This section presents a professionally wirtten variation of your essay and highlights the differences.
In the present climate, environmental problems have sparked an immense amount of heated debate. There exist two perspectives regarding those challenges. While one viewpoint claims that extinction of certain species of flora and fauna is the most important problem, the other argues there are more notable challenges.
In the current climate, environmental issues have sparked considerable debate. There are two predominant perspectives regarding these challenges. While some argue that species extinction represents the most critical problem, others maintain that more pressing environmental concerns exist.
The proponents of preservation of animals and plants may provide several justifications. Firstly, it has been scientifically proven that the survival of all creatures are dependent on each other, known as life cycle. As axiomatic as it may sound, humans are involved in this cycle, so we might be in danger if particular species become extinct. By way of illustration, cockroaches and mosquitoes are hunted by lizzards. if we have loss of lizzards, the population of cockroaches will be on the increase. This, in turn, can have several adverse consequences. For example, cockroaches may eat seeds of farming products and humans confront lack of certain produce.
Advocates for biodiversity preservation present compelling arguments. Scientifically, all organisms are interconnected through complex ecosystems. Humans, being part of these systems, face potential risks when species disappear. For instance, lizards naturally control cockroach and mosquito populations. Without lizards, these insect populations could surge, potentially damaging crops by consuming seeds and consequently reducing food supplies. This demonstrates how species extinction can trigger cascading ecological effects.
On the other hand, a group of people opine there are a few more noticeable environmental problems. Global warming has become a significant setback more specifically in recent years. Today, more and more factories and power plants are established, emitting carbon dioxide and other hazardous gases, such as greenhouse gases into the air. These eventually lead to the depletion of ozone layer, which is a protective layer against the UV of the sun. As a result, this dangerous radiation might reach the surface of the earth, threatening the health of billions of individuals. Skin cancer is one of the risks of the UV radiation, according to Dr. Johnes from the University of California.
Conversely, others emphasize more immediate environmental threats, particularly global warming. The rapid expansion of industrial facilities has significantly increased greenhouse gas emissions. These emissions contribute to ozone layer depletion, Earth's natural shield against harmful ultraviolet radiation. Increased UV exposure elevates health risks, including skin cancer, as noted by Dr. Jones from the University of California. This illustrates how atmospheric changes can directly impact human wellbeing on a massive scale.
What can be concluded from the above is that I believe there sure exist more noticeable environmental problems than extinction of certain species of creatures, including global warming, which can result in severe consequences in terms of health.
In conclusion, while species extinction presents serious ecological concerns, global warming and its associated health impacts constitute more urgent environmental challenges requiring immediate attention. The interconnected nature of environmental issues necessitates comprehensive solutions addressing multiple concerns simultaneously.