This section presents a professionally wirtten variation of your essay and highlights the differences.
Some people argue that professionals should be work in the countries where they have been trained, while others group believe that they should be free to move to any destination they want. This essay will examine both these views.
Some people argue that professionals should work in the countries where they were trained, while others believe they should be free to move wherever they choose. This essay will examine both perspectives.
Professionals such as doctors and engineers have to train long years, that is required to use of educational facilities and human resources of a country. Consequently, providing these facilities are government's responsibility. Governments consider plenty of resources to provide some conditions to study with assumption of have a professional labor sources in the future. For instance, doctors have to take long theory and practical courses to become a doctor. In this case they use of hospitals and their medical equipment which belong to government. Current professionals will be retired and new professionals who have been trained will replace with them.
Professionals such as doctors and engineers undergo extensive training, which requires significant educational resources and infrastructure provided by their home countries. Governments invest substantial resources in education with the expectation of developing skilled professionals for their workforce. For example, medical students complete years of theoretical and practical training using hospital facilities and equipment funded by the state. When current professionals retire, newly trained individuals are expected to replace them.
On the other hand, some people argue that professionals should be free to choose which country they want to work and live. Professional life in one aspect of life and should not effect on whole life. They can immigrate, according to their preferences or their goals. Because some country do not prepare sufficient situations for these professionals after graduating to encourage them to stay where they had been trained. These encouragements can be like reduction taxes for them or giving some benefits like simplify some labor lows for them to run their business.
Conversely, others argue that professionals should have the freedom to choose their country of work and residence. A career is only one aspect of life and should not dictate all personal decisions. Professionals may wish to emigrate based on personal preferences or better opportunities. Some countries fail to provide adequate incentives for graduates to remain, such as tax reductions or favorable business regulations that could encourage them to stay where they were trained.
In conclusion, although the process of become professional has a huge expenditures for governments, I firmly believe these people should be free to work in another country if they wish. Encouraging them to stay with consider some benefits will be useful, but I disagree with any force for them.
In conclusion, while professional training represents a significant government investment, I firmly believe individuals should have the freedom to work abroad if desired. Offering incentives to retain professionals may be effective, but compulsory measures would be inappropriate.