for housing increases, which can compromise both security and comfort. As a result, the quality of construction may deteriorate, leading to inadequate living conditions.
The final area which this kind of immigration has a negative impact on is the number of workers in rural areas. In other words, some occupations such as farming are far more important in villages and these sorts of jobs always need an adequate number of local workforce available. If the rural left villages to work and live in cities, we would face some workforce shortage in green areas.
The final area impacted by this trend is the workforce in rural regions. Certain occupations, such as farming, are vital to village life and require a sufficient number of local workers. If individuals leave their villages to seek opportunities in cities, we may encounter a significant shortage of labor in these essential sectors, ultimately threatening food security and rural economies.
To conclude, not only do extreme demands for housing in cities, but they also create worker shortage in the countryside. Therefore, although I acknowledge that immigrating to cities can make the rural living conditions better, I completely disagree that it is a constructive development.
In conclusion, the increasing demand for housing in cities not only leads to deteriorating living conditions but also creates a workforce shortage in rural areas. Therefore, while I recognize that migrating to cities can improve some aspects of rural life, I strongly disagree that it constitutes a constructive development overall.