Question: In some countries, more and more people are becoming interested in finding out about the h...
Click on red question marks (?) to see an explanation for each change. Some changes are only suggestions and don't mean the original is necessarily wrong.
Common sense argues that the primary goal of science should be the advancement of human lives in various aspects. This essay will evaluate this perspective and discuss the criteria supporting this view.
Firstly, since the existence of humanity, the motivation behind exploring various sciences has often been the desire to create a better world. While some scientific discoveries may have originated from destructive intentions, such as weaponry, in most cases, such as the development of computers and mobile phones, the motivation has been to simplify and improve daily life.
A prominent example of this is the field of medical science, particularly in the fight against cancer. Advances in cancer research, such as the development of targeted therapies and immunotherapy, have significantly improved survival rates and quality of life for many patients. These breakthroughs are a direct result of scientific efforts aimed at improving human health. Without these scientific advancements, the outlook for individuals diagnosed with cancer would be far more dire, highlighting the vital role science plays in enhancing and extending human life.
Secondly, although these motivations are often internal, governments also play a significant role in shaping the main goals of scientific research. Government funding influences the direction of scientific endeavours. If a government prioritizes the well-being of its citizens, scientific research will align with improving people's daily lives. However, in the case of authoritarian regimes or terrorist organizations, scientists may be coerced into pursuing goals that serve the rulers' interests rather than benefiting society.
In conclusion, while motivations behind scientific pursuits can sometimes be detrimental, throughout history, the primary aim has consistently been the improvement of people's live
This section presents vocabulary suggestions. Highlighted words are either too simple or are repeated more than 3 times . Please note that some suggested alternatives might require changes to other parts of the sentence.
This section presents a professionally wirtten variation of your essay and highlights the differences.
Common sense argues that the primary goal of science should be the advancement of human lives in various aspects. This essay will evaluate this perspective and discuss the criteria supporting this view.
Firstly, since the existence of humanity, the motivation behind exploring various sciences has often been the desire to create a better world. While some scientific discoveries may have originated from destructive intentions, such as weaponry, in most cases, such as the development of computers and mobile phones, the motivation has been to simplify and improve daily life.
A prominent example of this is the field of medical science, particularly in the fight against cancer. Advances in cancer research, such as the development of targeted therapies and immunotherapy, have significantly improved survival rates and quality of life for many patients. These breakthroughs are a direct result of scientific efforts aimed at improving human health. Without these scientific advancements, the outlook for individuals diagnosed with cancer would be far more dire, highlighting the vital role science plays in enhancing and extending human life.
Secondly, although these motivations are often internal, governments also play a significant role in shaping the main goals of scientific research. Government funding influences the direction of scientific endeavours. If a government prioritizes the well-being of its citizens, scientific research will align with improving people's daily lives. However, in the case of authoritarian regimes or terrorist organizations, scientists may be coerced into pursuing goals that serve the rulers' interests rather than benefiting society.
In conclusion, while motivations behind scientific pursuits can sometimes be detrimental, throughout history, the primary aim has consistently been the improvement of people's live