Writing evaluation result for: Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore, every home should have a... - Balang

Question: Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore, every home should have a water su...

Marking Generated by Free AI Models

You are on the free tier, which uses free AI models. They can occasionally be slow, unstable, or temporarily unavailable. Balang Plus uses premium models for faster, more reliable, and higher-quality marking.

Click on red question marks (?) to see an explanation for each change. Some changes are only suggestions and don't mean the original is necessarily wrong.

It is often argued that access to clean water is a fundamental human right. Therefore, everyone should have access to clean water free of charge at home. I partly agree with this view because water is essential for public health and ensures equal access. However, providing clean water free of charge may encourage wasteful water consumption and increase the financial burden on the government. Providing free access to clean water can greatly improve public health, and it also ensures that everyone has equal access to this essential resource. For these reasons, clean water should be provided free of charge because it reduces the spread of water borne waterborne diseases and is particularly beneficial for low-income families. For example, people can use clean water for drinking, cooking, and maintaining personal hygiene. Therefore, this policy can improve people's quality of life. As a result, governments may spend less on treating preventable diseases, allowing public funds to be invested in other essential services. On the other hand, providing clean water free of charge may lead to wasteful water consumption and place a financial burden on the government. Firstly, excessive water consumption significantly affects water resources and can lead to lower water levels, especially in dry regions. Secondly, governments must build and maintain water infrastructure, including pipelines and water meters, which results in higher public spending. Therefore, charging a reasonable fee for water encourages people to use it responsibly while also helping cover the costs of supplying clean water, provided that the price remains affordable. In conclusion, I believe that access to clean water is a basic necessity and should be available to everyone. However, making it completely free may encourage unnecessary water consumption and increase government expenditure. Therefore, providing affordable rather than entirely free access to clean water is the most practical solution, as it protects public health while promoting responsible water use and sustainable management of water resources.

See more samples for this topic

Check your essay for this topic

Overall Band Score

8

Overview

Vocabulary Range

strong

Linking Words

strong

Spelling

strong

Grammar Accuracy

strong

Grammar Range

strong

Cohesion

strong

Paragraph Structure

strong

Task Response

strong

Word Count

sufficient

While we are confident in our score estimation, you are not guaranteed to receive the same score in an official test.

Task Response: You present a clear, balanced position (partial agreement) and develop both sides logically. The argument for public health is strong, though the counter-argument regarding infrastructure costs could be more specific (e.g., mentioning taxation or tiered pricing models). The conclusion effectively synthesizes your view.

Coherence & Cohesion: The essay is well-organized with four distinct paragraphs. Linking words (Therefore, However, Firstly, Secondly) guide the reader effectively. Referencing (this policy, these reasons) works well. Paragraph 2 merges two ideas (health and equality) that could be separated for sharper focus.

Lexical Resource: Good range of vocabulary (fundamental, wasteful consumption, financial burden, infrastructure, sustainable management). Collocations are mostly natural (water-borne diseases, public spending, tiered pricing implied). Minor issue: "water borne" should be hyphenated (water-borne).

Grammatical Range & Accuracy: Sentence structures vary effectively (complex sentences, conditionals, passive voice). Grammar is largely error-free with good control of punctuation. One minor slip: "increase the financial burden on the government" (repeated in intro and body 3) shows slight lexical repetition.

Overall: A strong, well-argued response exceeding the word count. To improve, ensure distinct topic sentences for each main idea in body paragraphs and vary vocabulary for "financial burden/government spending."