This section presents a professionally wirtten variation of your essay and highlights the differences.
There is an opposing view on whether the people who have studied certain fields, including medicine and engineering, should occupy in the country where they have trained or they should be free to work where ever they desire. This essay will examine both perspectives, and explain why I strongly agree with the latter viewpoint.
There is a debate regarding whether professionals in fields such as medicine and engineering should remain in the country where they received their training or be free to work wherever they choose. This essay will examine both perspectives and explain why I strongly support the latter viewpoint.
To begin with, a number of people argue that authorities should ask specialists such as doctors and engineers to stay in the nation they have persued their educations, as they think not only a large number of facilities, but also a huge amount of budget have been dedicated to them. As a result, these professionals have to stay and serve the residents of that country. Furthermore, it is believed that the contents and lessons which are tought in other regions, will not be practical in their own country. For example, several countries ,namely the USA and Canada, do not accept educational contents of other nations, since those trainings are not up-to-date and there are some differences in the curriculum of various educatianal systems.
To begin with, some argue that specialists like doctors and engineers should stay in the country where they were educated, as significant resources and funding have been invested in their training. Consequently, they believe these professionals have an obligation to serve the local population. Additionally, some contend that curricula and training methods vary across countries, making foreign education less applicable elsewhere. For example, nations like the USA and Canada often do not recognize qualifications from certain countries due to differences in educational standards and outdated coursework.
On the other hand, a vast majority of individuals believe that people should not be limited to work in specific areas. Although countries usually provide the high quality education for qualified people, students often pay for that. In addition, sometimes, these educated people find that country an inappropriate area to make a living. Therefor, they might prefer to go overseas in order to find better opportunities. For instance, many peopel in Iran tend to migrate to other countries to achieve both job perks and parity in payment.
On the other hand, many believe individuals should not be restricted in their career choices. While governments may provide high-quality education, students often bear the financial burden themselves. Moreover, some professionals may find limited opportunities or unfavorable conditions in their home country, leading them to seek better prospects abroad. For instance, many skilled workers in Iran choose to emigrate to access higher salaries and improved working conditions.
In conclusion, while many think specialists have to stay in the place of their univesities, becuase the goverment offerd some facilities to them, others, mine included, believe it is not fair, because the professionals have the right to choose their own occupational paths.
In conclusion, although some argue that professionals should remain in their home country due to government investment in their education, I firmly believe they should have the freedom to pursue opportunities globally, as career choices are a fundamental right.