This section presents a professionally wirtten variation of your essay and highlights the differences.
While some people are advocate of working experts and professionals in the country that they were educated, others hold an opposite point of view and believe these experts should be free to work anywhere they prefer. In my opinion these talented individuals should stay in their own country. This essay will discuss both perspectives and provide a conclusion.
While some people advocate requiring experts and professionals to work in the country where they were educated, others hold the opposite view and believe these individuals should be free to work wherever they prefer. In my opinion, talented professionals should remain in their home countries. This essay will discuss both perspectives before reaching a conclusion.
On the one hand, forcing professionals to work in their own country is in contrast of human rights and freedom. There is no doubt that everyone has right to choose where to work. These experts have been educated for several years and after some difficult years they may prefer to work anywhere else except their on country. I think their decision should be accepted by authorities and, provide proper facilities to encourage them to stay and work in their mother-land. In this way, not only the acknowledgment of authorities will be shown but also experts' freedom would be preserved.
On the one hand, forcing professionals to work in their home country could be seen as a violation of human rights and personal freedom. Undoubtedly, everyone has the right to choose their place of work. These experts have undergone years of rigorous education, and after such effort, they may prefer opportunities abroad. While their choices should be respected, governments could implement policies to incentivize them to stay, such as offering competitive salaries and research funding. This approach would both acknowledge individual freedoms and demonstrate national appreciation for skilled professionals.
On the other hand, professionals should consider some factors in this term. Firstly, their country may probably subsidise them in many ways and now it is their turn to compensate in different ways. For instance, physician can attempt to help people in developing parts of country by curing poor individuals. Secondly, they should remember that by moving to foreign countries, their on country may face economic instability and other financial problems due to absence of productive workforce and, foreign labour force might seem essential in this case.
On the other hand, professionals should consider their responsibilities to their home countries. First, having often benefited from substantial public investment in their education, they might reasonably be expected to contribute to national development. For example, doctors could address healthcare disparities in underserved regions. Second, the departure of skilled workers may lead to brain drain, potentially causing economic instability and necessitating reliance on foreign expertise, which could be both costly and unsustainable.
In conclusion, I think if experts leave their own country , the country may face different problems. So, it would better to stay and work in their mother land.
In conclusion, while professionals should have the freedom to work abroad, the potential negative consequences for their home countries suggest that remaining and contributing locally is preferable. A balanced approach respecting individual choice while implementing retention strategies would be most beneficial.